Lecture 6: Value At Risk Part 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 6: Value At Risk Part 2

Description:

If price of gold is less than 100 we throw the option away. If Price of gold is greater than 105 then we make more than the initial cost of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: chr1103
Category:
Tags: lecture | part | risk | value

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 6: Value At Risk Part 2


1
Lecture 6 Value At Risk Part 2
2
What we will learn in this lecture
  • A recap on the end of last weeks lecture
  • How we can extend our ideas of mean and variance
    of continuously compounded returns to model
    portfolios of more complicated financial
    instruments
  • We will look at how to model bond portfolios
    using first order duration approximations
  • We will also examine option portfolios using
    first order delta approximations
  • We will see how these methods are limited and we
    need a better method Monte Carlo Simulations.

3
Value At Risk
  • Value-At-Risk can be defined as An estimate,
    with a given degree of confidence, of how much
    one can lose from ones portfolio over a given
    time horizon.
  • It is very useful because it tells us exactly
    what we are interested in what we could loose on
    a bad day
  • Our previous ideas of mean and variance of return
    on a portfolio were abstract
  • VaR gives us a very concrete definition of risk,
    such as, we can say with 99 certainty we will
    not loose more than X on a given day
  • Value at Risk is literally the value we stand
    to lose or the value at risk!

4
The Value Of Risk On A Portfolio
  • We are normally interested in describing the
    value at risk on a portfolio of assets and
    liabilities
  • We know how to describe mean and variance of
    return on our portfolio interms of the mean,
    variance and covariance of returns on the assets
    and liabilities it contains
  • We will now use this to describe the stochastic
    process of the portfolios value across time
  • From this stochastic process of the portfolios
    value we will estimate the Value At Risk for a
    given time horizon

5
Our Method
  • We can derive the continuously compounded mean
    and variance of a portfolios continuously
    compounded return for a portfolio from the
    expected return and covariance matrix of
    continually compounded returns for the assets it
    contains
  • Under the assumption that the proportional
    changes in the portfolios value are normally
    distributed we can translate the mean and
    variance of these proportional changes to the
    diffusion of the portfolios value across time
  • Using the diffusion process we can put a
    probabilistic lower bound of the portfolios value
    across time
  • So for example if we wanted to calculate the
    value of the portfolio we would only be bellow
    2.5 of the time we would use the formula
  • Where m is the mean of returns on the portfolio
    and s is the standard deviation of returns on the
    portfolio

6
Portfolio Value Diffusion
Portfolio Value
Value At Risk At Time T
Expected Path For Portfolio
PV0
Portfolio Value Will Only Go Bellow this 2.5 of
the time
Time
T
7
Value At Risk For Bond Portfolios
  • So far we have been focusing on equity assets
  • The principals used to model equities are the
    building blocks of modelling most financial
    assets
  • More assumptions are need to model more
    complicated assets

8
What is a bond?
  • A bond can be thought of as a loan in which you
    put some money in at the start and get certain
    fixed payments out in the future
  • These payments are specified in advanced so where
    is the risk?
  • There is the obvious default risk in that the
    debtor cannot pay you
  • There is a more subtle risk that becomes visible
    when we talk about the mark-to-market value of a
    bond.

9
A thought experiment
  • Imagine you have a very reliable friend who
    borrows 100 from you for one year
  • Even though he is your friend you are pretty
    careful with your money so demand an interest
    payment at the same rate of interest you would
    get in your bank account which is currently 10
    (annual continuously compounding rate).
  • How much does he have to pay you back in 1 years
    time?
  • 100e0.1 110.57

10
  • So your friend signs a piece of paper saying that
    in 1 year she will pay you 110.57 and you hand
    over the 100
  • A few hours after you sign your contract the
    interest rate the bank pays rises to 15!
  • How much could you resell the IOU for?
  • Xe0.15110.57
  • gtX 110.57 / e0.15 110.57 e-0.15 95.12
  • Although you will still get your 100.57 back at
    the end of the year the current value of the IOU
    discounted at the prevailing rate of interest has
    dropped!
  • This is called interest rate risk
  • We dont actually lose any money if we hold the
    IOU to maturity (excluding credit risk)

11
The market value of a bond
  • The market value of the bond is the present value
    of the discounted cash flows.
  • A bond that just pays a lump sum at the end (like
    our IOU) is called a zero coupon bond (also
    called discount bonds)
  • We will start by just thinking about zero coupon
    bonds
  • Then we will see that any bond, or set of bonds
    can be thought of as a portfolio of zero coupon
    bonds

12
Present Value of Zero Coupon Bond
  • Say we have a bond that promises to pay I in T
    years and the continuously compounded T year
    interest rate is rT then we can say that the
    market value of this bond (P) is
  • PI.e-T.r
  • The relationship better P and rT is non linear
  • We will make the relationship between DP and Dr
    linear by using a first order Taylor
    approximation!

