Title: Regulating the Fixed Income Market in the United States
1Regulating the Fixed Income Market in the United
States
- Felice B. Friedman
- OECD-World Bank Bond Market Forum
- 2-3 June 2003
2Introduction and Background
- The SEC and Debt Markets
- Two Myths to Debunk
- Debt markets as unregulated
- US as case study for Developing an Efficient
Regulatory Framework for Debt Markets
3Snapshot of US Fixed Income Market
- 20.2 trillion outstanding debt securities,
year-end 2002 - 11.7 trillion in equities, slightly more than
half the debt market
trillions
4Snapshot of US Fixed Income Market
- Treasury Securities 3.2 trillion
- Federal Agency Debt 2.4 trillion
- Municipal Securities 1.8 trillion
- Corporate Debt 4.1 trillion
- Mortgage-backed 4.7 trillion
- Asset-backed 1.5 trillion
- Money Market 2.6 trillion
Source Bond Market Association
5Framework of US Debt Market Regulation
- Multiple Govt Agencies/ Regulators
- US Department of the Treasury
- Federal Reserve System
- US Securities and Exchange Commission
- Self-Regulatory Organizations
- NYSE, NASD, MSRB
- Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight
6Framework of US Debt Market Regulation
- Multiple Governing Laws Crisis-driven rather
than designed - Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. Established disclosure framework
for regulation. - All securities offered to public must be
registered with the SEC, unless exempt - Government and municipal securities exempted from
registration and reporting requirements - No exemption from antifraud provisions
7Regulation of Municipal Securities
- Securities Acts Amendments of 1975
- Response to New York City financial crisis
- Regulated broker-dealers established the MSRB
- Rule 15c2-12, adopted in 1989
- Response to default of Washington Public Power
Supply System (WHOOPS) in 1983 - First bond disclosure rule
8Regulation of Government Securities
- Government Securities Act of 1986
- Response to failure of several key government
securities dealers - Regulated broker-dealers
- Government Securities Act Amendments of 1993
- Response to Salomon Brothers cornering incident
- Improvements in auction process
- Development of sales practices rules for
government securities markets - Large position record-keeping and reporting
requirements
9Regulation of Corporate Securities
- Corporate Debt Securities
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
- Response to failures of Enron, WorldCom
- Focus was equity and not debt, but disclosure
remedies of Sarbanes-Oxley apply equally to
issuers of debt as well as to issuers of equity - Regulatory framework for equity applied without
independent consideration of debt market
10What Lessons Can We Draw?
- Hodgepodge of Regulators
- Hodgepodge of Laws and Rules
- Why does it work? Whats key?
11A Closer Look at the Municipal Securities Market
- Why the municipal securities market?
- Financed the growth of the US
- Has both public and private aspects
- Highlights key regulatory elements
- Demonstrates creativity in regulation
12Snapshot of the Municipal Securities Market
- Approx. 1.8 trillion sub-sovereign debt
outstanding at year end 2002 - Approx. 430 billion in municipal debt issued in
2002, about 75 long term. About 25 due to
refinancing/ refunding - Over 50,000 issuers and 1.5 million different
issues
13Overview of Municipal Securities Regulation
- Historically
- Exempt from registration and reporting
requirements of Securities Act and Exchange Act - Reasons unique to United States
- Low-risk investment
- Institutional investor base
14Overview of Municipal Securities Regulation
- What changed?
- Financial crisis in major municipalities
- Changes in bankruptcy law in 1979
- Cutbacks on federal aid to municipalities
- Proliferation of new, untested financing
techniques - Change in investor base
15Regulation of Municipal Securities
- Broker-Dealer Regulation
- Securities Acts Amendments of 1975 established
regulatory scheme for municipal securities
broker-dealers - Added Section 15B to Exchange Act
- Authorized SEC to set up an SRO
- All MSRB rules approved by SEC
- Inspection and enforcement authority with SEC,
NASD, and FRBNY
16Regulation of Municipal Securities
- Disclosure Regulation
- Rule 15c2-12 -- Imposes both primary and
secondary market disclosure - Requires underwriter to obtain, file and
distribute Official Statement - Underwriter must obtain from issuer a written
agreement to make financial and operating
information available on ongoing basis - Transparency Requirements
- MSRB rules require transaction reporting for each
security traded at least two times the previous
day - Antifraud Regulation and Enforcement
- City of Miami, 2003
17Issues to Consider
- Who should be the regulator?
- Consider US example, or non-example
- Functional regulation How best to look after
investor concerns? - Should the safety and soundness regulator be
charged with disclosure requirements for public
offerings? - Coordination among regulators and
self-regulators
18Issues to Consider
- Should there be a self-regulatory organization
involved? - Sufficient government oversight
- Balance between SRO and regulator consider
powers of MSRB vs. powers of NASD
19Issues to Consider
- Should offerings of debt securities be
registered? - What is being offered?
- Is it backed by full faith and credit of the
government? - Who is the investor base?
- Registration and oversight more important for
retail investors and when material information is
similar to that as would be required for equity
offers
20Issues to Consider
- May not be necessary to have a registration
scheme for offerings - Broker-dealer conduct regulation with strong
market integrity provisions may substitute - Can impose disclosure obligations on
intermediaries instead of issuers - Rule 15c2-12, as example
21Issues to Consider
- What information should be disclosed?
- Material information, both financial and
non-financial - Importance of high quality accounting and
auditing principles/ standards (also to the
rating agencies) - Importance of non-financial statement disclosure
- MD A picture of company through managements
eyes - Role of market participants in demanding better
and more timely information
22Issues to Consider
- Is enforcement regime effective?
- Importance of strong, well-resourced,
independent, regulator - Complemented by individual private right of
action - Need effective judicial system with an impartial
judiciary that will enforce regulatory action,
where needed
23Conclusion
- Regulatory goal Increase investor confidence
and provide readily accessible source of capital - Comprehensive regulatory scheme not necessary
- Key elements of regulation critical, but may
vary depending on the legal structure, the market
and the investor base - Oversight of intermediaries, including capital
adequacy - Mandatory centralized disclosure and price
transparency for investors - Prohibition of fraud and effective enforcement
- Market development and regulation is evolutionary
process