Title: PDF analysis of CdS Nanoparticles
1PDF analysis of CdS Nanoparticles
- Reinhard B. Neder
- Institut für Mineralogie
- Universität Würzburg, Germany
2Topics
- Nanoparticles
- Experimental determination of PDF
- Interpretation of PDF
- Simulation of PDF
- Results for CdS-Glutathion
3Nanoparticles
- Extended clusters 1 nm to 300 nm
- Properties intermediate between molecule and
crystal - Optical properties depend on size
4Open topics for Nanoparticles
? TEM preparation core/shell statistics ?
XRD Debye-Scherrer invalid size disorder ?
Exciton depends on bulk theory ? small
angle available edges
5Invalidity of Scherrer equation
6Open topics for Nanoparticles
? TEM preparation core/shell ?
XRD Debye-Scherrer invalid size disorder ?
Exciton depends on bulk theory ? small
angle available edges
7Open topics for Nanoparticles
small crystal ltgt glass ltgt unique structure
homogeneous structure ? heterogeneous
structure
8Open topics for Nanoparticles
? TEM lattice planes gt well ordered ?
XRD too few, broad peaks ? EXAFS local order
only
9Open topics for Nanoparticles
? TEM lattice planes gt well ordered ?
XRD too few, broad peaks ? EXAFS local order
only
Wu et al. J. Phys. Chem B (2000), 106, 4569
10Open topics for Nanoparticles
? TEM lattice planes gt well ordered ?
XRD too few, broad peaks ? EXAFS local order
only
CeO2
Wu et al. J. Phys. Chem B (2000), 106, 4569
11Open topics for Nanoparticles
? TEM lattice planes gt well ordered ?
XRD too few, broad peaks ? EXAFS local order
only
12CdS-Glutathione
contradictory size information 15 to 30 Å
13Synthesis
Precipitation form aqueous solution Glutathione
CdCl
monodisperse powder
14Data Collection
BW5, HASYLAB
?0.088 Å E140 keV T15 K sealed capillary Qmax
30 Å-1
15Experimental Data
Inset corresonds to experiment with Cu-K?
Only three broad maxima
16Normalized Structure Factor
17Experimental PDF
narrow first maximum at 2.525 Å
broad, asymmetric second maximum at 4.11 Å
18Experimental PDF
19Experimental PDF
weak maxima at 1.5 Å
20Analysis of first Maximum
R 2.525 Å ? 0.063 Å N 3.4
ONE Cd-S distance
21Analysis of second Maximum
R 4.13 Å ? 0.15 Å N 5.8 R 3.85 Å ?
0.12 Å N 2.7
TWO Cd-Cd distances gt two Cd-S-Cd angles
Cd-Sorganic -Cd 100 Cd-Sinorganic -Cd
109
22Summary of direct Interpretation
RAMAN spectroscopy No H-S modes gt
Glutathione bound to Cd
- Chem. analysis Cd1 S0.5 Glutathione0.5
PDF 1. peak Cd-S 2.525 Å ? 0.063 Å
2. peak Cd-Sinorganic-S 109(5) Cd-Sorga
nic -S 100(4)
PDF longer distances highly disordered
PDF longest distances Diameter 18 Å
23Aspects of PDF Simulation
Finite particle size
Structure more cystal like? more glass like
?
Proper density Proper coordination
distribution Proper distance distributions
Best strategy trial and error RMC evoluti
onary algorithm
24PDF of Nano versus Bulk
Bulk Number of interatomic pairs increases with
r2
DISCUS uses r !
4 ? ?0 r
25PDF of Nano versus Bulk
Nanoparticle A longest vector exists
DISCUS uses r !
4 ? ?0 r
4 ? ?0 r tanh(shape(r-diameter))
Diameter
26Crystal of nanoparticles
Periodic boundary conditions lead to PDF
maxima well beyond the particle diameter.
27Crystal of nanoparticles
Periodic boundary conditions with random
orientation destroy PDF maxima beyond the
particle diameter.
28Individual nanoparticle
PDF with modified background function
29Simulation of PDF
Experimental PDF
Distorted zincblende structure
30Simulation of PDF
Growth algorithm
S- or Cd- terminated all lt111gt
N(Cd) 50 S on surface fault probability
starting group
31Simulation of PDF
Relaxation of the structure by Monte Carlo
constrains
lt Cd-Sorganic-C 100(4)
Cd-S 2.523(63)Å
lt Cd-Sinorganic-C 109(5)
32Simulation of PDF
Decoration by Glutathione
33Calculated PDF
70 Cd atoms
16 Å diameter
60 fault propability
average of many particles
34Further Issues
Fit to data by evolutionary algorithm easy to
adapt to multiple steps needed growth,
relaxation, glutathione, PDF calculation and
averaging different structures
Fit to data by RMC requires large supercell to
avoid inter-particle vectors gt adjust ?0,
avoid shift of particle, limit movement to
within particle starting model ? different
particles ?
to be learned...
35Acknowledgements
V.I. Korsounski K. Hradil J.Neuefeind P. Jovari
Ch. Barglik-Chory G. Müller Th. Proffen
Financial support by German Science Foundation
SFB 410