Title: Capital Gains
1Chapter 8
2Authors Observation
- To date, the connection between industry and
living systems has been largely ignored natural
capital has been for the most part irrelevant to
business planning.
3Limits To Growth
- The title of a 1972 book focusing on long-term
consequences of current human patterns
(production, consumption, population growth,
industrial capacity, food production, pollution) - Caused a public furor
- Attacked by business
- People now believe there is no energy crisis
- The idea of resource limits is scoffed at today
4The word Resource
- Comes from the Latin resurgere, to rise again
- A true resource returns over and over again
- Part of a cyclical process
5Lessons from Biosphere 2
- There are some resources no amount of money can
buy - Few, if any, made-made substitutes can supply
benefits provided by nature - Think in terms of integrity of systems (cannot
interrupt or replace complex interrelations in
ecosystems) - A dynamic equilibrium can be maintained in the
face of disruptions, but only up to a point
6Environment Source of Quality
- In science there is no production, only
transformation - Sum of matter and energy remains essentially the
same (under the Law of Conservation of Matter and
Energy) - What is consumed? Not matter or energy, but
order or quality (the structure, concentration or
purity of matter)
7it is ultimately the capacity of the
photosynthetic world and its nutrient flows that
determine the quality and quantity of life on
earth.
8Natural Capital
- Sum total of ecological systems that support life
- Cannot be produced by human activity
9Some services invisibly provided by Natural
Capital that have no substitutes
- production of oxygen
- maintenance of biological genetic diversity
- purification of air water
- storage,cycling global distribution of
freshwater - regulation of chemical composition of the
atmosphere oceans - maintenance of migration and nursery habitats for
wildlife - decomposition of organic wastes
- detoxification of human industrial wastes
- Natural pest disease control
- fixation of solar energy conversion into raw
materials - soil erosion sediment control
- flood prevention regulation of runoff
- protection against harmful cosmic radiation
- regulation of climate
- formation of topsoil maintenance of fertility
- storage and recycling of nutrients
10Scientists Agree
- Ecosystem services are essential to civilization
- The ways the ecosystem operates could not
replaced by technology - Human activities are impairing the flow of
ecosystem services on a large scale - Current trends will dramatically alter or destroy
our remaining natural ecosystems within decades - (Consensus paper from Spring 1997 Issues in
Ecology)
11Scientists are frustrated by the fact that the
public does not understand the economic
implications of ecosystem services.So, they
began to shrewdly put price tags on ecosystem
services.
12Annual value of 17 ecosystem services 36
trillion
- atmospheric regulation of gases 1.3 tril
- waste processing 2.3 tril
- nutrient flows 17 tril
- water storage purification 2.8 tril
- etc., etc.
13Ecosystem Values
- Marine systems (esp. coastal) 20.9 tril
- Terrestrial systems 12.3 tril
- forests 4.7 tril
- wetlands 4.7 tril
14Valuable Acres
- Estuaries - highest annual value per acre 9240
- Primary value is not as a food source, but
capacity to provide nutrient recycling for 40
trillion cubic meters of river water each year. - Wetlands floodplains - highest per acre value
for land based services 7924 - Primary value is in flood control, storm
protection, waste treatment, recycling water
storage
15Summary Valuing Natural Capital
- If annual income from nature is 36 trillion,
nature would be roughly worth 500 trillion, an
absurdly low figure - Establishing values for natural capital is rough
and difficult, but is a step towards
incorporating the value of ecosystem services
into planning, policy public behavior
16Limiting Factors
- Prevents a system from surviving or growing if it
is absent - Economist Herman Daly, formerly of the World
Bank, states for the first time, the limits to
increased prosperity are due to the lack of
natural capital. - The limiting factor for humanity is the decline
of living systems - Investing in natural capital is a matter of
common sense
17Investing in Natural Capital
- Need to transform the sticks carrots that
guide and motivate business - Revise the tax subsidy system
- Abusers of ecosystem services impose cost on the
rest of society - A very large, money-saving, cost-free way to
invest in natural capital eliminate perverse
subsidies the practices they encourage that are
heedless of the environment
18Perverse Subsidies
- Subsidies are suppose to exert a positive outcome
- Perverse subsidies do the opposite, functioning
as disincentives - The economy environment are worse off than if
they were never granted
19Examples of Perverse Subsidies
- Money donated to dying industries
- Federal insurance to floodplain coastal
developers - Cheap land leases to ski resorts
- Bailouts to savings loan felons
- Roads in National Forests for private companies
to take wood at a fraction of its replacement
cost
20Effects of Perverse Subsidies
- Inflate the cost of government
- Add to deficits that cause a raise in taxes
- Drive out scarce capital from markets where it is
needed - Confuse investors by sending distorted signals to
markets - Suppress innovation technological change
- Provide incentives for inefficiency consumption
- A powerful form of corporate welfare
21Authors Observation
- While Americans subsidize environmental
degradation . clean technologies that will lead
to more jobs and innovation are often left to the
market
22Taxes Subsidies
- Taxes make something more expensive to buy
- Subsidies artificially lower prices
- Everyone acts on price information everyday
- When something is taxed, you buy less of it
- When you subsidize, you reduce prices stimulate
consumption
23U. S. Tax Policy
- Taxes labor heavily through personal income taxes
and Social Security levies - Encourages businesses not to employ people
24What if taxes were shifted?
- Would not redefine who pays the taxes, only what
is taxed - Shift taxes away from labor income, with the
end goal of zero taxation on employees - Shift taxes toward pollution, waste, carbon fuels
resource exploitation - Businesses could hire less expensive labor
capital to save more expensive resources - A positive feedback loop develops that
incrementally generates more demand for labor
while reducing demand for resources
25Taxing resources and waste
- gases that cause climate change
- non-renewable energy
- air traffic, vehicles, roads
- pesticides, synthetic fertilizers, phosphorous
- harvest of wild fish
- grazing rights
- irrigation water from public land
- depletion of topsoil
- pollution of aquifers
- ores and metals
- any landfill waste
26Authors Observation
- As Europe and other countries move towards tax
shifting, it will force the United States to
follow, for the very simple reason that it will
lower our competitors labor costs while spurring
innovation.
27What would businesses do?
- Conserve existing natural capital
- Forgo corporate welfare
- Finds ways to invest in increasing the supply of
its limiting factor natural capital - Look at Interface, Inc.s experience