Title: Life of Pi: The Ending
1Life of Pi The Ending The Reader as Artist
2The Second Ending
- HyenaFrench Cook
- Orang-utanPis Mother
- ZebraChinese SailorTiger!
3Top Ten List the Ending of Life of Pi
410.Pi and Richard Parker are psychological
doubles.
5- Pi Richard Parker are doubles.
- anthropomorphism and zoomorphism
- Pi is like an animal
- I descended to a level of savagery I never
imagined possible (218). - I noticed, with a pinching of the heart, that
I ate like an animal, that this noisy, frantic,
unchewing wolfing-down of mine was exactly the
way Richard Parker ate (249-250). - Synchronicity between Pi Tiger
- We perished away (265). I began to imitate
Richard Parker in sleeping an incredible number
of hours (265). We were slow eaters now. . .
. The ordeal had reduced us to skin and bones
(267). - Pi and Richard Parker have a conversation
(273). - Pi has an Indian accent and Richard Parker has a
French accent together they embody history of
India as French colony (275).
69.The global allegory gives way to a
psychological allegory.
7- 8.
- But, the global allegory still lingers.
87.There is allegorical confusion!
97. There is allegorical confusion.
- 1. Pis adventure on the high seas with a tiger
is an allegory about difficult marriage.2.
Pis adventure on the high seas with a tiger is
an allegory about psychological degeneration and
fragmentation.3. Pis adventure on the high
seas with a tiger is an allegory about
postcolonial conflict, loss, diaspora,
fragmentation, and reconciliation.4. Pis
adventure on the high seas with a tiger is an
allegory about religious faith, belief, and
doubt.5. Pis adventure on the high seas with
a tiger is an allegory about allegory the
productive possibility of multiple overlapping
stories.Do these allegorical readings work
together successfully or awkwardly?
10- 6. What do we make of the meercat island?
116. What do we make of the meercat island?
- How do we explain the meercat island in
relationship to the novels allegories? - Psychology light/darksuperego/id
vegetarian/carnivorecivilised/savage visionary
projection of Pis cannibalistic act. - Global territory without foundation false
homecoming cf. Odysseus and his false returns - Marriage attempt at reconciliation vacation
gone bad? - Religion demands a leap of faith, another test
of faith - Allegory an authors imaginative excesses the
readers are the meercats?
125. The ending introduces interpretive
instability.
- Online interview on November 26, 2002 between
readers and Martel - Reader I believed it all, up until the island
and the meerkats, and then my suspended disbelief
started to wobble eastwards. Did you intend to
create that effect in the reader? To see how far
they would go? - YM Yes, I did. I wanted to push the reader
until he/she was forced to make some leap of
faith. If the island didnt do it, then I hoped
the second story would.
134. The ending celebrates the instability of
reality and the freedom of imagination.Is
reality what we make it? Is imagination free?
14- 3. The ending recasts author-reader relations.
15- 2. Nothing but a number to complete my top ten
list.
16- 1. The ending is a failure.
17God is a shorthand for anything that is beyond
the materialany greater pattern of meaning
Yann Martel, online interview with Random
House