Evolution of the ASTM E 1528 Task Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Evolution of the ASTM E 1528 Task Group

Description:

to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify ... John Manzo, Heron Environmental. ASTM E 1528 Task Group. Why Keep the Transaction Screen? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: envir4
Category:
Tags: astm | evolution | group | heron | task

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evolution of the ASTM E 1528 Task Group


1
Evolution of theASTM E 1528 Task Group
  • by
  • Jon Walker
  • Regional Vice President, EDR
  • Co-Chairman, E 1528 Task Group
  • For Presentation
  • at
  • Environmental Bankers Association
  • Portland, OR
  • June 2004

2
ASTM E 1528 Task GroupHow was the group formed?
  • After passage of the Brownfields Law, the
    industry questioned if the Transaction Screen
    (ASTM E 1528) could live up to its original
    purpose
  • to permit a user to satisfy one of the
    requirements to qualify for the innocent
    landowner defense to
  • CERCLA liability (E 1528 1.1)
  • ASTM set up a task group to explore the future of
    E 1528
  • Jon Walker (EDR) and Bill Weissman (Piper Rudnick
    LLP) were appointed as Task Group Co-Chairs

3
ASTM E 1528 Task GroupPurpose
  • E 1528 as it no longer satisfies all components
    of the proposed all appropriate inquiry
  • Focus revised standard on various alternative
    levels of environmental screening that may be
    appropriate as due diligence by users (lenders)
    for a parcel of commercial real estate,
    specifically those perceived as lower risk

4
ASTM E 1528 Task GroupInitial Members
  • Jon Walker-Co-Chair (EDR)
  • Bill Weissman-Co-Chair (Piper Rudnick LLP)
  • Dick Hoffman (B of NY)
  • John Rybak (BBT)
  • Cindi Lewis (Enviroassessments)
  • Harriet Greenwood (Comerica)
  • Susan Peck (Sovereign Bank)
  • Marc Guerin (Citizens Bank)
  • Dan Neal (TX DOT)
  • Julie Kilgore (Wasatch Environmental)
  • Scott Kurtz-Ninyo Moore
  • Jeff Telego-EBA
  • John Worland, Converse
  • John Manzo, Heron Environmental

5
ASTM E 1528 Task GroupWhy Keep the Transaction
Screen?
  • 1. There is a need at smaller sized banks
  • 75 of banks that lend on commercial real estate
    are community/smaller regional banks and they
    lack understanding and resources to manage
    environmental risk
  • Consequently, over 500,000 commercial real estate
    loans receive little or no due diligence

6
ASTM E 1528 Task Group Why Keep the Transaction
Screen?
  • 2. Byproduct of this effort is the creation of a
    Level Playing Field

7
ASTM E 1528 Task Group Why Keep the Transaction
Screen?
  • 3. The document makes business sense
  • It is risky for the lender and for the borrower
    to ignore environmental risk
  • Increasing losses due to environmental exposures
    are moving more and more banks, particularly the
    community and smaller regional banks, to address
    environmental issues during due diligence

8
ASTM E 1528 Task Group Why Keep the Transaction
Screen?
  • 4. The E 1528 document will allow lenders and
    consultants to consider alternative levels of
    environmental due diligence on lower risk
    properties where a Phase I Environmental Site
    Assessment may not be deemed appropriate (e.g.,
    recourse loans)

9
ASTM E 1528 Task Group Why Keep the Transaction
Screen?
  • 5. There is strong support for E 1528 from
    utilities and government agencies. These
    industries are represented in the task group.

10
ASTM E 1528 Task GroupProposed Changes
  • 1. Remove all references to CERCLA liability

11
ASTM E 1528 Task GroupProposed Changes (cont)
  • 2. Rewrite document to outline alternative levels
    of environmental due diligence that may be
    appropriate for a parcel of commercial real
    estate, specifically those perceived by the user
    (lender) as lower risk
  • Alternative levels of environmental screening
    options vary in scope, comprehensiveness and cost
  • The borrowers experience, creditworthiness of
    the borrower, loan structure, deal financials,
    and integrity of the collateral will influence
    the lenders selection of a specific level of
    environmental investigation

12
ASTM E 1528 Task GroupProposed Changes (contd)
  • Alternative levels of environmental screening may
    include
  • Level 1 Limited Questionnaire
  • Level 2 Comprehensive Questionnaire and Site
    Inspection
  • Level 3 Comprehensive Questionnaire, Site
    Inspection and Government Environmental Records
    review
  • Level 4 Comprehensive Questionnaire, Site
    Inspection, Government Environmental Records
    review and One Historic Use Resource
  • Level 5 Comprehensive Questionnaire, Site
    Inspection, Government Environmental Records
    review and Multiple Historic Use Resources

13
ASTM E 1528 Task GroupHow the lenders benefit?
  • 1. Provide a user friendly guidance tool for
    performing environmental due diligence on
    properties perceived by the lender as low-risk.
  • Leveling the playing field for all lenders
  • Support greater awareness of environmental risk
    management
  • 75 of the FDIC insured banks perform little or
    no environmental due diligence
  • This segment houses the greatest risk
  • 4. Build a stronger community of environmental
    bankers
  • Lenders are thirsty for environmental risk
    management information
  • Today the EBA has 37 banks membersTomorrow
    2,000 banks members?
  • 5. Drive awareness through EBA training
  • Seminars
  • Training
  • Tip sheets

14
ASTM E 1528 Task GroupHow can the EBA support
the effort?
  • Work with the Task Group to develop a document to
    support screening lower-risk properties
  • Goal is to create a viable revision and bring the
    draft to ballot in early 05

15
Items for Discussion
  • Should this be a standard guide or a standard
    practice?
  • Should we revise E 1528 to reflect changes
    brought upon by AAI and then create another
    environmental risk management guidance document?
  • 3. How will the consulting community be affected?

16
Items for Discussion
  • 4. Are the five levels of environmental due
    diligence appropriate? Should there be additional
    levels? Less levels?
  • 5. Should the document include dealing with
    higher risk loans Phase I, Phase I?
  • 6. What makes a loan lower risk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com