Title: INPHO
1INPHO
- Information Network for Public Health Officials
2INPHO Goal
- Build statewide public health infrastructure for
- Linkage
- Information Access
- Electronic Information Exchange
3INPHO State Projects
- 1993-7, 15 states GA, CA, FL, IL, IN, KS, MI,
MO, NJ, NY, NC, OR, RI, WA, WV - 1998- , 9 states
- Implementation GA, FL, NY, MO
- Demonstration IA, MD, MT, NV, TX
4INPHO Results
- Approximately 16 million spent
- Developed critical infrastructure
- supports immunization registries
- Awards
- 1994 Federal Technology Leadership Award
- 1995 National Information Infrastructure Award
(Health)
5INPHO Results - 2
- Key lessons learned
- leadership
- political and organizational obstacles
- incremental steps
- Model state integrated data systems NY, MO, GA,
FL
6Health Alert Network (HAN)
- Part of CDC bioterrorism preparedness initiative
- Provide local health departments
- Internet connectivity
- Distance learning connectivity
- Training
- FY99 funding 19 million
7INPHO HAN Future
- Continued close collaboration with National
Immunization Program All Kids Count - Expand INPHO and HAN nationwide
8How to Avoid Information Technology Disasters
- William A. Yasnoff, MD, PhD
- Public Health Practice Program Office
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
9How to Cause Information Technology Disasters
- William A. Yasnoff, MD, PhD
- Public Health Practice Program Office
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
10Causing IT Disasters
- Risks of Information Technology
- Disaster Strategies Management
- Disaster Strategies Technical
- Avoiding Disasters
11Rates of IT Failure are High
- 16.2 were project successful (software
projects that are completed on-time and on-budget
among American companies and governments) - 52.7 were project challenged (they were
completed and operational but over-budget, over
the time estimate, and offer fewer features and
functions than originally scheduled) - 31.1 were project impaired (canceled)
Source Charting the Seas of Information
Technology The Standish Group 1994
12... except in Lake Wobegon
- 100 were project successful (software projects
that are completed on-time and on-budget among
Lake Wobegon companies and governmental units)
Source A Prairie Home Companion, Garrison
Keillor, National Public Radio, 1995
13Risks of IT How Projects Fail
- Functional system does not perform needed tasks
(correctly) - Users resist new system
- Management resists new system
- Cost overrun
- Delays
- Technical problems system does not work
14Sources of IT Risk
- Mismatched expectations
- Lack of knowledge by management
- Lack of accurate forecasting
- Lack of adequate communication
- Inadequate planning
- Changing specifications
- Resistance to change
- Technology
15Nolan Norton Benefit/Risk Grid
HI
BlockBuster
High Wire Acts
B e n e f i t s
Bread Butter
Dud
LO
HI
D O A B I L I T Y
16Key Elements in IT Projects
Time
Features
Budget
17Strategies for IT Failure
181. Trust the Vendor
- Buy system without clear problem specification
- Rely on single source of advice
- Ignore standards and open systems
- Select the lowest cost option
- Use only one vendor for all purchases
- Only allow use of standard, centrally approved
software
192. Delegate
- Implement and manage IT systems with different
group from purchaser - Separate strategic and operational management
- Impose cosmetic quality control standards
- Delegate operations, retain financial control
- Develop rigid job descriptions
203. Impose Rigid Controls
- Eliminate exploratory work
- Enforce conformity with current in-house
standards - Require justification for every computer system
expenditure (savings or competitive advantage) - Eliminate operational managers who take an
organization-wide view
214. Divide and Rule
- Separate business and IT functions and personnel
separate career tracks and reporting lines - Encourage competition within the organization
discourage collaboration - Maintain management ignorance of IT do not fund
IT continuing education - Underpay all IT staff
225. Use IT as Tool for Finance
- Place IT under Director of Finance
- Use IT primarily for financial control
- Focus IT efforts on executive information systems
- Move corporate staff to remote site
- Move IT staff and operations to (different)
remote site
236. Use Consultants
- Rely solely on external consultants for IT
- Use the same external consultants for management
advice - Eliminate any in-house staff that address the
areas of IT covered by the consultants
247. Set Rigid Objectives
- Impose rigid quarterly financial performance
objectives with required cost-benefit analyses of
all IT expenditures - Use IT to support and reinforce vertical patterns
