The NIH, NIDA, and the Review Process: Focus on Undergraduate Institutions and Students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

The NIH, NIDA, and the Review Process: Focus on Undergraduate Institutions and Students

Description:

Research Project Grants. Traditional R01 ... Research Center Grants P20, P30, P50, P60. Small Business R41, R42, R43, R44 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: tlev4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The NIH, NIDA, and the Review Process: Focus on Undergraduate Institutions and Students


1
The NIH, NIDA, and the Review Process Focus on
Undergraduate Institutions and Students
Jose Ruiz, Ph.D. Scientific Review
Officer, Office Of Extramural Affairs, National
Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS May 28, 2008
2
NIH Mission
  • NIH is the steward of medical and behavioral
    research for the Nation
  • Our mission is to is to uncover new knowledge
    that will lead to better health for everyone
  • At a glance
  • One of 11 agencies in the Department of Health
    and Human Services (HHS)
  • 27 Institutes and Centers (IC)

3
FY 2007 29.228 Billion
Training 2.7 764 Million
Research Project Grants 52.7 15.417 Billion
4
NIH
NCI
NIBIB
NCMHD
NIDDK
NCRR
NIDA
NIAID
NIAAA
NICHD
NIEHS
NIGMS
NCCAM
NIMH
NINDS
NIDCD
NHGRI
NIA
NEI
FIC
NHLBI
NIAMS
NIDCR
NINR
NLM
CIT
CSR
CC
5
National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • Supports a great majority of the worlds research
    on the health aspects of drug abuse and addiction
  • Has an annual budget of about 1 billion
  • Is a leading supporter of behavioral research on
    HIV/AIDS
  • Supports primarily extramural, investigator
    initiated research
  • Supports research across the disciplines

6
NIDA Funding Strategy
  • Congressional Justification
  • Initiatives Requests for Applications Program
    Announcements (RFAs Pas)
  • Strategic Plan

7
NIDA BUDGET
(Thousands)
2006Actual
2008Est.
2009P.B.
2007Budget Authority
698,976
699,168 301,532 1,000,700 0.1
700,140 301,532 1,001,672 0.1
NonAIDS
699,852 300,162 1,000,014
299,882
AIDS
998,858
TOTAL
Increase Over Prior Year
0.6
-0.8
8
Addiction is a complex behavioral,
neurobiological, and genetic disorder
DEVELOPMENTAL, ENVIRONMENT (e.g. Social)
DRUG EXPOSURE
SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY
BRAINCHANGES
GENETIC VARIANTS
9
NIDAs Extramural Programs
  • Division of Basic Neurosciences Behavioral
    Research
  • Division of Pharmacotherapies Medical
    Consequences of Drug Abuse
  • Division of Epidemiology, Services Prevention
    Research
  • Division of Clinical Neuroscience and Behavioral
    Research
  • Center for Clinical Trials Network
  • AIDS Research Program

10
DBNBR supports basic research on the behavioral,
neurobiological, genetic developmental and social
cognitive factors associated with drug abuse and
addiction
11
Modeling the Addiction Process
V. Deroche-Gamonet, D. Belin, P. V. Piazza,
Science 305, 1014 (2004) L. J. M. J.
Vanderschuren, B. J. Everitt, Science 305, 1017
(2004)
12
NIH Grant Award Mechanisms
R21
R01
K08
F32
R03
T32
K23
R43
13
Research Project Grants
  • Traditional R01
  • Exploratory/Developmental/Planning Grants
    R03/R21/R33/R34
  • Program Project P01
  • Research Center Grants P20, P30, P50, P60
  • Small Business R41, R42, R43, R44
  • AREA Grants R15

14
Finding Grant Opportunities
  • How Do You Find Grant Opportunities?
  • All applications must be submitted in response to
    a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA)
  • FOAs are posted online in the NIH Guide for
    Grants Contracts and at www.Grants.gov (under
    Find Grant Opportunities)

NIH Guide http//grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/inde
x.html
15
NIH webpage http//www.nih.gov/
16
Office of Extramural Researchhttp//grants.nih.go
v/grants/oer.htm
New Parent FOA page added for quick reference
to unsolicited applications.
17
So What Type of GrantIs Right for Me?
Stage of research career? - experience and
expertise? Research needs? - mentors or
collaborators? - size of project?
Talk with staff Program Officers at NIDA. NIDA
will help you find the right funding mechanism.
18
R01
  • Original and historically oldest grant mechanism
    used by NIH
  • Used to support a discrete, specified,
    circumscribed project to be performed by the
    named investigator(s) in an area representing the
    investigator's specific interest and
    competencies, based on the mission of the NIH
  • Not limited in dollars
  • Generally awarded for 1-5 budget periods, each
    normally 12 months in duration
  • Can be renewed by competing for an additional
    project period
  • Supplements are allowed

