Genetic differences on a local scale - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Genetic differences on a local scale

Description:

Does variation between habitats over short distances ... Dead flies for body size. Experiments. Collection of flies. Maintained in open air laboratory ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: kimvand6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Genetic differences on a local scale


1
Genetic differences on a local scale
Kim van der Linde
  • Testing Drosophila life-history in the field

Paul M. Brakefield Jan G. Sevenster Jacques J.M.
van Alphen Bas J. Zwaan
Leiden University, Institute for
Biology, Sections Animal Ecology Evolutionary
Biology, The Netherlands.
2
Deforestation
The beginning...
. and the end
3
Habitat change local effects
  • Abiotic microclimatic changes
  • Higher day temperatures
  • Dryer
  • Higher light intensity at the forest floor
  • ...
  • Biotic
  • Vegetation composition and structure
  • Resource abundance
  • Species composition
  • ...

4
Research questions
  • Does variation between habitats over short
    distances result in local adaptation in the
    resident populations?
  • And if so, what is the relative importance of
  • Genetic differences?
  • Environmental variation?
  • GxE interactions?

5
Where?
  • Panama canal zone
  • Easy access
  • Established situation
  • Two transects with each three habitats
  • Forest
  • Intermediate
  • Grassland
  • Distance between habitats within a transect 1-2
    km
  • Distance between transects 10 km

6
Which model system?
  • Panamanian Drosophila
  • Ecologically well studied Sevenster (1987-1992),
    Krijger (1996-2000)
  • Many species30 within Panama canal zone, 12
    used in this experiment
  • Elimination of lucky choice
  • Robustness of effect
  • Short generation time 8-15 days
  • Easy to collect and culture
  • Three ecological relevant life-history traits
  • Body size
  • Development time
  • Starvation resistance

7
Field set-up
  • Large roofed cages to work in
  • Small cages with fine netting for development
    times
  • Petridishes with agar and covered with fine
    netting for starvation resistance
  • Dead flies for body size

8
Experiments
  • Collection of flies
  • Maintained in open air laboratory for several
    generations
  • Field experiment 1 expression of life-history
    traits in the original collection habitat
  • 12 species, 5941 individuals
  • Field experiment 2 transplantation experiment
  • 4 species, 5629 individuals
  • Common environment experiment expression of
    life-history traits in the laboratory environment
  • 12 species, 15802 individuals

9
Starvationresistance
10
Overall variation
Field experiment 1 original environment
11
Conclusions
  • First field experiment (original environment)
  • Habitat and location effect on starvation
    resistance
  • Forest populations do better then grassland
    populations
  • Second field experiment (transplantation
    experiment)
  • Common environment experiment

12
Field experiment 2 transplantation
13
Field experiment 2 transplantation
Degree of SS Freedom
MS F p Intercept .0673 1 .067
.330 0.56 Transect 1.3706 1 1.370 6.730
0.01 Origin (OR) .8766 2 .438 2.152
0.12 Experimental (EX) 26.9426 2 13.471 66.157 lt0.
001 TransectOR 3.4590 2 1.729 8.493
lt0.001 TransectEX 1.1549 2 .577 2.835
0.06 OREX 8.6395 4 2.159 10.607
lt0.001 TransectOREX 7.3454 4 1.836 9.018
lt0.001 Error 593.5638 2915 0.203
Degree of SS Freedom
MS F p Intercept .0673 1 .067
.330 0.56 Transect 1.3706 1 1.370 6.730
0.01 Origin (OR) .8766 2 .438 2.152
0.12 Experimental (EX) 26.9426 2 13.471 66.157 lt0.
001 TransectOR 3.4590 2 1.729 8.493
lt0.001 TransectEX 1.1549 2 .577 2.835
0.06 OREX 8.6395 4 2.159 10.607
lt0.001 TransectOREX 7.3454 4 1.836 9.018
lt0.001 Error 593.5638 2915 0.203
14
Original versus experimental habitat
Field experiment 2 transplantation
15
Subdivision into components
Field experiment 2 transplantation
16
Summary of conclusions
  • First field experiment (original environment)
  • Habitat and location effect on starvation
    resistance
  • Forest populations do better then grassland
    populations
  • Second field experiment (transplantation)
  • Strong environmental impact
  • Original by experimental location effect
    indicates gxe interaction for 4 species at
    population level
  • Common environment experiment

17
Overall variation
Common environment experiment
18
Summary of conclusions
  • First field experiment (original environment)
  • Habitat and location effect on starvation
    resistance
  • Forest populations do better then grassland
    populations
  • Second field experiment (transplantation)
  • Strong environmental impact
  • Original by experimental location effect
    indicates GxE interaction for 4 species at
    population level
  • Common environment experiment
  • Habitat and location related genetic differences
  • Grassland population are better adapted to stress

19
Comparison with other traits
20
Final conclusions
  • Local adaptation does take place
  • The results are robust and are duplicated between
    species
  • Extensive GxE interaction present in all three
    traits
  • Extrapolating the results from one common
    environment to general conclusions about the
    field is tricky

21
Questions?
  • van der linde, K. 2003. Testing Drosophila
    life-history theory in the field local
    adaptation in body size, development time and
    starvation resistance. Ph.D.-Thesis. Leiden
    university, Leiden
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com