Attachment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 175
About This Presentation
Title:

Attachment

Description:

1) It is easy for me to become emotionally close to others. ... Thompson, Lamb & Estes (1982) 53% of infants were assigned the same attachment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:244
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 176
Provided by: liamema
Category:
Tags: attachment | lamb

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Attachment


1
Attachment Sexual Offending
  • Liam Marshall
  • Rockwood Psychological Services
  • www.rockwoodpsyc.com

2
  • 1) It is easy for me to become emotionally close
    to others. I am comfortable depending on them
    and having them depend on me. I dont worry
    about being alone or having others not accept me.
  • 2) I am uncomfortable getting close to others. I
    want emotionally close relationships, but I find
    it difficult to trust others completely, or to
    depend on them. I worry that I will be hurt if I
    allow myself to become too close to others
  • 3) I want to be completely emotionally intimate
    with others, but I often find that others are
    reluctant to get as close as I would like. I am
    uncomfortable being without close relationships,
    but I sometimes worry that others dont value me
    as much as I value them
  • 4) I am comfortable without close emotional
    relationships. It is very important to me to feel
    independent and self-sufficient, and I prefer not
    to depend on others or have others depend on me

3
Topics
  • Intimacy
  • Attachment Treatment
  • History of Attachment as a Psychological Concept
  • Attachment in Childhood
  • Attachment in Adulthood
  • Attachment in Adult Sexual Offenders

4
Intimacy
5
Intimate Attachments provide...
  • sense of security and emotional comfort
  • companionship and a sense of shared experience
  • a chance to be nurturing and to be nurtured
  • reassurance and self-worth
  • support during adversity
  • a sense of meaning in ones life
  • provides a sense of kinship, belongingness
  • Marshall, 1989 1993 Marshall et al., 1993.

6
High Intimacy Individuals are characterized by...
  • Greater
  • ability to withstand stress
  • resistance to depression and anxiety
  • physical health
  • psychological well-being

7
High Intimacy Individualsare perceived by others
to be...
  • warm and sincere
  • egalitarian
  • cooperative
  • confident
  • interpersonally skilled
  • nonaggressive
  • empathic, caring

8
Low Intimacy Individuals are characterized by...
  • aggression or hostility
  • distrust of others
  • low self-esteem
  • poor interpersonal skills
  • lack of depth in relationships
  • low empathy
  • feelings of emptiness/emotional loneliness

9
Attachment Treatment
  • Comfort Exploration

10
CLIENTS PERSPECTIVE (Drapeau, 2005)
  • 1. See therapist as crucial but also see value
    of procedures
  • 2. Base judgments of quality of the program on
    the skills of the therapist
  • 3. Good therapists are seen as honest,
    respectful, nonjudgmental, available, caring,
    confident, competent, and persuasive
  • 4. Good therapists encourage discussion, listen,
    display leadership and strength, and maintain
    order
  • 5. Do not respond to therapists who are
    critical, devaluing, or confrontational
  • 6. Many clients who do well say they are able to
    re-enact aspects, with the therapist, of their
    past reactivation of attachment schemas with
    the therapist
  • 7. Most prevalent interpersonal interactions
    involve therapist supportively challenging the
    clients in a caring manner
  • 8. Clients desire to participate in decision
    making (work collaboratively) and they wish to
    attain mastery and feel competent

11
Therapist features that were related to
significant treatment - induced changes
  • Warmth
  • Empathy
  • Rewarding
  • Directive

12
History of Attachment as a Psychological Concept
  • Freud - emphasis on childhood and the lasting
    effects of early social experience on later
    development
  • Harlows (1950s 60s) - research on infant
    behaviour in rhesus monkeys - contact comfort
  • Tinbergen (1950s) Imprinting some species show
    a biological process in which the young acquire
    an emotional attachment to another to enhance
    their chances of survival.
  • Bowlby Father of Attachment
  • Ainsworth Strange Situation Test

13
Attachment Theory Origins
  • Innate capacity Harlows
  • Group of baby rhesus monkeys removed from mother
    at birth and raised in lab with 2 surrogate
    mothers
  • Half had food in bottle from cloth mother, half
    from wire mother.
  • Assessment of Attachment - amount of time with
    mother and extent of security seeking.
  • Babies spent 17-18 hours a day with cloth mother
    but less than 1 hour with wire mother.
  • Regardless of food source they sought out cloth
    mother.
  • Contact comfort more important to infants than
    food.

14
History of Attachment as a Psychological Concept
  • Bowlby (1950s)
  • Attachment behaviours all those behaviours that
    allow a child to achieve and retain proximity to
    someone else to whom he is attached
  • Attachment figure the person who is sought out
    for comfort when distressed, anxious, or
    frightened.
  • Primary attachment figure in childhood is usually
    a parent. In adulthood it is a romantic partner
    or a close friend.
  • Attachment relations based on who the person
    would most like to be with when feeling
    distressed, not on the attachment figures
    ability to help.

15
3 Functions of Attachment (Bowlby, 1976)
  • 1) Enhance infant survival.
  • 2) Promote an internal working model" of
    relationships - expectations and predictions.
  • 3) Attachment figure provides a secure base from
    which the infant can explore and learn

16
History of Attachment as a Psychological Concept
  • Ainsworth
  • Strange Situation Test
  • Attachment Categories

17
Episodes of SST
18
Coding
  • 1) active play and exploration in the caregivers
    presence
  • 2) how enthusiastic the greetings are when the
    child is not distressed
  • 3) the effectiveness of contact when the infant
    is distressed
  • 4) the presence or absence of anger, petulance
    and physical contact when the infant is
    distressed.

