BA Hons Broadcast Journalism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

BA Hons Broadcast Journalism

Description:

Aljazeera, Qatar based Arab news station critical of US/Coalition foreign policy ... Sami Muhyideen al-Haj Aljazeera cameraman held at Guantanamo. 130 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: tur753
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BA Hons Broadcast Journalism


1
BA (Hons) Broadcast Journalism
The Centre for Broadcasting and Journalism
  • Freedom of Expression
  • Airtime for the Minority/Controversial View

2
Freedom of Expression
  • Areopagitica, a Speech for the Liberty of
    Unlicensed Printing, 1644,
  • One of the first publications advocating freedom
    of the press
  • Pamphleteers are the first manifestation of the
    free press

3
Freedom of Expression
  • A right long fought for and still in need of
    defending
  • Bill of Rights 1688 (1 Will Mary Sess.2)
  • ..That the freedome of speech and debates in
    Parlyament ought not to be impeached or
    questioned in any court or place out of
    Parlyament

4
Freedom of Expression
  • Britain has no constitutional or legal tradition
    of media freedom
  • Freedom of expression was traditionally protected
    by the ordinary courts
  • The media had the same rights of free expression
    as the private citizen

5
AV Dicey
  • The legal philosopher and jurist Dicey expressed
    this position thus
  • Freedom of discussion is in England little
    else than the right to write or say anything
    which a jury of twelve shopkeepers, think it
    expedient to be said or written

6
ECHR and Human Rights Act 1998
  • As a high contracting party to the European
    Convention on Human Rights the UK was bound by
    article 10 on freedom of expression
  • However before the period immediately preceding
    the inception of HRA 1998 the UK courts actively
    discouraged free speech

7
Media Bias
  • Media bias has been with us since the media
    first appeared
  • The modern media is far from modern in terms of
    chronology
  • Media in terms of mass audience media arrived
    with the printing press

8
Media Bias
  • Practicalities prevent journalist from covering
    every angle in a story
  • Practicalities make media bias inevitable
  • Facts need to be linked into a coherent narrative
    (Newton 1989)
  • Excessive explanation in terms of balance would
    be confusing

9
Media Bias
  • Other factors influencing bias
  • Media ownership
  • Media Staff preferences
  • Audience targeted
  • Advertising revenue
  • Deadlines

10
Media Bias
  • Target Audience and selective bias
  • Modern media is directed towards particular
    audiences
  • Tabloid press
  • Quality press
  • Established political viewpoints

11
Media Bias
  • "The sinister fact about literary censorship in
    England is that it is largely voluntary
  • George Orwell Animal
    Farm (Preface)
  • Orwell recognises the fact that the readers
    themselves chose to self censor material they
    do not like

12
Political Censorship
  • Sinn Fein political wing of Irish Republicanism
    (IRA)
  • Sinn Fein spokespersons banned from speaking on
    TV during 1980s (denied the oxygen of publicity)
  • Led to absurd overdubbing of an actors voice
    speaking the words of the spokesperson

13
Terrorism Act 2006
  • Filling a gap in the law?
  • By inhibiting free speech
  • Incitement to commit acts of terrorism already
    well established as an offence under the criminal
    law
  • R v Most (1881) 7 QBD 244
  • Newspaper article advocating the assassination of
    crowned heads of Europe

14
Terrorism Act 2006
  • Joint Committee Third Report identifies what it
    calls a gap in the law
  • While it is incitement to say please go out and
    blow up a tube train on July 7th in London
  • But not generalised incitement
  • We encourage everybody to blow up tube trains

15
Terrorism Act 2006
  • S.1(1)
  • This section applies to a statement that is to be
    understood by some or all of the members of the
    public to whom it is published as a direct
    encouragement or other inducement to them to the
    commission, preparation or instigation of acts of
    terrorism or convention offences

16
Terrorism Act 2006
  • The legislation is designed to prevent the
    glorification of terrorism
  • Offence can be committed either intentionally or
    by objective recklessness
  • Publisher intends to incite terrorism
  • The publisher sees an obvious risk of harm but
    goes ahead and publishes anyway

