Managing for Results: a TOT for the LQAS Approach to Household Surveys - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 65
About This Presentation
Title:

Managing for Results: a TOT for the LQAS Approach to Household Surveys

Description:

Train participants to train trainers of CORE PVO staff to conduct ... Danger Signs during Delivery. Danger Signs during Pregnancy. Complementary Breastfeeding ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 66
Provided by: savethec
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Managing for Results: a TOT for the LQAS Approach to Household Surveys


1
Managing for Results a TOT for the LQAS
Approach to Household Surveys
  • Joseph J. Valadez, PhD, MPH, ScD
  • La Rue K. Seims, MA, MPH
  • Corey Leburg, MHS

2
Purpose of the LQAS TOT
  • Train participants to train trainers of CORE PVO
    staff to conduct household surveys to collect
    data for establishing baselines and for regular
    monitoring of community programs
  • Train participants to train trainers of CORE PVO
    staff to analyze LQAS data to identify priorities
    for improving program coverage

3
Skills to be Learned
  • How to Use Tested and Proven Methods for LQAS
    Training
  • Data Tabulation and Analysis for Program
    Improvement
  • LQAS Sampling Methods and Statistics Behind the
    Method

4
What is LQAS?
  • A sampling method that
  • Can be used locally, at the level of a
    supervision area, to identify priority areas or
    indicators that are not reaching average coverage
    or an established benchmark
  • Can provide an accurate measure of coverage or
    health system quality at a more aggregate level
    (e.g. program area)

5
A
Assume a program area that has 7 supervision
areas Each one is supervised by one person Each
one has between 25-35 promotors/communities to
supervise
B
C
D
E
F
G
6
A
Good
B
C
D
E
Below Average or Established Benchmark
F
G
7
Maintain the program at the current level
Good
Identify Supervisors and Health Workers that can
help other Health workers improve their
performance
Identify the reasons for program problems
Below Average or Established Benchmark
Develop targeted solutions
8
How LQAS Compares to Other Sampling Methods
  • Simple Random Sampling
  • LQAS provides a method for prioritizing local
    areas by indicator - unlike simple random
    sampling
  • Both provide coverage proportion for program area
    similar
  • Sample size requirements are similar for the
    program area
  • Cluster Sampling
  • LQAS provides a method for prioritizing local
    areas by indicator - unlike cluster sampling
  • Both provide coverage proportions for a program
    area
  • Sample size is smaller for LQAS (95 vs. 300)

9
(No Transcript)
10
Marble Exercises to Demonstrate
  • Random Sampling
  • Non-Random Sampling
  • Using a Sample Size of 19

11
Why Sample?
  • Sampling allows you to use the few to describe
    the whole, and this 
  • Saves time  
  • Saves money

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
What a Sample of 19 Can Tell Us
  • Good for setting priorities within an SA
  • Good for setting priorities among supervision
    areas with large differences in coverage
  • Good for deciding what are the higher performing
    supervision areas to learn from
  • Good for deciding what are the lower performing
    supervision areas
  • Good for identifying knowledge/practices that
    have high coverage from those of low coverage

16
What a Sample of 19 Cannot Tell Us
  • Not good for calculating exact coverage in an SA
    (but can be used to calculate coverage for an
    entire program)
  • Not good for setting priorities among supervision
    areas with little difference in coverage

17
Why Use a Sample of 19
  • A sample of 19 provides an acceptable level of
    error for making management decisions at least
    92 percent of the time, it identifies whether a
    coverage benchmark has been reached or whether an
    SA is below the average coverage of a program
    area
  • Samples larger than 19 have practically the same
    statistical precision as 19. They do not result
    in better information, and they cost more.

18
Identifying Locations for Interviews
  • Step 1. List communities and total population
  • Step 2. Calculate the cumulative population
  • Step 3. Calculate the sampling interval
  • Step 4. Choose a random number
  • Step 5. Beginning with the random number, use the
    sampling interval to identify communities for the
    19 sets of interviews

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Module ThreeWhom Should I Interview?
  • Session 1 Selecting Households
  • Sesssion 2 Selecting Informants
  • Session 3 Field Practical for Numbering and
    Selecting Households

27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
Process for Field Practical
  • 1. Meet with community leader.
  • 2. Revise and/or create community map.
  • 3. Subdivide com. into sections lt30 households.
  • 4. Give each section a number.
  • 5. Select a section using a random number.
  • 6. Repeat 3-5 if the selected section still too
    large.
  • 7. Assign numbers to households in selected
    section.
  • 8. Select a starting household using random
    number.
  • 9. Identify the next nearest household.

