Ethics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Ethics

Description:

... to use 'right,''wrong,' 'good,' 'bad' and 'evil' as labels in a predictable, way. Otherwise, ethics are just a moral judgment and not a basis for cooperation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: pattyr
Category:
Tags: ethics | evil | just | not | wrong

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethics


1
Ethics
  • A Crash Course

2
Simply Stated
  • Ethics is the science of morality. Ethics are
    very important because they can answer the big
    question, "How should we live?"
  • Ethics presuppose that we can define how we
    should live. Without this context, ethics is
    generally just talk implying moral judgment.
  • Simple ethics are useful to distinguish "good
    from bad" socially just as we might distinguish
    "good from evil" morally. Ethics are also
    useful to recognize that we use the word "right"
    to judge what is correct. Ethics begins when we
    try to use "right,""wrong," "good, "bad" and
    "evil" as labels in a predictable, way.
    Otherwise, ethics are just a moral judgment and
    not a basis for cooperation with other people in
    any due process or law.

3
Aristotle
  • Aristotle thought that ethics were separate from
    rhetoric a distinct science and that the
    principal concern of ethics was the well-being of
    human beings. Like Plato, he regards the ethical
    virtues (justice, courage, temperance and so on)
    as complex rational, emotional and social skills.
    But he rejects Plato's idea that a training in
    the sciences and metaphysics are a necessary
    prerequisite for a full understanding of our
    good (Stanford).

4
Aristotelian Ethics
  • Aristotle is deeply indebted to Plato's moral
    philosophy, which states that moral thinking must
    be integrated with our emotions. Preparation for
    this begins in childhood and is centered in
    education.
  • No one had written ethical treatises before
    Aristotle . To be sure, we can find in Plato's
    works important discussions of these phenomena,
    but they are not brought together and unified as
    they are in Aristotle's ethical writings
    (Stanford).
  • For our purposes, it is important to understand
    two concepts developed by Aristotle
  • The Human Good
  • The Function Argument

5
  • The Human Good
  • It is not simply because we want to have
    knowledge, but because we will be better able to
    achieve our good if we develop a fuller
    understanding of what it is to flourish.
  • Aristotle's search for the good is a search for
    the highest good whichhas three
    characteristics it is desirable for itself, it
    is not desirable for the sake of some other good,
    and all other goods are desirable for its sake
    (Stanford).
  • The Function Argument
  • Aristotle asks what is the function (Gk ergon as
    in ergonomics) of human beings?
  • This function consists in activity of the
    rational part of the soul in accordance with
    virtue (Stanford).
  • Doing anything well requires virtue or
    excellence, and therefore living well consists in
    activities caused by the rational soul in
    accordance with virtue or excellence.

6
  • Aristotle's conclusion about the nature of
    happiness is in a sense uniquely his own. No
    other writer or thinker had said precisely what
    he says about what it is to live well. But at the
    same time his view is not too distant from a
    common idea. As he himself points out, one
    traditional conception of happiness identifies it
    with virtue (1098b30-1). Aristotle's theory
    should be construed as a refinement of this
    position. He says, not that happiness is virtue,
    but that it is virtuous activity. Living well
    consists in doing something, not just being in a
    certain state or condition. It consists in those
    lifelong activities that actualize the virtues of
    the rational part of the soul (Stanford).

7
Why are ethics important in this course?
  • The artful and ethical speaker wants to
    persuade
  • Rhetoric should work to preserve character.
  • Therefore, in a rhetorical situation, ethics are
    necessary. We must appeal to the highest good.
  • As scholars, we must be honest.
  • We must derive our information from the most
    accurate and ethical sources.
  • Academic honesty, (i.e. not plagiarizing) relies
    on an academic code of ethics.

8
For discussion
  • Can we apply a code of ethics to our writing?
  • What types of things, besides plagiarism, would
    be considered unethical?
  • Are ethics and morals interchangeable?
  • Is it permissible to break the laws of man in
    order to preserve a common good?
  • Besides academics, what other professions rely on
    a code of ethics?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com