Orrs Love It or Lose It: The Coming Biophilia Revolution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Orrs Love It or Lose It: The Coming Biophilia Revolution

Description:

4: Francis Bacon (1561-1626) 'Francis Bacon provided the logic, and the evolution of government-funded research did the rest. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: fik5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Orrs Love It or Lose It: The Coming Biophilia Revolution


1
Orrs Love It or Lose It The Coming Biophilia
Revolution
  • HMXP 102
  • Adapted from Dr. Fikes slideshow

2
David W. Orr
  • Orr is the chair of the Environmental Studies
    Program at Oberlin College in Ohio.
  • He gives dozens of lectures around the country
    every year on environmental issues.
  • His paternal grandfather was Rev. W.W. Orr of
    Charlotte, NC.
  • Source http//www.oberlin.edu/news-info/98sep/o
    rr_profile.html

3
Biophobia
  • How does Orr define biophobia?
  •  What characteristics of biophobia does Orr list?

4
Characteristics of Biophobia
  • The world is not alive and worthy of respect, if
    not fear.
  • Distance yourself from animals (mere machines).
  • Have no sympathy for nature think of it only in
    scientific and economic terms.
  • Join power, money, knowledge in order to make
    nature useful.
  • Stress improvement and perpetual economic
    growth.
  • Cultivate dissatisfaction that can be alleviated
    only by mass consumption.

5
World Views
  • The next few slides help you explore WHY we
    arrived at the six characteristics of biophobia.

6
Re. 2 René Descartes (1596-1650)
  • Al Gore, Earth in the Balance  "The Cartesian
    approach to the human story allows us to believe
    that we are separate from the earth, entitled to
    view it as nothing more than an inanimate
    collection of resources that we can exploit
    however we like and this fundamental
    misperception has led us to our current crisis. 
  • One of the deepest and most lasting legacies of
    Descartes philosophy is his thesis that mind and
    body are really distinct--a thesis now called
    mind-body dualism. He reaches this conclusion
    by arguing that the nature of the mind (that is,
    a thinking, non-extended thing) is completely
    different from that of the body (that is, an
    extended, non-thinking thing), and therefore it
    is possible for one to exist without the other.
  • Source http//www.iep.utm.edu/d/descmind.htm

7
Homology
  • Descartes Environment
  • Mindbodyhumansnature
  • POINT There is disconnection on each side of
    the homology. What Descartes says about mind and
    body also applies to humans and nature.

8
Re. 4 Francis Bacon (1561-1626)
  • Francis Bacon provided the logic, and the
    evolution of government-funded research did the
    rest.
  • To take the place of the established tradition
    (a miscellany of Scholasticism, humanism, and
    natural magic), he proposed an entirely new
    system based on empirical and inductive
    principles and the active development of new arts
    and inventions, a system whose ultimate goal
    would be the production of practical knowledge
    for the use and benefit of men and the relief
    of the human condition.
  • Source http//www.iep.utm.edu/b/bacon.htm

9
Re. 1, 3, 5, and 6 Consumerism
  • What do you make of the obvious connection to
    Swimme, the sophisticated cultivation of
    dissatisfaction?
  • Swimme But at a deeper level, what we need to
    confront is a power of the advertiser to
    promulgate a worldview, a mini-cosmology, that is
    based upon dissatisfaction and craving (112).
  • Orr
  • Sixth, biophobia required the sophisticated
    cultivation of dissatisfaction, which could be
    converted into mass consumption.
  • Beneath each of these endeavors lies a barely
    concealed contempt for unaltered life and nature,
    as well as contempt for the people who are
    expected to endure the mistakes, purchase the
    results, and live with the consequences, whatever
    those may be. It is a contempt disguised by
    terms of bamboozlement, like bottom line,
    progress, needs, costs and benefits, economic
    growth, jobs, realism, research, and knowledge,
    words that go undefined and unexplained.
  • People must come to see their bondage as freedom
    and their discontents as commercially solvable
    problems.

10
A Troubling Contrast
  • What metaphors besides "board feet, tons,
    barrels, yield," etc. do we use to talk about
    nature?  Can you come up with others?
  • What does Orr say about stewardship?
  • What metaphors are more in line with stewardship?

