Hadron Correlations and Parton Recombination - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Hadron Correlations and Parton Recombination

Description:

5 GeV/c. Jet quenching not on the parton level? PHENIX. Recombination and Hadron Correlations ... 37. Rainer Fries. Intermediate PT. Naively expected behavior ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: Rainer90
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hadron Correlations and Parton Recombination


1
Hadron Correlations and Parton Recombination
  • Rainer Fries
  • University of Minnesota

Hard Probes 2006 Asilomar
June 11, 2006
2
Hard Probes
  • Hard processes as well controlled probes to
    measure properties of the QGP.
  • Hard probes ? high momentum transfer, high quark
    mass, high temperature
  • Careful which value of our scale is sufficiently
    high depends strongly on the question we ask.

3
Hard Probes
  • Careful which value of our
    scale is sufficiently high depends
    strongly on which question we ask.
  • Single inclusive pion spectrum in
    pp pQCD works
    from PT ? 1 GeV
  • But single inclusive spectra in
    AA dont work up to 5 GeV,
  • Maybe not even at 10 GeV ??

4
Why Recombination B/M
  • Enhanced baryon yield
  • p/? 1 in AuAu (for PT 2 4 GeV/c)
  • p/? 0.3 in pp,
  • p/? 0.1.0.2 in ee-

PHENIX
5
Why Recombination RAA
  • No jet quenching for baryons? (RAA RCP 1)
  • In the range PT 1.5 5 GeV/c.
  • Jet quenching not on the parton level?

PHENIX
6
Why Recombination v2 scaling
  • Different v2 saturation for mesons and baryons

7
Baryon/Meson Anomaly
  • General baryon/meson pattern p, ?, ?, ? versus
    K, ?, ?, K In the region PT ? 1.5 6 GeV/c

8
Baryon/Meson Anomaly
  • General baryon/meson pattern p, ?, ?, ? versus
    K, ?, ?, K In the region PT ? 1.5 6 GeV/c
  • No mass effect ? behaves like a pion (m? ? mp ,
    m? gtgt m?)

STAR Preliminary
9
Baryon/Meson Anomaly
  • General baryon/meson pattern p, ?, ?, ? versus
    K, ?, ?, K
  • No mass effect ? behaves like a pion (m? ? mp ,
    m? gtgt m?)
  • v2 of ? lt v2 of proton behaves like meson

10
Baryon/Meson Anomaly
  • General baryon/meson pattern p, ?, ?, ? versus
    K, ?, ?, K
  • No mass effect ? behaves like a pion (m? ? mp ,
    m? gtgt m?)
  • Hadron properties do not matter in this kinematic
    region.
  • Only the number of valence quarks!
  • We catch a glimpse of hadronization

11
Hadron Correlations
  • Away-side jets vanishes
  • Ridge on the near side

Away side gone/diffuse
Wiedemann et al.
STAR
AA
pp
?
Broadeningpedestal on near side
?
12
Signatures in Correlations
  • Deviations from jet shapes below PT 5 GeV/c
  • E.g. ? broadening of the near-side jet cone

Width of the peak in ??
STAR preliminary
13
Fragmentation?
  • Hard processes vacuum fragmentation are ruled
    out below 4 6 GeV/c because of RHIC results on
  • hadron chemistry
  • elliptic flow v2
  • Recombination idea hadrons at intermediate PT
    from recombination of soft partons

14
Recombination!
  • Fragmentation limit of hadronization for very
    dilute systems (parton density ? 0)
  • Recombination hadronization in the opposite
    limit thermalized phase of partons just above Tc

15
Recombination revisited
  • Basic assumptions
  • Recombine valence quarks
  • Instantaneous projection of quark states on
    hadron states
  • For simplicity factorize 2-parton distribution
    in 1-parton distributions
  • No correlations assumed!

