Title: GEP5: Biodiversity
1GEP5 Biodiversity
- The problem Sources, mechanisms and consequences
- International biodiversity policy
- Giant pandas and ecotourism
- Elephants, ivory and trade
2Biodiversity
- There are about 14 (2-100) million species, about
1.7 million of which are described - About .4 (.04-1.1) of the species goes extinct
each year - This is 50-100 times the natural rate
- In 50 years time, 18 (4-41) is gone
- In 100 years, 33 (4-66) is gone
3Biodiversity -2
- Proximate causes
- Land use change
- Exploitation
- Exotic species
- Homogenisation of agriculture
- Pollution
- Climate change
4Biodiversity -3
- Ultimate causes
- Expansion of human society
- Poverty and underdevelopment
- Deliberate choice
- Inappropriate policy, policy failure
- Institutional failure
5Biodiversity -4
- The consequences of a decline in biodiversity are
not clear-cut - There are ethical arguments Humans do not have
the right to destroy creation - There are aesthetic arguments Diversity is
pretty - There are utilitarian arguments Diverse systems
are more robust there may be unknown benefits
hiding in the woods - The last two do not cut much wood
6J.M.L. Santos (1998), The Economic Valuation of
Landscape Change, Cheltenham Edward Elgar.
7Biodiversity -5
- Why is biodiversity an international problem?
- Biodiversity is concentrated in the poor tropics,
concern about biodiversity is concentrated in the
rich temperate zone - The two are not unconnected There are good
reasons why hot implies poverty - Temperate zones squandered much of their natural
beauty so as to grow rich - The poor want to emulate this
8Ecotourism
- The crucial problem of biodiversity is that those
who value the resource, do not control it and
that those who control the resource, do not value
it - One way of reversing this is ecotourism
- Ecotourism is travel, holidays, recreation with
the purpose of enjoying natural beauty - Ecotourism is on the rise, now clearly recognised
as a valuable nice market
9International Tourism
10The Giant Panda
- The Giant Panda is
- one of the worlds most
- valuable species, e.g.,
- as a mascotte for the
- World Wide Fund for
- Nature
11The Giant Panda -2
- The Giant Panda is one of the worlds most
endangered species with about 1,000 animals still
living in the mountains of Sichuan, China - The main reason is loss of habitat to humans
- In the last 30 years, 30 of Sichuan forests have
disappeared - To protect the Panda, the Chinese government
designated nature reserves
12Wolong Reserve
- The Wolong Panda Reserve is the most important
reserve - Reserves imply restrictions on the activities of
local communities - People in Wolong are poor they engage in
livestock, agriculture and gathering wood
products, making an income of about 1 a day - The Wolong Reserve has taken away about 40 of
their agricultural land - In return, there is ecotourism
13Tourism Revenues 1994
14Wolong Reserve -2
- About 250,000 is received per year, for 200,000
hectare, say 1/ha - About 55 is spent on the park, about 5 flows to
the locals - This is about 0.05/ha, while subsistence makes
about 1/ha - Little wonder that the locals do not cooperate
with the reserve, and in fact continue to
deteriorate it
15Wolong Reserve -3
- Is this necessary?
