The Bible and Homosexuality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

The Bible and Homosexuality

Description:

According to Strong's, PAIS is, ... Vine's Expository Dictionary of New ... 'The same Hebrew word that is used in Genesis 2:24 to describe how Adam felt ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:205
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: hpcus263
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Bible and Homosexuality


1
The Bible and Homosexuality
  • Does the Bible approve of gay or lesbian
    relationships?

2
Recent Billboards
  • Does God approve of homosexuality?
  • Most Christians would probably answer no.
  • Yet, some recent billboards in Indianapolis would
    have us believe otherwise.
  • Today, lets consider these statements and their
    implications.

3
Background Information
  • The religious group funding these signs is called
    the Jesus Metropolitan Community Church.
  • According to their web site, one of their main
    missions is,
  • Doing Justice. Followers of Christ are called to
    care passionately about fairness and equity in
    society.  The Bible is filled with examples of
    people called by God to advocate justice e.g.,
    Moses, Esther, Gideon, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and (of
    course) Jesus. God seems to give every
    generation of Christians an opportunity to make
    earth a little more like heaven. Historical
    examples include slavery, child labor, voting
    rights for women, and the civil rights movement
    for African Americans. In our generation, we
    believe justice for gay and transgender people is
    a critical justice issue.
  • http//www.jesusmcc.org/about/belief.html

4
Background Information
  • Their history is described on their site
  • Our Church was founded in 1990 by a Bible study
    group of 18 devout gay Christians who -- at the
    time -- could find no other Indianapolis church
    that would fully welcome them.  They organized
    Jesus MCC as a member congregation in a
    denomination called Metropolitan Community
    Churches -- an international fellowship of
    Christian churches with a special outreach to
    gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT)
    people.
  • In the early days of Jesus MCC, our outreach was
    focused almost exclusively on the GLBT Community.
  • A few years ago, however, it began to occur to us
    -- as our congregation continued its rapid growth
    -- that there are many straight people who would
    deeply appreciate what we offer-- i.e., a vibrant
    congregation that loves Jesus and the Bible, but
    isn't afraid of diversity and independent
    thought.
  • We are now very intentional about welcoming all
    people straight or gay.
  • But we are also determined to stay true to our
    roots.  We consider it an honor that there are
    more GLBT people in our congregation than in any
    other church in Middle America. And all people in
    our congregation -- both straight and gay -- feel
    deep sadness that so many churches have long
    shunned GLBT people. We are determined to
    continue aggressively expanding our outreach to
    GLBT people.
  • http//www.jesusmcc.org/about/history.html

5
Background Information
  • The Pastor for JMCC is Jeff Miner, who
    according to their web site is an avowed
    homosexual.
  • Jeff is 45 years old and lives with his spouse
    of twelve years, David Zier, who is a biomedical
    engineer. Jeff was born and raised in
    Indianapolis, and has made a long-term commitment
    to Jesus MCC.
  • http//www.jesusmcc.org/about/ministers.html
  • In the fall of 2000, Jeff Miner and John Welch
    had a religious debate about the issue of
    homosexuality.
  • He is a kind, intelligent man and seems sincere
    in his beliefs and is obviously very zealous in
    espousing his beliefs.
  • He claims to believe in the Bible and uses it to
    defend his beliefs.
  • Yet, are they true?
  • Is he giving a valid and proper representation of
    the Bible or allowing prejudice to guide his
    interpretation?