17
Terrorism Act 2006
  • Originally the interpretation of the Act would
    have left the media exposed when interviewing
    extremists
  • Publishing such statements may have been reckless
    as to the effect on viewers of readers
  • Jersild v Denmark (1994) 19 EHRR 1

18
Terrorism Act 2006
  • The original drafting could have left
    broadcasters open to criminal prosecution since
    the publication of a statement by an extremist
    would have made out the s.1(1) offence even if
    only recklessly
  • Leading to a chilling effect on interviews
  • S.1(6) as amended provides a defence

19
Terrorism Act 2006 s.1(6)
  • (a) that the statement neither expressed his
    views not had any endorsement (whether by virtue
    of section 3 or otherwise)
  • (b) that it was clear in all the circumstances of
    the statements publication that it did not
    express his views and (apart from the possibility
    of his having been given and failed to comply
    with a notice under subsection (3) of that
    section) did not have his endorsement
  • Mere reportage of another's words does not
    constitute an offence

20
Jersild v Denmark (1994) 19 EHRR 1
  • Danish journalist convicted of racism after
    showing a documentary in which racist groups
    expressed their views
  • Conviction disproportionate to aim pursued
  • Breach of Article 10 ECHR
  • Anti racist laws were not meant to stifle media
    coverage of racism
  • Media as public watchdog

21
Racism and Free Speech
  • Article 10 ECHR is often invoked as a defence to
    racist commentaries
  • Lehideux and Isornia v France (1998) 5BHRC 540
  • Kuhnen v Federal Republic of Germany (1988) 56 DR
    205
  • Material attacking the Conventions underlying
    values not protected by Article 10

22
Racism and Free Speech
  • BNP argue freedom of speech rights to attack
    Muslims as a wicked faith
  • BNP relies on current position whereby an attack
    on faith is not racist
  • Muslims in fact serve only as a convenient target
    facilitating attack on Asian cultures in general

23
Public Order Act 1986
  • S.18 Liability will arise if..
  • Threatening, abusive or insulting words or
    behaviour are used by the defendant to stir up
    racial hatred or which make it likely that racial
    hatred will be stirred up against a racial group
    in Great Britain

24
Public Order Act 1986
  • S.18 where intent is not evident..
  • The accused must be shown to have been aware that
    the words might be threatening abusive or
    insulting
  • S.18(5) Awareness equates to subjective
    recklessness

25
Public Order Act 1986
  • S.19 Intention to cause or likely to cause
  • S.20 By public performance (context must be
    considered)
  • S.21 extends the offence to showing or playing of
    visual images or sounds
  • S.22 intention or likelihood
  • S.164(2) Broadcasting Act covers programme
    services (cable TV)

26
Public Order Act 1986
  • S.22 can be committed by
  • Programme producer
  • Director
  • Television Company
  • By any person using the offending words or
    behaviour

27
Public Order Act 1986
  • S.22 very broadly worded section requiring
    caution in the making of programmes about racism
  • Can be committed without intent on part of
    programme makers
  • And contains no express defence where
    broadcasters distance themselves from the
    offensive behaviour

28
Public Order Act 1986
  • S.23 creates even more problems
  • An offence to be in possession of racially
    offensive material with a view to publication or
    distribution
  • Intention or likelihood that it will stir up
    racial hatred

29
Public Order Act 1986
  • All of the PA 1986 section offences have elements
    in common
  • No need to show that racial hatred was actually
    stirred up
  • No need to show that there was any intention to
    do so
  • Only necessary to show that it might have been

30
Public Order Act 1986
  • S.18 is the only public order offence that can be
    committed by words alone
  • The biggest threat to broadcasting is that an
    offence could be committed simply by the
    offensive words causing the listener to applaud
    the racist views expressed or to be encouraged by
    them

31
Suppressing the Opposition
  • Aljazeera, Qatar based Arab news station critical
    of US/Coalition foreign policy in Middle East
  • President George W Bush allegedly threatens to
    bomb its headquarters
  • Humorous not serious?

32
Suppressing the Opposition
  • Sami Muhyideen al-Haj Aljazeera cameraman held at
    Guantanamo
  • 130 interviews all aimed at Aljazeera (rather
    than Al Qaeda)
  • Al-Haj offered deal to spy for US government in
    exchange for money US citizenship and to be
    taught Journalism
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com