Title: FIRE Engineering Summary
1FIRE Engineering Summary
Phil Heitzenroeder for the FIRE Engineering
Team Presented to the FIRE Physics Validation
Review Committee March 30, 2004
2Outline
- FIRE and its Status
- Engineering Evaluations of Coil Systems
- RD Plans for the Coil Systems
- Costs
- Summary
This talk concentrates on the coil systems
since the other key engineering systems are
covered in presentations by B. Nelson and M.
Ulrickson.
3Status
- The FIRE study began in late 1999.
- All major systems addressed.
- Preliminary cost estimates indicate a green
field cost of 1.19B. - Engineering Peer Reviews were held in June01.
Included - TF and PF coils
- Vacuum Vessel and PFCs
- Fueling and Pumping
- Nuclear effects and Activation
- Cryoplant
- Facilities and Siting
- Focused set of parameters were adopted RD plans
have been outlined. - Participated in and received good feedback from
SNOWMASS. - Many of these inputs are now reflected in the
design and the FIRE 2003-4 Engineering Report
Update - Work so far indicates all major systems can be
designed to meet or exceed requirements.
4FIRE Engineering Review Critical Issues (June
2001)
CRITICAL DESIGN ISSUES 1. FOCUS in an
expeditious manner on 2 Designs along the Q 10
zone, (not the Baseline design) that
indicate, at the Pre-Conceptual Design level, an
Engineering Margin value in the range of 1.2 to
1.3. (Done)This level of margin should also apply
to the insulation schemes. (Agreed) 2. Then
FOCUS, in an expeditious manner on one device,
either Wedged or Bucked/Wedged (to be selected by
the design team.) Done, Wedged 10T chosen 3.
Incorporated in the focusing effort should also
be the immediate design attention to the details
of leads, both TF and CS, associated cooling
fittings and design of all other critical systems
that are lacking detail at the Pre-Conceptual
level - (Not done, limited resources used to
address more global issues - I.e.,rep rate)- See
the material below and the associated attached
chits. (about 1/3 of the chits have been
addressed await resources for more detailed
items.) CRITICAL RD ISSUES 1. The qualification
of the properties, through RD of the TF coil
Materials (OFHC for the Bucked/Wedged and BeCu
for the Wedged device) in sizes and thickness
that are representative of those required for
fabrication. (Agreed, also Elbrudor for PF, will
pursue if CD-0) 2. For either device, the
qualification, through RD, of materials, that
are available today, for the insulation systems.
(Agreed, 4 Small Business Innovative Research
grants awarded by DOE for insulation development
in support of FIRE/fusion needs.)
5Key Components of FIRE
Modular Tungsten Brush Divertors
Double Walled VV with Integral Shielding.
LN2 Cooled Copper PF Coils
LN2 Cooled Segmented Central Solenoid
LN2 Cooled wedged Cu TF Coils
6Engineering Status of the TF Coil
- Stress and fatigue evaluations are performed in
accordance with the FIRE Structural Design
Criteria. - Structural stress allowable exceeds requirements
- Calculated max. membrane bending stress 611
MPa. - MB allowable for C17510 BeCu 724 MPa.
- Shear allowable exceeds requirements
- Shear required 50 MPa.
- Shear Developed 60 MPa. (200 MPa compression
m0.3) - Fatigue life exceeds requirements
- requirement 3,000 full power shots (H-Mode)
30,000 half power shots (L-Mode). - Evaluation indicates 5,000 full power shots
half power shots far exceed requirements. - Pulse Duration meets requirements gt20s flat-top
capability _at_10T
Structural model showing out of plane
displacements
7Engineering Status of the Central Solenoid and
PF Coils
- Structural stress allowable exceeds requirements
- 1.5 Sm Allowable for Elbrodur at that
temperature 541 - Highest Max. VonMises stress is 414 MPa. at EOB
for CS2 coils. - Max. Temperature (at EOC) of 188 K. Is well
within temp. limit of 373 K. - Fatigue more work required.