19
Small Grants R03
  • Support small research projects that can be
    carried out in a short period of time with
    limited resources
  • Project period of up to two years and a budget
    for direct costs of up to 50,000 per year
  • For new projects only competing continuation
    applications will not be accepted
  • Types of projects that ICs support with the R03
  • Pilot or feasibility studies
  • Secondary analysis of existing data
  • Small, self-contained research projects
  • Development of research methodology
  • Development of new research technology

20
Small Grants R21
  • Intended to encourage exploratory/developmental
    research projects by providing support for the
    early and conceptual stages of development
  • Ex Assess the feasibility of a novel area of
    investigation or a new experimental system that
    has the potential to enhance health-related
    research
  • may involve considerable risk but may lead to a
    breakthrough in a particular area, or to the
    development of novel techniques, agents,
    methodologies, models or applications that could
    have major impact on a field of biomedical,
    behavioral, or clinical research
  • long-term projects, or projects designed to
    increase knowledge in a well-established area
    will not be considered
  • Project period of up to two years with a combined
    budget for direct costs not to exceed 275,000
  • For new projects only competing continuation
    applications will not be accepted
  • Preliminary data not required

21
Other Funding Opportunities
22
NIH Academic Research Enhancement Awards (AREA)
R15
23
ACADEMIC RESEARCH ENHANCEMENT AWARD(AREA) or
R15 Program
  • PURPOSE
  • Strengthen the research environment at
    institutions that are not research intensive
  • Exposing students, especially undergraduates, at
    such institutions to biomedical and behavioral
    research
  • Providing support for meritorious research at
    these institutions

http//grants1.nih.gov/grants/funding/area.htm
24
Features of the AREA Grant
  • FEATURES
  • Duration - Up to 3 yrs
  • Mentor - No
  • Res. Costs - 150,000
  • Renew - Yes
  • Pages - 25 pgs.
  • Receipt Dates-Feb 25, June 25, Oct 25
  • Small-scale Research support
  • pilot research projects and feasibility studies
  • development, testing, and refinement of research
    techniques
  • secondary data analysis
  • similar discrete research projects that
    demonstrate research capacity
  • Eligible institutions with less than 3M total
    costs in NIH support in each of 4 or more of the
    last 7 years

25
NIH AREA /R15 FEATURES
  • Only 1 AREA grant at a time per PI/PD
  • PI cannot hold another active NIH research grant
    at the time of award
  • Eligible organizations include domestic public
    private institutions that offer at least a
    baccalaureate degree in the sciences
  • Majority of research should be done at the home
    institution
  • R15 grants eligible for administrative
    supplements for underrepresented students
  • Online application submission through
    www.grants.gov

26
R15 FUNDING
  • Multi-year Funding
  • R15 is a RESEARCH grant, not training
  • Specific funds available and research objectives
    at NIH ICs
  • http//grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/area_objectiv
    es.doc
  • Success rates for AREA applications are
    competitive

27
AREA Application Award Data
Rev
Awarded
Funds
Rate
IC
28
AREA Specific Review Criteria-Facilities and
Other Resources
  • A profile of available students and outcomes
    (degree and graduate school)
  • Special characteristics of the school/academic
    component that make it appropriate for an AREA
    grant
  • Brief description of resources that will be used
    at another institution, if relevant
  • Statement of institutional support for the
    proposed research project, if relevant

29
AREA Specific Review Criteria
  • INVESTIGATOR Is the principal investigators
    experience appropriate for supervising available
    students in research?
  • ENVIRONMENT Assess the suitability of the
    applicant school/academic component for an award
    in terms of the likely impact that an award will
    have on strengthening the research environment
    and exposing available students to research.

