Lichen-Based Critical Loads in the US Pacific Northwest - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lichen-Based Critical Loads in the US Pacific Northwest

Description:

LichenBased Critical Loads in the US Pacific Northwest – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Lin559
Learn more at: http://gis.nacse.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lichen-Based Critical Loads in the US Pacific Northwest


1
Critical Loads Meeting North Cascades National
Park September 5-7, 2006

Lichen-Based Critical Loads in the US Pacific
Northwest
Linda Geiser, Doug Glavich, Sarah Jovan,
USDA-Forest Service, Pacific Northwest
Region Peter Neitlich, USDI-National Park
Service, Western Arctic National Parklands
2
Background
  • Many lichens are highly sensitive to N
    S-containing air pollutants
  • NOx, SO2
  • In solution produce nitrite, nitrate, sulfite
    bisulfite nutrients at low concentrations ,
    toxic at high concentrations, interfering with
    biochemical processes, especially photosynthesis
  • In solution produce nitric and sulfuric acids
    which lower pH of substrates affecting lichen
    community composition
  • NH3
  • Absorbs readily to lichen surfaces in solution
    forms NH4. Some experiments show this ion is
    removed from solution by lichens preferentially
    compared to nitrate. Low concentrations have
    fertilizing effect but high levels raise
    substrate pH and favor weedy, nitrophytic
    species.

3
Background
Because individual species have differing
sensitivities to air pollutants, pollution
affects lichen community composition.
Group Sub-Group Indicator Species
Clean Air Regional distribution Bryoria capillaris, Lobaria oregana, Sphaerophorus globosus, Usnea filipendula, U. scabrata
Sub-regional distribution Ahtiana pallidula, Alectoria sarmentosa, Bryoria fuscescens, Cavernularia hultenii, Cavernularia lophyrea, Hypogymnia apinnata, H. enteromorpha, H. metaphysodes, Menegazzia terebrata, Nephroma bellum, Nodobryoria oregana, Platismatia herreii, P. lacunosa, P. norvegica, Pseudocyphellaria anomola, P. crocata, Usnea cornuta
Polluted Air Regional nitrophytes Candelaria concolor, Physcia adscendens, Xanthoria polycarpa
Sub-regional nitrophytic or tolerant species Evernia prunastri, Hypogymnia physodes, H. tubulosa, Leptogium saturninum, Melanelia exasperatula, M. fuliginosa, M. subaurifera, M. subelegantula, Parmelia sulcata, Physcia aipolia, P. tenella, Physconia americana, P. enteroxantha, P. isidiigera, P. perisidiosa, Platismatia glauca, Ramalina farinacea, R. subleptocarpha, Tuckermannopsis chlorophylla, Xanthoria candelaria, X. fallax
4
Background
  • We can map air quality using lichen community
    composition. Polluted sites are dominated by
    weedy, nitrophilous lichens. Clean areas have
    few or no nitrophilous lichens and are dominated
    by native, large, leafy and pendulous
    macrolichens that play valuable ecological roles.

5
Background
  • Lichen thalli accumulate nitrogen and sulfur in
    proportion to community-based air scores.

6
Background
  • The Forest Service maintains an extensive
    database for lichen communities and elemental
    content in WA, OR, ID, MT, CA

7
Background
  • Estimating lichen thallus N ( dw) thresholds.
  • Clean and polluted populations are mixed together
    in data.
  • Because most sites are in clean areas, lower half
    of distribution curve should be all clean sites.
  • In clean area, distribution of N in Letharia
    vulpina is normal.
  • Because normal distribution curve is symetrical,
    can reflect smooth curve horizontally at peak
    density (Nlevu 0.57) and predict 97.5
    quantile of clean sites to use as a threshold
  • Clean Site Threshold for N dw in Letharia
    vulpina
  • (0.57-0.3152) 0.57 0.82 N

8
Background
  • Map of N levels in lichen thalli. Thresholds are
    the predicted 97.5 quantiles for Platismatia
    glauca and Letharia vulpina at clean sites.

9
Developing Lichen-Based Critical Loads
  • If lichen data can be related to atmospheric data
    then there is a basis for estimating critical
    loads.

10
Developing Lichen-Based Critical Loads
  • Potential Approaches
  • 1. Lichen communities vs. NH4 concentrations in
    bulk wet deposition.

