Title: Aquatic Biofuels
1Aquatic Biofuels New Options for Bioenergy
Tony Piccolo Fish Utilization and Marketing
Service (FIIU) Thesis Topic (MBA - University
of Malta Rome Campus)
2- What are aquatic biofuels
- Why produce aquatic biofuels
- Conversion systems
- Growth and harvesting
- Potential for developing countries
- Challenges and Opportunities
3WHAT ARE AQUATICBIOFUELS?
4- Why ALGAE?
- Does not compete with agriculture
- High yield per acre
- Contains no sulphur therefore no SO2 emissions
- Non toxic and highly biodegradable
- Does not require soil for growth
- Uses as little as 30cm of water per year per
hectare (open pond system) - Adaptable anywhere even at great distances from
water - Abatement of CO2 carbon neutral
5Oil yield per hectare of microalgae significantly
exceeds other common oil sources such as soya
and rapeseed
33 times more than rapeseed
88 timesmore than soya
39 500
39 500 PBR
1190
1 190
446
448
PBR Photo Bio-Reactor
6- Photo Bio-Reactors?
- Using Photo Bio-Reactors is expensive
- but it is a State of the Art Technology, it
- produces higher yields than other systems.
- However, Development and Processing costs are
still quite high and perhaps not suited yet for
developing countries.
7Microalgae Biofixation Process with wastewater
8Open pond wastewater has demonstrated
productivities of 100 tonne/ha/yr tonne per
hecatre per year.
9- Costs and key performance parameters for Open
Pond biofixation systems for GHG abatement are - Land capital, cost of ponds, harvesting,
processing, water supply, infrastructure
operating costs (around US120/tonne) - Raceway mixed ponds capital costs of about
US100,000 per hectare - Availability or transport of flue gas and/or
waste water to the ponds - Algal productivity / harvestability / processing
- Product values biofuels, GHG abatement,
reclaimed water, fertilisers, other - co products.
- Caution With present technology fuel only
algal systems are not plausible on their own -
they require additional revenues.
10Adaptability to developing countries other key
factor requirements Algae production with
Photo Bio-Reactors (PBR) More suitable for
Higher Income Countries (due to higher start-up
costs) Algae production with MBP (Microalgae
Biofixation Process) More suitable for Lower
Income Countries (due to lower start-up
costs)
11AVIATION INDUSTRY
12- FISH WASTE From Aquaculture Farms
-
- Press the fish waste
- Oil is extracted through a water separation
process at 90o C -
- Manganese (Mn), methanol (9) and caustic soda is
added. - The by-product glycerine is sold to the cosmetic
industry and the residues are made into
fishmeal. -
- 1kg of fish waste can produce just over 1lt of
bio-diesel.
13Aquafinca - Honduras
Agifish Viet Nam
14(No Transcript)
15- Fish Waste - Key points and feasibility for
developing countries - Technology is adaptable and transferable in many
developing regions. - It can provide livelihoods through the
production of fish, and produce local energy
free from GHG emissions. - Relatively little investment required.
- Fish waste could also promote more efficient
utilization of aquatic living resources and
generate additional income for fishers' and fish
farmers' communities. - Adaptable on large fishing trawlers.
- Fishing Ports
16- Aquatic Biofuels Challenges, Opportunities and
Gains - Algae
- Cost intensive especially for Photo Bio-Reactors
may be suitable for Higher Income Countries. - Open pond systems are much more viable although
real costs are still not available,
by-products can however make the process
completely viable. - Abatement of CO2 Mitigation from the conversion
of the algal biomass to renewable fuels
directly substituting fossil fuels coal and gas - Each tonne of microalgae biomass produced
about a tonne of CO2 abated - Both algal to bio-fuel technologies are therefore
completely Carbon Neutral
17- Fish waste
- The oil produced for bio-diesel is already
marketable as fish oil, more fish oil - would have to be produced to cater for the
demand in bio-diesel this may disrupt fish oil
markets. - The technology is in place and is transferable
to other developing countries as pilot project
studies.
18 PROJECT PROPOSAL WORKING GROUP tony.piccolo_at_fao
.orgalessandro.flammini_at_fao.org
19 Thank you. Questions?