13
What is a first order approximation
  • Often in modelling we have a complicated function
    with a lot of high order terms that we want to
    simplify it
  • The greatest simplification is to just take the
    slope of a function at a point and draw a
    straight line to approximate the complicated
    function
  • This straight line approximation is called a
    first order Taylor expansion

14
First Order Approximation
P
We estimate DP for a Dr using the straight line
approximation
Q
Dr
Complicated Function
DP
Linear Expansion About Point Q
r
15
First Order Approximation Of Bond Price
  • This makes the relationship between DP and Dr
    very simple, perhaps too simple!
  • But remember it is only an estimation, for large
    changes in r it wont give a very accurate change
    in P.

16
The Stochastic Behaviour Of The Interest Rate
Across Time
  • It is a common assumption that there is no trend
    in interest rates and as such we can say that the
    change in interest rates (DrT) has a mean of 0
  • DrT Normally distributed with mean 0 and variance
    s2rT
  • If we treat DrT as a stochastic variable then we
    can say that

17
Value At Risk For A Bond
  • Since DP is the change in the market value of the
    bond it directly measures the Value At Risk for
    the bond
  • It is important to notice the negative
    relationship between the interest rate and the
    bond price
  • If the interest rate goes up the bond price goes
    down
  • If we want to calculate the lower boundary for
    the the bonds value then we must calculate the
    upper boundary for the value of Dr

18
Value At Risk For The Bond
DP
Because of the negative relationship between DP
and Dr we need to estimate the upper boundary of
Dr to estimate the VaR of DP
Dr
19
VaR For The Bond
  • Since the mean is zero the 2.5 upper boundary
    for the interest rate will simply be 1.96srT
  • So the VaR on P, the value of the bond will be
  • In general we say that VaR implies a negative
    value so we drop the negative
  • So we can say that we will only loose more than
    VaR(P) 2.5 of the time.
  • As will all VaR calculations we can change the
    number of standard deviations from the mean to
    change the level of confidence

20
Portfolios of Zero Coupon Bonds
  • If we want to describe the risk of a portfolio of
    bonds we have to describe the stochastic
    behaviour of the interest rates which effect it
  • Bonds of different maturities can have different
    interest rates
  • These interests rates can move independently but
    are likely to be highly correlated
  • We want to express the change in the portfolio of
    bonds value in terms of the change in the various
    interest rates that effect the bond prices
  • We will use our first order approximation to
    express the change in the portfolios value in
    terms of the changes in the various interest rates

21
VaR of a Bond Portfolio
  • Let DPV be the change in the portfolios value, T
    be the time in year to maturity for the bond, PT
    be the amount invested in the zero coupon bond of
    maturity T, DrT be the change in the change in
    the continuously compounded annualised interest
    rate for bonds of maturity T.

Or
  • In the later case we divide everything by PV
    (Portfolio Value) to get the proportional change
    in PV in terms of the investment weights (w) in
    the various bonds

22
  • So if we want to express the variance of return
    in the bond portfolio in terms of the variances
    of the various interest rates it contains we
    simply time weight the portfolio weights!
  • Notice that this will mean that the sum of
    weights will no longer equal 1

Var(DR1) Cov(DR1, DR2) Cov(DR1, DR3)
Cov(DR1, DR2) Var(DR2) Cov(DR2, DR3)
Cov(DR1, DR3) Cov(DR2, DR3) Var(DR3)
T1.w1
T2.w2
T3.w3
C
W
  • Note we drop the minus since it will cancel in
    the variance calculation
  • Var(Rp) WT.C.W
  • E(RP) 0 from our assumption that DR is always
    zero
  • Note the scaled weights will not add to one

23
  • Once we have calculated Var(Rp) we can then
    simply calculate the lower 2.5 confidence
    boundary on the change in the portfolios value as
  • Now
  • So the 2.5 VaR
  • The loss is normally expressed as a positive
    figure

