Title: Turfgrass Runoff
1Turfgrass Runoff
- Dr. John Stier
- University of Wisconsin-Madison
- Dept. of Horticulture
2Public Awareness of Environmental Contamination
Growing
- News stories
- Urban sprawl
- Nutrients and chemicals in ground and surface
waters - Scientific literacy of public
- Fear what is unknown
- Special interest groups
- Only voice heard
3Why Public Perception Matters
- Politicians seek re-election
- Laws difficult to change
- Well-intentioned laws may not help
- Diverts attention from true problem
- Base laws on scientific data when possible
4Lake Eutrophication
- Eutrophication-Transformation of barren lake into
nutrient-laden lake full of aquatic organisms - Natural process
- Civilization accelerates it
- Phosphorus is limiting nutrient
- 0.02 ppm
- Terrestrial plants require 0.2 ppm P in soil
moisture
5Stages of Eutrophication
- Oligotrophic Clear water, minimal organic matter
or sediment, minimum biological activity - Mesotrophic More nutrients, more biological
activity - Eutrophic Nutrient-rich, high biological
activity, change in aquatic species - Hypereutrophic Murky, highly productive, closest
to wetland many clearwater species cannot survive
6Understanding P types
- Soluble (dissolved) P pass through fine filter,
used by algae - Particulate P attached to sediments, solubilizes
in water unless water P high - 10-90 bioavailable (Sharpley et al. 1994)
- Total P Soluble Particulate P
7Watersheds
- Drainage region
- Size and type vary according to geography,
climate - Lakes water sources
- Rainfall
- Rivers, streams, creeks
- Groundwater (springs)
8How Our Environment Has Changed
- Impervious vs Pervious surfaces
- Pre-Development Forests, Fields, Wetlands
- Post-Development Rooftops, driveways, sidewalks,
streets, parking lots - Post-Development Lawns, Rain Gardens, Ditches,
Detention Ponds - Stormwater fees
9Runoff
- Definition Water that is discharged laterally on
or through the ground - Surface runoff
- Seepage flow from ground water
- Both Runoff Volume and Contamination must be
considered - Concentration level has little impact if only few
ounces or quarts runoff from large area
10Problems with Runoff
- Sediment
- Deposits in surface waters, sewers, etc.
- Carries adsorbed chemicals nutrients (P)
- Nutrients
- N P
- Algal blooms oxygen deprivation
- Pesticides
- Water treatment plants cant remove
- Agricultural not distinguished from turf
11Runoff Depends on
- Rate of precipitation/irrigation
- Pre-existing soil moisture
- Slope
- Infiltration percolation capacity of soil
- Soil type (sand gt loam gt clay)
- Time of year (frozen vs. unfrozen)
- Vegetation height and density
12Soil and Phosphorus
- Acre-furrow slice 1 acre soil, 6-8 deep,
2,000,000 lbs - P is 100-1000 ppm
- P bound tightly to soil, other molecules (P
fixation) - Unavailable to plants
- 0.01 in soil solution (inorganic P)
- P Mineralization Microbes degrade organics
13Soil Tests for P
- Soil tests measure P levels needed for crop
growth, not based on how much P can be adsorbed
to soil
14Phosphorus
- Essential to all life (DNA and ATP-energy)
- Natural compound in soil
15Phosphorus Sources in Runoff
- Organic sources
- Pollen, seeds
- Leaves (living and dead)
- Animal waste
- Manure spread on frozen fields
- Wildlife
- Aquatic animals/plants
16Phosphorus Sources in Runoff
- Inorganic sources Soil particles/dust
- Bare/exposed soil
- Agricultural operations
- Building construction
- Geography of area
17The Scientific Method
- Observe a condition
- Read existing information
- Develop theory
- Test theory
- Accept, reject, or alter theory
18Good vs Bad Science
- Good science has
- Scientifically accepted methods
- Multiple replications (repeated treatments)
- Minimal variation of conditions
- 2 years field data
- Validate statistically
- Publish in peer-reviewed journal
19Why Data Vary Runoff from 6 Grassland Plots
(Sharpley et al., 1992)
Scientists seek uniformity among plots and
replicate for statistical validation to overcome
natural variation in data.
