Title: Modern Data Analysis Methods for Wave and Oscillation Phenomena
1Modern Data Analysis Methods for Wave and
Oscillation Phenomena
- Bernhard Fleck1 Jack Ireland2
- 1ESA Research and Scientific Support Department
- 2L3Com/GSI, c/o NASA/GSFC
Special thanks to James McAteer, Markus
Aschwanden, David Berghmans, Shaun Bloomfield,
Mike Marsh, Scott McIntosh, Ineke de Moortel,
Leon Ofman, Eoghan OShea, Rob Rutten, Tongjiang
Wang
2Outline
- Data / Observations
- Time-Distance Analysis
- Fourier Methods
- Power, Phase, Coherence spectra
- Randomization Test
- Wavelet Techniques
- Travel-Time Analysis
- Other Approaches
- EMD, CEOF, Lomb-Scargle Periodograms,
- Conclusions
3Observations
- Ground (DOT, SST, Sac Peak, MOTH,)
4Observations
- Ground (DOT, SST, Sac Peak, MOTH,)
- TRACE
- SOHO (SUMER, CDS, EIT)
- Future
- Solar-B, SDO, Solar Orbiter
5Oscillations in hot coronal plasma
- The search has been driven by wave-based coronal
heating theories. - Few consistent observations in hot material prior
to 1998. - EIT and TRACE imaging - 1998, 1999, 2000 - new
oscillations found. - SUMER spectroscopy 2002 - MHD wave mode
conclusively identified.
6Time-Distance Waves in Polar Plumes
DeForest Gurman 1998, ApJ 501, L217
7Time-Distance Waves in Coronal Loops
Berghmans Clette 1999, Solar Phys. 186, 207
8Time-Distance Waves in Coronal Loops
De Moortel, Ireland Walsh 2000, AA 355, L23
9Time-Distance Waves in Coronal Loops
- 80 kms-1 projected velocity
- Amplitude 3
- 1 dominant period above 95 level (5.8 mHz, 170 s)
Marsh Walsh 2006 ApJ 643, 540
10Fourier Methods
- Bracewell 1978
- Brigham 1974
- Groth 1975
- Probability Distributions related to Power
Spectra (ApJS 286, 29) - Krijger, Rutten et al. 2002 (AA 379, 1052)
IDL vt fft(v,-1)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13Fourier Methods Power, Phase, Coherence Spectra
- Power spectrum
- Coherence spectrum
- Phase spectrum
14Phase Information
- Dispersion relation
- e.g. acoustic gravity waves in isothermal
atmosphere (Souffrin, 1966)
H pressure scale height, ? adiab. exponent
?
? By measuring the phase difference ?? between
two layers one can determine kz as a function of
?, and thus the wave type
15Phase SpectrumNa D1 Fe I 5930
Gravity waves
Evanescent waves
Running acoustic waves
Fleck Deubner 1989, AA 228, 506
162-D Phase SpectraNa D1 Fe I 5930
Theory (dispersion relation)
Observations
Deubner Fleck 1989, AA 213,423
17Is it real or is it noise?
- Randomization test
- NemecNemec 1985, AJ 90, 2317
- Originally developed to test significance of
periods detected in variable star light curves - Null hypothesis no periodicity
- Alternative hypothesis the light curve contains
a periodic function with a given period P. - Solar applications OShea et al. 2001, AA 368,
1095
18Is it real or is it noise?
- Randomization test
- NemecNemec 1985, AJ 90, 2317
- Solar applications OShea et al. 2001, AA 368,
1095)
19Is it real or is it noise?
- Randomization test
- NemecNemec 1985, AJ 90, 2317
- Solar applications OShea et al. 2001, AA 368,
1095)
20Is it real or is it noise?
- Randomization test
- NemecNemec 1985, AJ 90, 2317
- Solar applications OShea et al. 2001, AA 368,
1095)
21Randomization Test
22Randomization Test
23Randomization Test
24Randomization Test
25Randomization Test
26Randomization Test
27Randomization Test
28Randomization Test
29Wavelet Analysis - Definition
30Different Mother Wavelets
- Choice of mother wavelet depends on nature of
signal type of information to be extracted
from signal - Frequency resolution larger values of m
- Temporal resolution smaller values of m Paul
wavelet (De Moortel et al, 2000)
31A Practical Guide to Wavelet AnalysisTorrence
Compo 1998, BAMS 79, 61-78
- ADS search for solar wavelet in abstract
- Up to 1998 76 papers (first one in 1989)
- Since 1999 375 papers
- ADS search for solar fourier in abstract
- Up to 1998 1410 papers (first one in 1913)
- Turner, H.H. MNRAS 73 Sun-Spots and Faculæ, On
the expression of sun-spot periodicity as a
Fourier sequence - Since 1999 735 papers
- 1989-1998 673 papers
32Wavelets A Warning
If I had to give your review I would be nasty to
the wavelet fashion, which very often addresses
glimpses of possible behaviour instead of
collecting enough data to get convincing. Single
wave trains are far too often taken as highly
significant happenings (and the standard
place-consuming four panel diagrams then shown in
full extent, usually greatly overclaiming the
actual information content). My warning would use
the apparently totally uncorrelated successive
wave trains of the 5-min oscillation. The
WhiteCha papers were wavelet phase avant la
lettre and missed the point.