16
Recombination revisited
  • Conspiracy of thermal distributions and large P
  • i. e. P gtgt M, kT (collinear situation) Boltzmann
    w
  • No dependence on shape of ?!
  • Baryon meson
  • Reco ? Frag competition


fragmenting parton ph z p, zlt1
recombining partons p1p2ph
17
Recombination Fragmentation
  • Dual model of hadron production
  • Recombination pQCD/fragmentation to describe
    hadron production at RHIC for PT gt 12 GeV/c
  • With B. Muller, C. Nonaka, S. A. Bass
  • For RHIC
  • T 175 MeV
  • Radial flow ? 0.55
  • Constituent quark masses
  • Fit to pion data ? predictive power for all other
    hadron species

18
Spectra Ratios
  • Good description of spectra, ratios, RAA for all
    measured hadron species

RJF, Muller, Nonaka, Bass
19
Elliptic Flow Scaling
  • Assume universal elliptic flow v2p of the partons
    before the phase transition
  • Recombination prediction
  • Scaling works for all hadrons
  • Deviations for pions arise
    mostly from resonance decays
    (Greco et al.)

20
How robust is v2 scaling?
  • Scaling law uses the most primitive
    approximations
  • Momentum shared equally between constituents
  • Expect correction for realistic wave function ?
    with finite width.
  • Numerically effects are small

Momentum shared fractions x and 1-x
21
Fate of the Gluons?
  • Are there gluons or sea quarks?
  • No effect on particle yields for thermal spectra!
  • Resulting elliptic flow for hadrons does not obey
    scaling
  • For equally shared momenta

22
Zooming in on v2 Scaling
  • We proposed a new variable baryon/meson v2
    asymmetry (B-M)/(BM) for scaled v2.
  • First results
  • Size and sign of the
    effect predicted
    correctly.
  • Gluons could be
    accommodated.

P. Sorensen, QM 05
23
Hadron Correlations
  • How can hadrons at intermediate PT show jet-like
    structure?

24
Hadron Correlations
  • How can hadrons at intermediate PT show jet-like
    structure?
  • Naturally through soft-hard recombination
  • Soft-hard hadrons and jet hadrons correlated
  • Rudy Hwas talk
  • Naturally if the recombining partons are
    correlated

25
2-Particle Correlations
  • Recombination of mesons A, B from partons 1,2,3,4
  • New permit 2-particle correlations
  • Possible ansatz

26
Hot Spots
  • Strong energy loss (dE/dx up to 14 GeV/fm)
  • a lot of quenched/partially thermalized jets
  • Localized deposition of energy and momentum
  • Hot Spots?
  • Hot spot can be correlated
    with remaining jet
  • Partons in the hot spot can
    be correlated
    with themselves
  • Add collective effects Mach cone?

27
Associated Yield
  • List of assumptions
  • Only near side integrate rapidity
  • Small correlations, keep only terms linear in c0
    and v2
  • Narrow wave functions
  • Correlations constant over volume Vc
  • Associated yield
  • Here

28
Amplification of Correlations
  • Q Amplification factor
  • Count 2-parton pairs between
    the 2 hadrons for
    effects linear
    in c0, only 1 correlation allowed.
  • Uncorrelated background (for meson-meson)

Q4 Meson-meson
Q6 Meson-baryon
Q9 Baryon-baryon
4 pairings that lead to meson correlations
2 pairings without correlating the mesons
29
Numerical Example
  • Using Duke parametrization
  • consistent with spectra and ratios!
  • Consistency with PHENIX data can be reached.

Baryon trigger
Meson trigger
Large correlations from Frag-Frag.
F-F and SS-SS with C00.08x100/Npart (Vcconst.)
Lower associated yield when adding SS-SS without
correlations (C00), especially for baryon
triggers.
RJF, Muller, Bass Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 122301
(2005)
30
Identified Particles
31
Hadrochemistry in Jet Cones
  • The baryon/meson ratio can be an indicator for
    the amount of thermalization in a jet
  • Far side produces more baryons than near side

32
Where is Fragmentation?
  • Below PT 4 6 GeV/c no go for (hadronic) hard
    probes
  • Problems for pQCD fragmentation even above PT
    6 GeV/c ??
  • Baryon/meson ratio still too large above 5 GeV/c
    ??

33
Where is Fragmentation?
  • Below PT 4 6 GeV/c no go for (hadronic) hard
    probes
  • Problems for pQCD fragmentation even above PT
    6 GeV/c ??
  • Baryon/meson ratio still too large above 5 GeV/c
    ??
  • v2 from jet quenching ??