20Similar Studies Not Always Agree
- Different methods
- Bray vs Olsen for Phosphorus
- Time of year, soil type, etc.
- Environment!
- Body of Knowledge important
- Not just one experiment
- .cold fusion?
21Multiple Runoff Studies Conducted
- 1970 current
- Water quantity, nutrients, pesticides
- Crops, turf, fields/prairies
22Water Runoff from Crops, Turf, and Grasslands
23Sediment in Runoff from Crops, Turf, and
Grasslands
24Phosphorus in Runoff from Crops, Turf, and
Grasslands
25Seasonal Effects of Lawn Runoff
Source Kussow, 1995
26Fertilization Effect on Phosphorus Losses from
Lawn Turf
Source Kussow, 1997
27Turf Type Affects Runoff
- Penn State Univ., Linde et al., 1995
- Creeping bentgrass vs. perennial ryegrass
- Fairway height, sloped plots
- 6 inch irrigation/hr to force runoff
- Bentgrass intercepted 113 more water
- 6 times more tillers, thatch
- High water holding capacity, hydraulic resistance
28Tree Leaf Phosphorus
- Waschbusch et al., 1999
- Madison, WI
- P in street runoff
- No trees lt0.1 ppm P
- 80 tree canopy 0.8 ppm P
29Pollen Phosphorus
- Banks and Nighswander (1999)
- Pollen of 11 tree spp., Ontario Canada lake study
- Averaged 0.82 P
- Total atmospheric deposition 0.23 lb P/acre
- 43 occurred during May/June
30Tree Phosphorus on Streets
- Kluesner and Lee (1974)
- High P in runoff (May) elm seeds in
streets/gutters - High P in fall (November) P leached from street
leaves - Dorney (1986)
- Avg soluble P, 13 tree spp., 148 ppm
- Shapiro and Pfannkuch, 1973 (Univ. Minn.)
- Weekly street sweeping ? P runoff by 42
31Storm Water Runoff, Lake Wingra, WI (Kluesner and
Lee, 1974)
This study indicated that the amount of runoff
from the storm sewer basin could be accounted
for by summing the area of streets in the basin
(and in some cases driveways also). Thus, unless
fertilizers were carelessly strewn on
the impervious surfaces, it seems unlikely that
the home gardener would be guilty of adding
appreciable amounts of nitrogen or phosphorus to
urban runoff with the types of soils found in
Madison.
Kluesner, J.W., and G.F. Lee. 1974. Nutrient
loading from a separate storm sewer in
Madison, Wisconsin. J. Water Poll. Control Fed.
46(5)920-936.
32What Happens to Pesticides?
Photodecomposition
(Volatilize)
Pesticide Applied
(Drift)
Runoff ?
Plant Uptake Degradation
Thatch Adsorption
Microbial decomposition
Soil Chemistry Reactions and Decomposition
Leaching?
33Ultimate Fate of Organic (Synthetic) Pesticides
- Degradation!
- Microbes, soil chemistry, sunlight
- Enhanced degradation
- Half-life Time to degrade 1/2 of compound
- Varies by compound and situation
- Soil
- Foliar
- Water
- Laboratory
34Pesticides in Runoff Depend on
- Pesticide rate
- Solubility
- Formulation
- Soil adsorption
- Timing of application
- Liquid dries before rainfall?
- Dormant versus actively growing turf
- Placement of pesticide
- Thatchy turf versus pavement
35Solubility May Impact Pesticides in Runoff
- Greater than 10 mg/L high solubility
- Phenoxy herbicides
- 2,4-D 300,000 - 790,000 mg/L
- MCPP 660,000 mg/L
- Dicamba 850,000 mg/L
- Organophosphate insecticide
- Chlorpyrifos 2.0 - 4.8 mg/L
- Dursban, banned in 2002!
36Soil and Thatch Adsorption
- Soil and thatch bind (sorb) many compounds
- Determined by adsorption coefficient (Koc)
- Large Koc strong binding
- Chlorpyrifos 6,070 to 14,000
- 2,4-D 20
- Dicamba 2
37Research
- Numerous studies on turf pesticide runoff and
leaching - Fate and Management of Turfgrass Chemicals. 2000.
J.M. Clark and M.P. Kenna (ed.) American Chemical
Soc., Washington, D.C. - Summarizes studies
38Do Turf Pesticides Runoff?