19
Childhood Attachment Classifications
  • Secure - 60-65 of children
  • Use caregiver as a secure base
  • Communicates affect during play
  • Actively seeks contact/interaction at reunion
  • Shows no resistance to contact or interaction
  • When distressed -- is soothed by contact with
    caregiver
  • Avoidant - 20-25
  • Little or no proximity seeking
  • Little or no distress on separation
  • Little affective sharing
  • Often affiliates to stranger
  • Often conspicuous avoidance of caregiver on
    reunion

20
Attachment Classifications Cont.
  • Resistant 10
  • Appear ambivalent toward caregiver
  • Seek proximity and contact but also show open
    resistance to contact
  • Super-anxious during separation
  • Not easily soothed at reunion
  • Seem angry or passive toward parent
  • Disorganized-disoriented 10
  • Disorganized sequences Approach then avoid
  • Contradictory behavior
  • Odd motor activity Inappropriate stereotyped,
    repetitive gestures
  • Attachment behavior directed toward stranger when
    caregiver returns
  • Depressed, dazed, disoriented, Flat affect

21
Attachment in Childhood
  • Stages of development
  • Stability of attachment
  • Factors impacting attachment

22
Stages of Development
  • 1. Pre-attachment (0 - 2 months)
  • indiscriminate social responsiveness preference
    for faces
  • 2. Attachment-in-the-making (2 - 7 months)
  • preference for primary caregiver, but no distress
    when the caregiver is gone
  • 3. Clearcut Attachment (8-24 months)
  • Proximity seeking
  • Stranger anxiety
  • Separation anxiety
  • Greeting reactions
  • Secure-base behavior
  • 4. Reciprocal relationships (18 months )
  • Understand caregivers coming and going and
    predict their return, and care for attachment
    figures needs
  • Internal Working Model
  • A mental model that infants build as a result of
    their experience with their caregivers

23
Stability of Attachment Category
  • Classification stability is generally high,
    ranging from 50 to 96 for assessments 2 to 6
    mos. apart or longer (Solomon George, 1999).
  • Highest stability levels are generally found in
    middle-class samples, and the lowest in
    disadvantaged samples.

24
Stability of Attachment
  • Fonargy, Steele, and Steele (1991)
  • mothers prenatal attachment categorization
    (secure v insecure) predicts the infant-mother
    attachment categorization, when the infant was 12
    months old, 75 of the time.

25
Stability of Attachment
  • Benoit and Parker (2000)
  • Found concordance between the attachment
    categorizations of grandmothers, mothers, and
    their infants
  • Criticisms
  • Small sample size
  • Middle to Upper-middle class respondents who
    typically are stable over many variables
  • Only found concordance using 3 categories of
    attachment. Effect disappears when using 4
    categories

26
Stability of Attachment
  • Waters (1978) 96 concordance rate in strange
    situation attachment classifications of infants
    tested at ages 12 and 18 months
  • Similar findings by Frodi, Grolnick, Bridges,
    1985 Main Weston, 1981

27
Stability of Attachment
  • However
  • Thompson, Lamb Estes (1982) 53 of infants were
    assigned the same attachment classification at 12
    and 18 months
  • Belsky, Campbell, Cohn, Moore, 1996, and
    Easterbrooks, 1989, report similar results
  • Easterbrooks (1989), and Main and Weston (1981)
    report a similar pattern of instability of
    attachment categorization for infant-father
    attachment in the Strange Situation Test

28
Stability of Attachment
  • Thompson, Lamb, Estes, 1982
  • mothers returning to work and/or the infant
    experiencing a change in the primary caregiver
    was associated with change in attachment
    categorization.
  • Yet the distributions at time 1 and 2 matched
    Ainsworth et als (1978) distribution
  • And, changes were bi-directional. I.e., insecure
    infants just as likely to become securely
    attached, as secure infants were to become
    insecurely attached

29
Effect of lack of an attachment bond
  • Bowlby (1953)
  • Strong attachment to single mother figure is
    essential for later mental health.
  • 'Affectionless psychopathy may characterise
    those who are deprived of an early attachment
    bond.
  • Effects of lack of attachment relationship or
    break in the relationship are called maternal
    deprivation.
  • Bowlby considered that there was a critical
    period from about 6 months to 3 years when
    infants should have continuous, unbroken
    relationship with one person (monotropism).

30
What are the causes of disruption?
  • Factors which occur after birth which may
    interfere with the attachment bond
  • Adoption
  • Death of a parent
  • Abuse
  • Neglect
  • Unresolved chronic pain (earache or colic)
  • An emotionally cold mother
  • Frequent changes of address
  • Inadequate care.

31
Causes of the development of different attachment
styles?
  • Maternal Sensitivity
  • Attachment group membership predicted by number
    of mother-child synchronous behaviours.
  • Intrusive mother behaviour relates to avoidant
    behaviour.
  • Unresponsive mother behaviour relates to
    resistant ambivalent behaviour.

32
Attachment in High Risk Populations
  • Abuse/neglect more likely to exhibit
  • disorganized (Cole-Detke Kobak, 1998)
  • avoidant (Lyons-Ruth, Connell, Zoll, Stahl,
    1987)
  • Physically Handicapped Infants
  • No difference in attachment style distribution
    from normals (Cappuzzi, 1989 Wasserman, Lennon,
    Allen, Shilansky, 1987)

33
Attachment in High Risk Populations
  • High Social Risk/Low SES
  • More likely to be insecurely attached
    (Susman-Stillman, Kalkose, Egeland, Waldman,
    1996 Fish, 2001)
  • Secure versus Insecure predicted my maternal
    sensitivity
  • Infant temperament predicted type of insecure
    attachment
  • Prenatal Substance Abuse
  • Prenatal substance abuse throughout pregnancy and
    infant self-soothing behavior positively related
    with security of attachment (p lt .03).

34
Does attachment to father matter?
  • At 18 months of age 50 of infants have strong
    attachments to someone other than their mother.
  • Main Weston (1981) Strength of attachment to
    father depended upon the amount of time father
    spends with child
  • Fox et al., (1991) found children showed similar
    kinds of attachment to both parents.

35
Attachment Style and Cognitive Development
  • Cassidy (1988) Kindergarten childrens self
    esteem scores were related to secure attachment
    to caregiver
  • Frankel Cates (1990) Securely attached infants
    become better problem solvers
  • Crandell Hobson (1999)
  • Compared 20 secure 16 insecure Mentally
    Challenged mothers and their 3-year-old children
  • Children of secure mothers scored 19 points
    higher on the Stanford-Binet IQ test.
  • Degree of parent-child synchrony was also related
    to child IQ.
  • Fonagy et al., (1997) Secure pre-schoolers and
    young school aged children more competent in
    theory of mind task.