30
AREA Application Receipt, Referral and Review
Cycles
 http//grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/submissionsc
hedule.html
31
CRISP Check out potential opportunities and
competition
  • Search CRISP (Computer Retrieval Information on
    Specific Projects) for abstracts of funded
    projects
  • Get to know projects that are ongoing in your
    research area
  • Know potential collaborators and/or competition
    in the field
  • Determine if there are any potential projects
    eligible for supplement opportunities.
  • http//www.crisp.cit.nih.gov/

32
PubMed www.pubmed.gov
33
RePORT Webpage -
http//report.nih.gov/
34
Scientific Review Process
National Institutes of Health
School or Other Research Center
Research Grant Application
Center for Scientific Review
Assign Inst. Study Section

Initiates Research Idea
Study Section
Submits Application
Review Scientific Merit
Institute
Evaluate for Relevance
Advisory Councils and Boards
Allocates Funds
Conducts Research
Recommend Action
Institute Director
Takes final action
35
Dual Review System for Grant Applications
  • First Level of Review
  • Scientific Review Group (SRG)
  • Provides Initial Scientific Merit Review of Grant
    Applications
  • Rates Applications and Makes Recommendations for
    Appropriate Level of Support and Duration of Award
  • Second Level of Review
  • Council
  • Assesses Quality of SRG
  • Review of Grant Applications
  • Makes Recommendation to Institute Staff on
    Funding
  • Evaluates Program Priorities and Relevance
  • Advises on Policy

36
grants1.nih.gov/grants/grant_tips.htm
37
NIH Two System Process
  • Grants.gov
  • Grants.gov hosts standardized federal forms SF424
    (RR) and agency-specific forms (PHS 398)
  • Electronic application through Grants.gov using
    these forms is mandatory for most FOAs.
    Grants.gov checks the application for
    federal-wide requirements.
  • eRA Commons
  • NIH retrieves the data from Grants.gov and checks
    the application against NIH-specific requirements
  • eRA Commons allows applicants to electronically
    track the status of submissions and to
    receive/transmit application and award information

38
Registration
  • Grants.gov
  • Be sure your organization is registered! (one
    time)
  • U.S. organizations obtain EIN from IRS (foreign
    applicants see next slide)
  • Request DUNS from Dun Bradstreet
  • Register with Central Contractor Registry (CCR)
    identify the eBiz Point of Contact (POC)
  • Register the Authorized Organization Reps (AORs)
    who can officially sign the application and
    submit
  • Visit http//www.grants.gov/applicants/get_regist
    ered.jsp

Grants.gov registration can take up to 8 weeks
for international organizations. START NOW!
39
Registration
  • eRA Commons PD/PI Registration
  • The PD/PI needs to work with the SO to get
    registered in the eRA Commons
  • The PI and SO need separate accounts because each
    has different privileges
  • PIs have one account that follows them throughout
    their careers. They can view all applications
    where they are listed as PI. The same account
    may be affiliated with multiple organizations.
  • SOs can view all applications submitted on behalf
    of the organization

Allow 4 5 business days to complete PI
registration in the eRA Commons
40
Software Requirements
  • Grants.gov Forms Viewer Software (Free)
  • PureEdge Forms Viewer
  • New Adobe Acrobat Viewer coming this Fall
  • http//www.grants.gov/resources/download_software
    .jsp
  • PDF generation software list provided on
    Grants.gov website http//www.grants.gov/agencies/
    software.jsp3

41
Preparing Your Application
  • Download the Application Package and Instructions
    at the same time. NIH-specific instructions are
    denoted by the HHS logo
  • Save the application to your hard drive
    remember to save it after each change
  • The application includes specific data fields as
    well as multiple attachments
  • All attachments must be saved as PDF documents

42
Create a checklist
  • Extract all of the requirements from the FOA
  • Note what is required, including page limits
  • Pay attention to formatting guidelines (margins,
    font size)
  • Determine who will submit letters of
    recommendation
  • Create a timeline to help manage your application
    process

43
Preparing Your Application
  • Avoiding Common Errors
  • NIH requires all application attachments to be in
    PDF format
  • The eRA Commons Username must be entered in the
    Credential, e.g. agency login field for each
    PI. This field is located on the RR Senior/Key
    Person Profile(s) form.
  • The Organization Name must be included for all
    Senior/Key Persons listed
  • Senior/Key Person effort listed on the RR Budget
    form must be greater than zero

For more information visit http//era.nih.gov/Ele
ctronicReceipt/avoiding_errors.htm
44
Some key considerations
  • Never assume that reviewers will know what you
    mean
  • Tell a coherent and consistent story
  • Write for a multidisciplinary audience
  • Place your project in a larger scientific/public
    health context
  • Create a cohesive application package
  • Conduct a mock review with colleagues

45
Submit Your Application
  • Registration with Grants.gov and eRA Commons must
    be complete prior to submission
  • Only the AOR may sign submit the application on
    behalf of the organization
  • Grants.gov provides a Tracking Number and a
    Date/Time stamp when you click Submit save
    this information

