DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA 21-213 ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA 21-213 ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATION

Description:

taking 500 mg. niacin/day. have or have had hepatitis or liver disease ... Use 500 mg niacin/day 90% Use other cholesterol drugs 88% Label says: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: micros73
Learn more at: http://www.fda.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA 21-213 ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATION


1
DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA 21-213 ADVISORY COMMITTEE
PRESENTATION
2
Mevacor CC Label Comprehension Study 201
  • Karen Lechter, J.D., Ph.D.
  • Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and
    Communications
  • July 13, 2000

3
Presentation Overview
  • Purpose and Methodology of Label Comprehension
    Studies
  • Mevacor Study Characteristics and Results
  • Potential for Misuse
  • Comparison with Earlier Labels
  • Conclusions

4
Purpose and Methodology of Label Comprehension
Studies
5
Purpose of Label Comprehension Studies
  • 21 CFR 330.10(a)(4)(v)OTC labels shall be
    written in such terms as to render them likely
    to be read and understood by the ordinary
    individual, including individuals of low
    comprehension, under customary conditions of
    purchase and use
  • Low comprehension lt8th grade reading

6
Methodology of Label Comprehension Studies
  • Malls, other public gathering places
  • Special populations recruited from
  • phone lists
  • advertisements
  • May or may be potential users

7
Types of Questions
  • Open-ended--no response suggested
  • Closed-ended--possible responses given
  • true/false, yes/no, multiple choice
  • Levels of questions
  • simple--identify if information is on label
  • more difficult--regurgitate or recognize
  • even more difficult--apply information

8
Types of Questions to Avoid
  • Leading questions--suggest response
  • Questions assuming knowledge
  • Provide information participant may not know
  • Series of questions, most answered the same way
    (e.g. see a doctor)

9
Procedure
  • Show outer carton
  • Usually leave in view
  • Ask questions
  • May show leaflet, brochure, etc.
  • leave in view
  • Ask questions

10
  • Mevacor Study Characteristics

11
Mevacor Study Characteristics
  • Open ended 6
  • Multiple choice 34
  • Biasing series 2
  • Leading questions 4
  • Response choices faulty 12

12
Mevacor Study Characteristics contd
  • Assume information 5
  • Matching info. on label 3

13
Mevacor Study Characteristics contd
  • No hypotheticals--do not know if can apply
    information to variety of situations
  • Could have avoided leading questions
  • Could have produced more confidence in results
  • No questions about self-use

14
Communication Objectives
  • Condition product is for
  • Correct dosage
  • /dose, /day, /week
  • Appropriate age/gender
  • men age 40, women post menopause
  • Things to do before use
  • know total cholesterol level
  • call toll-free number if unsure
  • know Rx products currently taking

15
Communication Objectives, contd
  • Appropriate total and LDL cholest. levels for use
  • When talk to Dr.
  • total cholesterol over 240
  • heart disease, stroke, diabetes
  • hypertension
  • drink 3 or more alcohol beverages

16
Communication Objectives, contd
  • Warnings against use if
  • taking cyclosporine, erythromycin
  • taking other cholesterol drugs
  • taking 500 mg. niacin/day
  • have or have had hepatitis or liver disease
  • pregnant or breast-feeding, or may become pregnant

17
Communication Objectives, contd
  • Serious muscle side effects can occur if use
    other drugs with Mevacor CC

18
Additional Objectives
  • Do internal package materials enhance
    comprehension of important elements?
  • Is this label better than label in earlier study?
  • Do subgroups score similarly to representative
    sample?
  • Low literate
  • Safety risk

19
Participants
  • N502
  • Age 18 and older
  • Not necessarily concerned about cholesterol
  • 84 Low Literate (below 9th grade reading)
  • 96 Safety Risk
  • contraindicated meds
  • allergic
  • hepatitis or liver disease
  • Other Ineligible

20
Results--Well Understood
  • Purpose for using 97
  • Dosing 96-99
  • Things to know before use 91-94
  • total-c, Rx drugs, call if unsure
  • Who must consult Dr. before use 90-93
  • heart disease, stroke, diabetes
  • Age/sex or menopause
  • requirements 92-94

21
Results--Well Understood
  • Do not use if
  • Pregnant or breast feeding 93
  • Use gt500 mg niacin/day 90
  • Use other cholesterol drugs 88
  • Label says
  • talk to Dr. if 3 drinks/day 91
  • potentially serious s.e.s if use with
  • other drugs 91

22
Results--Moderately Understood
  • Do not use if
  • Have/had hepatitis or liver disease 83
  • Use erythromycin 80
  • Use cyclosporine 81

23
Results--Poorly Understood
  • Which women and men cannot use
  • Pre-menopausal 59
  • doesnt say 28
  • Menlt40 56
    doesnt say 33
  • gt240 mg/dL talk to Dr. 70
  • can use 18

24
Results--Data Not Clear
  • Check cholesterol in 8 weeks 85
  • Use with diet and exercise 85-86

25
No Data
  • Could participants use product themselves?
    (cross-checked with medical information)
  • Need several criteria at once for use (total-C,
    LDL, age for men, menopausal status for women)

26
Lower Low Literacy Scores
  • Low literate scored lower than non-low literate
    on 16 questions
  • Range of differences was 8-22 percentage points
  • Average difference12 percentage points

27
Safety Risk Scores
  • Scored the same as non-Safety Risk for
  • all but 3 items

28
Scores After Internal Materials
  • Premenopausal women should not use 59-77
  • Men lt age 40 should not use
    56-74
  • Total cholesterol gt240 should not use
    70-87
  • Most numerical differences not significant
  • Methodology confounded by 2 tests

29
  • Potential For Misuse

30
Potential for Misuse
  • Correct
  • Premenopausal women 59
  • Men lt40 56
  • Total-Cgt240 mg/dL 70
  • Simultaneous application of criteria

31
  • Comparison with Earlier Label

32
Comparison with Earlier Label
  • Comparisons with prior label comprehension
    results inappropriate
  • No head-to-head comparisons

33
  • Conclusions

34
Conclusions
  • Participants understand some important aspects of
    the label
  • Some issues moderately or poorly understood, or
    results unclear
  • Critical information not tested

35
Conclusions
  • Significant numbers may not understand who should
    not use
  • Inadequate information on
  • simultaneous requirements for use
  • need further cholesterol checks
  • applying information
  • appropriate self-selection

36
Conclusions
  • Evidence inadequate to conclude consumers can
    use safely and effectively in an OTC situation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com