36
Attachment Style and Social Development
  • Park Waters (1989) Securely attached children
    coordinate their activities with friends more
    harmoniously.
  • Meins Russell (1997) Greater social
    responsiveness and flexibility in securely
    attached two and a half year-old children.
  • Sroufe et al., (1993) Longitudinal study. At
    10-11 years children classified as securely
    attached in 1st year of life had many more
    favourable outcomes.
  • Avoidant infants became isolated children.
  • Ambivalent infants became deviant and more
    difficult (e.g. hyperactive, aggressive).

37
Attachment Style Social Development (Cont.)
  • Moss et al., (1996)
  • Link between psychopathology and Disorganized
    attachment style
  • This may be the result of the infants need to
    seek comfort from a caregiver who provokes fear.
  • Majority of children with Disorganized
    classification showed problems during the 3-7
    year-old period
  • It must be remembered that only 5 of children
    were classified as disorganized

38
Conclusions
  • Childhood Attachment develops in stages
  • Affected by SES, Abuse, Maternal Sensitivity,
    Prenatal care, Disruptions in primary caregiver
  • Childhood attachment affects Cognitive Social
    Development

39
Attachment in Adulthood
  • What is attachment in adulthood
  • Interpersonal relationships

40
Adult Attachment
  • Main
  • Adult Attachment Interview (AAI)
  • Four categories of attachment that are
    theoretically empirically related to childhood
    categories
  • Hazan Shaver
  • Attachment Questionnaire - 3 items
  • Effect of attachment style on romantic
    relationships
  • Feeny Noller
  • Importance of parental responsiveness in early
    childhood
  • Secure attachment style related to greater
    self-esteem, self-confidence, and less anxiety

41
Adult Attachment
  • Mental Models of Self and Others
  • Secure
  • Self - friendly, likeable
  • Others - reliable, trustworthy
  • Anxious/ambivalent
  • Self - unconfident, underappreciated
  • Others - unreliable, noncommittal
  • Avoidant
  • Self - suspicious, aloof
  • Others - unreliable, overeager

42
Adult Attachment
  • Issues in adult attachment theory research
    related to close interpersonal relationships
  • Stability of attachment style
  • Relationship characteristics satisfaction
  • Relationship dissolution

43
Related Research
  • Gerontology

44
Elderly Attachment Continued
45
Simpson (1990)
  • Impact of attachment style on
  • Nature of relationship
  • Interdependence
  • Commitment
  • Trust
  • Relationship satisfaction
  • Emotional experiences related to relationship
  • During relationship
  • Relationship dissolution

46
Simpson (1990)Method
  • Participants
  • University students
  • 144 heterosexual dating couples
  • M age men 19.4
  • M age females 18.7
  • M length of relationship 13.5 months
  • 92 in relationship for more than 1 month

47
Simpson (1990)Results
  • Attachment Relationship Indexes
  • Secure style greater
  • interdependence, commitment, trust,
    satisfaction
  • more frequent positive emotions
  • less frequent negative emotions
  • Insecure styles
  • less frequent positive emotions
  • more frequent negative emotions

48
Simpson (1990)Results
49
Simpson (1990)Results
50
Simpson (1990)Results
  • Relationship dissolution
  • Avoidant men least emotional distress

51
Simpson (1990)Summary
  • Attachment style related to quality of romantic
    relationships.
  • Attachment style related to emotional experience
    within romantic relationships.
  • Attachment style related to response to
    relationship dissolution

52
Simpson (1990)Summary
  • Perception of relationship related to own
    attachment style and not partners
  • But, anxious women tended to date avoidant men,
    and anxious men were dating less secure women
  • Stability of attachment style
  • Attachment style not affected by length of
    relationship

53
Attachment Sexual Offending
  • Why attachment?
  • Theories
  • Research

54
Theories of Relationship of Attachment to Sexual
Offending
  • Freund (1960s)
  • Marshall Barbaree (1990)
  • Marshall (1993)
  • Ward (1994)
  • Marshall Marshall (2000)
  • Smallbone (2004)

55
Freund
  • Sexual Offending is a Disorder of Courtship
  • Four stages of courtship (Problem)
  • Finding a prospective partner (Voyeurism)
  • Attracting Attention (Exhibitionism)
  • Touching (Frotteurism)
  • Sexual Interaction (Rape)
  • Criticisms
  • Little evidence of courtship behavior in sexual
    assault
  • Why dont females have courtship disorder
    problems?

56
Marshall Barbaree, 1990
  • First Integrated theory of sexual offending
  • Biological Influences
  • Childhood Experiences
  • Sociocultural Context
  • General Cultural Features
  • Availability of Pornography
  • Transitory Situational Factors

57
Marshall reports that intimate attachments
provide...
  • sense of security and emotional comfort
  • companionship and a sense of shared experience
  • a chance to be nurturing and to be nurtured
  • reassurance and self-worth
  • support during adversity
  • a sense of meaning in ones life
  • provides a sense of kinship, belongingness
  • Marshall, 1989 1993 Marshall et al., 1993

58
High Intimacy Individuals are characterized by...
  • Greater
  • ability to withstand stress
  • resistance to depression and anxiety
  • physical health
  • Psychological well-being

59
High Intimacy Individualsare perceived by others
to be...
  • warm and sincere
  • egalitarian
  • cooperative
  • confident
  • interpersonally skilled
  • nonaggressive
  • empathic, caring

60
Low Intimacy Individuals are characterized by...
  • aggression or hostility
  • distrust of others
  • low self-esteem
  • poor interpersonal skills
  • lack of depth in relationships
  • low empathy
  • feelings of emptiness/emotional loneliness

61
Bartholomews Model of Attachment
  • Two Dimensions - Inner working models of Self
    Others
  • Self as capable of inspiring love in others
  • Others as capable of being loving (reliability)
  • Four Categories
  • Secure
  • Preoccupied
  • Fearful
  • Dismissive

62
Bartholomews Dimensional Model of Attachment
63
Bartholomew
  • Secure Comfortable with closeness and autonomy
  • Preoccupied desperate for acceptance, low
    self-esteem
  • Fearful Fearful of closeness, low sense of
    self-worth
  • Dismissive Avoidant of closeness,
    anti-interdependence

