Title: Medicare Recovery Audit Contractors RACs
1Medicare Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs)
2Presentation Outline
- I. Background
- A. What are the RACs?
- B. When are the RACs coming to Georgia?
- C. RAC Focus Areas
- II. Case Studies
- III. How to Prepare for RACs
- IV. GHA Initiatives to Assist Member Hospitals
with RACs -
3What are RACs?
- Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 created a
3-year demonstration project in NY, FL, CA - Recover Medicare overpayments and identify
underpaymentspayment mistakes - RACs are paid on a contingency fee basis
- During FY 2007, RACs identified and corrected
371 Million dollars of Medicare improper
payements in the demonstration states - Over 96 were overpayments
4Why Congress Believes RACs are Necessary
- The Improper Medicare FFS Payments Report for
November 2007 estimates that 3.9 of the Medicare
dollars paid did not comply with one or more
Medicare coverage, coding, billing, or payment
rules. - This equates to 10.8 billion in Medicare FFS
overpayments and underpayments annually.
5Overpayments by Error Type in Demonstration
Project
- 42 Incorrectly coded
- 32 Medically unnecessary service or setting
- 9 No/Insufficient Documentation
- 17 Other
Source CMS RAC Status Document FY 2007,
February 2008
6Average Overpayment Amounts FY 2007
Source CMS RAC Status Document FY 2007,
February 2008
7Permanent RAC Program
- CMS will announce the 4 permanent regional RACs
by July 31, 2008 - RACS can review claims for
- Inpatient hospital
- Outpatient hospital
- Skilled nursing facilities
- Physician, ambulance, and lab services
- Durable medical equipment
8(No Transcript)
9Permanent RAC Program
- RACs cannot look for any improper payments on
claims paid before October 1, 2007 - RACs can review claims during the current fiscal
year - Each RAC must use certified coders
- RACs must pay back contingency fee if their
decision is reversed on any level appeal
10Types of RAC Reviews
- Automated Review
- Proprietary software algorithms used to identify
clear errors that resulted in improper payments - Complex Review
- Medical records requested to further review the
claim - RACs must use Medicare coverage, coding or
billing policies in effect at the time when the
claim was adjudicated
11RAC Focus Areas in Demonstration States
- Excisional Debridement
- Back Pain
- Outpatient vs. Inpatient Surgeries
- Transfer Patients
- Inpatient Rehab, especially knee and hip
replacements - Joint replacement patients and patients in
inpatient rehabilitation facilities that should
have been treated in a lower intensity setting
such as a SNF - Wrong diagnosis or principal procedure codes
12Outpatient Hospital Areas of RAC Focus
- Colonoscopy
- Speech Language Pathology Services
- Infusion Services
- Neulasta (boosts white blood cell counts to
reduce chance of infection in patients undergoing
chemotherapy)
13Short Stay Claims
- Validate whether the admissions met Medicares
medical necessity criteria - One-day stays by chest pain patients were
targeted by RACs in demonstration states - Many three-day stays were denied because they
were inappropriately extended in order to qualify
for Medicare Part A coverage of post-acute
skilled nursing care
14Some Case Examples from the Demonstration States
- (Note These slides are optional depending on
how the CEO wants to present this information to
the board members)
15Excisional Debridements
- Hospital coder assigned a procedure code of 86.22
(excisional debridement of wound, infection, or
burn) - In the medical record, the physician writes
debridement was performed
16Excisional Debridements
- Coding Clinic 1991 Q3 states unless the
attending physician documents in the medical
record that an excisional debridement was
performed (definite cutting away of tissue, not
the minor scissors removal of loose fragments),
debridement of the skin that does not meet the
criteria noted above or is described in the
medical record as debridement and no other
information is available should be coded as 82.26
(ligation of dermal appendage).
17Excisional Debridements
- The RAC determines that the claim was incorrectly
coded and issues repayment request letter for the
difference between the payment amount for the
incorrectly coded procedure and the payment
amount for the correctly coded procedure.
18Wrong Principal Diagnosis
- Principal diagnosis on claim did not match the
principal diagnosis in the medical record - Example Respiratory failure (code 518.81) was
listed as the principal diagnosis but the medical
record indicates that sepis (code 038-038.9) was
the principal diagnosis
19Wrong Principal Diagnosis
- The RAC issued overpayment request letter for the
difference between the amount for the incorrectly
coded services and the amount for the correctly
coded services - Most common DRGs with this problem
- DRG 475 Respiratory System Diagnoses
- DRG 468 Extensive OR Procedure Unrelated to
Principal Diagnosis
20Wrong Diagnosis Code
- Hospital reported a principal diagnosis of 03.89
(septicemia) - Medical record shows diagnosis of urosepsis, not
septicemia or sepsis Blood cultures were
negative - Did not meet the coding guidelines for
septicemia. Urinary tract infection causes the
claim to group to a lower payment DRG
21Wrong Diagnosis Code
- RAC issued a repayment request letter for the
difference between the payment amount for the
incorrectly coded procedure and the correctly
coded procedure
22Colonoscopy
- The hospital billed for multiple colonoscopies
for the same beneficiary the same day - Beneficiaries never need more than one
colonoscopy per day. The excessive services are
not medically necessary. - The RAC issued overpayment request letters for
the difference between the billed number of
services and 1.
23Outpatient Hospital Speech Therapy
- The outpatient hospital billed for each 15
minutes of speech therapy - The code definition specifies that the code is
per session, not per 15 minutes - The units billed exceeded the approved number of
sessions per day. The excessive services billed
are medically unnecessary - RAC issued overpayment request letters
24Coping with the RACs
- Comply with RAC medical record requests. If you
dont submit them on time, the RAC automatically
classifies the claim as an overpayment and makes
a recovery. - Develop an internal tracking system for medical
records requested for review by the RAC
25Review Your PEPPER Reports
- Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Report
(PEPPER) - Prepared by gmcf
- Identifies claims patterns that are outliers
relative to other hospitals in the state - Top 20 list of DRGs that are prone to certain
billing areas - Other problem areas which vary by state
26Hospital Next Steps
- Look at potential areas of risk
- Establish single point of contact for RAC
- Establish RAC committeeinclude key hospital
stakeholders (finance, UR, Case Management,
compliance, legal, medical records, etc.) - Review records before sending to RAC
- Support your claim
- Understand the parameters
- For Providers
- For the RAC
27Hospital Next Steps
- Plan to participate in the AHAs RACTrac to
report your hospitals experience with the RAC - www.AHARACTrac.org
- Data will provide both the AHA and GHA the data
they need to advocate on behalf of the hospitals
and to identify trends in reasons for denials - Implement a system for charging RACs for copying
costs of medical records (.12/page)
28GHA Next Steps
- Establish RAC Task Force
- Establish relationship with RAConce RAC is
announced for our region - Facilitate information exchange between CMS, RAC,
and hospitals - Monitor RAC activities with Georgia providers
29GHA RAC Task Force
- A multi-disciplinary cross-section of GHA members
including CEOs, CFOs, legal counsel, compliance
officers, case/utilization managers, medical
records, and others - Task Force will provide guidance and feedback to
GHA as we develop strategies and tools to assist
members in dealing with RACs
30Questions or Comments?
- Feel Free to Contact GHA Staff for assistance
- Robert E. Boldenrbolden_at_gha.org, (770) 249-4505
- Liz Schoen, lschoen_at_gha.org, (770) 249-4564
- www.gha.org