Title: Spatial and Temporal processing in Auditory Networks
1Spatial and Temporal processing in Auditory
Networks
- Vidit Jain
- Computer Science Department
- University of Massachusetts Amherst
2Motivation
- Why we are studying this?
3Mammalian Ear
4Cochlea
5Organ of Corti
6Cochlea
7Auditory Network
8Auditory Cortex
9Overview
- Composition of the frequency spectrum of acoustic
stimulus - Spectral Estimation
- Spectral Analysis
10Single Neuron Model
- Definitions
- Spike train, qj(t)
- Impulse response, hij(t)
- Linear time-invariant transformation
11Single Neuron Model
- Definitions (contd.)
- Intracellular potential
- Instantaneous firing rate
12Single Neuron Model
- Choice of hij(t)
- Depends on the objectives of modeling and
computational costs involved
13Single Neuron Model
14Single Neuron Model
15Neural Networks for Spectral Estimation
- The Mean Rate Hypothesis
- The Periodicity Hypothesis
- Lateral Inhibitory Networks
16The Mean rate Hypothesis
- Spatial Processing
- Mean firing rate of the auditory nerve fibers
- Average activity of a fiber population at CF
along tonotopic axis - Amplitude as basilar membrane vibrations
- Ignores phase
17The Mean rate Hypothesis(Implementation)
- No interconnections
- Tonotopically organized array of neurons
- Each neuron integrates the activity
18The Mean rate Hypothesis(Issues)
- Dynamic range issue
- Range 30-40 dB
- Require 70-80 dB
- Experimental recordings (Sachs and Young, 1979)
19The Periodicity Hypothesis
- Temporal Processing
- Firing patterns of nerve fibers can phase-lock to
the temporal waveform - Use of frequency analysis, (explicitly through
Fourier transform) - Requires time delay mechanisms
20The Periodicity Hypothesis(Implementation)
- Cosinusoidal Comb Filter (Young and Sachs(1979)
- Measure degree of phase-locking to a bank of
band-pass filters
21The Periodicity Hypothesis(Implementation)
22The Periodicity Hypothesis(Implementation)
- Exact delay critical
- Intracellular potential given by
23The Periodicity Hypothesis(Implementation)
- Taking Fourier Transform
- The output Power Spectrum
24The Periodicity Hypothesis(Implementation)
- The first term emphasizes the fc and its
harmonics relative to other frequencies (COMB
FILTER) - The second term is the low pass filter
- The final output will reflect the input fiber
responses in the neighborhood of fc
25The Periodicity Hypothesis(Issues)
- Regular and exact series of time delays
- Changes in axonal lengths
- Changes in membrane time constants
- Anatomical evidences only in the medial superior
olivary (MSO) nucleus
26Lateral Inhibitory Networks
- Spatiotemporal Processing
- Two properties of traveling waves
- Amplitude amplitude decay
- Phase lag accumulation
- These cause edges / sharp discontinuities
- Recurrent and Non-recurrent
27Lateral Inhibitory Networks
28Non-recurrent Lateral Inhibitory Networks
- Simplifying by rewriting input weights
29Non-recurrent Lateral Inhibitory Networks
- Generating continuous system equation
- Taking Fourier Transforms
30Non-recurrent Lateral Inhibitory Networks
- The first term is purely spatial
- Second term purely temporal, low pass filter
31Recurrent Lateral Inhibitory Networks
- Around a steady-state potential and input
- y and e are small signal fluctuations around
steady-state
32Recurrent Lateral Inhibitory Networks
- Generating continuous system equation
- Taking Fourier Transforms
33Comparison
- For identical inhibitory connectivities, wij
vij - For small W(O), recurrent version is approximated
by the non-recurrent version - In the recursive LIN, inhibition derived from the
outputs of neighbors, whereas in non-recursive
LIN it is derived from the inputs to the
neighbors - Difference between the stability properties
- Coupling of the temporal and spatial components
34Spatial Processing with LIN
35Spatial Processing with LIN
- Edge Detection
- High spatial frequency at edges
- Transfer function has high-pass transfer
characteristics - w(x) profile determines the effectiveness of LIN
in sharpening the input profiles
36Spatial Processing with LIN
- Peak Selection
- Each neuron in the network inhibits equally all
other neurons, but not itself - Stronger inhibition suppress the inputs in the
valley of input patterns - At the strongest inhibition, only the largest
peak of the input survives - Slight modification for local maxima
37Temporal Processing with LIN
- For higher spatial frequencies, time constant
increases and output is attenuated at lower
temporal frequencies. - Intuition based on time required for feedback
- Sharpening not effective for high temporal
frequencies - f 1-2 kHz, t 0.1-0.2 msec
- Oscillations can be simulated (?)
38Summary of LIN
- Edge detection and peak selection can be done
- Difference from purely temporal analysis
- Indirect role in encoding the spectrum, thus
dont require specific neural structure e.g.
organized time delays
39Biological Feasibility
- Feasible!!!
- Recurrent LIN first found in the compound eye of
horseshoe crab, Limulus (Hartline 1974) - Possibility of evidence of non-recurrent LIN in
the olfactory bulb (Rall 1970)
40Cortical Model
- Auditory spectrum repeatedly represented in AI at
various degrees of resolution - Repeated layers of tonotopically ordered neurons
with the receptive field widths gradually
changing along the isofrequency axis - Cortical cells analyze input spectral profiles in
a linear manner (superposition principle)
41Biological Plausibility of a Neural Network Model
- Countless candidates for the network model
- Only intuitive guidelines
- Mostly guided by the work in vision processing
42MP3 Encoding !!!
- Absolute hearing threshold
- 2kHz-20kHz
- Processing in critical bands
- Masking
- One component making another inaudible
- Compression ratio 121, without affection
perception
43References
- Spatial and Temporal Processing in Central
Auditory Networks, Shabib Shamma - Young, Sachs 1979
- http//www.benbest.com/science/anatmind/anatmd6.ht
ml