- Watschke Mumma, 1989
- 2 yr study, 29 sampling dates
- Kentucky bluegrass lawn-type turf
- 9-15 slope, clay soil
39Materials and Methods
- Both natural and artificial (irrigation)
precipitation analyzed - Irrigation conducted within 24 hr application
- Water collection devices at bottom of slope
- Volumes measured
- Pesticide concentrations percents
40Results
- Irrigation 6 in/hr for 1-1.5 hr to cause runoff
- Only 1 natural runoff event occurred
41Small Percentage of Pesticides Applied Detected
in Turf Runoff
42Why So Little Leachate and Runoff?
- 90-100 turf cover
- prevents sediment loss
- intercepts pesticides
- Abundant, contiguous root system
- absorbs nutrients and stabilizes soil
- Diverse microbial population
- degrades pesticides
- Thatch retains nutrients, pesticides until used
or degraded
43Therefore,
- Data indicate pesticide losses from turf are
minor - Nonpoint source pollution continued concern
- Urban landscapes targeted by legislation
- Careless lawn applications end up on driveways
- Hypothesis Pesticide losses from urban settings
are minimal from both impervious and pervious
surfaces
44Pesticide Runoff from Urban Landscapes
- Dr. John Stier
- Dept. of Horticulture
- University of Wisconsin-Madison
45Objectives Univ. of Wisconsin 1999-2001
- Estimate relative proportion of pesticide losses
from impervious (concrete) and pervious (turf)
surfaces - Compare professional versus retail formulations
- Products
- Granular versus liquid
46Plot Construction
- 2.4 x 4.3 m
- Concrete and KBG turf
- 6 slope
- Silt loam soil
- Irrigation 2x weekly, 50 ET
- Zn-plated weir channeled runoff into covered
plastic collection vessel - Randomized complete block, 3 reps
47Treatments
- Professional pesticide program
- Pre-emergent Barricade (prodiamine) (g)
- Surface insect Dursban Pro (chlorpyrifos) (l)
- Grubs Merit (Imidacloprid) (wp)
- Post-emergent HorsePower (Dicamba, MCPA,
triclopyr) (l) - Retail pesticide program (homeowner)
- Pre-emergent Pendimethalin (g)
- Surface insect Ortho Diazinon (g)
- Grubs Scotts Grub EX (Imidacloprid) (g)
- Post-emergent Weed-B-Gone (Dicamba, MCPP,
2,4-D) (l) - Untreated control
48Sample Analysis
- Aliquots extracted and held on Carbograph tubes
until analysis - HPLC/Mass Spectrometry
- Standard curves to estimate concentrations
- Runoff volumes to determine true pesticide
amounts - Proc Mix (SAS) to determine treatment effects
49Runoff 1999-2000
50Runoff 2000-2001
51Pre-Emergence Herbicide Losses ( recovery)
DAT Days after treatment. Data averaged over
2000 and 2001.
52Post-Emergence Herbicide Losses ( recovery)
DAT Days after treatment. Data averaged over
2000 and 2001.
53Surface Insecticide Losses ( recovery)
DAT Days after treatment. Data averaged over
2000 and 2001.
54Grub Insecticide Losses ( Recovery)
DAT Days after treatment. Data averaged over
2000 and 2001.
55Synopsis
- Negligible runoff of granular pre-emergent
herbicides - Partial (17-28) runoff of liquid post-emergent
herbicides from concrete - Imidacloprid losses approximately 90 from
concrete (new chemistry) - Chlorpyrifos and diazinon had negligible losses
(old, now banned)
56Synopsis
- Pesticide runoff from concrete dependent on type
retail similar to professional - Winter thaws and excessive precipitation
- (gt 2 in/hr) cause turf runoff
57Conclusions
- Avoid misapplication to impervious surfaces
- Use drop spreaders
- Sweep up missapplications
- Turf not major source of nonpoint pollution
58Prevent Environmental Contamination
- Use pesticides w/ low solubility and high Koc in
sensitive areas - Do not apply to saturated soils or when 0.5 inch
or more rainfall expected - Avoid inadvertent deposition into surface waters
- Reduce urban runoff use pervious surfaces
(turf, prairie, woodlots, turf pavers, etc.)