Title: OVERVIEW
1The Implications of Incomplete and Imperfect
Information for Multinational Management of
Transboundary Marine Fisheries A Cooperative
Research Project Robert McKelvey U. Montana
Kathleen Miller National Center for
Atmospheric Research Peter Golubtsov Moscow
State University, Russia
OVERVIEW
SPLIT STREAM MODEL RESULTS
APPLICATION MULTINATIONAL TUNA MANAGEMENT
EEZs in the WCPO
The Dynamic Imperfect Information Split Stream
Harvesting Model
- The Project Setting and Program
- Harvested marine fish stocks have been depleted
worldwide. - The Culprit Common Harvest of a breeding fish
stock by non-cooperating fleets--The Tragedy of
the Common - The Remedy Central management by a
governmental regulatory authority, to restrain
and allocate harvests among fleets. - Complications
- Transboundary fish stocks, which migrate
across zones of national authority, requiring
multilateral cooperative management. - Stochastic stock demographics, due to
oceanic environmental variability - (e.g. El Nino episodes.)
- Inability to predict environmental regime
shifts accurately, and in a timely way, so as to
make current harvesting decisions optimally. -
- The program Examine alternative management
institutions through case studies and
game-theoretic modeling.
- Tuna Fisheries Worldwide A Comparative Study
- Species of tuna are found is all of the worlds
oceans, in a wide variety of oceanographic,
ecological, socioeconomic, and political
circumstances. The goal here is to understand
the implications of these differing conditions. - All tuna stocks are highly migratory, and thus
their ranges may intersect the EEZs of many
coastal nations. Furthermore, oceanic climates
are often quite variable, so that the sites of
high concentrations of a tuna stock may move
great distances from year to year. Hence fish
concentrations within any particular EEZ may
fluctuate substantially. - Tuna are valuable market fish, and while some
high-value species have been over-harvested, most
stocks are not yet severely depleted. Thus,
fishing fleets from many distant-water nations
are attracted to all major tuna fisheries. - These circumstances complicate cooperative
management, since there are a great many
stakeholders, with differing rights and playing
differing roles in the fishery. - The strategic model is designed to explore the
impact of all these circumstances on effective
fishery management, and the interrelations among
the stake-holders.
- Both the stock-recruitment parameter b and the
stock-split parameter q are random and
imperfectly observed. - Each fleets objective is to maximize the
discounted sum of its annual payoffs to the time
horizon T.
Pacific Tuna Catch and the El Nino 3 Index
1995-1998
Influence of harvesting cost/price ratio for
different knowledge structures. Symmetric game.
Global Tuna Fisheries are Big Business
- The Stochastic Imperfect Information
Split-stream Game - A generic game, adjustable to describe
various species-types, e.g. salmon, migrating
along coastlines and small schooling species
(sardines, anchovies) which are easily
over-harvested and subject to large annual
demographic variations. -
- A migratory stock splits into two sub-streams,
each accessible to only one of two competing
harvesting fleets. After harvest, the residual
sub-streams reunite to form the brood-stock for
the subsequent generation. - The new generation grows to maturity and once
again splits into sub-streams. The growth and
subsequent split processes both are stochastic,
and imperfectly observed by the fleets. The
process repeats annually. - Each fleet chooses its harvest policy to
maximize the expected discounted sum of annual
net payoffs over time, in response to the policy
of its competitor. Thus it harvests to optimize
the balance of immediate net return and its
expected share of anticipated future returns. - The model demonstrates that, in
non-cooperative harvesting, enhancing the quality
of the fleets information may actually be
destructive to boththus contradicting the maxim
that information transparency is always
advantageous. -
- (Details on the far-right panel.)
