Title: Designing and Implementing Standardized Clinical Encounter Forms and Modules to Support HIV Care Geneva- March 2004
1Designing and Implementing Standardized Clinical
Encounter Forms and Modules to Support HIV
CareGeneva- March 2004
- John Milberg, US Dept. of Health and Human
Services, Health Resources and Services
Administration, - HIV/AIDS Bureau, Rockville, MD USA
2The Challenge
- Design and implementation How do you get useful
and timely information into and out of a data
collection system designed to track a
multi-faceted, chronic condition - Whether its a paper form or a computerized
information system, PDA, or phone-based system,
the HMIS should help - The provider of care in their daily activities
- The larger public health system and the ability
to monitor HIV care and supplies on a population
basis
3System Functions and Outputs
- Enable care providers to readily collect, use and
report information on main aspects of HIV care,
TB treatment and follow-up, pregnancy/ PMTCT.
etc. in a format that is useful to them and to
others providing clinical support. - Track prescriptions(and fees?) and drug stocks at
point of care - Deliver data to and from central monitoring
points (WHO) Provide mechanism for data to be
entered into or transmitted to a central location
so that treatment and care information can be
used for quality of care management and oversight
- Provide clinical support for treatment
decision-making (real-time vs. delayed)If
caregiver is uncertain how to treat, how do they
get support? Can they get it in real-time? Do
they need clinical decision support in real-time
in all instances?
4Standards to do What?
- Provide treatment and ensure quality of care
- Track
- Drug prescriptions and inventories, lab results
- Adverse events/side effects, reasons for changing
therapy - Adherence
- Clinical Course (OIs, body weight, stage of
illness, etc.) - TB prophylaxis/Treatment
- Pregnancy history/PMTCT
- Quality of Life
- Report aggregate informationfor WHO, PEPFAR,
TGF, etc. - Establishing common standards in data
collection and reporting can reduce burden to
providers AND improve capacity to monitor care -
5Standards to do What?
- Assess quality of care and needs What does the
individual patient require? - Who should start ARVs, TB, and other
medications? - Who is failing and should have medications
changed? - Who has missed visits and requires follow-up?
- Who requires supportive care for adherence,
transportation, mental health
6Barriers to Implementation
- To ensure minimum standards of care and adequate
patient follow up, do care providers have the - Time,
- Adequate training and
- Flexible data management and reporting tools?
-
- Are information systems--whatever form--able to
help with these client-specific monitoring tasks
and many other broader functions (assessing
trends overall, producing reports, exporting data
to a central administrator).
7WHO Chronic Care with ARV Therapy Translating
Complicated Treatment Protocols into Simple
Clinical Information and HIV Care Delivery Systems
8- Unaided human decision makers do not possess the
consistency of behavior or the accuracy of
perception necessary for the consistent delivery
of recommended therapies -
- Source Morris AH. Developing and Implementing
Computerized Protocols for Standardization of
Clinical Decisions. Annals Internal Medicine
2000 7 (132).
9Desired Features of Paper Forms
- Attributes
- Clear and as simple as possible for caregiver to
follow treatment protocol - Outlines essential alerts, warnings, and
reminders on treatments (e.g. Dont prescribe EFV
in pregnant women dont start ARVs until certain
clinical criteria are met, Ruling out active TB,
etc) - Design of form should allow ease of data entry
into HMIS upon completion, allowing for clinical
overviews to be fed back into clinic (timely
quality assurance)
10Limitations of Paper Forms
- Difficult to clearly convey all decision rules in
the form at time of care- becomes complicated
quickly - If not ultimately entered into a computer,
extremely difficult and cumbersome to summarize
data for reports and quality monitoring - What has been learned from other systems, in
particular TB, that can help in the design of HIV
care information systems?(see www.tbcindia.org)
11Electronic HMIS Lessons from CAREWare
- Standardized data core for tracking longitudinal
clinical, service, and social support
information - Ability to customize the application without
programming - Ability to rapidly generate reports for daily
patient care and monitoring overall quality of
care - While decision support rules currently not built
into software, patient-specific quality of care
reports easily generated that are used to monitor
and manage quality of care-produced before
patient visit - Ease of producing required reports
12Getting Data inand Out CAREWare Examples
13Getting Data inand Out CAREWare Examples
14Getting Data inand Out CAREWare Examples
15Getting Data inand Out CAREWare Examples
16Getting Data inand Out CAREWare Examples
17Examples of Clinical Support in CAREWare
18Examples of Clinical Support in CAREWarePatient
Scheduler
- Who has a visit today or this week?
- Clinical summary of expected patients
- Produce reports of missed visits
19CAREWare Limitations
- Lacks a simple one page interface for data entry
that mirrors a standard clinical encounter in
typical ARV treatment setting - Lacks simple alerts and reminders (if used in
real-time) relies on user running encounter
reports. - ButThis should change soon!
20CAREWare Future Developments
- Networkable version (in .NET) that will also
allow for disconnected clinic sites to export
data (store and forward ) - Collaboration, such as that promoted by this
meeting, will clarify essential features to
develop for international version. - Collaborate with specific clinical sites to pilot
test (e.g. in Uganda, South Africa) - Incorporate HIV clinical decision support
developed by Columbia University (HIV Tips)
21Focused and Timely Clinical Information
- Caregivers will likely have only a short time to
spend with each patient. In this setting, how
can the HMIS help prepare for the clinical
encounter so that it is focused and informed by
essential, up to date medical history information
necessary to make appropriate clinical decisions?
- What is feasible given Limited training and
experience - Lack of time Overburdened staff
- Lack of other resources
22Getting Data In and Information Out
- Can clinical data be used and retrieved by care
providers? Onsite, on-time? - Who will key enter the data?
- Who will have the time/skills to review and use
the data? - Can data be transmitted to another (central)
location where care givers with greater training
can offer clinical assistance (decision support) - Provide clinical summaries via some method of
Telehealth (phone call, email, website) make
treatment recommendations (either in real-time or
not) or help establish a longer-term treatment
plan - Can data be analyzed centrally to enable quality
of care management, and support public-health
decision-making, at the district, provincial or
national level)?
23Possible Solutions and Clinic FeedbackClinical
Decision Support and Quality Management
- Produce treatment plans prior to patient clinic
visit. (But how produced/by whom?) - Focus and tailor the clinical decision support so
it can be conveyed to the clinical provider and
the patient clearly, and in a short period of
time.(Onsite vs. some form of Telehealth)
24Possible Solutions and Clinic FeedbackTechnical
Assistance and Support
- Provide data management support, especially if
data entry is not occurring in a timely fashion - Provide data use support to ensure appropriate
treatment information is getting fed back to the
clinic site and that its use is understood
Create benchmarks/ treatment and service goals - Hire clinical and data consultants (MIS corps?)
to provide training, periodic oversight Provide
support to sites with high rates of ARV treatment
failures (regimen changes) and examine clinic
process Why is this occurring in this site? What
aspects of care can be improved? (See Frieden
and Khatri, Impact of national consultants on
successful expansion of effective TB control in
India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003 7837-41.)