Air Score -0.56 15.88 NH4 mg l-1 r2 0.55,
prob gt F lt 0.0001
NADP at Marblemount, NOCA
The threshold air score, 0.21, corresponds to
about 0.06 mg/l NH4 in bulk precipitation
(NADP). Only poor correlation to kg/ha.
11
Developing Lichen-Based Critical Loads
  • Potential Approaches
  • 2a. Lichen N vs. on-site measurements of total
    deposition.
  • Lichen thalli accumulate N in proportion to
    deposition, especially throughfall deposition. If
    the lichen N concentration threshold is 1.0 N,
    then throughfall (dry plus wet) deposition would
    be about 2.4 kg NO3/ha. Wet deposition alone
    would account for about 0.4 kg of the total.

12
Developing Lichen-Based Critical Loads
  • Potential Approaches
  • 2b. Lichen S vs. on-site measurements of total
    deposition.
  • Lichen thalli accumulate sulfur in proportion to
    deposition, especially throughfall deposition. In
    this case more measurements are needed at clean
    sites to produce a more accurate response curve.
    Currently SO4 at the Lichen S threshold (0.8)
    would be lt 0 kg/ha.

13
Developing Lichen-Based Critical Loads
  • Potential Approaches
  • 3a. Lichen N vs. CMAQ modeled estimates of
    depositional compounds
  • 3b. Lichen community-based airscores vs. CMAQ
    modeled estimates of depositional compounds

14
Developing Lichen-Based Critical Loads
  • CMAQ Maps of dry and wet plus dry deposition are
    similar with highest N deposition estimates in
    the Puget Trough-Seattle metro region, Willamette
    Valley-Portland metro region, and Columbia Basin.
  • Highest regional total deposition is 12
    kg/ha/yr, background levels are lt3 kg/ha/yr.
  • Highest dry deposition is 8 kg/ha/yr,
    background levels are lt 2 kg/ha/yr. Dry dep
    accounts for 2/3 of total dep.

Dry Deposition
Dry Wet Deposition
15
Relationship between lichen N, air score, and
CMAQ modeled DRY depositional pollutants
16
Initial Estimates of Critical Loads
  • Critical loads for total dry deposition of NO,
    NO2,, NH3,and HONO based on both lichen N
    lichen air scores is about 2 kg/ha/yr, a value
    similar to the throughfall deposition dry
    component critical load from the Gorge deposition
    study.

17
Relationship between lichen N, air score, and
CMAQ modeled WET depositional pollutants
18
Initial Estimates of Critical Loads
  • Ions of NO3- and NH4 make up gt99 of wet
    deposition of N and about 1/3 of total
    deposition. Total annual wet deposition (kg/ha)
    does not correlate well with lichen based air
    scores, but if precipitation is accounted for,
    then a better correlation is observed. This
    means that critical loads for lichens for wet
    deposition would vary from site to site.

19
Initial Estimates of Critical Loads
  • This corresponds to 9.5 and 10.9 kg/ha of total N
    deposition per year (range 5.6-15.2) based on
    lichen N or lichen community air scores,
    respectively.

20
Initial Estimates of Critical Loads
  • Questions
  • Why does dry deposition correlate with lichen
    response but not wet deposition?
  • Why are some N species (PAN) negatively
    correlated with lichen N and air scores?
  • Why are correlations better between CMAQ and west
    side lichen scores compared to east side lichen
    scores (pollution is more localized?, CMAQ
    estimates not as accurate?)
  • Next steps?
  • Try a subset of lichen data with best CMAQ data
    on finest grid scale, in geographical area where
    the lichen and CMAQ models best agree.
  • Fund a field study to measure, lichen N, survey
    lichen communities and collect throughfall
    deposition at as many sites as possible to
    formulate critical loads for deposition of S and
    N.

21
Initial Estimates of Critical Loads
  • Where do we go from here?

22
Acknowledgements
  • Matt Porter, WSU, Laboratory for Atmospheric
    Research, for CMAQ data maps. THANKS MATT!
  • Ray Drapek USDA-FS, PNW Research Station, Global
    Climate Change Laboratory, N for transposing the
    CMAQ data.
  • Joe Vaughn, Brian Lamb, Susan ONeil for putting
    us in touch with Matt!
  • Jim Russell, USDA-FS PNW Air Program and Tamara
    Blett, USDI-NPS Air Program for funding,
    feedback, and discussion.
  • Elizabeth Waddell, USDI-NPS, and Mark Fenn,
    USDA-FS, PSW Research Station for inspiration and
    deadlines
  • Greg Brenner, Pacific Analytics, for statistical
    advice
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com