Thousand US
Cur full current knowledge, both fleets Min
minimum current knowledge (only probability
distribution) both Cur-Min a outcome for fleet
a when it has full knowledge and fleet b has only
minimal knowledge Cur-Min b corresponding
outcome for player b
Knowledge structure
Effects of an El Niño
All alternatives competitive unless marked Coop
cooperative Note Information Inversions i.e.
enhancing information yields inferior outcomes
Harvest of tuna by zones (1950-1997)
Application to small schooling pelagics(e.g.
sardines-anchovies)
- Multilateral Management of Highly Migratory
Stocks through a Regional Fisheries Management
Commission (RFMC) - The RFMC Strategic Game Model assumes M
countries with fleets and N coastal countries
whose extended economic zones (EEZs) intersect
the range of a highly migratory harvested
fish-stock. Here M,N may be large, and while
they may intersect, usually differ. - All of these stake-holding countries are
members of the RFMC. The Commission makes long
term policy for the fishery, gradually lowering
the overcapacity of the fleets and thereby
raising the brood-stock level for sustainability
and profitability. It does this by negotiating
annually the distribution of harvest capacity
among the fleets and/or vessel days of harvest
among the coastal states. - With these regulatory rules, it sets up
annually a sequence of single-season competitive
sub-games among the fleets and coastal states.
Thus each coastal state sets its harvest-access
royalties and allocates its vessel-days of
harvest among the fleets, and each fleet
allocates its vessel distribution among coastal
sites. - The Tropical-Pacific tuna case, displayed on
the central panel, illustrates the management
issues to be addressed through this modeling
analysis. (Currently the strategic model is
being fine-tuned.)
- Specifies symmetry in information but erratic
temporal changes in stock growth and
distribution. (Figures show mean values over
time) - Usually the growth rate is high, and stock-split
favors the a-site, but rarely the growth rate is
small, with stock almost exclusively at b-site.
The tight schooling favors over-harvesting. - The cooperative solution based on bargaining
which is responsive to the asymmetries in the
fleets competitive strengths.
Note dominance of Pacific Center Region (i.e.
Tropical Pacific) and the dominance of Pacific
Center West over Pacific Center East
- Management issues in the
- Tropical Western Pacific
- The new Western and Central Pacific Tuna
Commission treaty came into effect in late 2004,
with substantive debate in 2005. Unusually, the
island states have been working together closely,
especially the 8 haves (parties to the Nauru
Agreement). Their interests deviate from those
of the 7 sometimes haves at the opposite pole
of the El Nino cycle, plus Australia and New
Zealand. - The harvesting nations do not cooperate, but
instead compete with one another for access to
the island states EEZs. Nevertheless, they
retain the lions share of the returns from
harvest. - The island states hope that, by further
cooperation, they will achieve a higher share of
harvest returns. To this end, they insisted on a
voting system within the RFMC which gives them,
collectively, a veto over its decisions. They
also have insisted that the regulatory controls
allocate vessel-days of harvest to them, rather
than allocating harvesting capacity to the
fleets. - Our RFMC model is designed to examine the
effectiveness, and societal implications of these
circumstances
Varying the Fleets Risk Attitude
- Tropical Tuna in the Western Pacific Specific
Circumstances - Stock ranges are huge, and contain an unusually
large number of coastal states, mainly island
states, within the stocks range. Further most
tuna are harvested within their EEZs rather than
on the high seas. - However stock concentrations move about from year
to year, across vast distances, following the
loci of food concentrations, as determined by
ocean currents and surface temperatures. - These tuna stocks are the largest and most
valuable in the world, attracting many
distant-water fleets (DWFs) worldwide. Few
coastal states have substantial fleets of their
own, and the DWFs take 85 of the catch. - Over time, stock-harvest has expanded
dramatically, with total fleet size becoming
excessive, so that stocks are increasingly
vulnerable to over-harvest.
- Risk attitude risk averse for d lt 1, risk
neutral at d 1 risk accepting for d gt 1 - Note small inversion on left (where fleets
highly risk averse), but not on right (where
fleets mildly risk averse or mildly risk
accepting) - As risk aversion increases (i.e. d ? 0) then
competitive outcomes merge with cooperative
outcomes.