The Developing Personality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

The Developing Personality

Description:

Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003) Introduction: ... Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003) Method: 132,515 participants were recruited from ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Kath303
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Developing Personality


1
The Developing Personality
2
Shortcomings of Behaviorism
  • Ignored peoples ability to think, plan,
    perceive, and believe.
  • Focused too strongly on animalsthus
    reinforcement. Forgot people could problem solve
    and use reason.
  • Forgot that people are inherently social. We
    learn from those around us. We dont live in
    Skinner boxes.
  • Did not explain how we are put into our
    environmentswe choose where we live, work, and
    socialize.
  • Social Learning Theory addresses the issues
    behaviorism wanted to ignore.

3
Dollard and Millers Social Learning Theory
  • Habit hierarchy (unobservable)
  • The behavior you are most likely to perform at a
    given moment resides at the top of your habit
    hierarchy your least likely behavior is at the
    bottom.
  • The effect of rewards and punishments is to
    rearrange the habit hierarchy.
  • Motivation and drives
  • Needs produce Drives
  • Primary drive (food, water, comfort)
  • Secondary drive (prestige, power, love)
  • Rewards MUST reduce a drive
  • Frustration and aggression, the
    frustration-aggression hypothesis
    (displacement)
  • Psychological conflict (approach-avoidance
    conflict)

4
Dollard and Millers Social Learning Theory
  • Psychological conflict (approach-avoidance
    conflict)

By Stephen Hansen
5
Rotters Social Learning Theory
  • Expectancy value theory (belief)
  • The basic assumption is that behavioral decisions
    are determined by
  • the presence or size of reinforcements.
  • beliefs about what the results of behavior are
    likely to be.
  • Even if a reinforcement is very attractive you
    are not likely to pursue it if your chances of
    success seem slim. Conversely, even something
    that is not particularly desirable might motivate
    behavior, if the chances of getting it are good
    enough.
  • Locus of control (generalized expectancies and
    your experience)
  • Internal
  • External

6
Banduras Social Learning Theory
  • Efficacy expectations (probability that you can
    do something in the first placebelief in
    yourself)
  • Observational learning (learning withOUT rewards
    or punishment!)
  • Reciprocal determinism

7
The Cognitive-Affective Personality System (CAPS)
  • Walter Mischels CAPS theory combines two
    important ideas about personality.
  • In the tradition of Kelly, the phenomenological
    idea that the individuals interpretation or
    construal of the world is all-important from
    this perspective to understand a persons
    thoughts is to understand the person completely.
  • A view of the cognitive system that describes
    thought as proceeding simultaneously on multiple
    tracks that occasionally intersect.

8
CAPS Interactions Among Systems
  • Mischel theorizes that the most important aspect
    of the many systems of personality and cognition
    is their interaction.
  • There is not a single output from a single,
    linear, serial process.
  • How the person feels, what he or she thinks, and
    what he or she ultimately does, involve
    compromises among many different processes.

9
CAPS Cognitive Person Variables
  • Individual differences in personality stem from
    four person variables that characterize
    properties and activities of the cognitive
    system.
  • Cognitive and behavioral construction
    competenciesan individuals mental abilities and
    behavioral skills (e.g., IQ, creativity, social
    skills)
  • Encoding strategies and personal
    constructsincludes a persons ideas about how
    the world can be categorized and efficacy
    expectations, or beliefs about his or her own
    capabilities
  • Subjective stimulus valuesan individuals
    beliefs about the probabilities of attaining a
    goal if it is pursued it also includes how much
    he or she values different rewarding outcomes
  • Self-regulatory systems and plansa set of
    procedures that control behavior, including
    self-reinforcement, selection of situations, and
    purposeful alteration of the situations selected
    also includes how people directly control their
    own thoughts
  • Affect and Emotions

10
CAPS If . . . Then . . . contingencies
  • If . . . Then . . . contingencies The four
    personality variables combine in each individual
    to yield a repertoire of actions triggered by
    particular stimulus situations.
  • Every individuals pattern of contingencies is
    unique, and it comprises his or her behavioral
    signature

11
CAPS If . . . Then . . . contingencies
  • Mischels goal is for if . . . then contingencies
    to replace personality traits.
  • Advantages of the if . . . then idea
  • Its specificity
  • It is more sensitive to the way people change
    their behavior across situations
  • If . . . then contingencies potentially integrate
    trait conceptions of personality with social
    learning and cognitive conceptions by
    redescribing traits as specific behavior
    patterns.
  • Personality traits are sometimes too broad and
    vague to provide the most useful way to think
    about behavior.
  • Integrating traits with the if . . . then idea
    could perhaps make both concepts richer and more
    useful.