64
Bartholomew Continued
  • Measures
  • RQ
  • RSQ
  • Criticisms
  • Reliability of measures
  • Over-endorsement of the Secure category
  • Not measured under conditions likely to inspire
    attachment behavior

65
(No Transcript)
66
Marshall, W.L. (1993). The role of attachment,
intimacy, and loneliness in the etiology and
maintenance of sexual offending. Sexual and
Marital Therapy, 8, 109-121
  • Attachment problems, Intimacy deficits,
    Loneliness contribute to a propensity to offend
    sexually

67
Marshall, 1993
  • Vulnerability for sexual offending is key
  • Vulnerability arises from poor quality
    parent-child attachment
  • Poor childhood attachment leads to
  • Low self-confidence
  • Impoverished social skills
  • Lack of empathy

68
Marshall, 1993
  • Poor childhood attachment impair ability to form
    appropriate peer adolescent relationships
  • Social messages
  • Objectification of others
  • Portray others as instruments of sexual pleasure
  • Emphasize power and control over others
  • Deny the need for social skills and compassion
    for others

69
Marshall, 1993
  • Poor childhood and adolescent attachment
  • Impair possibility for satisfactory adult
    relationships
  • Provide basis for loneliness as an adult
  • Diminish chance of intimacy in adult
    relationships
  • Emotional loneliness
  • A strong predictor of aggressive behavior (e.g.,
    Check, Perlman, Malamuth, 1985)
  • Promotes a self-serving lifestyle

70
Sexual Offenders
  • W. L. Marshall et al
  • Sexual offenders lack intimacy
  • emotional loneliness increases aggression
  • Sexual offenders show greater insecure attachment
    than non-sexual offenders and community controls

71
Sexual Offenders Continued
  • Smallbone Dadds (1998)
  • Prisoners
  • 48 Sexual Offenders
  • 16 Property Offenders
  • 16 Non-Offenders
  • Childhood maternal Paternal Attachment
  • Adult Attachment

72
Sexual Offenders Continued
  • Smallbone Dadds (1998)
  • SOs
  • Less secure maternal, paternal, adult
    attachment than nonoffenders
  • Less secure maternal attachment than property
    offenders
  • Incest offenders more problems with mother
  • Stranger rapists more problems with father

73
Marshall, Marshall, Arujo-Salas (1999)
  • Participants
  • 30 Community Controls
  • 30 Incarcerated Non-Sexual Offenders
  • 32 Sexual Offenders (18 with adult victims, 14
    with child victims)

74
Marshall, Marshall, Arujo-Salas (1999)
  • Measures
  • Screening measure (for community and non-sexual
    offenders)
  • Attachment
  • Adult - Relationship Scales Questionnaire (RSQ)
    (Bartholomew Horowitz, 1991)
  • Childhood - Attachment Questionnaire relating to
    father and mother (CAM, CAF) (Hazan Shaver,
    1986),
  • Others
  • Social Self-Esteem Inventory (Lawson, McGrath,
    Marshall, 1979)
  • Interpersonal Trust Scale (ITS) (Rotter, 1971)

75
Sexual Offenders Continued
  • Marshall (1999)
  • Sexual offending
  • insecure maternal attachment
  • Avoidant paternal attachment
  • preoccupied attachment style in adulthood
  • Secure maternal attachment
  • secure adult attachment style
  • neg r to fearful adult attachment style
  • greater social self-esteem

76
Sexual Offenders Continued
  • Smallbone Dadds (2000) -Male University
    Students
  • Maternal anxious attachment general antisocial
    behavior
  • Paternal avoidant attachment general antisocial
    behavior coercive sexual behavior

77
Etiological steps to sexual offending Marshall
Marshall, 2000
78
Marshall Marshall, 2000
  • Sexual Offenders
  • Childhoods marked by disruption, rejection, and
    poor parenting
  • Often report being loners as children
  • Earlier sexual involvement including
    masturbation
  • Earlier and greater use of drugs and alcohol

79
Marshall Marshall (2000)
  • Anxious/Ambivalent
  • Low self-esteem, poor interpersonal skills,
    desperate need for attention increased risk for
    sexual abuse
  • Research has shown sexual offenders to be more
    likely to report having been sexually abused as a
    child (Hanson Slater, 1998 Dhawan Marshall,
    1996 Marshall Mazzucco, 1995 Marshall, Serran
    Cortoni, 2000
  • May view abuse in positive terms and attribute
    any negative consequences to flaws in their own
    character

80
Marshall Marshall (2000)
  • Juvenile Sexual History
  • Abel and Rouleau (1990) 40-50 of child
    molesters 30 of rapists report an interest in
    sexually deviant activities before age 18 years
  • Cortoni Marshall (2000)
  • No differences in onset of various sexual
    activities or number of peer-aged sexual
    partners.
  • But, higher frequency of sadomasochistic
    fantasies and higher rates of masturbation during
    teens.
  • Frequency of juvenile masturbation predicted
    adult use of sex as a coping strategy, which
    predicted adult sexual aggression.

81
Marshall Marshall (2000)
  • Sex as a coping strategy
  • Children deprived of love and affection use
    self-stimulation as a way to feel better
  • Children learn quite early to masturbate and that
    this behaviour is pleasurable (Masters, Johnson
    Kolodny, 1985)
  • Consequently, use masturbation as a
    self-regulatory strategy

82
Relationship of Coping to Sexual Offending
  • Neidigh Tomiko (1991)
  • Daily stressors - Self-denigrating strategies
  • Urges to offend - Self-denigrating strategies
    Avoidance
  • Looman, 1999 Proulx et al, 1998
  • When in a negative mood sexual offenders use
    deviant fantasizing as a coping strategy

83
Marshall Marshall (2000)
  • Sex as a coping strategy
  • Cortoni Marshall (2000), and Marshall, Serran
    Cortoni (2000) Sexual offenders tend to use poor
    coping strategies (emotion-focussed,
    avoidance-focussed)
  • Sexual offenders more likely than matched
    controls to use sex as a coping strategy