6
  • Their first Scriptural justification comes from
    Matthew 85-13.
  • Based on this passage, they claim Jesus affirmed
    a gay couple.
  • Now when Jesus had entered Capernaum, a
    centurion came to Him, pleading with Him, 6
    saying, Lord, my servant is lying at home
    paralyzed, dreadfully tormented. 7 And Jesus
    said to him, I will come and heal him. 8 The
    centurion answered and said, Lord, I am not
    worthy that You should come under my roof. But
    only speak a word, and my servant will be healed.
    9 For I also am a man under authority, having
    soldiers under me. And I say to this one, Go,
    and he goes and to another, Come, and he
    comes and to my servant, Do this, and he does
    it. 10 When Jesus heard it, He marveled, and
    said to those who followed, Assuredly, I say to
    you, I have not found such great faith, not even
    in Israel! 11 And I say to you that many will
    come from east and west, and sit down with
    Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of
    heaven. 12 But the sons of the kingdom will be
    cast out into outer darkness. There will be
    weeping and gnashing of teeth. 13 Then Jesus
    said to the centurion, Go your way and as you
    have believed, so let it be done for you. And
    his servant was healed that same hour (NKJV)
  • Did anybody see anything there about a gay couple?

7
  • Lets read it from a more modern version, the
    Contemporary English Version.
  • When Jesus was going into the town of Capernaum,
    an army officer came up to him and said, 6"Lord,
    my servant is at home in such terrible pain that
    he can't even move."     7"I will go and heal
    him," Jesus replied.
  •     8But the officer said, "Lord, I'm not good
    enough for you to come into my house. Just give
    the order, and my servant will get well. 9I have
    officers who give orders to me, and I have
    soldiers who take orders from me. I can say to
    one of them, Go!' and he goes. I can say to
    another, Come!' and he comes. I can say to my
    servant, Do this!' and he will do it."
  •     10When Jesus heard this, he was so surprised
    that he turned and said to the crowd following
    him, "I tell you that in all of Israel I've never
    found anyone with this much faith! 11Many people
    will come from everywhere to enjoy the feast in
    the kingdom of heaven with Abraham, Isaac, and
    Jacob. 12But the ones who should have been in the
    kingdom will be thrown out into the dark. They
    will cry and grit their teeth in pain."
  •     13Then Jesus said to the officer, "You may go
    home now. Your faith has made it happen."
  •    Right then his servant was healed.
  • Did anybody see anything in that passage about a
    gay couple?

8
  • Lets try it one more time from The Message,
  • As Jesus entered the village of Capernaum, a
    Roman captain came up in a panic and said,
    "Master, my servant is sick. He can't walk. He's
    in terrible pain."
  •  7Jesus said, "I'll come and heal him."
  •  8-9"Oh, no," said the captain. "I don't want to
    put you to all that trouble. Just give the order
    and my servant will be fine. I'm a man who takes
    orders and gives orders. I tell one soldier,
    'Go,' and he goes to another, 'Come,' and he
    comes to my slave, 'Do this,' and he does it."
  •  10-12Taken aback, Jesus said, "I've yet to come
    across this kind of simple trust in Israel, the
    very people who are supposed to know all about
    God and how he works. This man is the vanguard of
    many outsiders who will soon be coming from all
    directionsstreaming in from the east, pouring in
    from the west, sitting down at God's kingdom
    banquet alongside Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Then
    those who grew up 'in the faith' but had no faith
    will find themselves out in the cold, outsiders
    to grace and wondering what happened."
  •  13Then Jesus turned to the captain and said,
    "Go. What you believed could happen has
    happened." At that moment his servant became
    well.
  • Did anybody see anything in that passage about a
    gay couple?
  • So, where does it come from?

9
  • If you want to understand why they believe this
    referred to a gay couple, youll have to go to
    their web sites explanation,
  • The Greek word that the Roman centurion uses in
    this passage to describe the sick man pais is
    the same word used in ancient Greek to refer to a
    same-gender partner.
  • Okay, so lets look up the definition of the
    word, PAIS, and see if this is true.
  • According to Thayers Definition, PAIS is
  • 1) a child, boy or girl
  • 1a) infants, children
  • 2) servant, slave
  • 2a) an attendant, servant, spec. a kings
    attendant, minister
  • According to Strongs, PAIS is,
  • Perhaps from G3817 a boy (as often beaten with
    impunity), or (by analogy) a girl, and
    (generally) a child specifically a slave or
    servant (especially a minister to a king and by
    eminence to God) - child, maid (-en), (man)
    servant, son, young man.
  • Does anyone see same-gender partner in those
    definitions?

