Designing and Implementing Standardized Clinical Encounter Forms and Modules to Support HIV Care Geneva- March 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Designing and Implementing Standardized Clinical Encounter Forms and Modules to Support HIV Care Geneva- March 2004

Description:

The provider of care in their daily ... Enable care providers to readily collect, use and report information on main ... and drug stocks at point of care ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: HRS873
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Designing and Implementing Standardized Clinical Encounter Forms and Modules to Support HIV Care Geneva- March 2004


1
Designing and Implementing Standardized Clinical
Encounter Forms and Modules to Support HIV
CareGeneva- March 2004
  • John Milberg, US Dept. of Health and Human
    Services, Health Resources and Services
    Administration,
  • HIV/AIDS Bureau, Rockville, MD USA

2
The Challenge
  • Design and implementation How do you get useful
    and timely information into and out of a data
    collection system designed to track a
    multi-faceted, chronic condition
  • Whether its a paper form or a computerized
    information system, PDA, or phone-based system,
    the HMIS should help
  • The provider of care in their daily activities
  • The larger public health system and the ability
    to monitor HIV care and supplies on a population
    basis

3
System Functions and Outputs
  • Enable care providers to readily collect, use and
    report information on main aspects of HIV care,
    TB treatment and follow-up, pregnancy/ PMTCT.
    etc. in a format that is useful to them and to
    others providing clinical support.
  • Track prescriptions(and fees?) and drug stocks at
    point of care
  • Deliver data to and from central monitoring
    points (WHO) Provide mechanism for data to be
    entered into or transmitted to a central location
    so that treatment and care information can be
    used for quality of care management and oversight
  • Provide clinical support for treatment
    decision-making (real-time vs. delayed)If
    caregiver is uncertain how to treat, how do they
    get support? Can they get it in real-time? Do
    they need clinical decision support in real-time
    in all instances?

4
Standards to do What?
  • Provide treatment and ensure quality of care
  • Track
  • Drug prescriptions and inventories, lab results
  • Adverse events/side effects, reasons for changing
    therapy
  • Adherence
  • Clinical Course (OIs, body weight, stage of
    illness, etc.)
  • TB prophylaxis/Treatment
  • Pregnancy history/PMTCT
  • Quality of Life
  • Report aggregate informationfor WHO, PEPFAR,
    TGF, etc.
  • Establishing common standards in data
    collection and reporting can reduce burden to
    providers AND improve capacity to monitor care

5
Standards to do What?
  • Assess quality of care and needs What does the
    individual patient require?
  • Who should start ARVs, TB, and other
    medications?
  • Who is failing and should have medications
    changed?
  • Who has missed visits and requires follow-up?
  • Who requires supportive care for adherence,
    transportation, mental health

6
Barriers to Implementation
  • To ensure minimum standards of care and adequate
    patient follow up, do care providers have the
  • Time,
  • Adequate training and
  • Flexible data management and reporting tools?
  • Are information systems--whatever form--able to
    help with these client-specific monitoring tasks
    and many other broader functions (assessing
    trends overall, producing reports, exporting data
    to a central administrator).

7
WHO Chronic Care with ARV Therapy Translating
Complicated Treatment Protocols into Simple
Clinical Information and HIV Care Delivery Systems
8
  • Unaided human decision makers do not possess the
    consistency of behavior or the accuracy of
    perception necessary for the consistent delivery
    of recommended therapies
  • Source Morris AH. Developing and Implementing
    Computerized Protocols for Standardization of
    Clinical Decisions. Annals Internal Medicine
    2000 7 (132).

