A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION

Description:

Provide manageable caseloads and supervision standards. ... Sex Offenders (Static 99, V-RAG, HARE PCL-R, RRASOR, VASOR) Strategy 2 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:242
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: statecon
Learn more at: http://www.ct.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION


1
A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO EFFECTIVECOMMUNITY
SUPERVISION
A Five Part Strategy
  • Judicial Branch
  • Court Support Services Division

2
FIVE PART STRATEGY
  • Manage probationers based on their risk and
    needs.
  • Engage probationers to change their behavior.
  • Provide manageable caseloads and supervision
    standards.
  • Implement evidence-based treatment programs.
  • Provide for quality assurance and measure
    outcomes.

3
RISK REDUCTION
  • There is no silver bullet when it comes to
    changing criminal behavior.

4
There is a substantial body of sound research
that identifies what has worked best in reducing
criminal behavior.
5
RESEARCH FINDINGS
  • Recidivism can be predicted.
  • Risk factors for reoffending can be identified.
  • Recidivism can be reduced.

6
How Community Supervision Can Reduce Recidivism
  • Provide intensive community supervision combined
    with appropriate treatment for high-risk
    offenders.
  • Match program intensity to the offenders level
    of risk.
  • Focus on the offenders identified criminogenic
    needs.
  • Use structured cognitive-behavioral treatment and
    incorporate motivational enhancement techniques.

7
Strategy 1
  • MANAGE PROBATIONERS BASED ON THEIR
  • RISK AND NEEDS

8
  • Research has established that high-risk offenders
    are less likely to recidivate when they receive
    more intensive treatment and services.

9
Risk Level, Treatment Intensity, and Recidivism
10
  • To have the greatest impact on recidivism
    reduction, supervision and treatment resources
    should focus on high-risk and non-compliant
    offenders by addressing their identified
    criminogenic needs.

11
Criminogenic Needs / Risk Factors
  • Antisocial peers
  • Antisocial values / attitudes
  • Antisocial personality
  • Antisocial behavior (low self-control)
  • Family distress
  • Substance abuse
  • Employment
  • Education

12
Selecting an Assessment Instrument
  • It took CSSD approximately two years to select
    and fully implement the assessment tools (LSI-R
    and ASUS-R).

13
Level of Service Inventory
  • Originally developed in 1982 and revised in 1995,
    the LSI-R is a validated objective 54 item risk /
    needs assessment instrument.

14
LSI-R Subscales
15
Level of Service Inventory-Revised
When scored appropriately, the LSI-R provides 3
basic scores or measures
  • A total risk score (risk to recidivate)
  • A profile of criminogenic need (crime
    producing risk factors)
  • A profile of prosocial or protective (protection
    from crime factors)

16
ASUS-R
  • A self-report validated assessment that provides
    insight into a persons drug use, emotional
    state, openness, and readiness to change.

17
ASUS-R Primary Scales
  • Drug Involvement
  • Drug Disruption
  • Drug Benefits
  • Social Non-Conforming
  • Legal Non-Conforming
  • Mood Adjustment
  • Defensive
  • Motivation to Change

18
CSSDAssessment Validation Study
  • These findings demonstrate the value of the LSI-R
    and secondarily, the ASUS-R in predicting
    recidivism. (Bogue, 2007)

19
Sample Assessment
20
Sample LSI-R Profile
21
Sample ASUS-R Profile
22
Sample Assessment Results
LSI-R Total Score 38 Calculated Sup. Level High
Rec. Substance Abuse Level Eval. for enhanced
treatment
23
CSSD Present Supervision Levels and Minimum
Monthly Contact Standards
October 2007
24
Judicial Branch Court Support Services
Division PROBATIONER PROGRAM REFERRAL GUIDE
NOTE This information serves as a guideline
and, at the discretion of the probation officer,
the probationer may be placed in other programs
as case circumstances warrant. Specific program
locations can be found at http//ares/cssd/Adminis
tration/default.aspx

25
Specialized Assessments
  • Domestic Violence (DVSI-R)
  • Womens Program (SPIN)
  • Sex Offenders (Static 99, V-RAG, HARE PCL-R,
    RRASOR, VASOR)

26
Strategy 2
  • ENGAGE PROBATIONERS TO CHANGE THEIR BEHAVIOR

27
Supervision Focus
  • Beyond short-term offender control, place an
    emphasis on long-term behavior change.

28
Enhancing offender motivation to change should be
a key component of a recidivism reduction
strategy.
29
Motivation A Key to Behavior Change
  • Of the 340 probationers in need of treatment,
    only 32.9 were somewhat or very troubled by
    their alcohol or drug problems

30
Enhancing Offender Motivation
  • Use Motivational Interviewing
  • Provide assessment feedback
  • Collaborate on a Case Plan

31
Strategy 3
  • PROVIDE MANAGEABLE CASELOADS AND SUPERVISION
    STANDARDS

32
  • Caseload size is directly related to workload
    which is directly related to the success of
    community supervision in enhancing public safety
    and reducing recidivism.

33
CT Probation Average Caseload Size2000 to 2007
34
Probationer Distribution by Classification Level
October 2007
35
Caseload Targets
36
Strategy 4
  • IMPLEMENT EVIDENCE-BASED OR RESEARCH INFORMED
    TREATMENT PROGRAMS

37
CSSD Evidence-Based or Research Informed
Treatment Interventions
  • Alternative Incarceration Centers
  • Reasoning and Rehabilitation (R R II)
  • Treating Alcohol Drug Dependence (TAD)
  • Adult Behavioral Health Programs
  • Anger Management for the Substance Abuse and
    Mental Health Client
  • Matrix Model for Intensive Out-Patient Treatment
  • Seeking Safety A Treatment Manual for PTSD and
    Substance Abuse
  • Helping Women Recover

38
Strategy 5
  • PROVIDE FOR
  • QUALITY ASSURANCE AND MEASURE OUTCOMES

39
  • An evidence-based program designed to reduce
    recidivism, when poorly implemented, can actually
    increase recidivism.

40
Program Integrity and Program Effects
41
CSSD Quality Assurance Initiatives
  • Provide comprehensive initial and ongoing
    training for program providers (2005)
  • Establish continuous Quality Assurance to
    maintain treatment fidelity (2006).
  • Provide staff feedback regarding performance and
    outcomes.

42
CSSDPerformance and Outcome Reports
  • Assessment timeliness
  • Contact standard compliance
  • Reductions in risk scores and increases in
    protective scores
  • Violation of probation percentage
  • Employment Status (Intake / Discharge)
  • Rearrest percentage

43
SUMMARY
44
  • Implementing evidence-based practice to reduce
    recidivism does not occur quickly nor easily.

45
How Community Supervision Can Become More Aligned
WithEvidence-Based Practices
  • Affording officers more time to spend with their
    clients.
  • Keeping caseloads at manageable levels.
  • Providing training and ongoing coaching in
    evidence-based supervision practices.

46
  • Implementing and quality assuring evidence-based
    treatment programs.
  • Focusing performance measurements and feedback on
    the quality of work that is linked to an outcome
    of improved public safety.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com