Synchronization System for LUX - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Synchronization System for LUX

Description:

Synchronization between pump lasers and probe X-rays to better than 50 fsec ... flicker and random walk of frequency and phase ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: wwwssrlSl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Synchronization System for LUX


1
Synchronization System for LUX John Staples,
LBNL 26 July 2004
2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
Fundamental Approach to Timing
  • Distribute accurate clock to all accelerator
    elements and end-station pump lasers
  • Measure residual jitter of accelerator
    components, sum them up, and transmit to
    end-station lasers
  • All elements ride on top of common-mode clock
    jitter
  • Differential jitter between X-ray pulse and
    end-station lasers is reduced to 50 femtosecond
    regime
  • Long term mechanical drifts also very important
  • 10 fsec is equivalent to a 3 micron motion
  • 1 meter of aluminum or SS grows 3 microns for 0.1
    degree C temperature change, invar about 0.1
    microns
  • transport systems geometric changes must also be
    monitored

5
(No Transcript)
6
Why Should This Work?
  • Spectral density of timing jitter dominated by
    low-frequency phenomena
  • flicker and random walk of frequency and phase
  • The coherence time of the significant spectral
    components is long (audio to sub-audio)
  • The jitter components above this frequency range
    are usually below the noise floor of the monitors
  • The integral over frequency space, the time
    jitter, is dominated by the low-frequency part of
    the spectrum.

7
Available Technology
  • Stabilized fiber laser links show promise for
    transporting timing signals with femtosecond
    jitter over short distances
  • ML lasers have been synchronized to 1 fsec
    relative jitter using electrical techniques, at
    10-14 GHz
  • Commodity fiber components are widely available
  • but the fiber must be actively stabilized
  • Don't need a super-stable clock
  • Crystal oscillators useable, a Poseidon not
    necessary
  • Common-mode jitter of a picosecond acceptable

8
NLC Approach Frisch et al. Transmit 357 MHz
timing signal over 15 km About 1 degree X-band
over moderate time scales (240 fs)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Hardware Approach
  • Start with a good (lt1 psec jitter) clock
  • Distribute clock very accurately (lt25 fsec) to
    all elements in accelerator and endstations
  • Use 1550 nm fiber optics components
  • Stabilize each fiber distribution link
  • Will try to stabilize based on modulation, not
    optical carrier
  • Fiber has much better bandwidth than coax cable
  • Local loops stabilize elements within
    gain/bandwidth limitations, provide residual
    error signal
  • Weighted sum of low-frequency error signal
    distributed over low-bandwidth digital link to
    TBCs
  • End-station lasers follow low-bandwidth correctors

11
ExampleCrab Cavity
  • 3.9 GHz deflector
  • include clock, microphonics
  • I-Q LLRF system
  • simulate residual noise after control loop is
    closed
  • 350 watts klystron output power
  • 12 fsec residual

12
Timing Distribution
  • Require timing distribution system that provides
    differential-mode jitter of a few femtoseconds to
    all clients over the entire facility.
  • Demonstrate a stabilized fiber network that can
    satisfy this requirement
  • fiber has wide bandwidth capability
  • use RF techniques to achive jitter stabilization
  • if inadequate, revert to interferometric
    techniques

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Proof-of-Principle Experiment
  • The key is low-jitter distribution of a 1 GHz
    clock
  • Demonstration is constrained by budget
  • 1 GHz crystal clock (Wenzel 100 MHz
    multipliers)
  • 1.5 mW 1550 nm DFB single-mode laser
  • EDFA increases power up to about 40 mW
  • Mach-Zehnder modulator, no chirp
  • 100 m single-mode fiber, APC/PC connectors
  • Low-noise (75K, 1 db NF) RF amplifiers
  • Low-noise op-amps in LLRF circuits
  • Piezo stabilization of fiber

16
(No Transcript)
17
Contributions to Jitter in POP
  • LLRF system operational bandwidth rolloff at 1
    kHz
  • 1 dB noise figure of ZRL-1150LN amplifiers
    following photodiodes operating at -8 dBm adds
    about 9 fsec noise at 1 GHz over a 10 kHz
    bandwidth
  • LMH6624 Low-noise op amps following phase
    detectors will add noise in the fsec range.
  • Still characterizing ZFM-4 mixers (phase
    detectors), but contribution may be significant
  • Wenzel clock is measured to have a 1.0 psec jitter

18
Example Noise contribution of op-amp following
mixer
Integrate noise current and voltage, including
Johnson noise over working bandwidth.
With a 10 kHz 2-pole LPF, the noise integrates to
0.2 uV, for a sub-femtosecond phase jitter.
19
Characterizing the Piezo Fiber Optic Phase
Modulator
Strong 18 kHz mechanical resonance, Q139,
measured interferometrically Shape and stabilize
feedback loop around modulator
Open-loop Bode Plot
Nyquist Stability Plot
20
Present Status
  • Have all the optical components
  • have measured and verified their specifications
  • LLRF system designed, not yet constructed
  • all items are at hand, including PC boards
  • Signal generators, spectrum analyzers, etc. are
    all acquired

21
(No Transcript)
22
Future Developments
  • Will establish capabilities of a fiber
    stabilization system at 1 GHz.
  • Move on to 10 GHz region
  • Improve laser itself, if budget permits
  • Mode-locked
  • A gas-stabilized reference would be nice
  • Look at interferometric techniques if necessary
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com