Title: Quantifying%20methane%20hydrate%20saturation%20in%20different%20geologic%20settings
1Quantifying methane hydrate saturation in
different geologic settings
Gaurav Bhatnagar1, George J. Hirasaki1, Walter G.
Chapman1 Brandon Dugan2, Gerald R. Dickens2 1.
Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.,
Rice University 2. Dept. of Earth Science, Rice
University AGU Fall Meeting December 13, 2006
2Objectives
- Develop a general numerical model for simulating
accumulation of gas hydrates in marine sediments
over geological time scales - Use dimensionless scalings to depict hydrate
saturation dependence on the large parameter set
using a few simple plots
3 Model schematic
4 Outline
- Phase equilibrium
- Component mass balances
- Simulation Results
- General hydrate distributions
5 Phase Equilibrium
6 Methane Solubility Profile
- Vertical depth normalized with the depth of the
BHSZ - Methane concentration normalized with triple
point solubility
7Outline
- Phase equilibrium
- Component mass balances
- Simulation Results
- General hydrate distributions
8 Component Mass Balances - Organic
- Assumptions
- Sedimentation rate is constant with time
- Densities of all components remain constant
- Organic component advects with the sediment
velocity - Organic decay occurs through a first order
reaction
Reaction term
Convective flux
Organic carbon in sediments
Pe1 Peclet no.
9Organic concentration profile
10 Component Mass Balances - Methane
- Assumptions
- Hydrate and gas phases form as soon as local
solubility is exceeded (no kinetic limitation) - Hydrate and gas phases advect with the same
velocity as the sediments
11Methane Balance (contd.)
ß Normalized organic content at seafloor
(quantifies net carbon input from top) Pe2
Peclet no. for external flow Ratio of
(External Flux/Diffusion)
12Outline
- Phase equilibrium
- Component mass balances
- Simulation Results
- General hydrate distributions
13 Hydrate accumulation with underlying free
gas
14 Hydrate accumulation without free gas
below
15Outline
- Phase equilibrium
- Component mass balances
- Simulation Results
- General hydrate distributions
16 Parameter space for biogenic sources
17 Parameter space for biogenic sources with
Da
- For each pair
- of curves
- Hydrate formation with free gas below
- Hydrate formation without free gas
- 3. No hydrate formation
18 Scaling of variables
- Scale x-axis to represent net methane generated
within the HSZ instead of just the input - Methane generated
- within HSZ (from
- analytical solution
- to organic balance)
19 Scaled parameter space (biogenic source)
20 Hydrate saturation distribution (biogenic)
- Compute average hydrate saturation ltShgt and plot
contour plots - Average hydrate saturation also scales with the
scaling shown before
21 Hydrate saturation averaged over GHSZ
(biogenic)
22 Parameter space for deeper sources
23 Scaled parameter space for deeper sources
24 Hydrate saturation distribution (deeper
source)
- Again compute average hydrate saturation ltShgt as
before - Average hydrate saturation does not scale with
the scaling shown before for this case (Pe1
Pe2) - The quantity that remains invariant in this case
is the flux of hydrate, defined as Pe1ltShgt - Scales with the original choice of dimensionless
groups and is plotted along contour lines
25 Hydrate saturations from deeper sources
Contours of Pe1ltShgt
26 Sensitivity to seafloor parameters
27Conclusions
- Better physical understanding of this system can
be obtained from our general dimensionless model
compared to previous site-specific models - Hydrate layer can extend down to BHSZ with free
gas below or remain within HSZ with no free gas - Dependence of hydrate saturation on various
parameters can be depicted using simple contour
maps. This helps in summarizing results from
hundreds of simulations in just two plots. - Hydrate saturation at any geological setting can
be inferred from these plots without any new
simulations
28 Financial Support Shell Center for
Sustainability Kobayashi Graduate Fellowship