PowerPoint Presentation Lecture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

PowerPoint Presentation Lecture

Description:

who owns the media today? ownership structures of local newspapers. media map of u.s. media ... news flows. implications. censorship. focus. fcc's current ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: warren1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Lecture


1

surveillance and capture fdm 20c introduction
to digital media lecture 22.05.2003
warren sack / film digital media department /
university of california, santa cruz
2
last time
  • who owns the media today?
  • ownership structures of local newspapers
  • media map of u.s. media
  • media map of international media
  • types of connection between media companies
  • mutual investment
  • interlocking directorates
  • news flows
  • implications
  • censorship
  • focus
  • fccs current review of ownership laws

3
media concentration bagdikians chronology
  • 1983 50 corporations dominated most every mass
    medium in the United States
  • 1987 23 corporations dominated
  • 1987-1996 the number decreased to 14
    corporations
  • 1997 10 corporations dominated the media
  • 2000 6 firms now dominate all U.S. mass media
  • 2003 FCC to decide whether to retain existing
    media ownership laws

4
what is the FCC?
  • Federal Communications Commission
  • http//www.fcc.gov/
  • what does it do?
  • listen to the interview by Robert McChesney with
    Commissioner Michael Copps
  • http//www.will.uiuc.edu/am/mediamatters/default.h
    tm

5
FCC rules currently under review
  • Broadcast-newspaper cross-ownership rule This
    policy has prohibited the two most important
    sources of information in a community-the daily
    newspaper and a broadcast TV station-from being
    owned by the same company.
  • Local TV multiple ownership rule and the radio/TV
    cross-ownership rule These rules limit somewhat
    the number of stations that any one entity can
    own in a single community.
  • National TV ownership rule This policy limits
    the number of TV stations a single company can
    own. The current limit prohibits a company from
    controlling stations that collectively reach 35
    percent of all TV households
  • Dual Network Rule This policy prevents one of
    the four major networks-ABC, CBS, NBC, and
    Fox-from buying another network.
  • http//www.democraticmedia.org/issues/mediaownersh
    ip/index.html

6
outline
  • surveillance
  • history
  • art
  • technology
  • legislation
  • capture
  • history (as extension of taylorism/fordism)
  • comparison with surveillance
  • cycle or process

7
surveillance
  • close watch kept over someone or something
  • Etymology French, from surveiller to watch over,
    from sur- veiller to watch, from Latin
    vigilare, from vigil watchful

8
agres surveillance model
  • visual metaphors
  • assumption that watching is nondisruptive
  • territorial metaphors as in the invasion of
    private space
  • centralized orchestration by means of a
    bureaucracy with a unified set of files
  • identification with the state and malevolent aims
    of a specifically political nature

9
history of surveillance the panopticon
  • panopticon developed by jeremy bentham in the
    18th century for prison
  • similar designs adapted for hospitals and
    factories
  • in the 18th century prisons and hospitals known,
    in france, collectively as environments of
    humanity

10
panopticon (1791)
11
panopticon (1791)
12
claude-nicolas ledouxs salt plant at
arc-et-senans (1779)
13
salt plant at arc-et-senans (1779)
14
surveillance as a dream of the 18th enlightenment
  • Michel Foucault I would say that Bentham was
    the complement t Rousseau. What in fact was the
    Rousseauist dream that motivated many of the
    revolutionaries? It was the dream of a
    transparent society, visible and legible in each
    of its parts, the dream of there no longer
    existing any zones of darkness, zones established
    by the privledges of royal power or the
    prerogatives of some corporation.
  • the eye of power, a conversation with jean-pierre
    barou and michelle perrot

15
but...
  • They that can give up essential liberty to
    obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither
    liberty nor safety.
  • Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of
    Pennsylvania

16
surveillance today
  • some artists and art groups concerned with
    surveillance
  • see the zkm show, ctrl space, 2001, curated by
    thomas y. levin
  • surveillance camera players
  • http//www.notbored.org/scp-video.html
  • institute for applied autonomy
  • www.appliedautonomy.com/isee/info.htm
  • julia scher
  • jenny marketou
  • steve mann
  • http//www.eyetap.org/wearcam/shootingback/

17
technologies of surveillance
  • example viisage superbowl XXXV
  • the company www.viisage.com
  • the technology eigenfaces
  • white.media.mit.edu/vismod/demos/facerec/basic.htm
    l

18
from surveillance to dataveillance
  • dataveillance/spying
  • carnavor
  • echelon
  • total information awareness agency
  • now the terrorism information awareness project
  • name change as of may 21, 2003 to mollify
    congress worries about intrusion of the privacy
    of u.s. citizens
  • headed by convicted felon (former admiral) john
    poindexter
  • http//www.darpa.mil/iao/TIASystems.htm

19
patriot act and post 9/11
  • aclus analysis
  • see http//www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cf
    m?ID11813c207
  • new powers of surveillance, search and seizure
  • threat to the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth
    and fourteenth amendments of the U.S. Constitution

20
surveillance/security/control/capture
l
  • from surveillance to capture via grammars of
    action

21
taylorism, fordism and grammars of action
ford assembly line circa 1925
22
grammars of action/winograd flores
23
capture (in comparison with surveillance)
  • linguistic metaphors (e.g., grammars of action)
  • instrumentation and reorganization of existing
    activities
  • captured activity is assembled from standardized
    parts from an institutional setting
  • decentralized and hetrogeneous organization
  • the driving aims are not necessarily political,
    but philoophical/market driven

24
political economy of capture
  • ...by imposing a mathematically precise form
    upon previously unformalized activities, capture
    standardizes those activities and their component
    elements and thereby prepares them for an
    eventual transition to market-based relationships
  • agre, p. 755

25
five stage cycle of grammars of action
  • analysis
  • articulation
  • imposition
  • instrumentation
  • elaboration
  • agre, p. 746-747

26
surveillance versus capture versus market
research?
  • what is the aim of market research? at whom is it
    aimed?

27
next time
  • privacy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com