46
On Time Submission
  • All registrations with Grants.gov eRA Commons
    must be complete
  • Initial submission must have a Grants.gov
    timestamp on or before 500p.m. local time of
    submitting organization on the receipt date
  • Errors in the application must be corrected
    within 5 business days of the receipt date

47
Errors Warnings
  • Errors stop processing and will keep your
    application from being accepted by NIH
  • Warnings provide caution for you to ensure the
    item is correct, but will not stop processing
  • Changed/Corrected applications may be submitted
    to Grants.gov again to address errors/warnings in
    the five business days after the receipt date.
  • Initial application must have been on time
  • you must include a cover letter explaining
    your changes

Limited Time!
48
Tracking Your Application
  • It is the applicants responsibility to track the
    application
  • Grants.gov will send status emails to the AOR.
    eRA Commons will send status emails to the
    Signing Official, PI Person to be contacted
    listed on the application
  • Log into eRA Commons to check application status
    do not rely on emails. If it is error-free, you
    will have an assembled application to view

49
Application Viewing Window
  • Applicants have two weekdays (M-F, not including
    U.S. federal holidays) to view the assembled
    application. If no action is taken, it
    automatically proceeds to NIHs Division of
    Receipt and Referral.
  • Signing Official has option to Reject
  • PI will receive e-mail notification if SO rejects
    application
  • If Rejected after receipt date for any
    reasonother than a Grants.gov or NIH system
    issue, the submission is subject to the NIH late
    policy

50
Release of scores and summary statements
  • Within 1 3 days, final priority scores are
    released to the PI and/SO in eCommons
  • In about 1 6 weeks summary statements are
    released to eCommons
  • Summary statements for new investigator
    applications are released within 30 days
  • Program seeks NIDA Council concurrence on
    funding recommendations
  • PI work with PO to discuss critiques and re-work
    application in time for the next round

51
How did the committee arrive at its evaluation of
your application?
  • Assignments to reviewers based on expertise and
    avoiding conflicts
  • Initial review conducted individually and
    preliminary scores and critiques posted to IAR
  • Review meeting in person, or by teleconference,
    also Asynchronous Electronic Discussion
  • Meeting facilitated by the Chair with SRO as the
    DFO
  • Discussion of applications at meeting led by
    assigned reviewers (R1, R2, R3)
  • Assigned reviewers set the range for final scores
  • All reviewers score based on the discussion
  • Critiques revised and uploaded after the meeting

52
Streamlining or UN
  • Based on preliminary scores, the committee
    categorizes each application as either highly or
    less meritorious
  • Any reviewer (if not in conflict) can champion
    the full discussion of an application
  • Applications designated as less meritorious are
    unscored (UN) and are not discussed
  • About 50 of applications are unscored

53
In-house opportunities for undergrads
  • NIDA Summer Scholars
  • NHLBI St. Marys College of Maryland student in
    Summer 2008 group

54
Summer Research with NIDA
  • Supported by Diversity Supplement Program
  • Summer program for undergraduates and high school
    students from racial/ethnic minority groups
  • 8-10 week research placement with NIDA
    investigator

55
Post-bac Opportunities
  • AAAS
  • NIH Tech Transfer
  • Other NIH Post-bac opportunities

56
Online Resources
  • Overview of Electronic Submission
    http//era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt/
  • Frequently Asked Questions http//era.nih.gov/Elec
    tronicReceipt/faq.htm
  • Avoiding Common Errors http//era.nih.gov/Electron
    icReceipt/avoiding_errors.htm
  • Training Resources, Videos, Quick Reference
    Materials http//era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt/tra
    ining.htm

57
Where to find information about trends and
success rates
  • Award Trends (http//grants.nih.gov/grants/award/a
    wardtr.htm)
  • Success rates (http//grants.nih.gov/grants/award/
    success.htm)

58
Finding Help
  • eRA Commons Help Desk Online Help Ticket
    http//ithelpdesk.nih.gov/eRA/
  • Phone 301-402-7469 or 1-866-504-9552
  • Hours Mon-Fri, 7a.m. to 8 p.m. EST
  • Support for Commons Registration, Application
    Status, Post-submission questions
  • Grants.gov Contact Center Toll-free
    1-800-518-4726Hours Mon-Fri, 7 a.m. to 9 p.m.
    ESTEmail support_at_grants.gov
  • Support for PureEdge Forms, PureEdge with a
    Mac, Grants.gov Registration
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com