Inspections and Risks: A Regulatory perspective on Aseptic Processing PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 55
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Inspections and Risks: A Regulatory perspective on Aseptic Processing


1
Inspections and Risks A Regulatory perspective
on Aseptic Processing
  • Paul Hargreaves
  • Inspection Enforcement Division
  • Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
    Agency
  • United Kingdom

2
What is a risk based inspection?
  • Aseptic processing is by definition a high
    risk
  • a risk for the patient in terms of infection
  • a risk to the company in terms of rejection rate
    and adverse publicity

3
Risk based inspections
  • A risk based inspection consists of two
    components
  • The company
  • The process
  • Whilst this presentation concentrates on the
    process (aseptic processing) I will spend a few
    minutes describing a risk based company
    inspection.

4
Company risk based inspection
  • What signals do we look for?
  • Rule of Thumb The number of times company
    personnel say Quality in a sentence is
    inversely proportional to the quality of their
    quality system.
  • Example We believe in quality and ensure that
    our customers only receive a quality product
    manufactured under our strict quality policy to
    the highest quality standards.

5
Risk based inspections
  • This is a real example, and during inspection we
    found that Quality was a marketing term and did
    not reflect the actuality.
  • Many critical deficiencies were identified as
    there was not a robust quality system in place.
  • Positive signal A company that has a mature and
    well implemented quality system in place does not
    mention Quality as it is a given (assumed).

6
Other Signals
  • Many companies do not recognise the other signals
    they give to Regulatory Authorities which
    identify them as High Risk.
  • Marketing led companies
  • Batch out of specification OK what market will
    accept it? We receive complaints from
    regulatory authorities when Agents try to sell
    OOS products in their countries.

7
Other Signals
  • Production led companies
  • Manufacturing do everything environmental
    monitoring, validation, investigations, problem
    solving etc.
  • Quality Assurance are just a token to rubber
    stamp everything that manufacturing do and give
    it some legitimacy.

8
Other Signals
  • Personality led companies
  • Strong personality overrules role function.
  • Role clarity not clear within the company.

9
Other Signals
  • Regulatory Dept. located and seen as a Head
    Office function
  • Poor communication with QA, QC and manufacturing
  • Leads to significant discrepancies with the
    Marketing Authorisations and failure to meet
    post-marketing commitments.

10
Risk based inspections
  • Risk assessment based upon previous inspections
  • Systemic weaknesses identified over a period of
    years
  • In depth inspection of previously identified
    weaknesses
  • May identify Critical or Major Deficiencies

11
Risk based inspections
  • Risk assessment based upon knowledge of common
    aseptic processing issues
  • Inadequate environmental monitoring programmes
  • Inadequate control over equipment autoclave
    sterilisation cycles
  • Inappropriate behaviour in clean rooms

12
Risk based inspections
  • Inadequate sanitisation of equipment, tools and
    utensils into the clean room
  • Changing rooms being too small with inadequate
    segregation
  • Inappropriate process and personnel flow
  • Single door autoclaves instead of double door

13
Risk based inspections
  • An inspector may use one or the other techniques
    but usually a combination of both during an
    inspection
  • The inspector is looking to find Critical
    deficiencies on Day 1, Major on Day 2 and Other
    on Day 3.
  • Long gone are the days of a general inspection
    - the inspector is focussed on risk and is
    trained to do this.

14
The Big Issue
  • Many companies, large and small collect a large
    amount of data.
  • What they fail to do is to convert data into
    information.
  • If they had information they could then convert
    this into knowledge about the process.

15
What is information and knowledge?
  • Data is pages and pages of results
  • Information is, for example, trending the results
  • Knowledge is about having a thorough
    understanding of the whole process. This is what
    PAT is all about - converting data into
    knowledge.

16
What is the role of PAT in aseptic processing?
  • The principles are the same
  • A settle plate or contact plate can provide as
    much information as a NIR spectrum - it is how
    you process the data that counts.
  • Its not just numbers - its species and how they
    got into the clean room and from where that
    counts.

17
The sum total
  • Risk is cumulative
  • Silo mentality
  • Each manufacturing department knows there is a
    problem but nobody can see the big picture
  • Minor problems in each Dept. cumulatively add to
    Major and eventually Critical deficiencies.

18
The sum total
  • Why does the inspector identify the sum total
    problem and not the company?
  • We need to look at how an inspector works

19
MEDIA PREPARATION
  • High quality microbiological growth medium,
    prepared to the highest standard is critical.
  • The whole of the monitoring programme is
    dependant upon this.
  • There is little point in examining monitoring
    data without first inspecting media preparation.

