K20 Education Accountability: Expectations via HB 915

1
K-20 Education Accountability Expectations via
HB 915

• July 15, 2003

Florida Department of Education
Jay Pfeiffer, Director K-20 Education
Accountability and InformationDivision of
Accountability Research and Measurement
2
Topics for the day

• HB 915 K-20 Accountability and the
  implementation schedule
• Implementation workplans
• Where we left off with K-20 Accountability

3
Background 2002 Statutory Requirements

• Section 1008.31, F.S. K-20 Accountability
• Established K-20 Education System Goals related
  to
• Highest student achievement
• Seamless articulation maximum access
• Promoting a skilled workforce and economic
  development
• Delivering high quality, efficient services
• Requires K-20 Performance Accountability System
• Phased in Performance-based funding 10
  conditional on performance
• Continued comprehensive and quality reporting
  systems

4
HB 915 Revised parts of s. 1008.31, FSKey
features (Page 1)

• Retained System Goals
• K-20 Accountability System to measure -
• Return on Investment
• Effectiveness of system in educating students
• Effectiveness of sectors in promoting student
  achievement
• Effectiveness of schools institutions in
  educating students
• References AYP, learning gains, school grades,
  NCLB

5
HB 915 Revised parts of s.1008.31, FSKey
features (page 2)

• SBE to recommend system and component measures
• SBE to establish performance measures, set
  standards
• SBE to cooperate with delivery systems in
  developing proposals for performance funding
• Retains requirement that 10 percent of state
  funds be conditional on performance

6
HB 915 Revised parts of s. 1008.31, FSKey dates
(Page 1)

• December 1, 2003
• SBE adopts common definitions, measures,
  standards, performance improvement targets
  required to
• Evaluate progress of each sector in meeting goals
• Notify sectors of progress in achieving standards
  and goals
• Begin collecting data required to establish
  progress, rewards, sanctions, and to implement
  performance funding.

7
HB 915 Revised parts of 1008.31, FSKey dates
(Page 2)

• December 1, 2004
• DOE recommends formula for performance funding,
  to apply accountability measures and standards
  for all components of the K-20 System.
• FY 2004-2005 and thereafter
• Subject to Legislative approval,
  performance-based funds will be allocated based
  on progress, rewards, and sanctions established
  in s.1008.31, FS

8
Implementation Plans

• There are five task forces that have been
  appointed by the Commissioner
• Work plan was approved by the SBE at its June 17
  meeting
• Key features
• High level of activity through the fall of 2003
• Activities designed to address system measures,
  sector measures, standards and goals, performance
  funding
• Ample opportunity for input and collaboration
• Continues building on the efforts of the K-20
  Accountability Advisory Council and other efforts
• Task force work begins on July 22, ends on
  October 8

9
Performance Accountability Process Components
Legislative Staff
Florida Legislature
State Board of Education
Commissioners K-20 Policy Council
Office of Planning and Budgeting Staff
Public
K-20 Performance Accountability Taskforce
DOE Accountability Resource Team
Sector Accountability Taskforces
Sector Taskforce Contacts
Community College
University
Workforce
K-12
10
K-20 Education Performance Accountability
Summit University of Central Florida Student
Union Orlando, Florida July 22, 2003 900
a.m. 300 p.m. P U R P O S E The purpose
of the summit is to begin and direct activities
for establishing a unified K-20 performance
accountability system. The summit will provide
an opportunity for task force members to review
and build on Florida's previous accountability
efforts, develop plans for accomplishing task
force objectives, and decide details about future
meetings. O B J E C T I V E S Review
legislative intent and requirements in HB 915.
Present an overview of Florida's accountability
history as background for developing a K-20
Performance Accountability System.
Provide pertinent research and other state
experiences in developing education performance
accountability and linking funding to
performance. Develop preliminary guiding
principles for establishing state and
sector-specific standards and measures. Review
previously proposed K-20 performance measures in
the context of state education mission goals.
Establish the relationship between the K-20
Performance Accountability System measures and
sector measures. Discuss data requirements.
Discuss state and sector data resources for the
K-20 Performance Accountability System, including
data quality and data timeliness. Identify
deliverables and timelines for the K-20 and
Sector Task Forces.
11
Four Goals Six Measures
Previously Existing Measures
Goals
Measures
Highest Student Achievement
Highest Student Achievement
1
Access
2
Seamless Articulationand Access
A
Credentials Awarded
Articulation
3
Placement
Readiness/Progression
Workforce/Economic Development
4
General Appropriations Act
Employment/Earnings
5
Quality, Efficient Services
Quality, Efficient Services
6
12
K-20 Sector Accountability
Delivery Sector
K-20 System Accountability
Local Education Agency/Institution