Clostridium difficile: An Emerging Threat - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Clostridium difficile: An Emerging Threat

Description:

Lethal hospital bug cases rocket, United Kingdom ... February 26, 2003 June 28, 2005. Only 1 case in 2003. Transmission to close contacts in 4 cases ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: CDC4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Clostridium difficile: An Emerging Threat


1
Clostridium difficile An Emerging Threat
  • L. Clifford McDonald, MD, FACP, FSHEA
  • Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion

2
Clostridium difficile
  • Anaerobic spore-forming bacillus
  • Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD)
  • Pseudomembranous colitis, toxic megacolon,
    sepsis, and death
  • Fecal-oral transmission through contaminated
    environment and hands of healthcare personnel
  • Antimicrobial exposure is major risk factor for
    disease
  • Acquisition and growth of C. difficile
  • Suppression of normal flora of the colon
  • Clindamycin, penicillins, and cephalosporins

Healthy colon
Pseudo-membranous colitis
3
The Historic Impact of CDAD
  • Rates
  • Acute care 3-25/10,000 patient days
  • Long term care carriage in 5-7 of patients
  • Boston, 19981
  • Very low attributable mortality
  • Average of 3,600 excess costs per case
  • Average of 3.6 extra hospital days
  • Kyne L, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 200234346-353.

4
Annual CDAD Rates, Hospitals with gt500 Beds,
Intensive Care Unit Surveillance Component, NNIS
From Archibald LK, et al. J Infect Dis.
20041891585158.
5
National Estimates of US Short-Stay Hospital
Discharges with C. difficile as First-Listed or
Any Diagnosis
From McDonald LC, et al. Emerg Infect Dis.
200612(3)409-15
6
Rates of US Short-Stay Hospital Discharges with
C. difficile Listed as Any Diagnosis by Age
From McDonald LC, et al. Emerg Infect Dis.
200612(3)409-15
7
Rates of US Short-Stay Hospital Discharges with
C. difficile Listed as Any Diagnosis by Region
From McDonald LC, et al. Emerg Infect Dis.
200612(3)409-15
8
Proportion of US Short-Stay Hospital Discharges
with C. difficile Listed as Any Diagnosis by
Hospital Bed Size
From McDonald LC, et al. Emerg Infect Dis.
200612(3)409-15
9
Increasing Severity of CDAD
  • Pittsburgh, 20002
  • Life-threatening disease from 1.6 to 3.2
  • 2000-2001 26 colectomies and 18 deaths
  • Quebec, 2004
  • 30-day attributable mortality 6.9
  • 12-month attributable mortality 16.7
  • Dallal RM, et al. Ann Surg. 2002235363-372.
  • Muto C, et al. Infect Control HospEpid. 2005
  • Pepin J, et al. CMAJ. 2005

10
CDAD in long term care
  • Number of patients with CDAD diagnosis
    transferred to long term care
  • Doubled between 2000 and 2003
  • 2 of all transferred patients
  • Ohio, 2006

11
Emerging Infections Network (EIN) Surveys, 2004
2 surveys conducted 6 months apart, 531 unique
Infectious Disease Clinician respondents with
observations over prior 6 months
Layton BA, et al. 15th Annual Scientific Meeting
of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of
America (SHEA), April 9-12, 2005 Los Angeles,
CA.
12
Potential Reasons for Increased CDAD Incidence
and Severity
  • Changes in underlying host susceptibility
  • Changes in antimicrobial prescribing
  • New strain with increased virulence
  • Changes in infection control practices

13
Acute Care Hospitals with CDAD Outbreaks
Between 2001-2004
Detected by increases in the number of positive
routine clinical laboratory tests for C.
difficile.
Data from McDonald LC, et al. N Engl J Med.
20053532433-2441.
14
Epidemic (BI/NAP1) Strain
From McDonald LC, et al. N Engl J Med.
20053532433-2441.
15
Nonepidemic (Non-BI/NAP1) Strains
From McDonald LC, et al. N Engl J Med.
20053532433-2441.
16
Resistance of Current (after 2000) BI/NAP1
Isolates to Clindamycin and Fluoroquinolones
Compared with Current Non-BI/NAP1 Isolates and
Historic (before 2001) BI/NAP1 Isolates
From McDonald LC, et al. N Engl J Med.
20053532433-2441.
17
Distribution of Levofloxacin Minimum Inhibitory
Concentrations in Current (ie, after 2000)
BI/NAP1 and Non-BI/NAP1 Isolates
From McDonald LC, et al. N Engl J Med.
20053532433-2441.
18
Increased Toxin A Production in vitro
In vitro production of toxins A and B by C.
difficile isolates. Median concentration and IQRs
are shown. C. difficile strains included 25
toxinotype 0 and 15 NAP1/027 strains (toxinotype
III) from various locations.
From Warny M, et al. Lancet. 20053661079-1084.
19
Increased Toxin B Production in vitro
In vitro production of toxins A and B by C.
difficile isolates. Median concentration and IQRs
are shown. C. difficile strains included 25
toxinotype 0 and 15 NAP1/027 strains (toxinotype
III) from various locations.
From Warny M, et al. Lancet. 20053661079-1084.
20
States with the Epidemic Strain of C. difficile
Confirmed by CDC and Hines VA labs
(N23),Updated 2/9/2007
DC
HI
PR
AK
21
Lethal hospital bug cases rocket, United Kingdom
  • Potentially lethal cases of C. difficile
    rocketed from 1990s to 2004
  • Cases had increased from 1,000 in 1990 to over
    35,000 in 2003
  • 44,488 cases of C. difficile in gt 65 year olds in
    2004.

