IRB Member Education Update June 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

IRB Member Education Update June 2004

Description:

... the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the Federal, Food, Drug, and ... licensing provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or Public ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Far60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IRB Member Education Update June 2004


1
IRB Member Education UpdateJune 2004
  • -Applicability of 21CFR
  • -Adverse Event Reporting under 21CFR

John Farley, MD, MPH Center for Clinical Trials
2
Case 1a
  • The IRB is reviewing an investigator-initiated
    pilot study to evaluate the potential efficacy of
    cidofovir in the treatment of post kidney
    transplant patients with previously diagnosed
    polyoma virus nephropathy. Cidofovir is a
    marketed drug which is approved for the treatment
    of cytomegalovirus.
  • Is Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations
    (21CFR) relevant to the review of this study?

3
Scope of 21CFR
  • Applies to all clinical investigations regulated
    by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under
    the Federal, Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as well
    as clinical investigations that support
    applications for research or marketing permits
    for products regulated by the FDA.

4
Requirements for Submitting Investigational New
Drug Application (IND) to the FDA
  • If the sponsor intends to conduct a clinical
    investigation with an investigational new drug
    subject to licensing provisions of the Federal
    Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or Public Health
    Service Act.
  • Sponsor may not begin a clinical investigation
    until a required IND is in effect.
  • Separate IND is required for exemption from
    informed consent under 21CFR50.24 (emergency
    research).
  • (21CFR312.20)

5
Exemption from IND Reqs
  • The clinical investigation of a drug product
    lawfully marketed in the U.S. is exempt from the
    reqs if all of the following apply
  • Not intended to be reported to the FDA as a
    well-controlled study in support of new
    indication or change in labeling
  • Lawfully marketed as a prescription drug product
    and not intended to support a significant change
    in advertising.
  • Route of administration, dosage level, or patient
    population does not significantly increase the
    risks (or decrease acceptability of the risks).
  • (21CFR312.2a)

6
IND Application Procedures
  • IND goes into effect 30 days after receipt by the
    FDA unless the FDA notifies the sponsor of a
    clinical hold. (312.40)
  • At any time during the investigation, the FDA may
    request more data or communicate about
    deficiencies in the IND (312.41). A clinical hold
    may be issued at any time (312.42).
  • The sponsor is the person or entity holding the
    IND not necessarily the same as the entity
    paying for the study.

7
Case 1b
  • As the IRB is discussing their concerns with the
    investigator re the possible need for an IND,
    Gilead Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to sponsor the
    study and Gilead files an IND application with
    the FDA which goes into effect.
  • Because an IND is in place, what minimum safety
    monitoring and reporting activity can the IRB
    assume will be ongoing for this study?

8
Regulatory Sources for Safety Monitoring and
Reporting of Studies Conducted Under 21CFR
  • International Conference on Harmonization
    (international standards) (ICH) major sections
    published in the Federal Register representing
    FDA current thinking)
  • Section E2A, Guideline on Clinical Safety Data
    Management published Federal Register March 1,
    1995
  • Section E6, Good Clinical Practice Consolidated
    Guideline published Federal Register May 9, 1997
  • The provisions of ICH E2A were largely encoded in
    21CFR312.32 entitled IND Safety Reports.

9
Definitions of Adverse Experiences (also known as
SAEs) Associated With the Use of a Drug
  • Life-threatening adverse drug experience places
    the patient at immediate risk of death
  • Serious adverse drug experience
  • Results in death
  • Life-threatening
  • Requires or prolongs hospitalization
  • Results in persistent/significant
    disability/incapacity
  • Congenital anomaly/birth defect
  • OR action on the part of a physician is necessary
    to avert any of the above
  • Unexpected adverse drug experience the
    specificity of severity of the adverse experience
    is not consistent with the Investigator Brochure
    or risk information described elsewhere in the
    IND application
  • (21CFR 312.32)

10
Reporting of Adverse Events
  • Reporting for SAEs is expedited.
  • The sponsor must report to FDA within 7 days
    (death, life-threatening) or 15 days (other SAE).
  • 21CFR312.32( c) uses the serious and unexpected
    adverse experience term when referencing sponsor
    obligations for safety reporting to the FDA.
  • Industry standard is for site investigators to
    notify the sponsor with 48 hours and notify their
    own IRB promptly.
  • Sponsors notify other investigators promptly
    per ICH. These notifications are intended as
    amendments to the Investigators Brochure.
  • (ICH Guideline Clinical Safety Data Management,
    Federal Register, March 1, 1995 21CFR312.32)

11
FDA Safety Monitoring
  • IND Safety Reports FDA may place a clinical
    hold on an IND at any time based on IND Safety
    Reports.
  • Annual Reports The sponsor (holder of the IND)
    is required to submit an annual report to the FDA
    which includes a summary of all IND safety
    reports and all deaths of study subjects during
    the prior year.

12
Disclaimer
  • Facts of Case 1 altered for teaching purposes.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com