OVERVIEW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

OVERVIEW

Description:

After harvest, the residual sub-streams reunite to form the brood-stock for the ... Nevertheless, they retain the lion's share of the returns from harvest. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: kath362
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OVERVIEW


1
The Implications of Incomplete and Imperfect
Information for Multinational Management of
Transboundary Marine Fisheries A Cooperative
Research Project Robert McKelvey U. Montana
Kathleen Miller National Center for
Atmospheric Research Peter Golubtsov Moscow
State University, Russia
OVERVIEW
SPLIT STREAM MODEL RESULTS
APPLICATION MULTINATIONAL TUNA MANAGEMENT
EEZs in the WCPO
The Dynamic Imperfect Information Split Stream
Harvesting Model
  • The Project Setting and Program
  • Harvested marine fish stocks have been depleted
    worldwide.
  • The Culprit Common Harvest of a breeding fish
    stock by non-cooperating fleets--The Tragedy of
    the Common
  • The Remedy Central management by a
    governmental regulatory authority, to restrain
    and allocate harvests among fleets.
  • Complications
  • Transboundary fish stocks, which migrate
    across zones of national authority, requiring
    multilateral cooperative management.
  • Stochastic stock demographics, due to
    oceanic environmental variability
  • (e.g. El Nino episodes.)
  • Inability to predict environmental regime
    shifts accurately, and in a timely way, so as to
    make current harvesting decisions optimally.
  • The program Examine alternative management
    institutions through case studies and
    game-theoretic modeling.
  • Tuna Fisheries Worldwide A Comparative Study
  • Species of tuna are found is all of the worlds
    oceans, in a wide variety of oceanographic,
    ecological, socioeconomic, and political
    circumstances. The goal here is to understand
    the implications of these differing conditions.
  • All tuna stocks are highly migratory, and thus
    their ranges may intersect the EEZs of many
    coastal nations. Furthermore, oceanic climates
    are often quite variable, so that the sites of
    high concentrations of a tuna stock may move
    great distances from year to year. Hence fish
    concentrations within any particular EEZ may
    fluctuate substantially.
  • Tuna are valuable market fish, and while some
    high-value species have been over-harvested, most
    stocks are not yet severely depleted. Thus,
    fishing fleets from many distant-water nations
    are attracted to all major tuna fisheries.
  • These circumstances complicate cooperative
    management, since there are a great many
    stakeholders, with differing rights and playing
    differing roles in the fishery.
  • The strategic model is designed to explore the
    impact of all these circumstances on effective
    fishery management, and the interrelations among
    the stake-holders.
  • Both the stock-recruitment parameter b and the
    stock-split parameter q are random and
    imperfectly observed.
  • Each fleets objective is to maximize the
    discounted sum of its annual payoffs to the time
    horizon T.

Pacific Tuna Catch and the El Nino 3 Index
1995-1998
Influence of harvesting cost/price ratio for
different knowledge structures. Symmetric game.
Global Tuna Fisheries are Big Business
  • The Stochastic Imperfect Information
    Split-stream Game
  • A generic game, adjustable to describe
    various species-types, e.g. salmon, migrating
    along coastlines and small schooling species
    (sardines, anchovies) which are easily
    over-harvested and subject to large annual
    demographic variations.

  • A migratory stock splits into two sub-streams,
    each accessible to only one of two competing
    harvesting fleets. After harvest, the residual
    sub-streams reunite to form the brood-stock for
    the subsequent generation.
  • The new generation grows to maturity and once
    again splits into sub-streams. The growth and
    subsequent split processes both are stochastic,
    and imperfectly observed by the fleets. The
    process repeats annually.
  • Each fleet chooses its harvest policy to
    maximize the expected discounted sum of annual
    net payoffs over time, in response to the policy
    of its competitor. Thus it harvests to optimize
    the balance of immediate net return and its
    expected share of anticipated future returns.
  • The model demonstrates that, in
    non-cooperative harvesting, enhancing the quality
    of the fleets information may actually be
    destructive to boththus contradicting the maxim
    that information transparency is always
    advantageous.
  • (Details on the far-right panel.)

