78th Legislature Interim Charges Regulatory Briefing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

78th Legislature Interim Charges Regulatory Briefing

Description:

Texas Department of Banking. April 20, 2004. House Financial Institutions Committee ... service provider will be able to fall under the OCC's preemption umbrella. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: rlb8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 78th Legislature Interim Charges Regulatory Briefing


1
78th Legislature Interim Charges Regulatory
Briefing
House Financial InstitutionsCommittee
  • Texas Department of Banking
  • Testimony of
  • Commissioner Randall S. James
  • April 20, 2004

2
OCC Preemption of State Laws
  • Background Information
  • On January 6, 2004, the Comptroller of the
    Currency (OCC) adopted final rules that
    effectively preempt all state laws that apply to
    activities of national banks and their operating
    subsidiaries, unless (i) Congress has expressly
    incorporated state-law standards into federal
    statutes, or (ii) particular state laws have only
    an incidental effect on national banks. And,
    the OCC preempted any state visitorial rights
    as well.
  • This occurred in spite of requests from
    Congressional leaders to delay implementation.
    The following groups also expressed opposition
  • Previously, the OCC would occasionally preempt
    state law, but on a case-by-case basis after
    performing an analysis of the state law and its
    impact on national banks. The practical effect of
    the new rules is to accomplish sweeping
    preemptions, or field preemption, of state laws
    similar to that of the Office of Thrift
    Supervision.

3
OCC Preemption of State Laws
  • Why is OCC preemption detrimental to Texas?
  • OCC is attempting to establish field preemption
    by expressing its preemption rules as general
    principles, without providing clear guidance on
    what banks are expected to do. This will create
    enormous uncertainty in the industry.
  • Severely limits the ability of the Texas
    Legislature to pass laws that affect financial
    service providers in Texas.
  • National banks operating in Texas can refuse to
    comply with laws designed to protect Texas
    citizens. And, due to a Constitutional parity
    provision, state-chartered banks are due equal
    treatment.
  • Simply by organizing as a subsidiary of a
    national bank, any financial service provider
    will be able to fall under the OCCs preemption
    umbrella.
  • OCC preemption affects more than just banks.
    Most financial service companies finance
    companies, mortgage lenders, check cashers,
    securities firms, etc. - that are chartered,
    licensed, and regulated in Texas can organize as
    a subsidiary of a national bank and claim that
    they are not required to comply with Texas laws.

4
OCC Preemption of State Laws
  • Why is OCC preemption detrimental to Texas?
    (Continued)
  • State agencies and law enforcement officials have
    a good history of protecting consumers often
    through regulatory programs or laws that would
    now be preempted by the OCC. CSBS reports that
    state banking agencies returned 500 million to
    consumers after investigations uncovered fraud
    and deceptive practices. (See the attached press
    release on state regulators role in Household
    Finance settlement.)
  • Though the OCC asserts otherwise, removing
    nonbank subsidiaries from state oversight will
    not be replaced by OCC enforcement.
  • OCC preemption will create an incentive to
    organize as a national charter, thus eroding the
    foundation of the dual banking system.
  • The dual state and federal system has provided a
    safety valve against out-dated and inflexible
    regulatory controls.
  • Acting as laboratories for innovation, the states
    have frequently developed new products and
    services, some of which include checking
    accounts, NOW accounts, and branch banking.
    These have limited national risk implications.

5
OCC Preemption of State Laws
  • Possible Considerations
  • State laws regarding consumer protections and
    lending that exempt financial institutions.
    (Example Indiana, see included article)
  • Continued pursuit of Congressional and / or court
    action against the OCCs rules.

