Scientific Americans Experiment in Collaborative Publishing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Scientific Americans Experiment in Collaborative Publishing

Description:

In September of last year, paleontologists unveiled a spectacular fossil of the ... in our blog, with an eye toward helping us shape the forthcoming print article. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: kate95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Scientific Americans Experiment in Collaborative Publishing


1
Scientific Americans Experiment inCollaborative
Publishing
Kate Wong Scientific American www.sciam.com
2
The Story
  • In September of last year, paleontologists
    unveiled a spectacular fossil of the oldest baby
    girl ever discovered. Born 3.3 million years ago
    in what is now Ethiopia, the child did not live
    past her third birthday.
  • Her discoverers christened her Selam, but she is
    often referred to as Lucys baby, because she
    belongs to the same proto-human
    species--Australopithecus afarensis--as the
    famous Lucy fossil discovered in 1974.
  • Selam is one of the most complete hominid fossils
    ever found--even more complete than Lucy--and she
    provides scientists with an unprecedented view of
    childhood in an early human ancestor.

3
The Experiment
  • Momentous stories like this one can be the bane
    of monthly magazines. Because of the long lead
    times involved in preparing articles for print,
    we knew we wouldnt be able to get this story
    into print until our December issue at the
    earliest. What could we bring to the table by
    then?
  • We decided this story presented a good
    opportunity to conduct an experiment we had been
    pondering for a while, inspired by various wikis
    and other collaborative projects.

4
The Setup
  • We created a special report on the find for our
    web site
  • We then invited readers to post their questions
    and comments about the story in our blog, with an
    eye toward helping us shape the forthcoming print
    article.
  • I also solicited remarks from a number of experts
    in the field of paleoanthropology.
  • In addition to the links to the story and
    discussion from the home page, we drove traffic
    to the experiment with promotional banners and
    MPUs

5
The Reader Response
  • We had no idea what to expect in terms of
    response from the readers
  • We were pleasantly surprised. We ended up with
    roughly 40 reader comments and questions.
  • I popped into the comments section from time to
    time to answer their questions and keep the
    discussion on track.

6
The Scientist Response
  • Six scientists provided written commentary on the
    discovery, which we posted verbatim in the blog.
  • These posts generated far fewer reader comments
    than the general discussion post did, which is
    understandable given the technical nature of the
    writing.
  • But they provided good fodder for the print
    version of the article.

7
Distillation
  • Armed with all this feedback, we then had to
    decide what, exactly, to do with it.
  • The biggest question was, do we want to just
    rewrite the article to address the readers
    questions and reflect the various points of view
    from the scientists, or do we want to incorporate
    their feedback in a more transparent way?
  • We decided to do a bit of both.

8
The End ProductRefining and expanding the main
text
9
The End Product Highlighting readers questions
10
The End Product Expert commentary and new art
elements
11
Was Our Experiment a Success?
  • Yes--on both the web and print fronts.
  • All told, the total number of page views for the
    web version of this special report and the
    related blog posts was several times the average
    number of page views for an article of this type.
  • A survey regarding the December issue revealed a
    high level of reader interest in the article,
    particularly the sidebars containing the reader
    questions and the scientists views.

12
Was It Worth Our Time?
  • We spent a lot of time trying to figure out how
    to conduct this experiment within the confines of
    our existing site design.
  • I spent a fair amount of time answering reader
    questions and coaxing the scientists to furnish
    us with remarks.
  • But in all, it was reasonably efficient. Getting
    the scientists to write their own comments saved
    me some reporting time. And the presence of the
    sidebars--both of which could be readily
    shortened or lengthened--made fitting the print
    article much easier than usual.

13
Will We Do It Again?
  • We already have. Earlier this month we put up a
    draft of an article on the origin of life.
  • So far, the discussion has been lively.
  • The print execution will probably be very similar
    to that of the Lucys Baby article.

14
Variations on a Theme
  • Were also trying out different ways of engaging
    the readers-and picking their brains.
  • In preparing our holiday gadget guide, we
    solicited reader ideas for gadgets to include in
    our list
  • In January, we started a blog discussion on a
    conservation idea that will be the subject of a
    forthcoming article in print. We didnt post a
    draft of the article--we just told readers
    briefly what it was about, and invited them to
    submit their questions about the proposal.

15
Looking Ahead
  • The is definitely room for improvement in the way
    we present these interactive opportunities. Were
    looking into establishing a dedicated area on the
    site for articles under construction.
  • We see this kind of collaborative publishing as a
    way to both foster reader interaction with the
    brand and to build a certain amount of customer
    satisfaction into the print product--without
    sacrificing the control needed to preserve our
    reputation as the voice of scientific and
    technological authority.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com