9
Desired Features of Paper Forms
  • Attributes
  • Clear and as simple as possible for caregiver to
    follow treatment protocol
  • Outlines essential alerts, warnings, and
    reminders on treatments (e.g. Dont prescribe EFV
    in pregnant women dont start ARVs until certain
    clinical criteria are met, Ruling out active TB,
    etc)
  • Design of form should allow ease of data entry
    into HMIS upon completion, allowing for clinical
    overviews to be fed back into clinic (timely
    quality assurance)

10
Limitations of Paper Forms
  • Difficult to clearly convey all decision rules in
    the form at time of care- becomes complicated
    quickly
  • If not ultimately entered into a computer,
    extremely difficult and cumbersome to summarize
    data for reports and quality monitoring
  • What has been learned from other systems, in
    particular TB, that can help in the design of HIV
    care information systems?(see www.tbcindia.org)

11
Electronic HMIS Lessons from CAREWare
  • Standardized data core for tracking longitudinal
    clinical, service, and social support
    information
  • Ability to customize the application without
    programming
  • Ability to rapidly generate reports for daily
    patient care and monitoring overall quality of
    care
  • While decision support rules currently not built
    into software, patient-specific quality of care
    reports easily generated that are used to monitor
    and manage quality of care-produced before
    patient visit
  • Ease of producing required reports

12
Getting Data inand Out CAREWare Examples
13
Getting Data inand Out CAREWare Examples
14
Getting Data inand Out CAREWare Examples
15
Getting Data inand Out CAREWare Examples
16
Getting Data inand Out CAREWare Examples
17
Examples of Clinical Support in CAREWare
18
Examples of Clinical Support in CAREWarePatient
Scheduler
  • Who has a visit today or this week?
  • Clinical summary of expected patients
  • Produce reports of missed visits

19
CAREWare Limitations
  • Lacks a simple one page interface for data entry
    that mirrors a standard clinical encounter in
    typical ARV treatment setting
  • Lacks simple alerts and reminders (if used in
    real-time) relies on user running encounter
    reports.
  • ButThis should change soon!

20
CAREWare Future Developments
  • Networkable version (in .NET) that will also
    allow for disconnected clinic sites to export
    data (store and forward )
  • Collaboration, such as that promoted by this
    meeting, will clarify essential features to
    develop for international version.
  • Collaborate with specific clinical sites to pilot
    test (e.g. in Uganda, South Africa)
  • Incorporate HIV clinical decision support
    developed by Columbia University (HIV Tips)

21
Focused and Timely Clinical Information
  • Caregivers will likely have only a short time to
    spend with each patient. In this setting, how
    can the HMIS help prepare for the clinical
    encounter so that it is focused and informed by
    essential, up to date medical history information
    necessary to make appropriate clinical decisions?
  • What is feasible given Limited training and
    experience
  • Lack of time Overburdened staff
  • Lack of other resources

22
Getting Data In and Information Out
  • Can clinical data be used and retrieved by care
    providers? Onsite, on-time?
  • Who will key enter the data?
  • Who will have the time/skills to review and use
    the data?
  • Can data be transmitted to another (central)
    location where care givers with greater training
    can offer clinical assistance (decision support)
  • Provide clinical summaries via some method of
    Telehealth (phone call, email, website) make
    treatment recommendations (either in real-time or
    not) or help establish a longer-term treatment
    plan
  • Can data be analyzed centrally to enable quality
    of care management, and support public-health
    decision-making, at the district, provincial or
    national level)?

23
Possible Solutions and Clinic FeedbackClinical
Decision Support and Quality Management
  • Produce treatment plans prior to patient clinic
    visit. (But how produced/by whom?)
  • Focus and tailor the clinical decision support so
    it can be conveyed to the clinical provider and
    the patient clearly, and in a short period of
    time.(Onsite vs. some form of Telehealth)

24
Possible Solutions and Clinic FeedbackTechnical
Assistance and Support
  • Provide data management support, especially if
    data entry is not occurring in a timely fashion
  • Provide data use support to ensure appropriate
    treatment information is getting fed back to the
    clinic site and that its use is understood
    Create benchmarks/ treatment and service goals
  • Hire clinical and data consultants (MIS corps?)
    to provide training, periodic oversight Provide
    support to sites with high rates of ARV treatment
    failures (regimen changes) and examine clinic
    process Why is this occurring in this site? What
    aspects of care can be improved? (See Frieden
    and Khatri, Impact of national consultants on
    successful expansion of effective TB control in
    India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003 7837-41.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com