6
OCC Preemption of State Laws
  • State Laws That Might be Preempted
  • These are current Texas statutes to which
    preemption could apply. The list is not intended
    to be all-inclusive.
  • Property Code 73.003 prohibits an inactive
    account being reduced by the imposition of fees.
  •  
  • A nonuniform UCC provision in Business Commerce
    Code 4.406(b) requires a bank that does not
    return items in a statement to provide at least
    two items per statement cycle at no charge.
  •  
  • Transportation Code 521.126 requires a specific
    disclosure to be given to and consent obtained
    from a customer before information from the
    customer's drivers license can be retained in an
    electronic database.
  •  
  • Texas Constitution, Article XVI, Section 50, in
    its requirements for home equity loans, contains
    very explicit requirements regarding terms of
    credit, including schedule for repayment, minimum
    payments, loan-to-value ratios, circumstances
    under which a loan may called, etc. In addition,
    the section requires very explicit disclosures
    for home equity loans.
  •  
  • Finance Code Title 4 includes requirements
    relating to collateral on insurance and credit
    life and other products. For example, a lender
    may not require credit life and similar products
    for a consumer installment loan. An entire
    chapter of the Credit Title deals with the
    methodology for notifying customers with regard
    to collateral protection insurance, but provides
    a safe harbor for banks that comply.
  •  
  • Finance Code Title 4 also contains very explicit
    requirements regarding terms of credit and
    disclosures with respect to certain consumer
    loans, and perhaps imposes some of these
    requirements on certain types of commercial loans
    in specific contexts. Texas law also has specific
    requirements or limitations relating to private
    mortgage insurance, acceptance of a binder for
    collateral and other rules relating to insurance
    protecting collateral.
  •  

7
OCC Preemption of State Laws
  • State Laws That Might be Preempted (Continued)
  • Article 21.48A of the Insurance Code prohibits a
    lender from requiring a borrower to purchase home
    owners insurance in an amount that exceeds the
    replacement value of the dwelling and its
    contents (i.e., excluding the land), regardless
    of the amount of the mortgage or other financing
    arrangements.
  •  
  • Finance Code 307.051, 307.052 allows the
    collateral protection insurance on real property
    to be either the amount of the unpaid
    indebtedness or replacement cost of the
    improvements, which matches the law regarding
    practices of the secondary market mortgage
    servicers. A recent amendment requires the lender
    to add a statement to the notice to borrower
    relating to the FAIR plan.
  •  
  • Finance Code 347.254, relating to manufactured
    housing, requires a lender to establish an escrow
    account for taxes, although the escrow
    requirement does not apply to a federally insured
    financial institution that does not otherwise
    require the escrow of taxes, insurance premiums,
    fees, or other charges in connection with loans
    secured by residential real property.
  •  
  • With respect to third-party financing for the
    construction of improvements under a residential
    construction contract, Property Code 53.257
    requires the lender to meet certain documentation
    delivery requirements and make certain
    disclosures.
  •  
  • Finance Code 276.001 prohibits a bank from
    opening an account in the name of a candidate for
    public office unless it first obtains the
    candidate's consent and signature. The candidate
    is not required to be a signatory to the account.
  •  
  • Finance Code Chapter 277 requires a bank to
    obtain certain information from a business
    account holder and then make that information
    available to holders of dishonored checks on the
    account upon an appropriately documented request.
  •  
  •  

8
OCC Preemption of State Laws
  • State Laws That Might be Preempted (Continued)
  • Business Commerce Code Chapter 46, dealing with
    electronic mail solicitation, prohibits a person
    from sending an unsolicited commercial electronic
    mail message unless either (1) the recipient is
    an existing customer, or (2) "ADV" (or
    "ADULT-ADVERTISEMENT" for sexually explicit
    material) is in the beginning of the message
    line.
  •  
  • Business Commerce Code 35.57 requires
    truncation to the last five digits of the credit
    card account number for electronic credit card
    receipts.
  • Property Code 93.012 requires that charges on
    commercial leases be reasonable and made by a
    method customarily used by landlords in
    commercial leases. This would apply to a bank as
    lessor of space in its office building.
  •  
  • Property Code 11.008 requires a Notice of
    Confidentiality Rights to be included in a deed,
    mortgage, or deed of trust presented for
    recording with the county clerk. The notice
    advises natural persons that they may remove or
    strike certain personal information in the
    document.
  •  
  • Business Commerce Code 20.06(h) requires a
    business offering check verification or check
    guarantee services, on request and with proper
    identification, to disclose to a consumer in
    writing all information pertaining to the
    consumer in its files.
  •  
  • Trust Code 113.059 prohibits a settlor of a
    trust from relieving a trustee of liability for
    certain actions or conditions and provides that
    the exculpatory provision in a trust instrument
    relieving the trustee of liability for a breach
    of trust is ineffective to the extent that the
    provision is inserted as an "abuse" by the
    trustee.

9
Profile of Texas Banking
CIT - Chartered in Texas COT - Chartered
outside Texas Information is from the FDIC
Summary of Deposits as of June 30, 2003 and the
NCUA Semi-annual report. Numbers are in
millions. State Chartered Banks, Savings Banks
and Credit Unions represent 22 of total deposits
in Texas.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com