Chapter 4: defined benefit integration provisions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 4: defined benefit integration provisions

Description:

How xyz's Retirement Benefit Is Combined With Social Security. Example: ... did not change as Social Security benefits increased through colas. TRA 86 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: jacklva
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 4: defined benefit integration provisions


1
Chapter 4 defined benefit integration provisions
  • Last updated 9/17/00

2
How xyzs Retirement Benefit Is Combined With
Social Security
  • Example
  • Age 65 - 30 years of service - FAE 3,000 -
    Social Security Benefit 1,313.10
  • 60 of 3000 1,800.00
  • 50 of 1313 - 656.55
  • xyz Retirement Benefit 1,143.45
  • Social Security Benefit 1,313.10
  • Total Monthly Retirement Benefit 2,456.55 (81.9
    of FAE)
  • In this example, the final average earnings is
    3,000. The total retirement benefit is
    2,456.55.
  • FAE - Final Average Earnings, including Profit
    Sharing

3
A quick review of PIA offset plans
  • pre-TRA86 Revenue Ruling 71-446 imposed a
    maximum limit on the permitted offset
  • up to 83 1/3 percent but most employers did not
    want to explain a reduction higher than 50
    percent to employees
  • N.B. linked to primary PIA
  • did not change as Social Security benefits
    increased through colas

4
TRA 86
  • Add Section 401(l) defining statutory permitted
    disparity and killing pure excess
  • offset Abbot provides 1.1 highest average pay
    (max 35) with offset of .5 highest 3 year
    average pay up to Social Security covered comp
    (yob table) participation (max 35 years)
  • excess Acco provides (0.75 HAP to CC 1.25
    HAP over CC) service (max 30)

5
Impact of TRA 86 on employers
  • According to CRS, it appears to have influenced
    plan sponsors to change their integration methods
    from offset to excess
  • Although more than 1/2 of all pension
    participants were still covered by integrated
    plans

6
Employer breakdown by size
KPMG Retirement Benefits in the 1990s 1998
7
What happened to PIA offset?
  • Conventional PIA-offset plan violates the
    integration disparity condition under 401(l)
  • Does not mean that this violates the
    nondiscrimination requirement
  • However, must satisfy the general
    nondiscrimination test (Section 401(a)(4))

8
What does this mean?
  • Quick definition of rate groups and minimum
    coverage principles
  • IF the plan covers no HCEs, then satisfaction
    should be automatic
  • Otherwise, depends on demographics of the group
    (see Benefits Quarterly article)

9
What is the difference between a PIA-offset and a
statutory offset?
  • Mathematically they may be essentially the same
  • See Record of the Society of Actuaries, Volume
    16, Number 4B, page 3071 for a discussion
  • BUT from the employees standpoint it MAY be true
    that the impact of the latter is harder to discern

10
Interested in more detail on permitted disparity?
11
Permitted disparity
  • The benefits from the employer's plan must be
    dovetailed with Social Security benefits
  • in such a manner that employees earning over the
    taxable base will not receive combined benefits
    under the two programs that are proportionately
    greater than the combined benefits for employees
    earning under this amount.
  • The integration level
  • the dollar amount specified in an excess plan at
    or below which the rate of employer-provided
    contributions or the plan is less than the rate
    of employer provided contributions or benefits
    under the plan above such dollar amount.
  • The offset level
  • the dollar limit specified in the plan for the
    amount of each employee's final average
    compensation taken into account in determining
    the offset under an offset plan
  • The covered compensation
  • the average (without indexing) of the taxable
    wage bases in effect for an employee for each
    year during the 35-year period ending with the
    year in which Social Security retirement age is
    attained

12
Alternative methods of meeting the Section 401(l)
requirements for a defined benefit plan
  • excess plan
  • the rate at which employer-provided benefits are
    determined with respect to average annual
    compensation above the integration level is
    greater than the rate at which employer-provided
    benefits are determined with respect to average
    annual compensation at or below the integration
    level
  • expressed as a percentage of such average annual
    compensation
  • offset plan
  • each employee's employer-provided benefit is
    reduced or offset by a specified percentage of
    the employee's final average compensation up to
    the offset level under the plan.