84
Relationship of Coping to Sexual Offending
  • Marshall et al
  • Child molesters use more emotion-focused
    strategies (e.g., blaming oneself,
    self-preoccupation, and fantasizing) compared to
    rapists, non-sex offenders, and non-offenders
  • Sex as a coping strategy related to both
    emotion-focused and avoidance coping strategies
  • Negative mood induction related to
  • Lower self-esteem
  • Greater anxiety

85
Conditioning Processes
  • Conditioning processes play a part in the
    development of eccentric and deviant sexual
    behaviours (Abel Blanchard, 1974 McGuire,
    Carlisle Young, 1965)
  • Sexual preference hypothesis
  • Negative and positive reinforcement
  • Sex may be used to achieve feelings of intimacy,
    obtain affection, alleviate boredom or
    frustration, obtain self-affirmation, achieve a
    sense of conquest, escape from problems, fulfill
    a need to exercise power and control over another
    person, exploration of sexual taboos (e.g., anal
    intercourse), and releasing pent up anger

86
Marshall Marshall (2000)
  • Child molesters have been found to be afraid of
    potential adult partners and threatened by sex
    with an adult but feel emotionally congruent with
    children (Howells, 1979)
  • Rapists may have felt anger toward parents for
    maltreatment, blame women for their lack of
    interpersonal skills and incorporate aggression
    toward women into masturbatory fantasies.
  • Rapists hold negative and hostile views of women
    (Burt, 1980 Marshall Hambley, 1996),

87
Marshall Marshall (2000)
  • Disinhibiting factors
  • Alcohol has been shown to disinhibit social
    constraints (Firestone, Keyes Korneluk, 1999),
    encourage the expression of aggression (Bushman
    Cooper, 1990), and facilitate sexual arousal
    (Wilson, 1981)
  • Abel et al (Abel, Becker Cunningham-Rathner,
    1984 Abel, Gore, Holland, Camp, Becker
    Rathner, 1989) cognitive distortions disinhibit
    sexual offenders belief that children are
    sexually disposed, behave sexually provocatively
    toward adult males, initiate sexual activity with
    adults, enjoy such activity, and are not harmed
    by sex with an adult.

88
Marshall Marshall (2000)
  • Disinhibiting factors
  • Rapists have been shown to express views of women
    and their sexuality that can be expected to
    facilitate rape (Bumby, 1990 Burt, 1984
    Marshall Hambly, 1996).
  • Hostility toward women, support for rape myths,
    condoning violence toward women, and distorted
    perceptions toward women
  • Mood states have all been shown to
    trigger/disinhibit deviant sexual fantasies in
    sexual offenders loneliness, anger, humiliation,
    depression, feelings of inadequacy and conflict
    in a relationship, (Looman, 1999 McKibben,
    Proulx Lusignan, 1994 Proulx, McKibben
    Lusignan, 1996).

89
Marshall Marshall (2000)
  • Opportunity
  • Planning
  • Grooming
  • Cognitive deconstruction
  • Opportunistic
  • Further conditioning processes
  • Fantasizing about offence during masturbation

90
Etiological steps to sexual offending Marshall
Marshall, 2000
91
Burk Burkhart (2003)
  • Disorganized attachment as a diathesis for sexual
    offending
  • Children develop organized means of controlling
    attachment relationships around age 6
  • Punitive or Caring
  • Self-control through the control of others
  • DA children externalize attempts to self-regulate
  • Control of others, though, precludes formation of
    secure attachments (reciprocity key to secure
    attachment)
  • May use sex with others as a way to self-regulate

92
Ward, T., Hudson, S.M., Marshall, W.L.,
Siegert, R. (1995). Attachment style and intimacy
deficits in sex offenders A theoretical
framework. Sexual Abuse A Journal of Research
and Treatment, 7, 317-335.
  • Insecure attachment style will be related to
    style of sexual offending
  • Preoccupied
  • Fearful
  • Dismissive

93
(No Transcript)
94
Sexual Offenders Continued
  • Marshall et al (2002 2004)
  • Preoccupied attachment style related to
  • Grooming behaviour
  • low levels of violence
  • Child molesters not rapists

95
Grooming Behaviour among Differentially Attached
Child Molesters
From Marshall Marshall, 2002
96
Smallbone - 2004
  • Meshing of Biological systems
  • Nurturing (Parenting)
  • Attachment
  • Sexual

97
Siegal (2000)
  • Neural adaptation to insecure attachment style
  • Bypass of normal behavioural inhibition processes

98
Marshall Moulden, 2004
  • Hypotheses based on Smallbone
  • Attachment styles with a positive view of others
    will be related to sexual offending
  • Lower levels of violence
  • Grooming behaviour
  • Child molesters
  • Results
  • Hypotheses not supported

99
Conclusions
  • Little research on Attachment in sexual offenders
  • 43 articles dissertations compared to more than
    20,000 for attachment in general
  • Sexual offending and attachment theory relatively
    new and needs further exploration
  • Attachment theory has potential utility for
    understanding sexual offending

100
  • SECURE It is easy for me to become emotionally
    close to others. I am comfortable depending on
    them and having them depend on me. I dont worry
    about being alone or having others not accept me.
  • FEARFUL I am uncomfortable getting close to
    others. I want emotionally close relationships,
    but I find it difficult to trust others
    completely, or to depend on them. I worry that I
    will be hurt if I allow myself to become too
    close to others
  • PREOCCUPIED I want to be completely emotionally
    intimate with others, but I often find that
    others are reluctant to get as close as I would
    like. I am uncomfortable being without close
    relationships, but I sometimes worry that others
    dont value me as much as I value them
  • DISMISSIVE I am comfortable without close
    emotional relationships. It is very important to
    me to feel independent and self-sufficient, and I
    prefer not to depend on others or have others
    depend on me

101
Outcome for Our Program
102
Therapists in therapy
  • What does the research show?

103
Positive therapist features
  • An ability to create an appropriate alliance with
    the client
  • Ability to generate a belief in the possibility
    of change
  • Providing opportunities for learning
  • Instilling the expectation in the client that
    therapy will be beneficial
  • Emotionally engaging clients

104
Therapist Interpersonal Characteristics
  • Empathy - the ability of the therapist to attempt
    to understand and relate to, the feelings of the
    client.
  • Genuineness - described as non-defensive,
    comfortable with themselves, involved in
    treatment sessions, honest and interested.
  • Warmth - refers to accepting, caring and
    supportive behaviour of the therapist.