of management reporting - Do not support general objectives with detailed
IT project planning
258. Control Information
- Restrict contacts between departments
- Penalize criticism of IT systems
- Avoid discussions of failures or conflicting
views - Minimize communication between management and
staff - Centralize all IT operations and development
269. Avoid User Input
- Do not consult with staff who will use or be
affected by new systems - Provide minimal training in new IT systems
- Automate all possible functions with the goal of
eliminating the maximum number of staff
27Strategies for IT Failure
281. Technical Leadership
- Appoint a technical project leader with complete
authority do not involve users - Ensure that team consists only of programmers
- Give technical team complete financial and
decision-making autonomy
292. Resources
- Provide whatever resources are requested at
outset and as project continues - Do not involve managers or users in resource
allocation - Provide latest state-of-the-art equipment,
software, and tools without regard to other IT
systems
303. Planning
- Insist on complete specification of system in
advance, including all deliverables, tasks, and
sub-tasks allow no revisions - Require strict adherence to a timetable
completely defined in advance - Allow continuous modification of requirements
throughout the project
314. Feedback
- Avoid discussing technical issues with users
- Avoid user testing of system operational concepts
- Develop complete working systems without user
involvement - Insist on user cooperation in use of new systems
even if they do not benefit
325. Technology
- Encourage development of custom software and
tools rather than use of commercial packages - Encourage use of latest technology, especially if
unproven in operational systems - Avoid purchases of any capability that can be
developed in-house
33Avoiding Disasters
- Reasons for success and failure
- Warning signs of projects in trouble
- Paradigm for IT project implementation
34Reasons Projects Fail
- Expectation Mismatch
- Poor communication
- Bad idea
- Forcing project delivery dates
- Assigning under-skilled managers
- No high-level business sponsorship
- No comprehensive plan
35Reasons Projects Succeed
- User involvement
- Senior management support
- Skilled, experienced project managers
- Clear requirements statement
- Comprehensive work plan
- Sound development methodology
- Prototyping
- Extensive Testing
36Project Failure Warning Signs
- Lack of agreement on goals
- Continuously changing requirements
- No written project implementation plan
- Rapidly growing budget
- Repeated contract modifications
- Major deliverables are late
- Project managed solely by contractor
37Paradigm for Success
- Behavior Modification
- Management
- Users
- Minimize increments of change
- Use intermittent positive reinforcement
- Provide real benefits to users
- What they want, NOT what you want
38Disaster Avoidance Pearls
- Clear goals supported by management
- Adequate budget and time
- Continuous user involvement
- Education and planning
- Use proven methods and technology
- Prototyping
- Minimize increments of change
- Behavior modification
39References
- Ennals R Executive Guide to Preventing
Information Technology Disasters (Berlin
Springer-Verlag, 1995) - Clemons EK Evaluation of Strategic Investments
in Information Technology. Communications of the
ACM 34,1 22-36, 1991. - Tapscott D Caston A Paradigm Shift The New
Promise of Information Technology (New York
McGraw-Hill, 1993)
40For Further Information
- http//weber.u.washington.edu/ ocarroll/infrmatc/
home.htm - William A. Yasnoff, MD, PhD 770/488-2503 way2_at_c
dc.gov
41(No Transcript)
42Nancy Hoffman, MSN
- Deputy Director, Center for Health Information
Management Epidemiology, Missouri Deparment of
Health - Active in MOHSAIC project since its inception in
1992 - 20 years experience in public health nursing
- MSN, U of MO-Columbia
43(No Transcript)
44Amy Zimmerman, MPH
- Chief, Childrens Preventive Services, Division
of Family Health, RI Department of Health
(Childhood Immunization, Childhood Lead
Screening, Universal Newborn Development Risk
Assessment, Family Outreach, KIDSNET) - 11 years in Dept. of Health with KIDSNET since
inception in 1993 - MPH, UNC Chapel Hill
45(No Transcript)
46Debra Sottolano
- Senior Project Coordinator, Integrated Child
Health Information System (ICHIS), Bureau of
Healthcom Network Systems Management, NY State
DOH - Formerly Director, Institute for the Advancement
of Health Care Management, SUNY-Albany - PhD candidate, Organizational Studies,
SUNY-Albany - MBA, Athabasca U, Edmonton
47(No Transcript)