34
Where is Fragmentation?
  • Below PT 4 6 GeV/c no go for (hadronic) hard
    probes
  • Problems for pQCD fragmentation even above PT
    6 GeV/c ??
  • Baryon/meson ratio still too large above 5 GeV/c
    ??
  • v2 from jet quenching ??
  • No difference between quark and gluon jets ??
  • It may be soft-hard recombination.
  • Pick-up of soft quarks by jets

35
Soft/Hard Recombination
  • Attempt to treat reco fragmentation
    consistently
  • Hwa and Yang jets as cones of parton showers at
    late times fitted to fragmentation functions
  • Majumdar, Wang and Wang 2- and 3- quark
    constituent quark fragmentation recombination
    (? Q2 evolution)
  • Recombine all partons
  • Partons soft/thermal showers from jets
  • Two parton distribution function

Partons from 1 jets
soft-soft
Partons from 2 jets
soft-shower
36
Soft/Hard Recombination
  • Soft/Hard Reco could be important.
  • Signatures in the p/?, ?/K ratio at large PT.
  • Produces hadron correlations.

Hwa and Yang
37
Intermediate PT
  • Naively expected behavior of observables
  • What is found at RHIC
  • Some soft physics extends up to 4-6 GeV/c
  • But above 2 GeV/c not described by ideal
    hydrodynamics
  • Soft-hard region of phase space new phenomena

Soft/Hydro
pQCD
Hydro
ReCo/soft-hard
pQCD
38
Jets Medium
  • Recombination alone is not sufficient to
    understand the soft-hard region.
  • Uses parameterizations of effects on the parton
    phase
  • Need understanding of the mechanisms behind
    jet-medium interaction
  • Still much to learn
  • LHC will the soft/hard region be larger?

Jets ? Medium
39
Summary
  • Soft-hard regime at intermediate PT extends up
    to 6 GeV/c, maybe more.
  • Recombination describes hadronization in this
    regime.
  • Recombination translates parton correlations into
    hadron correlations possible origin of jet
    correlations
  • Hot spots from jet-medium interactions create
    such correlations.
  • Soft-Hard correlations are an additional mechanism

40
Backup
41
Recombination Fragmentation
  • Competition of hadronization mechanisms
  • Fragmentation dominates for power
    law spectra
    in the limit PT ? ?
  • Recombination dominates for

    exponential spectra
  • Note thermal recombination statistical model
    for PT ? ?

Power law
for mesons
Exponential
42
Jets vs Medium
  • Apparent question what is a jet, what is the
    medium?
  • Possible (not unique) definition
  • Jets dominate when the hadron chemistry matches
    expectation for jets in the vacuum
  • No pure jet scenario when partons from the
    medium contribute to hadron production
  • We compare vacuum fragmentation with
    recombination
  • Medium influence on jets effectively

    taken into account via energy loss
  • Everthing that does not belong to a
    vacuum
    jet, e.g. additional gluon
    radiation,
    is assumed to be part of
    the
    medium (thermalized or not)

43
Correlations from Fragmentation
  • Simple model for correlations from fragmentation
  • Dihadron fragmentation (Majumder Wang) here
    factorized in single hadron fragmentation
  • Gaussian azimuthal dependence
  • Note
  • Contributions from soft-hard are small in our
    parametrization
  • Correlations from soft-hard negligible because of
    the small yields
  • Different from other groups.

u thermal
?-
d
Fragmentation u ? ?
d
?
u minijet
44
Identified Particles!
  • Again no prediction about the input
    (correlations) on the parton side.
  • If predictive power, then for comparison of
    different hadron species.

45
Higher Fock States
  • Tower of Fock states, ?th state with n? partons
  • Probability for ejection of a very fast cluster
    with n partons from a thermal source at fixed P
    is independent of n!
  • Elliptic flow
  • scaling violated even for very narrow wave
    functions (xi ? 1/n?)

46
Conical Flow?
  • Preliminary data suggest
    double peak
    away side
    correlation
  • Mach cone?
  • More conservative scenario
    flowing hot spots?
  • Defocussing through radial flow
  • Supported by PT,trig dependence?
  • Has to be ruled out before any more daring
    conclusion

47
Summary
  • Jets deviate in shape and hadrochemistry from
    vacuum for values below 6 GeV/c
  • Exact definition needed.
  • To study jets and energy loss PT,trigger gt 6
    GeV/c mandatory, maybe more
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com