10
  • Lets look up PAIS in a few other places too.
  • Liddell and Scott state in their Greek-English
    Lexicon,
  • 1. in relation to descent, a child, whether son
    or daughter (Euripides, 480-406 BC)
  • 2. in relation to age, a child, either a boy,
    youth, lad or a girl, maiden (Homer, 900-800
    BC)
  • 3. in relation to condition, a slave, servant,
    man or maid, (Aeschylus 525-456 BC) (p. 585).
  • Bauer, Arndt, Danker and Gingrich in
    Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and
    Other Early Christian Literature,
  • Point out that beyond the common meaning of PAIS
    there are applications to men in their
    relationship to God, angels, and Christ in His
    relationship to the Father (pp. 604-605).
  • Does anybody see same-gender partner or gay
    couple in any of those definitions of the word?
  • Friends, the lesson in Matthew 8 is not the faith
    of a gay man, it is the faith of a Gentile man
    beyond that of the Jews!

11
  • While we are in Matthew, notice another passage
    cited by the billboards.
  • Now, according to the billboard, this passage is
    going to teach some are born gay.
  • The New King James Version of Matthew 1910-12,
  • His disciples said to Him, If such is the case
    of the man with his wife, it is better not to
    marry.
  • 11 But He said to them, All cannot accept this
    saying, but only those to whom it has been given
    12 For there are eunuchs who were born thus from
    their mothers womb, and there are eunuchs who
    were made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs
    who have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom
    of heavens sake. He who is able to accept it,
    let him accept it.
  • Does anyone see Jesus saying some are born gay
    in this passage? What about lesbian? Bisexual?

12
  • Lets try the Amplified Bible and see if it opens
    our understanding.
  • The disciples said to Him, If the case of a man
    with his wife is like this, it is neither
    profitable nor advisable to marry. 11But He said
    to them, Not all men can accept this saying, but
    it is for those to whom the capacity to receive
    it has been given.  12For there are eunuchs who
    have been born incapable of marriage and there
    are eunuchs who have been made so by men and
    there are eunuchs who have made themselves
    incapable of marriage for the sake of the kingdom
    of heaven. Let him who is able to accept this
    accept it.
  • Does anybody see something about being born gay
    in this passage?

13
  • So, why would they believe this?
  • Once again, you need to go to their web site,
  • Here Jesus refers to "eunuchs who have been so
    from birth." This terminology ("born eunuchs")
    was used in the ancient world to refer to
    homosexual men. Jesus indicates that being a
    "born eunuch" is a gift from God.
  • http//wouldjesusdiscriminate.com/biblical_evidenc
    e/born_gay.html
  • While JMCC tries to claim eunuch is equivalent
    to homosexual lets see if it is defined that
    way.

14
  • Vines Expository Dictionary of New Testament
    Words says of EUNOUCHOS,
  • denotes (a) an emasculated man, a eunuch, Matt.
    1912 (b) in the 3rd instance in that verse, one
    naturally incapacitated for, or voluntarily
    abstaining from, wedlock (c) one such, in a
    position of high authority in a court, a
    chamberlain, Acts 827-39.
  • The previously cited Thayers says,
  • 1) a bed keeper, bed guard, superintendent of the
    bedchamber, chamberlain
  • 1a) in the palace of oriental monarchs who
    support numerous wives the superintendent of the
    womens apartment or harem, an office held by
    eunuchs
  • 1b) an emasculated man, a eunuch
  • 1b1) eunuchs in oriental courts held by other
    offices of greater, held by the Ethiopian eunuch
    mentioned in Act_827-39.
  • 1c) one naturally incapacitated
  • 1c1) for marriage
  • 1c2) begetting children
  • 1d) one who voluntarily abstains from marriage
  • Perhaps I need my rose-colored glasses, but I do
    not see homosexual men in any of those
    definitions.