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35Wavelet Application to Transversal Coronal Loop
Oscillation
- Horizontal dot-dashed lines from Nakariakov et
al. (1999) from fitting time series with a
sinusoidal envelop with exponential decay - Fourier analysis also gives P ? 200-250 s
- Wavelet scale of the oscillation varies as a
function of time - Oscillation period increases linearly
- Any theory that predicts a linearly varying
oscillation scale?
Ireland de Moortel 2002, AA 391, 339
36Detection of ultra-long-period oscillations in an
EUV filament
- Lomb-Scargle periodogram - Fourier power
spectrum - global wavelet spectrum
- Slow string mode? (Joarder Roberts 1993)
Foullon, Verwichte Nakariakov 2004, AA 427, L5
37Wavelet Analysis
OShea, Banerjee Doyle 2006, AA, submitted
38Wavelet Phase Analysis
Bloomfield et al. 2004, ApJ 617, 623
39Travel-Time Analysis Basic Principle
Courtesy Scott McIntosh
40Travel Time Analysis Measuring both Group and
Phase Velocity
Finsterele, Jefferies et al. 2004, ApJ 613, L185
41Field of View / TopologyMOTH Data
42Travel Time Maps Na V - K VMOTH Data
43Power Maps Na VelocityMOTH Data
44Travel Time Map Na - K
107 hours of MOTH data
Jefferies et al., in prep.
45Travel Time Analysis Results
- Wave propagation behaviour significantly changed
in and near magnetic field regions - 3-5 mHz band (evanescent regime)
- Upward propagation with significant time lag in
strong field regions, while evanescent waves
(high phase speed, small travel times) in quiet
sun - acoustic portals regions of inclined magnetic
fields ? smaller fcut-off - f gt 5 mHz (i.e. gt fcut-off)
- small time lag (and in some cases even downward
propagation) in magnetic field regions, while
quiet sun showing expected behaviour of upward
propagating sound waves - Mode conversion and/or wave reflection at ?1
surface? - Power Maps
- Significantly reduced power in magnetic field
regions, with enhanced power halos at f gt 6 mHz - Next steps modelling (cf. Carlsson et al.)
46Other methods (1)
- Lomb-Scargle periodogram
- Lomb 1976 Scargle 1982
- good for unevenly sampled data
- well understood confidence level properties
- large literature of application and theory
- Empirical mode decomposition (EMD)
- Huang et al 1998, 1999
- The method gives a decomposition of the signal
into essentially band-limited components by using
information from the signal itself instead of
prescribing basis functions with fixed frequency,
such as in Fourier analysis, or imposing a
particular set of basis functions, as is the case
with wavelet analysis. - Handles nonstationary data
- Good for filtering - but many empirical aspects
- See Terradas et al., 2004, ApJ 614, 435
47Other Methods (2)
- Multi-fractals
- used to look at bursty type behaviour in time
series looking for evidence of statistical
processes (e.g. financial time series, heart
rhythms, or solar flares) - Watari, 1996, Solar Phys. 163, 371
- MacAteer et al, in preparation
- Active area of research in many disciplines, but
problems in implementation and interpretation. - Complex Empirical Orthogonal Functions (CEOF)
- Observed oscillations occur in space and time -
the signal is decomposed into spatial components
(eigenfunctions) that have a time varying
amplitude. - The eigenvalues describe how strong each
component is. - See Terradas et al., 2004, ApJ 614, 435
- Noise properties not well understood - unless you
know better!
48Many, many other methods exist - for example.
- Entropy approach
- The correct period of the time series orders the
data in the best possible way - this leads to the
information (Shannon) entropy approach to
identifying periods - Cincotta et al., 1995, ApJ 449, 231
- Expansion into orthogonal polynomials
- better for non-sinusoidal signals
- Schwarzenberg-Czerny, 1996, ApJ 460,L107
- Phase Dispersion Minimization
- Suited for nonsinusoidal time variations covered
by only a few irregularly space observations - Stellingwerf, 1978, ApJ 224, 953
- Singular Spectrum Analysis
- separates periodic, chaotic, and random
components - Watari, 1996, Solar Phys. 186, 413
49Conclusions 1/2
- Forthcoming instruments need significant
improvements in spatial resolution - Solar-B ?
- Solar Orbiter ?
- Detection of oscillation is not the end, but just
the start - Whats next?
- Need to move to more statistical studies
- what are the properties of this "class of
oscillations" rather than one particular wiggle
seen in one particular data set - Coronal seismology is in its infancy
- shows a lot of promise
- relies on data analysis methods getting as much
information out of the data as it can safely give
you - should be coupled to the unambiguous
identification with wave modes
50Conclusions 2/2
- Where are the waves that might be responsible for
coronal heating? - If they remain unobservable, why is that?
- Currently observable wave modes tell us more
about the state of the corona than they do about
coronal heating. - What instruments are required in order to see the
waves that may cause coronal heating? - Reconnection theory is a big driver for getting
better spatial resolution - shouldn't wave theory
be a big driver for getting better spectral
resolution (identification of wave modes,
measuring travel times between different layers
of the atmosphere)? - Look at whats happening in other fields
- cf. success stories of wavelets or randomization
test - If you want give your citation index a boost
Implementation in IDL SolarSoft (cf. Torrence
Compo)