12
Learning, Thinking, and the Person
The learning approaches to personality have made
three major, lasting contributions
  • They approached the goal of establishing
    psychology as an objective science their work is
    characterized by tight theoretical reasoning,
    careful experimental design, and a style of
    argument that backs up every statement with data.
  • They recognize better than any other basic
    approach the degree to which peoples behavior
    may depend on the environment and even the
    specific, immediate situation.
  • The learning approaches have contributed a
    technology of behavior change its principles can
    be applied to virtually anything for example
  • Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) seeks to
    understand and manipulate functional
    relationships between behavior and the
    environment it involves a systematic process of
    studying and modifying observable behavior
    through careful manipulations of the environment,
    and tracking of behavioral outcomes it is most
    frequently used in educational settings,
    particularly when working with individuals with
    autism and other developmental disorders it is
    also used in organizations and in the area of
    sports psychology.
  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy applies concepts of
    learning to the treatment of depression, phobias,
    addictions, and other emotional and behavioral
    disorders.
  • The evidence clearly shows that techniques based
    in learning theory work well in the short run,
    but in the long run the evidence is less clear.

13
Learning, Thinking, and the Person
  • Several limitations to learning theories can be
    noted
  • It turns out that people are more complicated
    than simple theories like classical conditioning
    sometimes acknowledge.
  • While the recent versions of social learning
    theory acknowledge that people think, they still
    tend to underappreciate the degree to which the
    characteristic ways in which people think can
    cause them to respond differently to the same
    situation.
  • People and their behavior are much harder to
    change than the learning theories suggest people
    tend to remain who they are, inevitably and even
    stubbornly, in the face of the strongest
    pressures from the situation.

14
Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
  • Introduction
  • Trait theorists (e.g., McCrae Costa, 1996)
    posit genetic determination of genes, thus
    personality should ____________ after adulthood.
  • Contextualist (e.g., Kwan, 2002) argue that
    traits are multiply determined, specifically
    _________ is very important, thus personality
    should _________ after adulthood.
  • These views are both opposing and intriguing.
    Like any good article that helps perpetuate
    science, the authors sought to __________ this
    argument.

15
Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
  • Introduction (cont)
  • What has past research said? (e.g., Roberts et
    al.,)
  • The hard plaster hypothesis states Age effects
    on personality traits after age ___ should not be
    significantly different from _____.
  • The soft plaster hypothesis states Age effects
    on personality traits after age ____ should _____
    the rate of change.
  • In the transactional view, ________ select their
    ________, and these ________ affect their
    personality.
  • According to Eriksons (1950) theory of
    adulthood, _______, _______, and ______ are
    social roles that undergo great change from early
    to mid adulthood.

16
Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
  • Method
  • 132,515 participants were recruited from
    _________.
  • Participants answered questions on the ___ ____
    ___.
  • Was the study longitudinal?

17
Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
  • Results
  • The hard plaster hypothesis was tested by
    comparing age _____ after age 30 to _____. If
    the hard plaster hypothesis is confirmed, they
    should find that this result is _________?
  • The soft plaster hypothesis was tested by
    comparing age slopes _____ age 30 to age slopes
    _____ age 30.

18
Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
  • Results

Trait Rate of Change
--Change is of similar strength, but
opposite direction for women. --Increases for men.
Openness
Conscientiousness
--Change slows for both men and women.
--Change is of similar strength, but
opposite direction for women. --Slows for men.
Extraversion
Agreeableness
--Increases
19
Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
  • Results

Trait Rate of Change
--women show strong change and this remains
before and after 30. --men have show weak change
and this remains before and after 30.
Neuroticism
20
Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
  • Results

Trait Linear modeling
Openness Linear (gender x age) Conscientiousnes
s Quadratic Extraversion Linear
Agreeableness Cubic fit Neuroticism Linear
(gender x age)
21
Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
  • Discussion

--Cross-sectional design cannot differentiate
between cohort and developmental
effects. --Rejection of plaster
hypothesis. --Acknowledgement of interactionist
hypothesis. --Data does not deny biological
effects, but does present evidence of plasticity
in certain personality domains. --This presents
the idea that culture, society, and life course
can affect peoples personality as they
agehelping them adapt to circumstances.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com