24
Value At Risk On Option Portfolio
  • An simple option is basically the right to buy or
    sell an asset at a fixed price at a future point
    in time
  • There are 2 types of options a call option and
    put option
  • A call option is the right to buy at a fixed
    price at a future date
  • A put option is the right to sell at a fixed
    price at a future date

25
Thought Experiment
  • Imagine you have a deal with your friend to have
    the option (not obligation) to buy a bar of gold
    in 1 years time for 100
  • You will only want to exercise the option if the
    market value of the bar of gold is more than 100
    (ie you can make profit)
  • You pay 5 to have the option to buy this bar of
    gold
  • What will the your profit look like 1 year from
    now?

26
Our Call Option Payoff Diagram
Profit
If Price of gold is greater than 105 then we
make more than the initial cost of 5
10 profit in 1 year!
100
105
Price of Gold In 1 Years Time
115
-5
If price of gold is less than 100 we throw the
option away
27
How to we value this contract?!?
  • Pricing of options is very complex
  • A lot of what you read in textbooks
    (Black-Scholes etc) is not used in practice
  • We will just say that the option price (OP) is a
    complex function of Time T, Stock Price S and
    Stock Price Volatility (V)

28
Delta Approximation
  • We will take a first order approximation of the
    option pricing function with respect to the price
    of the asset it is written on
  • Delta is essentially how the option price moves
    with the price of the underlying asset at a given
    point in time
  • Delta is always between 1 and 1

29
A crucial insight
  • The delta approximation lets us make an
    equivalence between holding an option on an asset
    and holding some fraction of the asset itself
  • The delta tells us what fraction of the asset is
    equivalent to holding the option at a point in
    time
  • We can model a portfolio of options in terms of a
    portfolio of the assets those options are written
    against
  • Our task is to work out the amount of exposure
    to the underlying assets our options imply

30
Estimating an Equity Option Investment Into An
Equity Investment
  • 1) Calculate the total value of equities the
    options are written upon
  • 2) Multiply this value by the Delta of the option
  • 3) We can then calculate the VaR on the stock
    holding and multiply it by the option delta to
    get the option holding VaR!

31
An Example
  • We have 100 call options on Manu Shares
  • The current price of Manu Shares is 2.50
  • The delta of the option is 0.5
  • The portfolio of 100 call options is equivalent
    to a portfolio of
  • 2.50 100 0.5 125 worth of Manu Shares,
    or 50 shares
  • We need to convert to a value because sometimes
    the option might be to buy more than 1 share

32
A More Formal Definition A Portfolio of Options
Shares
  • The value of the portfolio can be expressed as
    the sum of the value of Options and Shares it
    contains
  • We can say that the change in the portfolio value
    is derived from the change in the value of the
    options and shares the portfolio contains

33
  • Our next step is to just re-express this as
  • Where Si is the price of the share the option is
    written on
  • We know from our earlier discussion that
  • So we can re-express this as

34
  • Finally expressing this in the familiar weight
    format
  • Now we might have an option on the same asset
    that we have a share holding in, so lets join
    these two sums
  • Where woi is the investment weight of any options
    invested in the ith stock and wsi is the
    investment weight of any direct investment in the
    ith stock

35
An Example
  • We have a portfolio of 2 assets a 15 call options
    on Abbey National each with a delta of 0.3, and
    20 shares in Manchester United. The current price
    of Abbey National shares is 2, the current Abbey
    National call option price is 1 and the price of
    Manchester United shares is 1.25
  • If we want to estimate this equity/option
    portfolio as a straight equity portfolio then the
    weights will be as follows
  • Total Portfolio Value (15 1) (20 1.25)
    40
  • Weight in Abbey (0.3 15 2) / (40) 0.225
    22.5
  • Weight in Manu (20 1.25) / (40) 0.625
    62.5
  • Notice the sum of our weight dont add up to
    100!
  • Using the weights of 22.5 and 62.5 we can go
    onto find out the Value at Risk of our
    option/equity portfolio by treating it simply as
    a equity portfolio!

36
Errors with First Order Approximations
  • First Order Approximations are good for
    estimating VaR and statistical properties over
    short time periods
  • However as the time horizon increases they become
    increasingly inaccurate
  • There are no statistical tricks that allow us to
    get a high degree of accuracy
  • We need to move onto Monte Carlo Simulations
    (next week).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com