105
Therapist Interpersonal Characteristics
  • Support - reflected by positive valuation,
    encouragement and comforting statements.
  • Clients appear less aggressive and resistant
    toward therapists who are rated as highly
    supportive.
  • Confidence - confident presentation by the
    therapists is crucial to effective treatment.
  • Emotional responsivity - encouragement of
    emotional expressiveness by clients and emotional
    experiences during treatment.

106
Therapist Interpersonal Characteristics
  • Open-ended questioning - helps the client develop
    insight into his/her difficulties and assists in
    cognitive restructuring.
  • Problematic reactions by clients reduced in
    frequency when open-ended questions used.
  • Directiveness - encourage clients to exhibit and
    practice particular behaviours in and out of
    therapy - optimal level - can increase negativity
  • Provides structure for clients and enhances
    likelihood of cooperation.

107
Therapist Interpersonal Characteristics
  • Flexibility - different clients and the same
    clients at different times can respond
    differently to the same counselor skills.
  • E.g. directive approach may work with submissive
    clients but increases aggression in defensive
    clients.

108
Therapist Interpersonal Characteristics
  • Encouraging active participation - clients who
    actively participate are more likely to
    successfully complete therapy and experience
    positive outcomes.
  • Increases clients levels of commitment to, and
    compliance with the therapeutic process,
    reactance is reduced.
  • Clients more likely to participate when new and
    positive behavior is targeted rather than a
    negative behaviour is to be reduced.

109
Therapist Interpersonal Characteristics
  • Rewarding - reinforcement or encouragement
    typically given initially for small steps in
    right direction and then gradually moved to
    chains of small steps.
  • Respect - behaving toward clients in a respectful
    manner conveys they are valued and models the
    type of behaviour therapists expect in return.
  • Disrespectful responses to clients defenses have
    been related to poor outcome.
  • In a series of studies treatment dropouts
    reported feeling disrespected by the therapist.
  • (Marshall et al., 2001 Strupp, 1980 Salzman,
    Luetgert, Roth, Creaser, Howard, 1976
    Rabavilas et al., 1979)

110
Therapist Interpersonal Characteristics
  • Use of humour
  • may increase social interest.
  • May reduce feelings of inferiority, help clients
    recognize the value of humour in their lives.
  • Suggested it helps create a therapeutic
    atmosphere of freedom and openness.
  • Releases tension, decreases anxiety, increases
    therapist-client cohesion.
  • But must be in context of empathic relationship.
  • Little research to date.
  • (Rutherford, 1994 Greenwald, 1987 Falk Hill,
    1992 Marshall et al., 2001.)

111
Features That Impede Change
  • Poor outcome is also associated with the quality
    of the therapeutic relationship.
  • Negative therapist behaviours include
  • Confrontational behaviour
  • Rejection of the client
  • Low levels of interpersonal skills
  • Lack of interest in the client
  • Manipulation of client for therapist needs
  • (Marshall et al., 2001.)

112
Features That Impede Change
  • Anger and hostility
  • Negatively affects therapist-client relationship
    and treatment outcome.
  • Major characteristic of poor outcome cases is
    therapist hostility in response to client
    negativism.
  • Therapist expressing anger toward client
    associated with disrupted relationship and
    diminished progress.
  • (Marshall et al., 2001 Strupp, 1980 Cullari,
    1996 Fremont Anderson, 1986)

113
Confrontation
  • Particularly damaging to clients with low
    self-esteem.
  • Associated with noncompliance in treatment.
  • Clients react by
  • discrediting or challenging therapist
  • devaluing the issue
  • agreeing on surface but dismissing the relevance
    of the issue
  • (Annis Chan, 1983 Patterson Forgatch, 1985
    Cormier Cormier, 1991)

114
Clients perception of the therapist
  • Positive correlation between clients perception
    of the quality of the therapeutic relationship
    and perception of positive outcome.
  • (Walborn, 1996)
  • These perceptions significantly influence client
    compliance and predict treatment outcome.
  • (Saunders, 1999)
  • Consequently it is not enough for therapists to
    believe they are displaying appropriate
    characteristics
  • (Schindler et al., 1983 Ryan Gizynski, 1971
    Ford, 1978 Marshall et al., 2001.)

115
Clients perceptions of the therapist
  • Greater treatment benefits generated by
    therapists who are perceived as
  • Confident
  • Involved
  • Focused
  • Emotionally engaged
  • Have positive feelings toward the client
  • Directive
  • Persuasive
  • Sincere

116
Clients perceptions of the therapist
  • Therapists are relatively poor at evaluating
    their own therapeutic characteristics and style.
  • In 34 of 47 studies clients estimates of
    therapist features correlated with beneficial
    treatment effects.
  • Therapist ratings were related to outcome in only
    4 of 15 studies.
  • (Free, Green, Grace, Chernus, Whitman, 1985
    Orlinsky et al., 1994)

117
Therapeutic Alliance/Atmosphere
  • The therapists interpersonal characteristics and
    techniques in combination with the clients
    perceptions of the therapist play important roles
    in establishing the therapeutic alliance.
  • Valued as the context of therapeutic change.
  • Key component is collaboration between client and
    therapist.
  • (Luborsky, Barber, Chris-Christoph, 1990
    Marshall et al., 2001 Safran Murran, 1996
    Matt Navarro, 1997)
  • Strict adherence to treatment manuals without
    establishing a good therapeutic alliance is not
    effective. (Fernandez Serran, in press)

118
Therapeutic Alliance
  • Poor outcomes show greater evidence of negative
    interpersonal process in the therapeutic
    relationship.
  • particularly hostile and complex interactions
    between therapist and patient.
  • Ratings of the therapeutic alliance have been
    shown to predict dropouts from treatment.
  • (Marshall et al., 2001.)

