The Ideal Occlusion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

The Ideal Occlusion

Description:

Canine Guidance/ or Group Function. Nonworking: NO contact. 3. Protrusion: ... teeth 2 with one being the canine. ... Canine Guidance: tend to have ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:396
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: garycan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Ideal Occlusion


1
The Ideal Occlusion
2
Ideal Morphologic Occlusion
  • Posterior Teeth
  • Angle I
  • Contact
  • Normal buccal overjet
  • Anterior Teeth
  • AP 2-3 mm Hor OJ
  • Vertical 2-4 mm Ver OB,
  • 50
  • Transverse Midlines aligned

3
Ideal Functional Occlusion
  • Intercuspal Position CR jaw position
  • Simultaneous posterior contact
  • Axial loading of posterior teeth
  • Lighter contact of anterior teeth
  • Anterior Excursive Guidance
  • Canine Guidance/ or Group Function
  • Nonworking NO contact
  • 3. Protrusion NO posterior contact

4
My first patient in the clinic!
5
Biologic Variation of Occlusion
6
I. Morphologic Variation Brunelle JA et al.
Prevalence and distribution of selected occlusal
characteristics in the US Population, 1988-1991,
J Dent Res 199675706-713.
  • Third National Health and Nutrition Examination
    Survey (NHANES III)
  • Age 8-11 18-50 y/o
  • n 11,000
  • Hx of ortho tx 20
  • Crowding Children 48-58 Adults 57-67

7
A. Sagittal Plane(Children and Youths)
  • Angle I Normal 30
  • Angle I Malocclusion 55
  • Angle II Malocclusion 15
  • Angle III Malocclusion 1

8
B. Horizontal Plane (Transverse)
  • Posterior Crossbite 9.1

9
High Mandibular Plane Angle
  • Tall lower face
  • Smile maxillary teeth and gingival visible
  • Lips postured to seal
  • Anterior open bite tendency

10
Low Mandibular Plane Angle
  • Short lower face
  • Smile Minimal maxillary tooth visibility
  • Lower lip everted
  • Deep bite tendency

11
C. Vertical Plane
  • Open Bite ( 0 mm) lt 3
  • Vertical Deep Bite (gt5 mm) 16

12
D. Racial Differences
  • Asian increased Angle III prevalence
  • Afro-American 10 anterior open bite
  • Northern European increased prevalence of
    vertical deep bite, increased prevalence Angle II

13
II. Functional Occlusal Variation
14
A. CR/IP (CO) Slide
  • Slide Prevalence gt90
  • Horizontal Component Usually 0.5-1.0 mm
  • Lateral Component 25
  • (Rieder CE J Prosthet Dent 39324-329, 1978
    n323)

15
1. Working Side Contacts
  • Great Variation Combination of guidance schemes
    typical. Average of contacting teeth 2 with
    one being the canine. (Woda AV et al., J
    Prosthet Dent 197942335-342.

16
1. Working Side Contacts
  • Great Variation One sample identified 2 with
    bilateral canine guidance and 18 with unilateral
    canine guidance. (Ingerval B, Archs Oral Biol
    197717191-200)

17
Skeletal Variation of Occlusion
18
Skeletal Effect
  • Canine Guidance tend to have mandibular plane
    angle lt 24o
  • Group Function tend to have a mandibular plane
    angle gt 24o
  • (DiPietro GJ J Prosthet Dent 38452-458, 1977
    n112)

19
2. Nonworking Side Contacts
  • Nonworking contacts identified in gt 60 of a
    sample (Ingervall B, Archs Oral Biol 17191-200,
    1977)

20
2. Nonworking Side Contacts
  • Nonworking interferences (contact only on the
    nonworking side) identified in 8 of a study
    sample (Ingervall B, Archs Oral Biol 17191-200,
    1977)

21
C. Intercuspal Position Contacts Ideal
  • Size small circular areas
  • 1 mm diameter
  • Location cusp tips to flat fossae marginal
    ridges or balanced inclines.
  • Number n26 or 66

22
C. IP Contact Biological Variation (Riise C
Ericsson SG J Oral Rehabil 10473-480, 1983.)
  • Size large irregular areas
  • Location on cuspal inclines
  • Number average of 2 contacts/ molar, 1 contact/
    premolar and lt1 contact/ anterior tooth

23
Homo sapiens exhibit greater occlusal variation
than any other primate
24
III. Biomechanical System
  • Great population variability
  • Masticatory system very adaptable to this
    variation but exhibits greater adaptive capacity
    with slow developmental change as compared to
    rapid change, I.e. restorative dentistry.

25
III. Biomechanical System
  • Restorative Treatment We as dentists can not
    control the biological adaptability but we can
    control mechanical characteristics. Therefore
    restorations are fabricated to an ideal occlusion
    within the scope or extent of the treatment.

26
Objectives CR Adjustment Intercuspal Occlusion
  • Eliminate CR-IP slide, create new IP in CR
  • VDO slightly closed from original IP VDO
  • Simultaneous posterior contact
  • Axial loading of posterior teeth
  • Anterior lighter contact

27
Occlusal Adjustment A Method
Goal All centric cusps contacting and every
posterior tooth pair holding shimstock.
28
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com