Research Methods I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Methods I

Description:

A system of interconnected abstractions or ideas that condenses ... Elephant's trunk, giraffe's neck. Stay away from ... should Psychology Club serve at ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: rboug
Category:
Tags: methods | research

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Methods I


1
Research Methods I
  • Role of Theory in Research

2
Theory
  • Definitions I found
  • A system of interconnected abstractions or ideas
    that condenses and organizes knowledge about the
    world.
  • In a general sense, any more or less formalized
    conceptualization of the relationship between
    variables. Any generalized explanatory principle.
  • An always tentative explanation of phenomena that
    we observe never proven representative of the
    most logical explanation based on currently
    available evidence becomes stronger as more
    supporting evidence is gathered provides a
    context for predictions.

3
Misconceptions about theory
  • A tentative theory about the natural world a
    concept that is not yet verified but that if true
    would explain certain facts or phenomena "a
    scientific hypothesis that survives experimental
    testing becomes a scientific theory
  • A theory is more than just an idea.
  • All theories are not equal.
  • Examples of theories
  • Theory of gravity
  • Theory that the earth revolves around the sun
  • Theory of evolution
  • Frustration-aggression theory

4
Hypothesis vs. theory
  • Hypothesis is an educated guess. A prediction
    about the relationship between two or more
    variables.
  • A prediction as to what you expect to find.
  • Hypotheses are more specific than theories.
  • Theories have many different hypotheses.
  • Results of a single research study will not prove
    or disprove a theory. 
  • If the hypotheses offered by the theory are
    confirmed, the theory is supported (not proved).
  • If lots of studies reveal that many of the
    hypotheses generated by the theory are false, the
    theory must be reevaluated.

5
What makes a good theory?
  • 1. Falsifiability - The theory must make
    sufficiently precise predictions that we can at
    least imagine evidence that would contradict the
    theory.
  • Examples Frustration-aggression theory
  • Freuds theory of repression.
  • Theory of psychic ability
  • If something is not falsifiable, it doesnt mean
    it is wrong, simply that it has no place in
    science.

6
  • 2. Parsimony simplicity
  • The best theory is the one that makes the fewest
    number of assumptions
  • All things being equal, the simplest theory is
    the best theory.
  • Also known as Ockhams razor
  • The simplest of two or more competing theories is
    preferable and the unknown should first be
    explained in terms of the known
  • E.g., theories of intelligence
  • Theories of UFOs
  • Magic acts
  • Warning simple theories are not always right.

7
  • 3. Generativity - A good theory doesnt just
    explain results that have been found, but it also
    generates predictions that can be tested
  • Research is promoted by the offering of a good
    theory.
  • E.g., frustration-aggression little evidence
    for the theory initially, but it generated a lot.

8
  • 4. Precision the theory makes precise
    predictions.
  • Ambiguity is bad for a theory.
  • Predictions must have consistency there cannot
    be internal contradictions.
  • 5. Good track record the theory holds up to
    research results. Studies have tested the
    hypotheses and have provided support.

9
The use of theory
  • Theory guides research
  • Organizes ideas
  • All research has a purpose
  • Paradigms
  • Sociology, history, and political science,
    especially.
  • A model or framework for observation and
    understanding, which shapes both what we see and
    how we understand it.
  • E.g., conflict theory, feminist theory

10
The Aspects of Theory
  • Theories can be categorized by
  • The direction of reasoning
  • The level of explanation

11
Direction of theorizing
  • Inductive vs. deductive reasoning
  • Deductive reasoning reasoning from the general
    to the particular
  • Process of concluding that something must be true
    because it is a special case of a general
    principle that is known to be true
  • All children like ice-cream general principle
  • Tommy is a child particular case
  • Tommy will like ice-cream deduction
  • Examples.

12
  • Inductive reasoning reasoning from the
    particular to the general
  • Process of reasoning that a general principle is
    true because the special cases you've seen are
    true
  • Example
  • Dr. Boughner is strange
  • Dr. Boughner lives in Tulsa
  • People who live in Tulsa are strange
  • More examples
  • Creation and use of stereotypes

13
  • Applying these types of reasoning to theory
    construction.
  • Deductive approach build a theory by starting
    with an abstract, logical idea. Based on the
    theory, perform research to test the theory.
  • Often starts with common sense, personal
    experience
  • Theories change with testing

14
  • Inductive approach build a theory by first
    looking at the results of many research projects
    and offering a theory that can be used to explain
    the data.
  • Creating a theory in order to explain data.

15
  • Examples
  • Frustration-aggression theory very little
    evidence existed in 1939. Deductive reasoning.
  • Thorndikes law of effect
  • any behavior that is followed by favorable
    consequences will be more likely to occur in the
    future, and behavior that is followed by aversive
    consequences will be less likely to occur.
  • Thorndike built the law after years of research.
    Inductive reasoning.

16
  • Grounded theory
  • Full use of induction
  • Typically, both induction and deduction are used
    by scientists.
  • Good theories probably use a little of both.

17
Warning about induction
  • Gould and Lewontin (1979) - The spandrels of San
    Marco and the Panglossian paradigm
  • Elephants trunk, giraffes neck
  • Stay away from just-so stories. Just because it
    fits the data does not mean it is right.
  • The main problem with just-so stories lack of
    falsifiability.

18
Level of explanation
  • Levels of explanation are different throughout
    science
  • E.g., chemistry vs. physics vs. psychology vs.
    sociology
  • Theory can be used at various levels of
    explanation.
  • In the social sciences, three levels of
    explanation for theory.

19
  • Micro-level theory seeks to explain behavior at
    the level of the individual or family environment
  • Most of psychology is at the micro level
  • Examples
  • Frustration-aggression hypothesis
  • Sternbergs theory of love

20
  • Macro-level theory seeks to explain behavior at
    the level of large groups of people.
  • Study things like ethnicity, class, or gender
  • Example
  • Conflict theory the society or organization
    functions so that each individual participant and
    its groups struggle to maximize their benefits,
    which inevitably contributes to social change
    such as changes in politics and revolutions.
  • Evolution
  • Much of sociology is at the macro level
  • The primary difference between psychology and
    sociology is the level of explanation.

21
  • Meso-level theory seeks to explain the
    interactions of micro-level organisms.
  • Somewhat between micro and macro.
  • Looks at things like social institutions,
    organizations, or communities. Basically small
    groups.
  • Ex. What role should Psychology Club serve at
    RSU?
  • Much of communications functions at the
    meso-level, though also micro and macro.
  • Social psychology also may function at the
    meso-level.

22
  • Many times the same topic can be studied by all 3
    levels of theory.
  • E.g., Tax cuts
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com