Title: Population Status and Habitat Modeling
1(No Transcript)
2Population Status and Habitat Modeling of
Marbled Murrelets in the Area of the Northwest
Forest Plan
Mark H. Huff, US Fish and Wildlife
Service Martin G. Raphael, Pacific Northwest
Research Station Sherri L. Miller, Pacific
Southwest Research Station S. Kim Nelson, Oregon
State University Jim Baldwin, Pacific Southwest
Research Station
3Key Members of the Marbled Murrelet Effectiveness
Monitoring Team
Diane Evans-Mack Gary Falxa Beth Galleher C.J.
Ralph Chris Thompson Craig Strong Rich Young
4Bio Sketch--Marbled Murrelet
Federally listed 1992, threatened in WA, OR, CA
Distribution Pacific Coast of North America
Breeds April-July up to 50 mi inland from
coast (non-breeding, coastal waters) Nesting
lays egg w/o nest uses substrate (e.g., moss)
on large tree branch Habitat conifer forests w/
large trees
5Zone stratification
6Effectiveness Monitoring for Marbled Murrelet
- Plan Objective provide for persistence
- Monitoring Objective status and trends
Plan-wide evaluations Multiple scales
7Murrelet Monitoring Approach
Population at Sea
Potential Nesting Habitat
Unified design Standardized methods
Model habitat relations and trends
8Marbled Murrelet biology S. Kim Nelson At-sea
population monitoring status and trends Sherri
L. Miller Habitat modeling (spatial and
non-spatial) Martin G. Raphael and Mark H. Huff
Murrelet Concurrent Session
9Population Status and Trends
- Transect surveys
- from boats
- Coastal waters adjacent to Plan
May through July, 2000-2003
10What Does a Population Value of 22,000 Marbled
Murrelets Mean?
Estimated Mean Population (4 years)
Relative Population among Conservation Zones (4
years)
Relative Density among Conservation Zones (4
years)
22,000 birds 95 C.I. /- 5,000
- Suggests that only a small fraction of the total
population uses this portion of range
No significant change
11Marbled Murrelet Population By Region
Alaska 860,000
British Columbia 55,000-78,000
PNW 17,000-27,000
2-3 of population
12 Is the Plan Area Murrelet Population Stable,
Increasing, or Decreasing?
95 CI
Inconclusive after 4 Yrs of Surveys Detect 5
Change w/ 9 Survey Yrs (95) Detect 2 Change w/
15 Survey Yrs (95)
No statistically significant trend
13Habitat Modeling
Spatial (map) habitat suitability Satellite
imagery Habitat suitability classes Two
approaches Amount and distribution
Non-spatial Statistical model Predict
habitat suitability (classes) Estimate amount
14Spatial Habitat Modeling
(1) Expert Judgment Reclassified 22
established vegetation mapping classes
into 4 classes of suitable nesting
habitat (2) Ecological Niche Factor
Analysis Compute habitat suitability scores
15Spatial Habitat Modeling
Federal landshigh quality potential nesting
habitat Most in reserve land
allocations (gt80) In Reservesmost in WA
(44) least in CA (20)
Exclude National Parks most in OR
16Spatial Habitat Modeling
Federal landshigh quality potential nesting
habitat Province scale-- most in
Olympic Peninsula (20)
17Spatial Habitat Modeling
All landshigh quality potential nesting
habitat 40 on non-federal lands
18Spatial Habitat Modeling
All landshigh quality potential nesting
habitat First 10-year period of the Plan
Habitat loss to fire and harvest Rate higher on
non-federal lands
19Habitat Modeling (Non-spatial)
Predictions Higher probability of murrelet
nesting habitat being occupied Closer to
the sea Relatively flat topography Less
solar radiation (topographically cooler)
Lower conifer density (gt10 in dbh) Higher
large conifer basal area (gt30 in dbh)
Only 13 land area (600K ac.) had odds
gt known nesting habitat 99.8 in Zone
1 55 land area had near zero odds
Prediction equation habitat suitable for nesting
1) Calculate odds inventory grid locations as
nesting habitat 2) Use grid location odds to
estimate amount of nesting habitat
20Habitat Modeling (Non-spatial)
Suitable nesting habitat
State Highest Oregon Lowest California
Province Highest Olympic Peninsula
Oregon Coast Range Oregon Klamath Mts.
21Is Marbled Murrelet nesting habitat being
maintained and restored on federal lands?
After 10 Years its too early to determine. More
than 80 of high quality habitat are in reserves.
22Implications of the New Habitat Models?
? Revised amounts and distribution of
Potential Nesting Habitat
? Simple Habitat Classification (Suitable/
Unsuitable) succeeded by Suitability Classes
and GradientsVersatile
? Most Suitable Habitat is in Inland Zone 1
Zone 2 has a low likelihood for nesting
23First Plan-wide Estimates
using consistent baseline data
Potential Nesting Habitat
Population
24The End