Outcome of ACIP Reviews

1
Outcome of ACIP Reviews
2
Intent of ACIP Reviews

• Correct Fleet support issues
• Methodology
• Use G and J source codes as indicators
• G part isnt in ship configuration
• J part is in ship configuration, may be
  properly supported just not allowed

3
Dilemma

• How do we correct support deficiencies most
  effectively?
• Concern about junk candidatesthose with
  minimal value
• Consumable type items
• Next higher/lower APLs (response code 2,4, 8s)

4
Resolution?

• Have incorporated some techniques
• Auto assign consumables based on FSC list
• Search for higher/lowers/related based on EIC
• Whats next?
• Add detail to filtering
• Focus on G source code
• Concern about 9 and 12 response codes for G
  source coded candidates.
• These could be indicators of real/complex support
  problems

5
Recommendation

• Develop methodology to focus on troubled areas
• Recommendations from the ISEAs and TYCOMs
• NSLC can filter candidates but some decisions may
  come down type of equipment/item