- The FIRE design criteria requires a Factor of
Safety (FS) of 20 on the number of cycles - The CS-2 coil does not meet this requirement for
H-mode operation its FS is 15.
8Meeting FIREs Operating Pulse Requirements
- As noted in the previous slide, the CS-2 coil
falls short of the 20 X life ASME-Like fatigue,
based on currently available fatigue information
on Elbrodur . - Possible remedies
- Work with the copper suppliers to develop
Elbrodur with improved fatigue properties and
more extensive testing of existing materials. - Use a strip-wound copper design for all CS and PF
coils. - It is expected that metallurgical flaws will be
smaller. - inspection for flaws will be easier with strip
compared to plate. - Use a fracture based fatigue analysis rather than
traditional fatigue analysis. - This requires quantification of flaw size, but
requirements for multiples of life are reduced to
4. - Requires investigation to see if, with expected
flaw size, this is a net win. - Other possibilities
- Carefully review the required operating pulse
spectrum required for FIREs mission. We may find
that the current fatigue life is acceptable. - Another option might be to use the aircraft
approach i.e., design the engine (central
solenoid) to be readily replaced while still
within its safe operating lifetime.
9Coil RD Highlights
- FIREs magnet systems have relatively modest RD
needs - Cryo cooled copper design.
- Much data to draw upon from CIT/BPX IGNITOR
ALCATOR C-Mod. - RD Focus
- Filling gaps in data bases of materials
(Elbrodur insulators) - RD which may permit higher performance (refined
design criteria optimized materials improved
inspection techniques) - Cost reduction (manufacturing process
development materials selection) - Risk mitigation (component testing prototypes).
10TF Copper BeCu Plate Developed for BPX Should
Meet FIREs Needs.
- The C17510 BeCu plate shown was produced for BPX
by Brush-Wellman. - Properties and size are very similar to those
required for FIRE. - Brush-Wellman requires modest RD to establish
production details.
11Copper Joining RD
- C17510 BeCu
- C10200 OFHC
- RD is planned to develop friction stir or e-beam
welding for joining the TF copper segments. - RD is also planned for electroform welding for
possible use in the PF coils.
12PF Coil Conductor RD
- The CS and ring coils all use Elbrodur CuCrZr
copper. - RD will focus on
- Processing to optimize fatigue properties.
- Inspection techniques to reliably measure flaw
sizes. - Characterization of physical properties for the
Elbrodur conductor in the sizes and forms FIRE
plans to use. -
13Radiation Resistant Insulating Materials RD
- Requirements
- FIRE plans 3,000 full power D-T shots producing
5 TJ of neutrons 30,000 half power D-D shots
producing 0.5 TJ of neutrons. - End of life peak insulation dose 1.05 x 1010
rads. - BPX insulation would meet this requirement
- This is a high leverage area since it has the
potential of permitting a greater number of D-T
shots . It has a strong bearing on reliability
and risk mitigation. - Plans
- Collaborate with several existing SBIRs which
are underway to develop high radiation resistant
insulating materials with good processing
characteristics. - Characterize and life test the friction
characteristics of insulating materials required
between the CS coils and in the TF coils.
14Costs
15Summary
- The FIRE study has addressed all major systems.
- Results have been encouraging no show
stoppers in technical or cost areas. - An Engineering Peer Review was held in 2001.
- FIRE adopted a focused set of parameters in FY
01, as recommended. - The other detailed recommendations have been
addressed. - Favorable comments about depth of analysis,
considering we are in Pre-Conceptual design
phase. - RD plans have been developed.
- FIREs Cryo cooled Cu design has modest RD
requirements lots of data to draw upon. - RD will focus on areas which will reduce
uncertainties and costs and can improve
performance. - FIRE participated in and received much feedback
from SNOWMASS in 02. Much of this has been
factored into FIREs design and plans. - Preliminary cost estimate is 1.19 B. If a site
with modest credits is identified, the 1B cost
goal can most likely be achieved.