Thousand US
Cur full current knowledge, both fleets Min
minimum current knowledge (only probability
distribution) both Cur-Min a outcome for fleet
a when it has full knowledge and fleet b has only
minimal knowledge Cur-Min b corresponding
outcome for player b
Knowledge structure
Effects of an El Niño
All alternatives competitive unless marked Coop
cooperative Note Information Inversions i.e.
enhancing information yields inferior outcomes
Harvest of tuna by zones (1950-1997)
Application to small schooling pelagics(e.g.
sardines-anchovies)
  • Multilateral Management of Highly Migratory
    Stocks through a Regional Fisheries Management
    Commission (RFMC)
  • The RFMC Strategic Game Model assumes M
    countries with fleets and N coastal countries
    whose extended economic zones (EEZs) intersect
    the range of a highly migratory harvested
    fish-stock. Here M,N may be large, and while
    they may intersect, usually differ.
  • All of these stake-holding countries are
    members of the RFMC. The Commission makes long
    term policy for the fishery, gradually lowering
    the overcapacity of the fleets and thereby
    raising the brood-stock level for sustainability
    and profitability. It does this by negotiating
    annually the distribution of harvest capacity
    among the fleets and/or vessel days of harvest
    among the coastal states.
  • With these regulatory rules, it sets up
    annually a sequence of single-season competitive
    sub-games among the fleets and coastal states.
    Thus each coastal state sets its harvest-access
    royalties and allocates its vessel-days of
    harvest among the fleets, and each fleet
    allocates its vessel distribution among coastal
    sites.
  • The Tropical-Pacific tuna case, displayed on
    the central panel, illustrates the management
    issues to be addressed through this modeling
    analysis. (Currently the strategic model is
    being fine-tuned.)
  • Specifies symmetry in information but erratic
    temporal changes in stock growth and
    distribution. (Figures show mean values over
    time)
  • Usually the growth rate is high, and stock-split
    favors the a-site, but rarely the growth rate is
    small, with stock almost exclusively at b-site.
    The tight schooling favors over-harvesting.
  • The cooperative solution based on bargaining
    which is responsive to the asymmetries in the
    fleets competitive strengths.

Note dominance of Pacific Center Region (i.e.
Tropical Pacific) and the dominance of Pacific
Center West over Pacific Center East
  • Management issues in the
  • Tropical Western Pacific
  • The new Western and Central Pacific Tuna
    Commission treaty came into effect in late 2004,
    with substantive debate in 2005. Unusually, the
    island states have been working together closely,
    especially the 8 haves (parties to the Nauru
    Agreement). Their interests deviate from those
    of the 7 sometimes haves at the opposite pole
    of the El Nino cycle, plus Australia and New
    Zealand.
  • The harvesting nations do not cooperate, but
    instead compete with one another for access to
    the island states EEZs. Nevertheless, they
    retain the lions share of the returns from
    harvest.
  • The island states hope that, by further
    cooperation, they will achieve a higher share of
    harvest returns. To this end, they insisted on a
    voting system within the RFMC which gives them,
    collectively, a veto over its decisions. They
    also have insisted that the regulatory controls
    allocate vessel-days of harvest to them, rather
    than allocating harvesting capacity to the
    fleets.
  • Our RFMC model is designed to examine the
    effectiveness, and societal implications of these
    circumstances

Varying the Fleets Risk Attitude
  • Tropical Tuna in the Western Pacific Specific
    Circumstances
  • Stock ranges are huge, and contain an unusually
    large number of coastal states, mainly island
    states, within the stocks range. Further most
    tuna are harvested within their EEZs rather than
    on the high seas.
  • However stock concentrations move about from year
    to year, across vast distances, following the
    loci of food concentrations, as determined by
    ocean currents and surface temperatures.
  • These tuna stocks are the largest and most
    valuable in the world, attracting many
    distant-water fleets (DWFs) worldwide. Few
    coastal states have substantial fleets of their
    own, and the DWFs take 85 of the catch.
  • Over time, stock-harvest has expanded
    dramatically, with total fleet size becoming
    excessive, so that stocks are increasingly
    vulnerable to over-harvest.
  • Risk attitude risk averse for d lt 1, risk
    neutral at d 1 risk accepting for d gt 1
  • Note small inversion on left (where fleets
    highly risk averse), but not on right (where
    fleets mildly risk averse or mildly risk
    accepting)
  • As risk aversion increases (i.e. d ? 0) then
    competitive outcomes merge with cooperative
    outcomes.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com