20
TSB
Tube B
Tube A
Which tube of TSB is unsuitable for use and why?
21
WHAT INSPECTORS LOOK FOR
  • Overcooking of media (some media have to be
    heated to dissolve it).
  • Excessive autoclave cycles. A target of Fo 8.
    The standard cycle of 15 min. at 121 deg.C will
    give Fo 25.
  • Media pH not checked after autoclaving.
  • Autoclave not validated.
  • Different size containers in the load.

22
WHAT INSPECTORS LOOK FOR
  • Same containers used for selective media
    (contains antibiotics, inhibitors, etc.) and
    growth promoting media.
  • Same for tubing used in peristaltic pumps for
    dispensing media.
  • At one site, management could not find the media
    preparation area!!

23
WHAT INSPECTORS LOOK FOR
  • Water used to reconstitute media heavily
    contaminated with micro-organisms (bacteriocins,
    exotoxins, etc. inhibit growth).
  • Algae in water storage container tubing.

24
FERTILITY/GROWTH PROMOTION TESTS
  • Test results may be used as an excuse for poor
    media preparation or the use of inappropriate
    media.
  • This test uses very healthy strong laboratory
    strains that will grow on poor quality or
    inappropriate media.
  • Microbiological monitoring is meant to detect
    physically metabolically injured cells.

25
FERTILITY/GROWTH PROMOTION TESTS
  • Environmentally damaged cells will only recover
    grow on high quality media.
  • No quantitative limits for fertility test.
    Qualitative limit (growth/no growth is not
    acceptable)
  • Expiry date of media not validated.
  • Growth promotion capability decreases rapidly in
    first week after preparation.

26
FERTILITY/GROWTH PROMOTION TESTS
  • Stabilises after 1 week for 1 month then
    rapidly declines further.
  • Ive seen expiry dates of up to 1 year based upon
    the fact that the plates have been irradiated!
    No account taken of growth promoting capability.
  • Irradiated media should contain free radical
    scavengers and anti-oxidants.

27
TESTING PRACTICES or How to obtain Zero Results?
  • It is very easy to obtain zero results in all
    microbiological monitoring, including sterility
    bioburden testing.
  • If there are find pages pages of zero results
    this should ALERT you NOT satisfy you.

28
HOW TO OBTAIN ZERO RESULTS
  • In clean rooms
  • Position plates directly under HEPA filters
  • Position plates well away from human activity
  • Use old plates that are dehydrated
  • Do not monitor filling machine set-up
  • Do not use Sabouraud Dextrose media when fungal
    spores are likely to be present
  • This is how pages pages of zero results are
    obtained.

29
HOW TO OBTAIN ZERO RESULTS
  • In water testing
  • Run water at the test point for 5 min.
    (Production wont do that)
  • Store the water sample as long as possible before
    testing (cells attach to container walls)
  • Use the pour plate method
  • Use the incorrect medium

30
ZERO RESULTS
31
ZERO RESULTS
  • Clinicians have long been aware of human
    diseases associated with viable but
    non-culturable micro-organisms.
  • Biofilm mass contain only 1 to 15 culturable
    micro-organisms and so the underestimate by
    traditional tests is significant.
  • Recovery from water samples is in the region of
    only about 0.25.

32
L- forms of bacteria - Another hazard for the
patient!
  • L-forms lack cell walls and consist of highly
    pleomorphic elements ranging in size from 100nm .
    to 800nm.
  • They form and grow in interstitial spaces such as
    found in filters and membranes (c.f. recent paper
    on filters in water systems).
  • There is evidence that L-forms may act as the
    primary aetiological agents in infectious
    diseases and, in particular , may be responsible
    for relapse after apparent cure. (Thomas, A.J.
    Pharm. Tech.)

33
L- forms of bacteria - Another hazard for the
patient!
  • L-forms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been
    isolated from clinical specimens of sputum, pus
    and urine.
  • The evidence for the spontaneous formation of
    wall-defective microbial variants of Pseudomonas
    aeruginosa in filtration systems has therefore
    been demonstrated as the cause of filter failures
    during these bacterial challenge studies.
    (Thomas, A.J. Pharm. Tech.)

34
ASEPTIC FILTRATION
  • Absolute filters?
  • 0.2 micron filters?
  • Sterilizing filters?
  • Passage of Ps. Pickettii thru
  • 0.2 filter.
  • Isolate from commercial 0.9
  • Saline placed on the market -
  • infected neonates.