119
Therapeutic Process in the Treatment of Sexual
Offenders
120
CLIENTS PERSPECTIVES(Drapeau, in press)
  • 1. See therapist as crucial but also see value
    of procedures
  • 2. Base judgments of quality of the program on
    the skills of the therapist
  • 3. Good therapists are seen as honest,
    respectful, nonjudgmental, available, caring,
    confident, competent, and persuasive
  • 4. Good therapists encourage discussion, listen,
    display leadership and strength, and maintain
    order
  • 5. Do not respond to therapists who are
    critical, devaluing, or confrontational
  • 6. Many clients who do well say they are able to
    re-enact aspects, with the therapist, of their
    past reactivation of attachment schemas with
    the therapist
  • 7. Most prevalent interpersonal interactions
    involve therapist supportively challenging the
    clients in a caring manner
  • 8. Clients desire to participate in decision
    making (work collaboratively) and they wish to
    attain mastery and feel competent

121
GROUP CLIMATE(Beech Fordham, 1997 Beech
Hamilton-Giachritis, in press)
  • Used Moos (1986) Group Environment Scale 10
    subscales
  • Pre to post-treatment changes produced a
    composite score to identify magnitude of
    treatment-induced gains
  • Two of Moos subscales (Cohesion and
    Expressiveness) were significantly related to the
    composite measure of treatment gains
  • - Cohesion includes involvement, participation,
    commitment to the group, and concern and
    friendship for each other
  • - Expressiveness measures the encouragement of
    freedom of action and the expression of feelings

122
EMOTIONAL EXPRESSION AND MASTERY(Pfäfflin et
al., in press)
  • Expressions of understanding (mastery) of the
    relevant issues appear first in treatment
  • Emotional expression emerges later in treatment
  • When emotional expressions first appear, mastery
    statements are reduced
  • When emotional expression and mastery statements
    appear together, changes begin to occur quite
    rapidly

123
Marshall, Serran et al., 2001
  • Examined therapist features and their
    relationship to client changes in sexual offender
    treatment.
  • Videotaped sessions rated and then related to
    pre-post treatment changes.

124
Therapist features that were related to
significant treatment - induced changes
  • Warmth
  • Empathy
  • Rewarding
  • Directive

125
Results of regression analyses
126
Treatment strategies
127
Treatment Strategies
  • Three approaches have typically been used
  • a) Confrontational approach
  • b) Unchallenging approach
  • c) Motivational approach

128
Self-esteem
129
Enhancing client self-esteem as a therapeutic
technique
  • Why is it important for some group members to
    improve their self-esteem?
  • What techniques can you use?

130
Low self-esteem individuals
  • Engage in self-handicapping behaviours such as
    practicing tasks less often.
  • are less inclined to make commitments to change.
  • perceive greater costs to involving themselves in
    situations which might threaten their self-image.
  • do not expect change will lead to benefits.
  • more readily give up efforts.
  • more likely drop preventive strategies.
  • (Baumeister, 1993)

131
Low self-esteem individuals cont.
  • Engage in more frequent cognitive distortions.
  • have poorly defined self-concepts.
  • are reactive to self-relevant feedback and feel
    more threatened by negative feedback.
  • experience more mood fluctuations (greater
    frequency and intensity of emotional distress).
  • Brustad, 1988 Campbell, Chew Scratchley, 1991
    Harter, 1993 Janis Mann, 1977 Silberstein,
    Stiegel-Moore Rodin, 1988 Spencer et al.,
    1993 Wills, 1981.

132
Negative Emotions linked to low self-esteem
  • Depression
  • Trait anxiety
  • Hopelessness
  • Suicidal ideation
  • Baumeister, 1990 Beck, 1976Harter, 1993 Tarlow
    Haaga, 1996.

133
Increased Self-esteem
  • Increases belief in ability to perform novel
    tasks.
  • Increases efforts at change.
  • Increases belief that change will be a benefit to
    the individual.
  • Spencer et al., 1993.

134
Importance of Self-esteem to Sexual Offending
  • Self-esteem linked to aggressive behaviour.
  • Association between self-esteem and sexual
    offending
  • empathy deficits, social competence, intimacy,
    loneliness

135
Importance of Self-esteem to Sexual Offending
cont.
  • Low self-esteem may cause the individual to
    channel violent tendencies toward targets
    perceived to be weak such as women and children.
  • Baumeister, Smart Boden, 1996.

136
Ways in which sexual offenders may try to protect
their self-esteem
  • Establish social and romantic relationships with
    other low self-esteem individuals
  • denigrate their victims
  • focus on portraying themselves in a favourable
    light
  • comparing their offenses with others

137
Ways in which sexual offenders may try to protect
their self-esteem
  • engaging in stereotypic or prejudiced behaviours
  • avoiding risky situations (like group
    treatment) where they may receive negative
    feedback
  • conceiving of their behaviour as a sickness
  • seeing himself as a victim

138
Relationship Between Social Self-esteem and Other
Variables
139
Relationship Between Social Self-esteem and Other
Variables
  • Sexual offenders low in SSE tend to be
  • More anxious
  • More susceptible to negative moods
  • Acute risk factor!

140
Enhancement of Self-esteem
  • Contextual Factors
  • support from non-therapy staff
  • acceptance by other inmates/residents
  • Therapist/Client Factors
  • therapist characteristics
  • therapist style
  • therapist/client relationship

141
Enhancement of Self-esteem cont.
  • Range/frequency of social and pleasurable
    activities
  • Educational/occupational skills
  • Positive self-statements

142
Therapist strategies for improving self-esteem
  • Distinguish between the offender as a person and
    his behaviour
  • Emphasize strengths/positive characteristics
  • Reinforce effort

143
Therapist strategies for improving self-esteem
  • Remind them of their positive progress
  • Recognize when denial/minimization is related to
    self-esteem problems and address it appropriately
  • Provide face-saving ways out of excuses and
    rationalizations

144
What can we do as therapists?
  • Primarily focus on positives
  • Use supportive challenges
  • Give positive feedback before and after negative
    feedback

145
What can we do as therapists?
  • Make sure therapy goals are in line with
    abilities
  • For low SE clients a series of small achievable
    goals may enhance performance
  • For high SE clients more challenging assignments
    may enhance performance

146
Group exercises for improving self-esteem
  • Complete the following exercise
  • Write a list of 6 to 8 positive things about
    yourself in at least 4 categories.

