CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION A WATER PERSPECTIVE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION A WATER PERSPECTIVE

Description:

139 years in the US water market. 2000: Became wholly owned subsidiary of Suez Group ... Letchworth Village WTP (1 mgd) System Demands growing 5% - 7.5% per year ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: hil3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION A WATER PERSPECTIVE


1
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATIONA
WATER PERSPECTIVE
  • NARUC STAFF SUBCOMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTING AND
    FINANCE SPRING MEETING
  • New Orleans
  • April 2, 2008
  • Walton Hill and Sameet Master

2
United Water at a Glance
  • 139 years in the US water market
  • 2000 Became wholly owned subsidiary of Suez
    Group
  • Key Highlights
  • Revenues 600M
  • Total assets 2.0B
  • 2,000 employees
  • Active in 20 States
  • 6.5 Million people served
  • Two Business Segments
  • Regulated and Contract Services
  • 21 Regulated utilities
  • 138 OM contracts

Strategy Develop a balanced portfolio of
Regulated and Contract Services operations that
generate value in line with their risk profiles
includes 2007 Aquarion and AOS Acquisitions
3
The New York Experience
  • Established and evolving regulatory framework and
    practice since 1977
  • History of normal rate cases, regulatory
    improvements
  • New era of greatly increasing capital
    requirementstwo examples
  • A new approach that works for major capital
    projects for water supply and/or water quality,
    not revenue producing

4
United Water New RochelleDelaware
Interconnection Project
5
Key Statistics - United Water New Rochelle
  • Regulated by
  • New York Public Service Commission (PSC)
  • New York Department of Health (DOH)
  • Population served 145,000
  • Service Area Westchester County, NY
  • Average daily production 21 mgd
  • Max. daily production 36 mgd
  • Total peak hour production 50 mgd

6
UWNR Service Area
  • New Rochelle
  • North Pelham
  • Pelham
  • Pelham Manor
  • Tuckahoe
  • Seasonal Supply Briarcliff Manor
  • Communities Served
  • Ardsley
  • Bronxville
  • Dobbs Ferry
  • Eastchester
  • Greenburgh
  • Hastings

7
Water Supply
UWNR
8
Water Supply
Central Avenue PS
Catskill Supply
Little Catskill PS
Delaware Supply (Shaft 22)
Distribution System
Delaware PS
Croton Supply Eliminated
Croton Supply
Croton PS
9
Project Drivers/Constraints
  • Regulatory requirements
  • Project is required by New York State Department
    of Health
  • Croton supply no longer meets EPA regulations
  • Deficiencies in water supply reliability
  • Heavy reliance (90 of supply) is on Catskill
    Aqueduct source
  • New York City has defined plans for aqueduct
    repairs with sustained shutdowns
  • Catskill shutdown from September to May from 2010
    2014
  • Delaware shutdown continuously as early as 2013
  • Lack of adequate storage in the system
  • Poor supply pressure at times of peak demands
  • Deficiencies in asset conditions
  • Minimum redundancy, constant speed pumps,
    outdated controls
  • Aged equipment causing deficiencies in chemical
    storage, handling, spill containment, controls,
    and safety

10
Project History/Key Events
  • 1989 US EPA promulgated the Surface Water
    Treatment Rule (SWTR), adopted by DOH
  • Established criteria for avoiding filtration
  • Established source water quality requirements
  • Established disinfection requirements
  • Established filtration requirements if avoidance
    criteria not met
  • Established monitoring and reporting requirements
  • 1991 UWNR notified by DOH that the Croton
    Supply does not meet the SWTR
  • Provide filtration or discontinue use
  • 1992 UWNR began planning for treatment or
    replacement of the Croton supply
  • 1993 DOH requires UWNR to eliminate Croton
    supply and develop new source of supply, a
    connection to the Delaware
  • UWNR developed concept of the DIP with new pump
    station at UWNR property located in the Town of
    Eastchester, NY, initiates engineering and
    permitting
  • 1995 - 2005 UWNR is in prolonged litigation
    with the Town, public resistance ongoing (not in
    my backyard)

11
Project History/Key Events, continued
  • May 2005 Application to connect to NYC Delaware
    Aqueduct filed with NYC
  • Dec. 2005 UWNR and Town settle litigation,
    construction of the Delaware Pump Station begins
  • April 2007 Approval from the City of Yonkers to
    construct the Shaft 22 Transmission Main is
    obtained
  • May 2007 Construction of the Transmission Main
    begins

