ATTENTION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

ATTENTION

Description:

Person's ability to attend to a field of stimulation over a prolonged period of time... e.g. Moray (1959) you always detect your name in the excluded' message ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: ster6
Category:
Tags: attention | moray

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ATTENTION


1
ATTENTION
2
Attention
  • Sternberg (1999) Attention acts as a means of
    focusing limited mental resources on the
    information and cognitive processes that are most
    salient at a given moment

3
Attention
  • Types of attention
  • Vigilance
  • Focused
  • Auditory
  • Visual
  • Divided

4
Vigilance
  • Persons ability to attend to a field of
    stimulation over a prolonged period of time
    person seeks to detect the appearance of a
    particular target (Sternberg, 1999)
  • A vigilance task usually involves waiting for
    something unpredictable to happen
  • e.g. radar operator

5
Vigilance
  • Signal detection theory
  • Technique which measures two components that
    affect the ability to detect signals
  • Perceptual sensitivity to stimuli
    physiologically governed
  • Decision criterion psychologically governed
    (variable) point at which you decide that youve
    detected a signal. Varies from conservative to
    reckless

6
Focused Auditory Attention
  • Illustrated by the cocktail party phenomenon
    (Cherry, 1953)
  • Ability to listen selectively to one conversation
    during a party while ignoring the noise going on
    around you
  • Questions what happens to the excluded
    message? To what extent is it processed?

7
Focused Auditory Attention
  • Dichotic listening task
  • Different messages are presented to each of a
    participants ears
  • S/he is asked to shadow or repeat one of the
    messages on-line
  • Questions about the message in the unattended ear
  • Only the physical characteristics of unattended
    message could be reported e.g. gender of voice
    (Cherry, 1953)

8
Focused Auditory Attention
  • Broadbents model (1958)
  • An early selection model
  • Sensory characteristics of all messages are
    processed
  • A filter, under conscious control, selects one
    message
  • Selection on the basis of physical
    characteristics, e.g. gender of voice
  • All other messages excluded

9
Focused Auditory Attention
  • Broadbents Model (contd)
  • But counter evidence suggests that the meaning of
    the unattended message, not just its physical
    characteristics, were being processed
  • e.g. Moray (1959) you always detect your name
    in the excluded message
  • e.g. Treisman (1964a) bilingual participants
    able to recognise the identity of two messages in
    different languages

10
Focused Auditory Attention
  • Treismans Model (1964)
  • An early selection model
  • All messages are processed beyond the sensory
    stage
  • All messages are processed but unattended
    messages are attenuated
  • Important stimuli (own name) have low thresholds
    so attenuated form is enough to activate name

11
Focused Auditory Attention
  • Deutsch Deutsch (1963)
  • Response selection model
  • All messages processed perceptually and for
    meaning. No filtering, no attenuation
  • Bottleneck comes at the response stage, when only
    one of the messages can be responded to

12
Focused Visual Attention
  • Attentional shifts from one target to another can
    be achieved
  • Overtly overt movement of head and/or eyes
  • Covertly internal shift, in conditions where
    there is no time for eye movements

13
Focused Visual Attention
  • Analogies for covert attention
  • The spotlight analogy
  • Attention is like an internal spotlight. The area
    within the spotlight is attended to, the area
    outside is not
  • The zoom lens analogy
  • Experimental subjects can control whether they
    focus on a specific target (the middle letter of
    a five letter word) or spread their attention
    (across all the letters) (La Berge, 1983)

14
Focused Visual Attention
  • Treisman's feature integration model (Treisman
    Gelade, 1980)
  • Describes the role of attention in perceptual
    processing
  • Detecting the features (colour, size, corners,
    lines) of a stimulus is done in parallel
    (simultaneously) and needs no attention
  • Integrating these features into a percept is done
    serially (one after the other) and needs attention

15
Divided Attention
  • Focused attention asks about the extent to which
    we can focus on one task and ignore others
  • Divided attention asks about the extent to which
    we can do more than one task at the same time

16
Divided Attention
  • There is a general assumption of limited
    capacity
  • i.e. resources available to process information
    are limited
  • Two models
  • Central resource theory a central bank of
    resources which is available for all tasks
    requiring mental effort
  • Multiple resource theory several banks of
    specialised resources, e.g. specific to a modality

17
Divided Attention
  • Strategic Control the degree to which attention
    can be allocated, relatively, to competing tasks
    is under strategic control (Wickens Gopher,
    1977)
  • Practice improves the ability to do simultaneous
    tasks because practice leads to automaticity
    (Anderson). Automatic tasks need very little
    attention

18
Divided Attention
  • Central vs. multiple resource theory
  • Doing two similar tasks is harder than doing two
    dissimilar tasks
  • e.g. Segal Fusella (1970) doing a visual
    imagery task with a visual detection task is
    harder than with an auditory detection task
  • This suggests that there are separate resources
    for vision and audition, i.e. supports multiple
    resource theory
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com