147
Therapist Strategies for Improving Intimacy
  • Outline the benefits of achieving intimacy.
  • Outline the costs of remaining lonely.
  • Look at the origins of intimacy
  • childhood attachments
  • adult attachment style
  • emphasize the breadth of intimacy (partners,
    close friends, acquaintances).

148
Group Exercises for Improving Intimacy
  • Have the group discuss the following questions
  • What is intimacy?
  • Why is intimacy important to you personally?
  • What has poor intimacy kept you from achieving in
    the past?
  • How will improved intimacy benefit you personally?

149
Finding a partner
  • Ask clients to
  • consider what sort of features to look for in a
    partner.
  • create list of important features (encourage
    compatible features rather than physical).
  • practice skills while dating (not every
    relationship must become long-term).

150
Relationship Skills Building
  • May need to address issues of
  • social skills, empathy, self-confidence.
  • seeking a compatible partner.
  • progressing slowly (challenge relationship myths
    such as love at first sight).
  • learning from relationships - dont blame.
  • expanding breadth of intimacy - more support if
    partner is lost.

151
Relationship Skills cont.
  • developing ability to effectively initiate and
    maintain conversations
  • developing listening skills
  • overcoming social anxiety and shyness

152
Maintaining a relationship
  • Have clients identify skills for maintaining a
    relationship, such as
  • Good communication skills - both verbal and
    nonverbal
  • capacity for trust
  • self-confidence

153
Maintaining a relationship cont.
  • appropriate self-disclosure
  • conflict resolution
  • challenging dysfunctional expectations (e.g.,
    partner can never change)
  • engaging in enjoyable activities together while
    maintaining some independence

154
Loneliness
  • Social Loneliness
  • 1. Removed from prior social circle (i.e., job
    transfer).
  • 2. Isolated from others - prison or hospital or
    by choice.
  • 3. Restricted social range - few friends, few
    activities.
  • Emotional Loneliness
  • 1. Removed from intimates.
  • 2. Feelings of alienation.
  • 3. Poor quality (e.g., little depth)
    relationships.

155
Therapist Strategies for Addressing Loneliness
  • Have the group discuss the following questions
  • What is loneliness?
  • What is the difference between emotional
    loneliness and social loneliness?
  • Is being alone (i.e., not a in a relationship)
    the same as being lonely?

156
Loneliness Treatment cont.
  • Identify and discuss fears of either being in a
    relationship or not being in a relationship.
  • Challenge bases for feeling lonely
  • being alone does not mean you are worthless
  • positive things about being without a partner
  • Enhance self-confidence.

157
Group Exercises for Treating Loneliness
  • Have each group member create a list of the basic
    skills for building a relationship.
  • Have each group member write out a list of what
    they would seek in a compatible partner.

158
Group Exercises for Treating Loneliness
  • Have each group member create a list of mutually
    enjoyable activities which partners may pursue
    together.
  • Have each group member create a list of things
    they can do when they are not in a relationship
    that they might not do otherwise?

159
Jealousy
160
Why Jealousy is Important to Sexual Offending
  • Jealousy reflects a desire to control the
    relationship, betraying selfish desires rather
    than love.
  • Many people interpret unfaithfulness (believed or
    real) by their partner to indicate they are
    worthless and perceive their partner in absolute
    terms (i.e., all bad).
  • Independent partners may generate jealousy in men
    who lack self-esteem.

161
Suspicious Jealousy vs. Reactive Jealousy
  • Suspicious Jealousy
  • based on partners past behaviour
  • but becomes exaggerated and persistent despite
    obvious changes by partner
  • Reactive Jealousy
  • response to clear evidence of infidelity
  • but degree needs to be proportional to the
    betrayal

162
Jealousy
  • Even if clear evidence, what do you do?
  • Exam attributions (e.g., I am worthless, she is
    evil).
  • Persist in working through feelings.
  • Examine degree of perceived betrayal and analyze
    if reaction is in proportion.
  • Recognize that the rational response is still
    painful.
  • Self-reliance is more effective than distraction.

163
Factors That Influence Jealousy
  • Greater frequency of unfaithfulness by partner.
  • Degree to which partner is involved with other
    person.
  • Who the person is (more attractive people are
    seen as a greater threat).
  • Degree of unfaithfulness of the jealous person.
  • Independence of partner (particularly for those
    with low self-esteem).

164
Therapist Strategies for Addressing Jealousy
  • Have the group discuss the following questions
  • What is the difference between suspicious
    jealousy and reactive jealousy? Which one is
    most damaging?
  • What factors increase the chances you will feel
    jealous of your partner?
  • Does jealousy reflect true love?

165
Group Exercises for Addressing Jealousy
  • Have each group member create a list of
    attributions people often make when they believe
    their partner has been unfaithful.
  • Have the group discuss how you could challenge
    each attribution.
  • Have each group member create a list of possible
    strategies for dealing with unfaithfulness or a
    dissolved relationship.

166
Loneliness Jealousy
167
Sexuality
  • Having sex isnt the problem

168
Why Sexuality is Important to Sexual Offending
  • Sexual satisfaction is related to levels of
    satisfaction in the rest of the relationship.
  • Many sexual offenders have very poor knowledge of
    sexuality in general.
  • Myths about sex reduce the chances of obtaining a
    satisfying sexual relationship.
  • Becoming comfortable talking about sex in general
    may make discussion of offenses easier.

169
Sexual Relations
  • Differences between males and females
  • Males are body-oriented, females are
    person-oriented.
  • For males physical gratification is primary, for
    females emotions and commitment are primary.
  • Females count love as more important in their
    lives than do males.

170
Sexual Relations cont.
  • When females are dissatisfied they ask for more
    love and affection whereas males ask for higher
    frequency.
  • All these differences are apparent in younger
    males but disappear by age 40 years.

171
Sexual Relations cont.
  • Equitable relations lead to greater sexual
    satisfaction - satisfaction with sex is related
    to more general satisfaction with relationship.
  • Dysfun
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com