12
Project Current Status
  • Delaware Pump Station
  • Construction substantially complete,
    commissioning and testing underway.
  • Final completion expected in June 2008
  • Shaft 22 Connection/Pipeline
  • Construction of the transmission main is
    underway, completion expected in June 2008
  • Approval of from NYC to connect to Delaware
    Aqueduct is imminent, construction expected to
    begin in May 2008, and completion is expected in
    September 2008
  • System Improvements
  • Construction substantially complete,
    commissioning and testing underway.
  • Final completion expected in June 2008

13
Project Current Status, continued
14
Project Budget Summaries
  • UWNR DIP Expenditures prior to construction
    include
  • Costs incurred since 1992 through July 2005
  • Legal, engineering, and company overheads

15
United Water New YorkHudson River Desalination
Project
16
Key Statistics - United Water New York
  • Regulated by
  • New York Public Service Commission (PSC)
  • New York Department of Health (DOH)
  • Population served 266,000
  • Service Area Rockland County, NY
  • Average Day 30 mgd
  • Peak Day 46.5 mgd

17
UWNY Service Area
18
Water Supply - Current
  • Existing Sources of Supply
  • Peak sustainable supply 45.5 mgd
  • Short-term peak supply 48.5 mgd
  • Additional 3 mgd from RVWF, during peak demand
    periods, based on Ramapo River flow
  • Four sources of supply
  • System Wells (20.5 mgd)
  • Ramapo Valley Well Field (4 mgd/7 mgd)
  • Lake DeForest WTP (20 mgd)
  • Letchworth Village WTP (1 mgd)
  • System Demands growing 5 - 7.5 per year
  • Growth rate includes significant conservation
    measures implemented over the years

19
Water Supply - Planned
20
Project Drivers/Constraints
  • 2006 Rate Case settlement requires UWNY to
    achieve Average Supply Increases to be
    implemented in two phases
  • Short-Term 3 5 years
  • Long-Term 6 8 years
  • 2006 Rate Case established milestones that UWNY
    must meet
  • Project Description to PSC January 15, 2007
    (Filed)
  • Preliminary conceptual design September 30,
    2007 (Filed)
  • Submit DEIS and all required environmental permit
    applications September 30, 2008
  • Complete pilot plant studies, if required
    December 31, 2009
  • Obtain Environmental Permits September 30, 2010
  • Complete 50 design September 30, 2011
  • Begin Construction May 31, 2013
  • In-service December 31, 2015
  • Failure to achieve these milestones will result
    in financial penalties
  • State of New York Public Service Commission,
    Case 06-W-0131, Exhibit 11

21
Project Budget Summaries
  • UWNR DIP Expenditures prior to construction
    include
  • Costs incurred since 1992 through July 2005
  • Legal, engineering, and company overheads
  • UWNY LTWSP Expenditures prior to construction
    include
  • Land purchase, legal, and engineering costs to be
    incurred from 2007 through 2012

22
NYPSCs Policy Statement
  • Established regulatory framework in 1977
  • Consistently employed since then (for water)
  • Unsuitability of historic test years
  • Goal of ratemaking to ascertain as much as
    possible revenue, expenses and conditions in the
    year the new rates will be in effect
  • Basic framework historic base year, bridge
    period fully forecasted rate year
  • Year end 12-31-07, plus 14 months bridge, to
    date of PSC decision, 2-28-09 begin rate year

23
NARUC Best Practices
  • NAWCs 2005 Water Policy Forum
  • NARUCs July 2005 Best Practices Resolution
  • Prospective test years
  • DSIC
  • CWIP (rate base/surcharges)
  • Pass-throughs
  • Consolidation
  • Streamlined rate process
  • Mediation and settlement
  • Integrated resource management
  • Fair return
  • Improved communication

24
Rate Year As A Platform For Continued
Improvement
  • Revenue reconciliation (decoupling)
  • Plant reconciliation
  • Cost reconciliations r/e taxes, purchased
    water, power and chemicals
  • Earnings sharing provisions
  • Multiyear rate plans
  • Collaborate or dieregulatory efficiency

25
Recent Developments
  • Distribution System Improvement Charge (DSIC-PA),
    LTMRP, UIRP
  • NYPSC Water Supply Surcharge
  • Regulatory reactions to greatly increasing
    infrastructure investment requirements

26
How They Work
  • Preconstructionannual filings, primarily to
    avoid continued AFUDC compounding
  • During construction, semiannual filings for
    capital costs
  • Depreciation, property tax and personnel after
    closing until next base rate case
  • (CE-AD-ADIT) x RORDPPT
  • R
  • Percentage applied to customer bills, annual
    reconciliation
  • NY NWSS tied to construction milestones
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com