11
Sample Nature Metaphors
  • Here are some areas (nouns and adjectives) to get
    you started.
  • Garden
  • Resource
  • Divine
  • Wilderness
  • Pristine
  • Female
  • Source http//www.wsu.edu8080/amerstu/ce/summe
    r97/ta/Metaphors.html

12
Question
  • How can we be good stewards of nature when we
    have the wrong metaphors to describe our
    relationship to it?
  • Perhaps by changing our metaphors
  • Argument as war vs. argument as dance (Lakoff and
    Johnson, page 8)
  • Our relationship to nature is USE vs. our
    relationship to nature is ____________.

13
A Further Problem
  • Not only metaphor is off. In addition, we tell
    ourselves the wrong myths about nature
  • What kind of myths do we have about nature? Cf.
    Gores emphasis on story.

14
Paul Bunyan and Babe
15
Paul Bunyan
16
Paul Bunyan
  • Source for the previous two slides
  • http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImagePaul_Bunyan_an
    d_Babe_statues_Bemidji_Minnesota_crop.JPG

17
Myths About Man and Nature
  • http//youtube.com/watch?vM3l2a_ESwPc
  • http//youtube.com/watch?vzZp2JcmUU6o
  • http//youtube.com/watch?vD_45epTAZLg
  • http//youtube.com/watch?vDvVRMrUYvYs
  • http//youtube.com/watch?vo-Y0Az-4wUg

18
The Upshot
  • Biophobia sets into motion a vicious cycle 
    This sentence describes the notion of feedback
    loop.  The idea is that a biophobic orientation
    feeds itself.
  • Fortunately, that would probably work for
    biophilia as well.

19
The Other Orientation Biophilia
  • How does Orr define Biophilia?
  • We will be reading Naesss text soon. In it the
    author speaks of deep ecology. see next slide

20
Deep Ecology
  • Deep ecology is a recent branch of ecological
    philosophy (ecosophy) that considers humankind as
    an integral part of its environment. It places
    more value on other species, ecosystems and
    processes in nature than is allowed by
    established environmental and green movements,
    and therefore leads to a new system of
    environmental ethics. The core principle of deep
    ecology as originally developed is Naess's
    doctrine of biospheric egalitarianism the claim
    that all living things have the same right to
    live and flourish a principle which, after
    criticism, has been substantially qualified (see
    Naess 1989). Deep ecology describes itself as
    "deep" because it is concerned with fundamental
    philosophical questions about the role of human
    life as one part of the ecosphere, rather than
    with a narrow view of ecology as a branch of
    biological science, and aims to avoid merely
    utilitarian environmentalism.
  • Source http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecolog
    y

21
Topophilia An Extension of Biophilia
  • loving the setting that is familiar to us.
  • And there is hope in doing so because we want to
    preserve what we love.
  • What is the relationship between topophilia and
    biophilia? Can there be one without the other?

22
Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas
  • Does the principle of repression apply to
    environmentalism?  If we continue to repress
    nature, will it bite us on the backside? 
  • Here is Jesus, speaking in the Gospel of Thomas 
    If you bring forth what is within you, what you
    bring forth will save you.  If you do not bring
    forth what is within you, what you do not bring
    forth will destroy you.  Is this true or false
    as regards the environment? 
  • Cf. technology in the Aliens movies. The monster
    is the thing that is repressed.

23
Lewis Thomas, Antaeus in Manhattan
  • But I think it was chiefly the plastic that was
    at fault in the death of the ant colony on
    display in Manhattan, which seems to me the most
    unearthly of all mans creations so far. I do
    not believe you can suspend army ants away from
    the earth, on plastic, for any length of time.
    They will lose touch, run out of energy, and die
    for lack of current (The Lives of a Cell 26).

24
C.G. Jung, CW 10, 882/466-67
  • Yet the danger that faces us today is that the
    whole of reality will be replaced by words. This
    accounts for that terrible lack of instinct in
    modern man, particularly the city-dweller. He
    lacks all contact with the life and breath of
    nature. He knows a rabbit or a cow only from the
    illustrated paper, the dictionary, or the movies,
    and thinks he knows what it is really likeand is
    then amazed that cowsheds smell, because the
    dictionary didnt say so.
  • END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com