Title: Experiences applying Ecosim in the Gulf of Alaska
1Experiences applying Ecosimin the Gulf of Alaska
- Sheila JJ Heymans, Sylvie Guénette
- Villy Christensen, Andrew Trites
INCOFISH WP 4 Meeting Cape Town 11-16 September
2006
2Aims
- To evaluate how fishing and climate change have
impacted the ecosystem resources of the Northeast
Pacific - Used two systems Aleutians and SE Alaska
species, notably Steller sea lions and other
mammals, have different trajectories.
3Problem
Aleutians
SEAK
4Study areas
Southeast Alaska
Aleutian Islands
- Shelf east of 140oW
- 0 - 1,000m depth
- 91,000 km2
170oW 170oE 0 - 500m depth 57,000 km2
5Methodology
- Construct models of both ecosystems (1963)
- Driven by fisheries (i.e. using C/B)
- Fitting change vulnerabilities, feeding time,
P/B, etc. - Estimate forcing function
- Correlate to environmental parameters
- Enter environmental function to fit model.
6Aleutians biomass
7SE Alaska biomass
8Estimate environmental variation
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
9Known environmental indices
3
15
2
14
1
13
0
12
-1
11
-2
-3
10
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
10Environmental variation
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
Jan-63
Jan-66
Jan-69
Jan-72
Jan-75
Jan-78
Jan-81
Jan-84
Jan-87
Jan-90
Jan-93
Jan-96
Jan-99
Jan-02
11Fitting the models Aleutians - biomass
Biomass
12Fitting the models Aleutians - catch
Catch
13Fitting the modelsSE Alaska - biomass
Salmon
Steller sea lions
4,000
200,000
3,000
150,000
2,000
100,000
50,000
1,000
0
0
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
Pacific Ocean perch
Sablefish
250,000
100,000
200,000
80,000
150,000
60,000
100,000
40,000
50,000
20,000
0
0
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
Halibut
Herring
100,000
500,000
80,000
400,000
300,000
60,000
200,000
40,000
100,000
20,000
0
0
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
14Fitting the modelsSE Alaska - catch
Catch
Steller sea lions
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
45,000
30,000
15,000
0
0
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
15Steller sea lion decline
Aleutian Islands
Guenette, Heymans, Christensen Trites (in prep)
16Conclusions
- Both external forces (fishing climate change)
have caused the changes in these two ecosystems - Fishing important for POP, herring and sablefish
- Environmental forces such as PDO combined with
fishing important for Steller sea lions, halibut
and pollock - Sea lion decline explained by climate and
predation - Unable to fit salmon as effects are larger scale
than these models.
17Total systems throughput
6500
Aleutians
5500
4500
SEAK
3500
Jan-63
Jan-66
Jan-69
Jan-72
Jan-75
Jan-78
Jan-81
Jan-84
Jan-87
Jan-90
Jan-93
Jan-96
Jan-99
Jan-02
18Network Analysis Indices
- Finn cycling index relative amount of cycling in
the ecosystem as a percentage of the total
systems throughput (Finn 1976). - Ascendency indicator of the specialization and
organization in the ecosystem (Ulanowicz, 1986). - Redundancy Internal flow overhead is an
indication of the internal redundancy in the
system (Mageau et al. 1998).
19Information theory
Organization Specialization
F C - A
Ulanowicz 1986
20Finn cycling index
3.5
1.2
3.0
1.1
2.5
1.0
SEAK
Aleutians
0.9
2.0
1.5
0.8
1.0
0.7
0.5
0.6
Jan-75
Jan-78
Jan-81
Jan-84
Jan-87
Jan-90
Jan-93
Jan-96
Jan-63
Jan-66
Jan-69
Jan-72
Jan-99
Jan-02
21Ascendency
80
32
31
75
30
70
29
SEAK
Aleutians
65
28
27
60
26
55
25
50
24
Jan-63
Jan-66
Jan-69
Jan-72
Jan-75
Jan-78
Jan-81
Jan-84
Jan-87
Jan-90
Jan-93
Jan-96
Jan-99
Jan-02
22Ascendency - Aleutians
80
60
40
20
0
Jan-63
Jan-65
Jan-67
Jan-69
Jan-71
Jan-73
Jan-75
Jan-77
Jan-79
Jan-81
Jan-83
Jan-85
Jan-87
Jan-89
Jan-91
Jan-93
Jan-95
Jan-97
Jan-99
Jan-01
23Redundancy
38
49
37
48
36
47
35
46
Aleutians
SEAK
34
45
33
32
44
Jan-63
Jan-66
Jan-69
Jan-72
Jan-75
Jan-78
Jan-81
Jan-84
Jan-87
Jan-90
Jan-93
Jan-96
Jan-99
Jan-02
24Conclusions
- Effects of environmental variation is seen in the
total systems throughput, ascendency and
redundancy - Finn cycling index shows less direct effects and
might be more useful as index of emergent
effects - Change from the running average increased after
regime shift in most indices - Difference less in SEAK than in AI
- AI largest fluctuations in respiration for both
ascendency and overhead.
25Acknowledgements
- Support from NOAA through the North Pacific
Universities Marine Mammal Research Consortium
and the North Pacific Marine Science Foundation - Colleagues from DFO, ADFG, NMFS, MMU
- Carl Walters, Steve Martell