15
  • Lets break down Matthew 1912
  • The first phrase says,
  • For there are eunuchs who were born thus from
    their mothers womb
  • Some are born with physical imperfections or
    deformities and are unable to perform.
  • The second phrase says,
  • and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by
    men
  • In many royal palaces men were intentionally
    castrated as they served the royal harem.
  • The third phrase says,
  • and there are eunuchs who have made themselves
    eunuchs for the kingdom of heavens sake.
  • Those who choose not to indulge in a sexual
    relationship to devote themselves more fully to
    the kingdom of God (see 1 Cor. 732-33).
  • No competent translator or interpreter sees this
    as a passage celebrating being born gay.

16
  • The same basic argument is used by JMCC with the
    Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8.
  • They say,
  • In the ancient world, eunuchs were widely
    associated with homosexuality. Here a self-avowed
    eunuch is welcomed in to the early church without
    any concerns about his sexual orientation. He was
    welcomed on the same basis as other people his
    faith in Jesus Christ.
  • http//wouldjesusdiscriminate.com/biblical_evidenc
    e/early_church.html
  • By reading the context, we might understand more
    of the relevance of the term eunuch.

17
  • Acts 826-40,
  • Now an angel of the Lord spoke to Philip,
    saying, Arise and go toward the south along the
    road which goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza.
    This is desert. 27 So he arose and went. And
    behold, a man of Ethiopia, a eunuch of great
    authority under Candace the queen of the
    Ethiopians, who had charge of all her treasury,
    and had come to Jerusalem to worship, 28 was
    returning. And sitting in his chariot, he was
    reading Isaiah the prophet. 29 Then the Spirit
    said to Philip, Go near and overtake this
    chariot. 30 So Philip ran to him, and heard him
    reading the prophet Isaiah, and said, Do you
    understand what you are reading? 31 And he
    said, How can I, unless someone guides me? And
    he asked Philip to come up and sit with him35
    Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning at
    this Scripture, preached Jesus to him. 36 Now as
    they went down the road, they came to some water.
    And the eunuch said, See, here is water. What
    hinders me from being baptized? 37 Then Philip
    said, If you believe with all your heart, you
    may. And he answered and said, I believe that
    Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
  • 38 So he commanded the chariot to stand still.
    And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the
    water, and he baptized him. 39 Now when they came
    up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord
    caught Philip away, so that the eunuch saw him no
    more and he went on his way rejoicing. 40 But
    Philip was found at Azotus. And passing through,
    he preached in all the cities till he came to
    Caesarea.

18
  • The reason the Biblical text stresses this
    Ethiopian is a eunuch is because of his
    occupation.
  • He worked in close contact with the queen of
    Ethiopia.
  • The context in no way implies he was a homosexual
    working with the queen.
  • Instead, he was most likely castrated in order to
    obtain this high position.
  • This helps avoid any disgraces within the royal
    palace such as infidelity, rape or illegitimate
    children.
  • This was a common practice of the culture among
    those who worked in such high positions.
  • The early church welcome an celibate man, not a
    homosexual man!

19
  • Notice the two passages cited here.
  • Genesis 224,
  • Therefore a man shall leave his father and
    mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall
    become one flesh
  • Ruth 114,
  • Then they lifted up their voices and wept again
    and Orpah kissed her mother-in-law, but Ruth
    clung to her.
  • Please notice two details
  • The word love is not used in either passage.
  • Naomi was Ruths mother-in-law (both were
    previously married and their spouses died).

20
  • JMCCs main argument from this passage is,
  • The same Hebrew word that is used in Genesis
    224 to describe how Adam felt about Eve (and how
    spouses are supposed to feel toward each other)
    is used in Ruth 114 to describe how Ruth felt
    about Naomi. Her feelings are celebrated, not
    condemned.
  • And throughout Christian history, Ruth's vow to
    Naomi has been used to illustrate the nature of
    the marriage covenant. These words are often read
    at Christian wedding ceremonies and used in
    sermons to illustrate the ideal love that spouses
    should have for one another. The fact that these
    words were originally spoken by one woman to
    another tells us a lot about how God feels about
    same-gender relationships.

