An Empirical Study of Collaborative Acoustic Source Localization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

An Empirical Study of Collaborative Acoustic Source Localization

Description:

Online marmot detector based on Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) A centralized marmot call localization system based on Approximate-ML (AML) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: eeU
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An Empirical Study of Collaborative Acoustic Source Localization


1
An Empirical Study of Collaborative Acoustic
Source Localization
  • Andreas M. Ali
  • Kung Yao
  • EE, UCLA

Travis Collier Charles E. Taylor Daniel T.
Blumstein Ecol. and Evolutionary Biology, UCLA
Lewis Girod CSAIL MIT
2
Contribution
  • Online marmot detector based on Constant False
    Alarm Rate (CFAR)
  • A centralized marmot call localization system
    based on Approximate-ML (AML) bearing likelihood
    estimation
  • A field study on real animals in natural habitat

Yellow Bellied Marmot Rocky Mountain Biological
Lab (RMBL)
3
Outline
  • Motivation to study Marmot alarm calls
  • Acoustic ENS Box Platform and Methods
  • Analysis and Results
  • Summary

4
Motivation for Using Marmot Alarm Calls
Rocky Mountain Colorado Lab (RMBL)
  • Biologically important
  • Infrequent
  • Difficult to observe
  • 30 identified by observation

Marmot at RMBL
5
Acoustic ENS Box Platform
Acoustic ENSBox V1 (2004-2005)
  • Wireless distributed system
  • Self-contained
  • Self-managing
  • Self-localization
  • Processors
  • Microphone array
  • Omni directional speaker

V2 (2007)
6
DOA Based Localization System
CFAR
J1
JN
J2
  • Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) based event
    detection
  • Combine AML Direction of Arrival (DOA) likelihood
    estimate to produce the source location estimate

7
Satellite Picture of Wide Deployment
  • Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (RMBL),
    Colorado
  • 6 Sub-arrays
  • Burrow near Spruce
  • Wide deployment
  • Max range 140 m
  • Compaq deployment
  • Max range 50 m

8
CFAR Detector Performance
9
Source Directionality Test
10
Aligning Node Position with GPS Coordinate
  • Compact Deployment
  • GPS (red)
  • Self-Loc (blue)

11
Pseudo Log-likelihood Map
  • Compaq deployment
  • location estimate
  • spruce location
  • Normalized beam pattern
  • Collective result mitigate individual sub-array
    ambiguities
  • Marmot observed near Spruce

12
Aligning Node Position with GPS Coordinate
  • Wide Deployment
  • GPS (red)
  • Self-Loc (blue)

13
Location Estimates Scatter Plot for Wide
Deployment
Meter
Meter
Meter
Meter
6 sub-arrays
4 sub-arrays
14
Summary
  • Non-intrusive acoustic source localization is
    practical and tractable
  • Self-localization and synchronization feature of
    Acoustic ENS Box is essential for practical field
    deployment
  • Combining multiple AML based DOA likelihoods from
    multiple nodes effectively overcomes ambiguity
    individual node suffers
  • Redundancy can be used to identify and exclude
    sub-arrays which have especially poor data due to
    reverberations, multi-path, or other practically
    unavoidable problems.

15
Yellow Bellied Marmot
Thank you!
16
Generate Pseudo Log-likelihood Map from AML
  • From a position, sum all the log-likelihood
    values of the bearing estimates
  • Beam crossing

17
Deployment Collection Method
Node n
  • Self-localization stage
  • Acoustic ENS Box
  • Detection/recording stage
  • Each node
  • Runs CFAR event detector
  • Silent recording
  • Each node estimate bearing via AML (can be run in
    fusion center)
  • Fusion centerGenerate a Pseudo Likelihood map to
    estimate source location
  • Deployment size (Compaq or Wide)

Self-loc
Store
Event?
CFAR event detector
AML
Yes
No
Fusion center
Pseudo Log-likelihood
Estimate
18
Performance Impact on Sub-array Size
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com