Title:
1Those who cast the votes decide nothing, those
who count the votes decide everything
 Joseph Stalin
2- The goal of a voting system is to accurately
translate voter intent into a final tally
3Election Musts
- Every vote counts
- Every vote is counted
- Every vote accurately reflects the intent of the
voter - The voting public has confidence in the electoral
system - The paper record is the legal representation of
the vote - Electronic records can be audited and compared
with the paper records - Election equipment and systems are open for
public review
4What Must Go Right?
- Registration
- Polling Places
- Poll Workers
- Ballots
- Voting Mechanism
- District Tally
- Aggregate Tally
- Recount
5Characteristics of a Perfect Voting System
- Accuracy
- Tally correctly
- Secure from interference
- Anonymity
- Ballot must be secret
- There must be no way to force someones
- Scalability
- Ability to handle large elections
- Ability to handle many mixes of candidates and
issues - Ability to serve disabled
- Ability to serve other languages
- Speed
- The American Way
- Schneier on Security, http//www.schneier.com/blog
/archives/2004/11/the_problem_wit.html
6Old-fashioned Voting Paper ballot hand
countPaper ballot machine countLevers
machine countPunch Cards machine count
- PROS
- Verifiable in recount
- Simple to administer
- Low Tech
- CONS
- Inflexible design
- Must trust poll workers
- Slow to tally
- Possible poor
- ballot design
7Old Fashioned Troubles
- Bad Weather
- Shortage of or insufficiently trained poll
workers - Mail in ballots
- Super Bowl Parades
- Ballot Stuffing or lost ballots
- Unscrupulous poll workers
- Disenfranchised voters
8Help America Vote Act"Every registered voter
deserves to have confidence that the system is
fair and elections are honest, that every vote is
recorded and that the rules are consistently
applied." --President Bush, upon signing
legislation to authorize HAVA, October 22, 2002.
- requires states to
- modernize voting equipment
- Centralize registered voter rolls
- Require drivers license to register
- Make voting machines accessible to disabled
9THE ANSWER!Touch Screen Voting Machines
10E-Voting
- PROS
- Easy to use
- Electronic guidance thru process
- Audio prompting
- ADA devices
- Different Languages
- CONS
- Requires high tech expertise of poll workers
- Can be hijacked
- May have software bugs
- Difficult to verify
11Voting Machines
- Diebold AccuVote TSX
- ES S iVotronic
- Optical Scan
12Mishaps - Arithmetic
- In Fairfax County, VA, in 2003, a programming
error in the electronic voting machines caused
them to mysteriously subtract 100 votes from one
particular candidates totals. - In Volusia County, FL in 2000, an electronic
voting machine gave Al Gore a final vote count of
negative 16,022 votes. - The 2003 election in Boone County, IA, had the
electronic vote-counting equipment showing that
more than 140,000 votes had been cast in the Nov.
4 municipal elections. The county has only 50,000
residents and less than half of them were
eligible to vote in this election
13Mishaps Programming Code
- In San Bernardino County, CA in 2001, the
computer looked for votes in the wrong portion of
the ballot in 33 local elections, which meant
that no votes registered on those ballots for
that election. A recount was done by hand. - 2006 Waldenburg, AK, 0 votes tallied for
mayoral candidate - 2006-Sarasota, FL 18,000 person undervote for a
Congressional seat
14Security Flaws
- Johns Hopkins University and Rice University
researchers have discovered numerous serious
security flaws in the Diebold Electron Systems'
e-voting terminal - There are several ways in which individual voters
could vote multiple times in a given election. - The researchers also uncovered methods permitting
voters to "trick" the e-voting machines into
allowing them system administrator privileges or
even terminating an election before tallying all
legitimate votes. - "EFF supports electronic voting, but this report
indicates Diebold's e-voting system isn't ready
for prime time," said EFF Legal Director Cindy
Cohn, who advised the security researchers. "This
report describes how voters, election officials,
insiders at e-voting companies, and even
custodians at election locations could manipulate
elections and defraud the public." - http//www.eff.org/Activism/E-voting/20030723_eff_
pr.php
15Mishap - Scale
- A problem with a manual machine just affects that
machine. A software problem, whether accidental
or intentional, can affect many thousands of
machines -- and skew the results of an entire
election.
16In 2004 Elections
- Election Systems Software (ESS) (40-50) and
Diebold Election Systems (DES) (30-35) are
responsible for the integrity and processing of
around - 80 of United States election voting
- voter registration
- printing of ballots
- the programming of the voting machines
- the counting and tabulation of the votes
- the final reporting of the results for over
- 150 million Americans.
172004 Election
- Florida use of E-Touch or Op-Scan machines
could predict the outcome at the plt.0001 level - Gahanna Ohio 20K eligible voters, 70 turnout
21K votes counted - Most swing states had 4-15 discrepancies between
exit polls and results - Florida one county has 77 registered democrats
but republicans received 77 of vote
18Virginia - 2006
- Jim Webb 1,175,579 votes 49.59
- George Allen 1,166,253 votes 49.20
- Difference 9,326 votes .039
- A change of 3 votes per polling place would
change the outcome. - There are no paper backups for Virginias DREs
19Primaries 2008
- New Hampshire
- South Carolina
20Voter Verified Paper Record Manual Audits
VVPR manual audits (16) VVPR required No
audit required (14) VVPR in use statewide not
required (8) Nothing required (12)
21How Do You Insure a Good Outcome?
- Voter Verified Paper Ballot System
- Software and Hardware is opened to public
scrutiny - Well trained Poll Workers
- Adequate testing of machines and procedures
- Open Source Software