21
  • The word they refer to is translated cleave in
    Genesis 224 and Ruth 114 of the KJV.
  • This is not the word love.
  • It is not a sexual word.
  • To imply this is a lesbian relationship is
    stereotyping at its worst!
  • According to Strongs it means,
  • A primitive root properly to impinge, that is,
    cling or adhere figuratively to catch by
    pursuit - abide, fast, cleave (fast together),
    follow close (hard, after), be joined (together),
    keep (fast), overtake, pursue hard, stick, take.
  • Now, lets see if the context implies a lesbian
    relationship or otherwise.

22
  • Does the context teach Ruth and Naomi were
    engaged in a lesbian relationship?
  • Ruth 11-5 teaches both Ruth and Naomi were
    widows and had been previously marriedto men.
  • Naomi kissed both of her daughters-in-law as she
    went back to Moablesbian polygamist (Ruth 19)?
  • Ruth vows to follow her mother-in-law Naomi and
    take care of her (Ruth 114-18).
  • Does the context imply this is because Ruth
    desired a sexual relationship with Naomi?
  • Or, does it imply that Ruth wanted to take care
    of Naomi because she had no one else to do so
    (Ruth 120-21 211-12)?
  • If this is a homosexual relationship
  • Why does Naomi encourage Ruths relationship with
    Boaz (31)?
  • Why does Ruth marry Boazchange her mind (413)?
  • Context often exposes false teaching!

23
  • At the death of Jonathan, David lamented,
  • I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan
    you have been very pleasant to me your love to
    me was wonderful, surpassing the love of women
    (2 Samuel 126).
  • The key mistake made by homosexuals in this
    passage is equating sex with love.
  • The passage does not say,
  • Your sex to me was wonderful, surpassing the sex
    of women.
  • It uses the word love.

24
  • If lovesex then think of these ridiculous
    consequences
  • All Israel and Judah had sex with David (1 Sam.
    1816).
  • God has had sex with the whole world (Jn. 316).
  • Jesus teaches us to have sex with our neighbors
    (Matthew 2237).
  • Peter taught us to have sex with the brethren (1
    Peter 122 217).
  • It is pretty pathetic that our world cannot
    separate love from sex!
  • Is it possible to love without it involving
    sexuality?
  • Then, it is possible for David and Jonathan too.

25
  • Yet, this is what we read from the JMCC web site,
  • At Jonathans funeral, David declares that he
    loved Jonathan more than any woman. This is just
    one of several Bible passages that describe and
    celebrate an intense love between these two men
    that went well beyond friendship.
  • http//wouldjesusdiscriminate.com/biblical_evidenc
    e/david_jonathan.html
  • This argument is completely based on supposition.

26
  • Suppose
  • 1 Samuel 181-5 had been referring to a woman?
  • He gave David his clothes and armor because he
    was infatuated with him rather than out of
    respect for a man of God?
  • In 1 Samuel 2030 Saul was angry with Jonathan
    about homosexuality instead of dynastic
    succession?
  • David and Jonathan were both unhappy in their
    heterosexual marriages and longed for each other?
  • David is speaking of sex as he talks of love
    rather than intense, sacrificial friendship?
  • Their kiss of parting was sexual rather than the
    normal expression in Eastern countries?
  • Again, this is obvious stereotyping from a group
    that does not like stereotyping!

27
What the Bible Does Teach About Homosexuality
  • From the beginning, God intended marriage to be
    between a man and woman (Gen. 224).
  • Homosexuality was an abomination in the Old
    Testament (Leviticus 1822).
  • This sin stirred up Gods anger and led to the
    destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.
  • The English word sodomy is derived from this
    event.
  • Paul declares homosexuality is against nature
    in Romans 126-27.
  • Homosexuality in its passive and active sense
    will keep us from Gods kingdom (1 Cor. 69-10).

28
Yet, homosexuality can be forgiven (1 Cor. 611)!
  • There is no temptation too great to overcome (1
    Cor. 1013).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com