13
Average annual compensation and final average
compensation.
  • Average annual compensation is calculated as an
    average over a period of at least three
    consecutive years, and can exclude years before
    the final ten years of service.
  • Final average compensation is the average of the
    employee's annual compensation from the employer
    for the three consecutive year period ending with
    or within the plan year.
  • Compensation for any year in excess of the
    taxable wage base in effect at the beginning of
    that year must not be taken into account in
    determining final average compensation.

14
Maximum excess allowance
  • The disparity between the excess benefit
    percentage and the base benefit percentage may
    not exceed the maximum excess allowance defined
    as the lesser of
  • the base benefit percentage or
  • 0.75 percent (reduced for any integration level
    or retirement age modifications)

15
Gross benefit percentage
  • The rate at which employer-provided benefit are
    determined under an offset plan (before
    application of the offset) with respect to an
    employee's average annual compensation (expressed
    as a percentage of average annual compensation)
  • The disparity (as determined by the offset
    percentage) may not exceed the maximum offset
    allowance defined as the lesser of
  • 0.75 percent (reduced for any integration level
    or retirement age modifications as explained
    below) or
  • one-half of the gross benefit percentage,
    multiplied by a fraction (not to exceed one)
    equal to the employee's average annual
    compensation divided by the employee's final
    average compensation up to the offset level

16
Annual/Cumulative disparity fractions
  • Disparity provided under the plan divided by
    either the maximum excess allowance (for excess
    plans) or the maximum offset allowance (for
    offset plans)
  • ? disparity fractions ? 1
  • The cumulative permitted disparity limit is
    satisfied if the sum of the employee's total
    annual disparity fractions does not exceed 35

17
The future of PIA offsets?
  • If the government were to improve Social
    Security benefits and the gross pension benefit
    did not change, the larger offset would result in
    a smaller net benefit
  • Section 411 of the IRC (vesting) generally
    prohibits a reduction in benefits already accrued
  • Will this be modified????

18
The other side of Social Security reform
KPMG Retirement Benefits in the 1990s 1998
19
Questions
  • The following facts apply to the next three
    questions unless otherwise provided plan is
    noncontributory and is the only plan ever
    maintained by the employer the plan uses a
    normal retirement age of 65 and contains no
    provision that would require a reduction on the
    0.75 percent factor. Defined benefit excess
    plans used each employee's covered compensation
    as the integration level offset plans used each
    employee's covered compensation is the offset
    level and provides that an employee's final
    average compensation is limited to the employee's
    average annual compensation each employee has a
    Social Security retirement age of 65.

20
Db integration - 1
  • An excess plan provides a normal retirement
    benefit of 0.5 percent of average annual
    compensation in excess of the integration level,
    for each year of service. The plan provides not
    benefits with respect to average annual
    compensation up to the integration level. Result?

21
Db integration - 2
  • An offset plan that provides a normal retirement
    benefit of 2 percent of average annual
    compensation, minus 0.75 percent of final average
    compensation up to the offset level, for each
    year of service up to 35. result?

22
Db integration 3
  • skip

23
Db integration - 4
  • An employee benefits under C, a dc excess plans
    and B, a Defined benefit excess plan of the
    employer. Plan C provides a base contribution
    percentage of 5 percent and an excess
    contribution percentage of 7 percent. Plan B
    provides a base benefit percentage of 1 percent
    and an excess benefit percentage of 1.35 percent.
    Do the plans satisfy the annual overall pd limit
    with respect to the employee?

24
Db integration - 5
  • A Defined benefit excess plan that provides a
    normal retirement benefit of 0.75 percent of
    average annual compensation up to cc, plus 1.25
    percent of average annual compensation above cc,
    for each year of service up to 45. result?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com