BBC News. http//news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/418683
4.stm
22
BI/NAP1 in the Netherlands, 2006
Kuiper EJ et al. Emerg Infect Dis
200612(5)827-830.
23
Challenges
  • Emergence of a new epidemic strain
  • Toxinotype III or BI by REA
  • Distinct from J strain of 1989-19921
  • Binary toxin as a possible virulence factor
  • In addition to toxins A and B containing
  • 18 bp deletion in tcdC gene
  • Could lead to increased toxin production (18-fold
    for toxin A, 23-fold for toxin B) observed by
    Warny et al.2
  • Increased resistance to fluoroquinolones
  • Appears responsible for increase in cases
  • May be responsible for increase in disease
    severity
  • Johnson S, et al. N Engl J Med.
    19993411645-1651.
  • Warny M, et al. Lancet. 20053661079-1084.

24
Recommendations for Hospitals
  • Hospitals should conduct surveillance for CDAD
  • Recently proposed surveillance recommendations1
  • Early diagnosis and treatment important for
    reducing severe outcomes and should be emphasized
  • Subset of epidemic isolates tested metronidazole
    susceptible
  • Strict infection control CDC Fact Sheet2
  • Contact precautions for CDAD patients
  • An environmental cleaning and disinfection
    strategy
  • Hand-washing with CDAD patients in outbreak
  • Further research needed
  • Role for antimicrobial controls in stemming this
    epidemic

1McDonald et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
2007 28140-145 2See CDC C. difficile Fact
Sheets http//www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/.
25
Severe CDAD in Populations Previously at Low
RiskFour States, 2005 (1)
  • Recent reports to the Pennsylvania Department of
    Health and CDC
  • Young patients without serious underlying disease
  • C. difficile toxin-positive by routine diagnostic
    testing
  • Responded to CDAD-specific therapy
  • Peripartum
  • Within 4 weeks of delivery
  • Reports from PA, NJ, OH, and NH
  • Community-associated
  • No hospital exposure in prior 3 months
  • Reports from Philadelphia and 4 surrounding
    counties

CDC. MMWR. 2005541201-1205.
26
Severe CDAD in Populations Previously at Low
RiskFour States, 2005 (2)
CDC. MMWR. 2005541201-1205.
27
Severe CDAD in Populations Previously at Low
RiskFour States, 2005 (3)
  • Recent onset dates
  • February 26, 2003 June 28, 2005
  • Only 1 case in 2003
  • Transmission to close contacts in 4 cases
  • 8 cases without antimicrobial exposure
  • 5 children 3 required hospitalization
  • 3 had close contact with diarrheal illness
  • Another 3 cases with lt 3 doses of antimicrobials
  • Clindamycin most common exposure (10 cases)
  • Estimated minimum annual incidence of
    community-associated disease
  • 7.6 cases per 100,000 population
  • 1 case per 5,000 outpatient antimicrobial
    prescriptions

CDC. MMWR. 2005541201-1205.
28
Comparison of Molecular Characteristics of 2 C.
difficile Isolates with Historical Standard-Type
Strains and a Recently Recognized Epidemic
Strain, by Selected Characteristics, OH and PA,
2005
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. North
American pulsed-field type 1. McDonald LC,
Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens RC Jr, Kazakova
SV, Sambol SP, Johnson S, Gerding DN. An
epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of
Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med.
20053532433-2441. CDC. MMWR. 2005541201-1205.
29
Stomach Acid-Suppressing Medications and
Community-Acquired CDAD, England
From Dial S, et al. JAMA. 20052942989-2995.
30
Recommendations for CDAD in Previously Low-Risk
Populations
  • Further investigation and surveillance in these
    populations are warranted
  • Strains responsible for severe CDAD in previously
    low-risk populations unknown
  • May be other toxin variants and/or hospital
    epidemic strain
  • Clinicians should consider the diagnosis
  • CDAD in patients without traditional risk factors
  • Patients should seek medical attention
  • Diarrhea lasting longer than 3 days
  • Fever
  • Blood
  • Antimicrobial exposure is not benign
  • Continue to emphasize judicious antimicrobial use
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com