Title: INTRODUCTION TO SALES LAW
1INTRODUCTION TO SALES LAW
2LAW OF CONTRACTS
- COMMON LAW OF CONTRACTS
- UCC - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
- CISG INTERNATIONAL B2B SALE OF GOODS
3COMMON LAW OF CONTRACTS
- Foundation of US contract law
- State court decisions
- Governs a wide array of contracts services,
land, business agreements, employment
consulting
4UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
- ARTICLE 2
- Governs the sale and purchase of goods
-
- GOODS - tangible personal property
- Includes business and consumer goods
-
5MIXED TRANSACTIONS
- Predominant Factor Test
- Whether the primary purpose of the contract is
services (with goods incidental) or goods (with
services incidental) - To determine predominant factor, courts examine
- Language of contract, the nature of the
suppliers business, the reason for the contract,
and relative amounts charged for goods services
6MIXED TRANSACTIONS
- Krietzer v. Land OLakes
- Contract for chicken feed and consulting services
was a sale of goods - AAF McQuay v. MJC, Inc.
- Contract for application of anti-corrosive
coating to air conditioner coils was deemed a
sale of goods
7UCITA UNIFORM CONSUMER INFORMATION TRANSACTIONS
ACT
- Governs computer information transaction
- Defined as an agreement to create, modify,
transfer, or license computer information or
rights in computer information - Adopted only in Virginia and Maryland
-
8SOFTWARE AS A SALE OF GOODS?
- Ilan v. Netscout
- Packaged software license considered a sale of
goods - Multi-Tech v. Floreat
- Computer software design and development contract
not a sale of goods
9ELEMENTS OF A SALES CONTRACT
- MUTUAL ASSENT
- FREE AND VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT
- CONSIDERATION
- PRICE BARGAINED FOR AND PAID FOR A PROMISE
- CAPACITY
- COMPETENT PARTIES
- LAWFUL PURPOSE
- CONTRACT OBJECTIVE CANNOT VIOLATE THE LAW OR
PUBLIC POLICY - FORM OF CONTRACT
- STATUTE OF FRAUDS WRITING IS REQUIRED FOR SOME
CONTRACTS
10PARTIES TO A SALES CONTRACT
- MERCHANTS
- Person who regularly deals in goods of the kind
in the transaction - Person who holds himself out as having knowledge
or skill relating to goods - NONMERCHANTS
11MUTUAL ASSENT
- THE MEETING OF THE MINDS
- THE OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE
12FIRM OFFER
- WRITTEN OFFER FOR SALE OF GOODS
- SIGNED BY A MERCHANT
- THAT STATES IT WILL BE HELD OPEN
- IRREVOCABLE FOR TIME STATED OR REASONABLE TIME
(MAX. 3 MONTHS)
13THE ACCEPTANCE
- MANNER OF ACCEPTANCE
- Orders to ship goods
- TERMS OF THE ACCEPTANCE
- Battle of the Forms
14BATTLE OF THE FORMS
- Whose Terms Govern The Sales Contract
- Affects warranties, remedies and other rights of
the parties under a sales contract - Buyers purchase order form often has different
terms than sellers invoice - UCC has complicated rule (2-207) to resolve the
differences
15COMMON LAW APPROACH TO BATTLE OF THE FORMS
- MIRROR IMAGE RULE ACCEPTANCE WITH CHANGED
TERMS IS COUNTEROFFER - LAST SHOT RULE LAST FORM EXCHANGED BY
PARTIES USUALLY GOVERNED CONTRACT
16UCC APPROACH 2-207
- ACCEPTANCE WITH ADDITIONAL OR DIFFERENT TERMS
CONSTITUTES AN ACCEPTANCE UNLESS - ACCEPTANCE IS MADE EXPRESSLY CONDITIONAL UPON
AGREEMENT TO THE TERMS (COUNTEROFFER)
17ADDITIONAL TERMS BECOME PART OF THE CONTRACT
BETWEEN MERCHANTS UNLESS
- THE OFFER LIMITS ACCEPTANCE TO ITS TERMS OR
- ADDITIONAL TERMS MATERIALLY ALTER THE CONTRACT OR
- OFFEROR OBJECTS TO THE TERMS
18WHAT IS A MATERIAL ALTERATION?
- Term in contract that would be surprise
(unexpected) or hardship to other party - Terms changing standard warranty protections or
requiring arbitration of disputes have generally
been held to be material
19Knock Out Rule For Different Terms In
Acceptance
- Knock Out Rule conflicting terms cancel each
other out different terms do not become part of
the contract - E.g., Flender v. Tippins, purchase order had
binding arbitration clause, invoice required
lawsuit in Chicago, neither term was binding
20Fall Back Rule
- Conduct may indicate a contract even if the
writings do not, e.g., seller ships buyer
accepts the goods - If so the contract consists of those terms on
which the writings agree plus UCC gap fillers
21DEFENSES TO SALES CONTRACT
- FRAUD, DURESS, UNDUE INFLUENCE, INCAPACITY ETC.
- UNCONSCIONABILITY
- GROSSLY UNFAIR CONTRACT
22CONSIDERATION
- MODIFICATION OF SALES CONTRACT
-
- NEW CONSIDERATION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR BINDING
MODIFICATION OF SALE OF GOODS CONTRACT - GOOD FAITH IS REQUIRED
23UCC STATUTE OF FRAUDS THE WRITING REQUIREMENT
- A CONTRACT FOR THE SALE OF GOODS WHERE THE PRICE
IS 500 OR GREATER - 1,000 RULE FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY LEASES
24UCC REQUIREMENTS FOR THE WRITING
- CONTENT REQUIREMENT
- MUST INDICATE THERE IS A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE
PARTIES AND - CONTAIN QUANTITY OF GOODS (NEED NOT CONTAIN
PRICE) - SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT
- MUST BE SIGNED BY THE PARTY TO BE CHARGED UNLESS
THERE IS A BINDING CONFIRMATORY LETTER
25 CONFIRMATORY LETTER RULE
- PARTIES MUST BE MERCHANTS
- MUST BE CONFIRMATORY LETTER SENT BY ONE PARTY AND
RECEIVED BY ANOTHER - THE LETTER IS NOT REPUDIATED IN WRITING IN TEN
DAYS
26STATUTE OF FRAUDS EXCEPTIONS
- Full payment or acceptance of goods
- Part payment/partial acceptance
- Divisible/indivisible goods
- Specially manufactured goods
- Judicial admissions
27INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT
- COURSE OF PERFORMANCE
- Manner in which the parties have performed the
existing contract - COURSE OF DEALING
- Manner in which the parties have performed
several contracts - USAGE OF TRADE
- Custom within industry, trade or profession
28GOOD FAITH
- PARTIES OBLIGATED TO PERFORM IN GOOD FAITH
- Merchants honesty plus reasonable commercial
standards of fair dealing in the trade - Nonmerchants honesty in fact
29Format Briefing Cases
- Facts
- Relevant Factual Circumstances Procedural
History - Issue - Legal Question in Case
- Decision
- Decision of Appellate Court (not lower
court/jury) - Reasons
- Rationale for Courts Decision
- Managerial Implications
- Significance of Law/Case to Business
30Format Case Problems
- Facts
- Issue
- What is the issue of law presented by case?
- Law
- What legal rules apply to the issue?
- Application
- How should the rules apply to facts of case?
- Conclusion
- What is the outcome of your analysis? Who wins?
Who loses? Why?