A Nuclear Future Cody Rimes IDS 3303 4-9-09 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A Nuclear Future Cody Rimes IDS 3303 4-9-09

Description:

America is facing some tough decisions when it comes to our ... ( Gosling, 1999)? (1946) Nuclear technology is first used for something other than killing. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Jes134
Learn more at: http://ruby.fgcu.edu
Category:
Tags: ids | cody | future | gosling | nuclear | rimes

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Nuclear Future Cody Rimes IDS 3303 4-9-09


1
A Nuclear FutureCody RimesIDS 33034-9-09
2
Introduction
  • America is facing some tough decisions when it
    comes to our power needs.
  • We consume 25 of the world's energy, but account
    for only 5 of the population.
  • This can be a little misleading, as we also
    account for 22 of the world's productivity.
  • Our energy needs are expanding, while resources
    are limited.

3
Timeline
  • (1905) Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity.
    E mc2, baby.
  • (1932) The first atom is split.
  • (1939) The first Uranium atoms are split.
  • (1939-1945) The Manhattan Project. The US
    government contracted scientists to build the
    first atom bomb out in New Mexico.
  • (1945) Boom. The first, and incidently, the last
    time large scale nuclear weapons are deployed on
    major cities. (Gosling, 1999)?
  • (1946) Nuclear technology is first used for
    something other than killing.

4
Cont.
  • (1946) The Atomic Energy Commission is founded.
  • (1951) A usable amount of electricity is
    produced from Nuclear Energy.
  • (1954) Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
  • (1957) International Atomic Energy Agency is
    founded.
  • (1986) Chernobyl (and a few years earlier,
    Three Mile Island.)

5
Major Energy Resources
  • Petroleum
  • Coal
  • Natural Gas
  • Nuclear

6
How our Energy Needs are Met
7
Petroleum
  • Accounts for 38 of our total power usage.
  • US consumption is around 21 million barrels per
    day, while domestic production is only 6 million
    barrels per day.

8
Cons of Petroleum (OIL)?
  • A large contributor of greenhouse gases in the
    atmosphere.
  • Reliance on foreign supplies. America imports the
    vast majority of its oil at great cost.
  • Political concerns. Much of the oil we use is
    produced in politically unstable regions. Global
    disruptions in supply are a concern.

9
Where is all of the Oil?
10
By Country
11
Coal
  • Most abundant type of fuel in America.
  • About half of our electricity is generated using
    coal.
  • Accounts for around 26 of our total power usage.

12
Cons of Coal
  • Extremely dirty. The burning of coal releases
    more carbon dioxide than anything else.
  • Lbs of CO2 per M BPUs of energy. ---gt

13
Natural Gas
  • Accounts for around 22 of our total energy use.

14
Cons of Natural Gas
  • Even though it is 'better' on the environment, it
    is still a fossil fuel. Once burned, it releases
    carbon dioxide and other dangerous chemicals into
    the atmosphere.
  • It takes up a lot of space, making it less
    practical for transportation uses.

Speeding from the scene of the crime, a Chinese
boy tows a floating plastic bag of stolen natural
gas.
15
Nuclear
  • Accounts for around 8 of our total energy use.
  • Has a lot of public outcry against its use within
    our borders.

16
Pros of Nuclear
  • It doesn't produce the greenhouse gases that are
    present in other forms of energy.
  • There is plenty of 'fuel' available to power
    nuclear energy for many years.
  • No dependence on unstable foreign supply.
  • Safer than many people think.

17
Uranium
18
How much fuel is out there?
  • As a fuel source, it is the cheapest of all,
    producing more power per dollar spent than any of
    the conventional fossil fuels (WNA, 2008).
  • Some estimates say that at current technology
    levels and current consumption, we have between
    100-300 years of fuel left to power our nuclear
    plants. (IAEA, 2006).
  • Though in actuality, estimates for uranium
    supplies vary widely if breeder reactors and
    fuel reprocessing are assumed, estimates tend to
    be tens of thousands of years or longer. The
    technology for such is available now, but because
    of the availability of Uranium, we don't
    reprocess our waste currently.

19
More Fuel on the Way?
  • Current estimates put our worldwide reserves of
    Uranium at around 5-6 million tons on land,
    though surveying methods have not been perfected
    because demand isn't that high.
  • According to research by the Japanese government,
    the ocean has vast untapped amounts of Uranium.

20
Fast Breeder Reactors
  • Can harness much more energy from Uranium than
    traditional reactors.
  • Can be built to use Thorium, which is 3.5 times
    more common than Uranium. May also use U-238, an
    isotope of Uranium that is far more common than
    the U-235 we currently use. 99.3 of all Uranium
    is U-238.
  • Can use reprocessed fuel, multiplying the
    lifetime of fuel by more than 60 (UIC), and
    lowering the volume of waste by 90.

21
Breeder Reactor
22
How Dangerous is Nuclear Power?
  • Not as bad as many people think.
  • When people talk about Chernobyl and the lives
    lost from Cancer following it, they often forget
    about the many thousands of people that have died
    in coal mining, for example.
  • In general, fears have been overstated. There are
    examples out there of how safe nuclear energy can
    be.

23
Cancer Risks near Plants
  • A common safety concern that people have is that
    the area around nuclear power plants are
    dangerous because of radiation. The claim is that
    it is not safe to be close to the plants because
    of Cancer concerns.
  • The National Cancer Institute performed a study
    to ascertain the dangers of living close to
    nuclear power plants. They found no correlation
    between living proximity to a nuclear plant and
    cancer risks. (Cancer.gov)?

24
Cancer Risks in Workers
  • If anybody is suffering from radiation, it would
    be the workers at these plants, right?
  • An article written by OSHA and posted on the CDC
    website covers a study that was conducted on
    laboratory workers in nuclear energy plants. The
    study concluded that these workers were actually
    LESS likely to die of Cancer than the general
    population (cdc.gov)?

25
The Future?
  • Our population is booming, and our energy
    production must ramp up to meet the demand. Where
    will we look to solve our power crises? It is
    clear that we cannot continue to wreck our
    atmosphere with the burning of fossil fuels for
    much longer. Because of the implications of
    relying on unstable foreign regions and the fact
    that we must do more to avert global climate
    change, we can not expect to meet the demand with
    fossil fuels.
  • There is so much promise in nuclear power that
    growth in the industry seems certain.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com