Title: Hadron Correlations and Parton Recombination
1Hadron Correlations and Parton Recombination
- Rainer Fries
- University of Minnesota
Hard Probes 2006 Asilomar
June 11, 2006
2Hard Probes
- Hard processes as well controlled probes to
measure properties of the QGP. - Hard probes ? high momentum transfer, high quark
mass, high temperature - Careful which value of our scale is sufficiently
high depends strongly on the question we ask.
3Hard Probes
- Careful which value of our
scale is sufficiently high depends
strongly on which question we ask. - Single inclusive pion spectrum in
pp pQCD works
from PT ? 1 GeV - But single inclusive spectra in
AA dont work up to 5 GeV,
- Maybe not even at 10 GeV ??
4Why Recombination B/M
- Enhanced baryon yield
- p/? 1 in AuAu (for PT 2 4 GeV/c)
- p/? 0.3 in pp,
- p/? 0.1.0.2 in ee-
PHENIX
5Why Recombination RAA
- No jet quenching for baryons? (RAA RCP 1)
- In the range PT 1.5 5 GeV/c.
- Jet quenching not on the parton level?
PHENIX
6Why Recombination v2 scaling
- Different v2 saturation for mesons and baryons
7Baryon/Meson Anomaly
- General baryon/meson pattern p, ?, ?, ? versus
K, ?, ?, K In the region PT ? 1.5 6 GeV/c
8Baryon/Meson Anomaly
- General baryon/meson pattern p, ?, ?, ? versus
K, ?, ?, K In the region PT ? 1.5 6 GeV/c - No mass effect ? behaves like a pion (m? ? mp ,
m? gtgt m?)
STAR Preliminary
9Baryon/Meson Anomaly
- General baryon/meson pattern p, ?, ?, ? versus
K, ?, ?, K - No mass effect ? behaves like a pion (m? ? mp ,
m? gtgt m?) - v2 of ? lt v2 of proton behaves like meson
10Baryon/Meson Anomaly
- General baryon/meson pattern p, ?, ?, ? versus
K, ?, ?, K - No mass effect ? behaves like a pion (m? ? mp ,
m? gtgt m?) - Hadron properties do not matter in this kinematic
region. - Only the number of valence quarks!
- We catch a glimpse of hadronization
11Hadron Correlations
- Away-side jets vanishes
- Ridge on the near side
Away side gone/diffuse
Wiedemann et al.
STAR
AA
pp
?
Broadeningpedestal on near side
?
12Signatures in Correlations
- Deviations from jet shapes below PT 5 GeV/c
- E.g. ? broadening of the near-side jet cone
Width of the peak in ??
STAR preliminary
13Fragmentation?
- Hard processes vacuum fragmentation are ruled
out below 4 6 GeV/c because of RHIC results on - hadron chemistry
- elliptic flow v2
- Recombination idea hadrons at intermediate PT
from recombination of soft partons
14Recombination!
- Fragmentation limit of hadronization for very
dilute systems (parton density ? 0) - Recombination hadronization in the opposite
limit thermalized phase of partons just above Tc
15Recombination revisited
- Basic assumptions
- Recombine valence quarks
- Instantaneous projection of quark states on
hadron states - For simplicity factorize 2-parton distribution
in 1-parton distributions - No correlations assumed!
16Recombination revisited
- Conspiracy of thermal distributions and large P
- i. e. P gtgt M, kT (collinear situation) Boltzmann
w - No dependence on shape of ?!
- Baryon meson
- Reco ? Frag competition
fragmenting parton ph z p, zlt1
recombining partons p1p2ph
17Recombination Fragmentation
- Dual model of hadron production
- Recombination pQCD/fragmentation to describe
hadron production at RHIC for PT gt 12 GeV/c - With B. Muller, C. Nonaka, S. A. Bass
- For RHIC
- T 175 MeV
- Radial flow ? 0.55
- Constituent quark masses
- Fit to pion data ? predictive power for all other
hadron species
18Spectra Ratios
- Good description of spectra, ratios, RAA for all
measured hadron species
RJF, Muller, Nonaka, Bass
19Elliptic Flow Scaling
- Assume universal elliptic flow v2p of the partons
before the phase transition - Recombination prediction
- Scaling works for all hadrons
- Deviations for pions arise
mostly from resonance decays
(Greco et al.)
20How robust is v2 scaling?
- Scaling law uses the most primitive
approximations - Momentum shared equally between constituents
- Expect correction for realistic wave function ?
with finite width. - Numerically effects are small
Momentum shared fractions x and 1-x
21Fate of the Gluons?
- Are there gluons or sea quarks?
- No effect on particle yields for thermal spectra!
- Resulting elliptic flow for hadrons does not obey
scaling - For equally shared momenta
22Zooming in on v2 Scaling
- We proposed a new variable baryon/meson v2
asymmetry (B-M)/(BM) for scaled v2. - First results
- Size and sign of the
effect predicted
correctly. - Gluons could be
accommodated. -
P. Sorensen, QM 05
23Hadron Correlations
- How can hadrons at intermediate PT show jet-like
structure?
24Hadron Correlations
- How can hadrons at intermediate PT show jet-like
structure? - Naturally through soft-hard recombination
- Soft-hard hadrons and jet hadrons correlated
- Rudy Hwas talk
- Naturally if the recombining partons are
correlated
252-Particle Correlations
- Recombination of mesons A, B from partons 1,2,3,4
- New permit 2-particle correlations
- Possible ansatz
26Hot Spots
- Strong energy loss (dE/dx up to 14 GeV/fm)
- a lot of quenched/partially thermalized jets
- Localized deposition of energy and momentum
- Hot Spots?
- Hot spot can be correlated
with remaining jet - Partons in the hot spot can
be correlated
with themselves - Add collective effects Mach cone?