35
ZERO RESULTS
  • In the sterility test
  • Allow the membrane filter to dry out under vacuum
  • Place filter in the oxidised layer of
    Thioglycollate medium
  • Use old Thioglycollate that is fully oxidised

36
Thioglycollate mediumSterility test
No oxidation
Oxidised layer pre-incubation
Oxidised layer post-incubation
37
Thioglycollate mediumSterility test
  • What are the Ph. Eur. limits for maximum
    permitted levels of oxidation
  • Pre-incubation?
  • Post-incubation?
  • Where should the membrane filter be placed in the
    tube
  • Top?
  • Middle?
  • Bottom?

38
Thioglycollate mediumSterility test
  • What is the name of the indicator used in
    Thioglycollate to indicate oxygen uptake?
  • What colour is it in the oxidised state?
  • Is Thioglycollate available without the
    indicator?

39
What does the inspector look for?
  • Bad practices
  • See the monitoring locations for themselves
  • Inspect media preparation
  • Does not rely upon the results - checks first
    whether the results are reliable

40
Moving on
  • Another current and ongoing issue is the
    inadequate validation of equipment sterilisation
    used in aseptic processing.
  • Validation data often shows that either the
    autoclave is defective or
  • The cycle used is inappropriate (lack of air
    removal and/or lack of steam penetration into the
    equipment)

41
How has this situation arisen?
  • Reliance upon biological indicators and Fo to
    validate the cycle
  • Ignoring the thermometric data that conclusively
    demonstrates a significant problem
  • Non-recovery of a BI does not mean the BI has
    been killed! At best it demonstrates that a heat
    damaged BI has not been able to recover under the
    conditions used.

42
The misuse of the Fo concept
  • Fo is only valid when the microenvironment can be
    guaranteed, i.e. in a closed container
  • ampoule/vial
  • bag
  • tin of baked beans (Fo originated from the food
    industry)

43
The misuse of the Fo concept
  • The microenvironment inside an equipment load
    cannot be guaranteed because it relies upon
  • adequate air removal
  • adequate steam penetration
  • lack of leaks in the autoclave (door seal,
    valves, pipework)
  • prevention of introduction of non- condensable
    gases from the steam supply
  • prevention of condensate accumulating in
    equipment

44
Draft 14 of the PDA Monograph No.1
  • Unfortunately, this Draft does not take adequate
    cognizance of European, International and
    American National Standards with regard to these
    critical factors.
  • Reliance upon inherently variable biological
    systems rather than hard science (the laws of
    physics) does not comply with EU GMP.

45
AUTOCLAVE VALIDATIONEquipment Loads
  • There is just one objective
  • TO DEMONSTRATE UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT
  • ALL PARTS OF THE LOAD ARE
  • SUBJECT TO DRY SATURATED STEAM AT
  • THE REQUIRED TEMPERATURE FOR
  • THE REQUIRED TIME.

46
Physics versus BIsWhy dry saturated steam?
  • ENTHALPY
  • Saturated steam at 121 deg. C has an enthalpy of
    2706 joules per gram mass. When it condenses on
    a surface there is a potential transfer of 2198
    joules per gram of condensate produced.
  • When the steam condenses the space created is
    replenished with steam.

47
Physics versus BIs
  • ENTHALPY
  • To put it into perspective to heat a load from
    100 deg. C to 121 deg. C one gram of saturated
    steam has 2287 joules, one gram of saturated
    water has 89.3 joules and dry air has 15.3 joules
    of energy available.
  • Reference Thermodynamic properties of steam,
    Keenan Kayes. Encyclopoedia of Pharmaceutical
    Technology, Swarbrick Bolan (Eds)

48
Physics versus BIsCritical Parameters
  • Equilibration time, that is , the time for the
    penetration thermocouples to show the same
    temperature as the chamber.
  • Equilibration time should be less than 15 seconds
    for chambers less than 800l and 30 seconds for
    larger chambers.

49
Physics versus BIs
  • If the equilibration time is exceeded it
    diagnoses
  • Inadequate air removal
  • OR
  • Inadequate steam penetration
  • OR
  • Excessive non-condensable gases

50
AUTOCLAVE VALIDATION
51
AUTOCLAVE VALIDATION
52
Physics versus BIs
  • Leak Rate Test
  • Should be performed weekly
  • Recommended limit is not more than 1.3 mbar per
    minute

53
Clean Steam Generators
  • Feed water not heated to remove non condensable
    gases
  • Correct functioning of baffle plates not
    confirmed
  • Water droplet removal system (e.g. cyclone) not
    confirmed as functioning
  • Lack of venting on generator start up
  • or changeover

54
Steam Distribution
  • Lack of steam traps
  • Lack of air vents
  • Steam traps not Near to steam

55
Final Issues
  • Deficiencies not rectified site wide and company
    wide
  • Same deficiencies found during later inspections
    in different departments different sites
  • Specific corrective action taken but no
    preventative action to stop reoccurrence of the
    same deficiency
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com