33
Common Respondent Types
  • Women, 15-49, non-pregnant
  • Men, 15-49
  • Mothers with children 0-11 months
  • Mothers with children 12-23 months

34
(No Transcript)
35
Parallel Sampling
  • Separate questionnaires are used for different
    respondent types in the same households
  • The same person can be interviewed if they fit
    the criteria for different respondent types
    except when data are aggregated for different
    respondent types in the analysis

36
(No Transcript)
37
Household Composition Scenarios - Examples
  • Household 1
  • Mother 18 yrs. Old with child 24 months
  • Father 26 years
  • Household 2
  • Man 65 years
  • Mother of 15 month old absent in field nearby
    might be pregnant
  • 15 month old baby
  • Father in city

38
Module FourWhat Questions Do I Ask and How
Should I Ask Them?
  • Session 1 Reviewing the Survey Questionnaires
  • Session 2 Interviewing Skills
  • Session 3 Field Practical for Interviewing
  • Session 4 Planning for the Data Collection/Survey

39
GO TO TABULATION TABLES IN EXCEL
  • Alt-Tab

40
After the Baseline Define Program Goals and
Annual Targets
BASELINE
Yr. 1
Yr. 2
Yr. 3
Yr. 4
10
30
50
70
80
PROGRAM GOALS FROM BASELINE UNTIL YEAR 4 OF THE
PROJECT
IMPROVEMENT
41
Example Using LQAS Data for Supervision Area
Decision Making
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
Number of Mothers with Children 0-11 Months With
Substandard Knowledge or Health Practices
According to LQAS Thresholds and Decision Rules
13
13
14
10/17/00
45
Questions to Consider When Monitoring Programs
  • How often should I monitor?
  • Once Every 6 Months
  • Once a Year
  • End of Project only
  • How should I collect the data
  • Should I stop work for 3 days and collect
    monitoring data?
  • Should I visit a household while I am in the
    village doing normal work? At the end of 1 month
    or so I have enough data.

46
Baseline Survey Report Format
  • Summary
  • Program Overview (location, objectives,
    activities, beneficiaries, etc.)
  • Purpose of Baseline Survey and Methodology
  • Main Findings Priorities by SA Program Area
  • Action Plans and Goals/Benchmarks for Key
    Indicators
  • Conclusions and Recommendations
  • Appendix Summary Tabulation Tables

47
How LQAS Works
  • LQAS uses binomials to determine whether a
    supervision area has reached a performance
    benchmark
  • Pa n! paq n-a
  • a! (n-a)!

48
n! a! (n-a)!
Number of Times an Even Occurs in a Sample
3! 3x2x1 3 2! (3-2)! 2x1x1
H H H H H T H T H T H H
T T T T T H T H T H T T
49
Using Cumulative ProbabilitiesUpper end of
Triage
50
Using Cumulative ProbabilitiesLower end of
Triage
51
(No Transcript)
52
Producer Risk
Consumer Risk
53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
Identifying Pockets of Risk
Mean 71.5
80
90
85
80
55
85
95
55
90
50
50
95
75
45
45
65
57
(No Transcript)
58
Why Use a Sample of 19 ?
Larger samples do not provide that much more
information
Sample of 28 16 adequate municipalidades 16
sub-standard municipalidades X .039 error X
.044 error 0.624 or 1 misclassified 0.704 or 1
misclassified as poor as adequate Sample of
19 16 adequate municipalidades 16 sub-standard
municipalidades X .068 error X .084
error 1.08 or 1 misclassified 1.344 or 1
misclassified as poor as adequate
59
How to Calculate Coverage Proportions with LQAS
Data
  • How many Supervision Areas do I need to calculate
    accurate coverage estimates?
  • Do I weight or do I not weight?
  • How much error is acceptable?

60
(No Transcript)
61
Costs of LQAS
62
Traditional LQAS Compared with GPV Approach
  • WHO approach main purpose
  • population based survey with known confidence
    interval
  • Supervision Area assessment is secondary
  • Traditional LQAS main purpose
  • Accurate assessment of Supervision Areas
  • Catchment Area assessment is secondary

63
WHO Approach Example 1
  • Choose the desired confidence interval 7
  • Choose the desired level of confidence 95
  • Calculate needed total sample size n196
  • Count of SAs 5
  • Divide sample by of SAs to determine lot sample
    size 196/5 39
  • This is a lot of work in each SA (p80,
    alpha.03 .p50, beta.01)

64

WHO Approach Example 2
  • Choose the desired confidence interval 10
  • Choose the desired level of confidence 95
  • Calculate needed total sample size n96
  • Count of SAs 13
  • Divide sample by of SAs to determine lot sample
    size 96/13 7
  • The error to classify each SA is too high (p80,
    alpha.14 p50, beta.23)

65
Refer to BASICS New Publication
  • See The Series of LOT Samples
  • Review Alpha and Beta Errors
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com