- Estimates suggest that the reserve can handle
about 150,000-180,000 tourist per year (3 to 4
times as much as current), and up to 44,000 in
the core area (0 at the moment) the Panda would
still outnumber humans by a factor of 2 - So, tourist numbers and revenues can go up
without ecological damage
16Wolong Reserve -4
- Prices can go up too
- People are willing to pay an entrance fee of 24
rather than the current 7, and would be happy to
pay for a four-star hotel instead of the current
one-star hotel - There is also a high-value part of the market,
prepared to pay some 1,200 for a two-day stay in
the core area - For visible local participation, add 10
17Wolong Reserve -5
- Furthermore, tourists (6 million in 1995) are
prepared to pay 12-14 as an airport tax this
includes tourists who have not been with the
pandas - In total, the annual revenue of Wolong Reserve
could amount to 450/ha (1 at present) - If the locals get 4 (as they do now), that would
be 18/ha, compared to 1/ha for subsistence
farming
18Ecotourism -2
- The story is the same everywhere
- Ecotourism is sold cheap this sometimes implies
that there are too many tourists who care too
little - Ecotourism brings only a meagre return, only a
fraction of which is paid to the locals - As a consequence, locals have little interest in
preserving this source of income
19Biodiversity Policy
- CITES Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora - Negotiated in 1973, entered into force in 1975
(18 members) now 152 signatories - Appendix I species Need both an export and an
import permit, signed by both the Scientific and
Management Authorities The SA checks species
survival the MA checks i.a. commercial use and
specimen well-being
20Biodiversity Policy -2
- Appendix II species Need an export permit,
signed by both the Scientific and Management
Authorities The SA checks species survival the
MA checks i.a. specimen well-being - Appendix III species Need an export permit,
signed by the Management Authority The MA
checks i.a. specimen well-being
21Biodiversity Policy -3
- App I Gorilla, Chimpanzee, most whales, cheetah,
panda, otter, lion, tiger, some bear, elephants,
rhino, ostrich (Sahel), most eagles - App II Most monkeys, most dolphins, wolves,
other bear, Southern African elephant (limited),
flamingoes, hawks, falcons - App III Some mongoose, armadilloes, bats,
squirrels, martens, weasels, antelopes, ducks,
walrus
22African Elephants
- Populations fell from 1.2 million (mid 70s) to
600,000 by 1988, 300,000 in 2001 - In 1989, the African elephant was upgraded to
CITES App I, and populations started to increased
again, though not by enough to lift the trade ban - In 1997, elephants in Southern Africa were put in
App II again, mainly because populations there
are large and growing, and a nuisance to people
23African Elephants -2
- What is the effect of a trade ban on the optimal
size of the elephant herd? - The herd has three effects
- First, elephants damage crops
- Second, elephants bring tourism
- Third, elephants give ivory
- If ivory cannot be sold, and the herd is in
steady state, then the size of the herd is such
that the marginal crop damage per elephant equals
the marginal tourism benefit
24African Elephants -3
- If ivory can be sold, then the size of the herd
is such that the marginal crop damage per
elephant plus marginal ivory revenue equals the
marginal tourism benefit plus the opportunity
cost of culling - Forget about crops and tourists
- If you shoot the elephant, you sell the ivory
- If you dont shoot the elephant, it will have
baby elephants and you will have more elephants
to shoot in the future and more ivory to sell
25African Elephants -4
- If you shoot now, you put the money in the bank
- If you shoot later, your bank is the herd of
elephants - If the interest rate is greater (smaller) than
the growth rate of the herd plus the growth rate
of the price of ivory, then you shoot now (later) - That is, the elephant herd is treated as any
other capital stock
26(No Transcript)
27African Elephants -5
- How does poaching enter into this?
- On the one hand, a trade ban reduces supply,
increases price it also increases transaction
costs, reducing the net price to the producer,
perhaps driving up the price further - Poaching is an uncertain business, there is
little reason to maintain the stock as other
poachers may get at it and youre not necessarily
around to cull later - Legal ivory is a cover for illegal ivory
28African Elephants -6
- How does poaching enter into this?
- On the other hand, legal trade provides a steady
source of income for local hunters and hence an
incentive to protect (if the discount rate is
appropriate) - There are also revenues for the government and
hence an incentive to protect, as well as the
revenues to do so
29Some Conclusions
- So, if nature yields a revenue, that revenue can
be reaped without damage, and that revenue can be
reaped by those who conserve nature, ecotourism
can help conserve biodiversity - If nature yields a revenue, that revenue can only
be reaped with damage, and that revenue can be
reaped by those who conserve nature, trade may
help conserve biodiversity, but need not