27Associated Yield
- List of assumptions
- Only near side integrate rapidity
- Small correlations, keep only terms linear in c0
and v2 - Narrow wave functions
- Correlations constant over volume Vc
- Associated yield
- Here
28Amplification of Correlations
- Q Amplification factor
- Count 2-parton pairs between
the 2 hadrons for
effects linear
in c0, only 1 correlation allowed. - Uncorrelated background (for meson-meson)
Q4 Meson-meson
Q6 Meson-baryon
Q9 Baryon-baryon
4 pairings that lead to meson correlations
2 pairings without correlating the mesons
29Numerical Example
- Using Duke parametrization
- consistent with spectra and ratios!
- Consistency with PHENIX data can be reached.
Baryon trigger
Meson trigger
Large correlations from Frag-Frag.
F-F and SS-SS with C00.08x100/Npart (Vcconst.)
Lower associated yield when adding SS-SS without
correlations (C00), especially for baryon
triggers.
RJF, Muller, Bass Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 122301
(2005)
30Identified Particles
31Hadrochemistry in Jet Cones
- The baryon/meson ratio can be an indicator for
the amount of thermalization in a jet - Far side produces more baryons than near side
32Where is Fragmentation?
- Below PT 4 6 GeV/c no go for (hadronic) hard
probes - Problems for pQCD fragmentation even above PT
6 GeV/c ?? - Baryon/meson ratio still too large above 5 GeV/c
??
33Where is Fragmentation?
- Below PT 4 6 GeV/c no go for (hadronic) hard
probes - Problems for pQCD fragmentation even above PT
6 GeV/c ?? - Baryon/meson ratio still too large above 5 GeV/c
?? - v2 from jet quenching ??
34Where is Fragmentation?
- Below PT 4 6 GeV/c no go for (hadronic) hard
probes - Problems for pQCD fragmentation even above PT
6 GeV/c ?? - Baryon/meson ratio still too large above 5 GeV/c
?? - v2 from jet quenching ??
- No difference between quark and gluon jets ??
- It may be soft-hard recombination.
- Pick-up of soft quarks by jets
35Soft/Hard Recombination
- Attempt to treat reco fragmentation
consistently - Hwa and Yang jets as cones of parton showers at
late times fitted to fragmentation functions - Majumdar, Wang and Wang 2- and 3- quark
constituent quark fragmentation recombination
(? Q2 evolution) - Recombine all partons
- Partons soft/thermal showers from jets
- Two parton distribution function
Partons from 1 jets
soft-soft
Partons from 2 jets
soft-shower
36Soft/Hard Recombination
- Soft/Hard Reco could be important.
- Signatures in the p/?, ?/K ratio at large PT.
- Produces hadron correlations.
Hwa and Yang
37Intermediate PT
- Naively expected behavior of observables
- What is found at RHIC
- Some soft physics extends up to 4-6 GeV/c
- But above 2 GeV/c not described by ideal
hydrodynamics - Soft-hard region of phase space new phenomena
Soft/Hydro
pQCD
Hydro
ReCo/soft-hard
pQCD
38Jets Medium
- Recombination alone is not sufficient to
understand the soft-hard region. - Uses parameterizations of effects on the parton
phase - Need understanding of the mechanisms behind
jet-medium interaction - Still much to learn
- LHC will the soft/hard region be larger?
Jets ? Medium
39Summary
- Soft-hard regime at intermediate PT extends up
to 6 GeV/c, maybe more. - Recombination describes hadronization in this
regime. - Recombination translates parton correlations into
hadron correlations possible origin of jet
correlations - Hot spots from jet-medium interactions create
such correlations. - Soft-Hard correlations are an additional mechanism
40Backup
41Recombination Fragmentation
- Competition of hadronization mechanisms
- Fragmentation dominates for power
law spectra
in the limit PT ? ? - Recombination dominates for
exponential spectra - Note thermal recombination statistical model
for PT ? ?
Power law
for mesons
Exponential
42Jets vs Medium
- Apparent question what is a jet, what is the
medium? - Possible (not unique) definition
- Jets dominate when the hadron chemistry matches
expectation for jets in the vacuum - No pure jet scenario when partons from the
medium contribute to hadron production - We compare vacuum fragmentation with
recombination - Medium influence on jets effectively
taken into account via energy loss - Everthing that does not belong to a
vacuum
jet, e.g. additional gluon
radiation,
is assumed to be part of
the
medium (thermalized or not)
43Correlations from Fragmentation
- Simple model for correlations from fragmentation
- Dihadron fragmentation (Majumder Wang) here
factorized in single hadron fragmentation - Gaussian azimuthal dependence
- Note
- Contributions from soft-hard are small in our
parametrization - Correlations from soft-hard negligible because of
the small yields - Different from other groups.
u thermal
?-
d
Fragmentation u ? ?
d
?
u minijet
44Identified Particles!
- Again no prediction about the input
(correlations) on the parton side. - If predictive power, then for comparison of
different hadron species.
45Higher Fock States
- Tower of Fock states, ?th state with n? partons
- Probability for ejection of a very fast cluster
with n partons from a thermal source at fixed P
is independent of n! - Elliptic flow
- scaling violated even for very narrow wave
functions (xi ? 1/n?)
46Conical Flow?
- Preliminary data suggest
double peak
away side
correlation - Mach cone?
- More conservative scenario
flowing hot spots? - Defocussing through radial flow
- Supported by PT,trig dependence?
- Has to be ruled out before any more daring
conclusion
47Summary
- Jets deviate in shape and hadrochemistry from
vacuum for values below 6 GeV/c - Exact definition needed.
- To study jets and energy loss PT,trigger gt 6
GeV/c mandatory, maybe more